- Last 7 days
-
blogs.bmj.com blogs.bmj.com
-
How will covid-19 vaccine safety concerns impact vaccine confidence? (2021, April 16). The BMJ. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/04/16/how-will-the-uks-decision-to-offer-an-alternative-to-the-oxford-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-for-under-30s-following-safety-signals-impact-vaccine-confidence/
-
- May 2021
-
dataforpolicy.org dataforpolicy.org
-
Special Track 3. (n.d.). Data for Policy CIC. Retrieved 8 March 2021, from https://dataforpolicy.org/data-fof-policy-2021/special-track-3/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Stephan Lewandowsky. (2021, March 6). 25 March deadline for submissions to our ‘special track’ https://t.co/qwLxCCSjks at Data for Policy conference, 14-16 September at UCL. Please consider submitting @SciBeh @stefanmherzog @Sander_vdLinden https://t.co/A8KSC1Tkh9 [Tweet]. @STWorg. https://twitter.com/STWorg/status/1368280722709110789
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci. (2020, November 25). We didn’t have explicit discussion of Red Team process at our SciBeh workshop, but I suspect it’s an extremely useful way to manage criticism- simply because the recipient is inviting it [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1331558570668806147
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
r/BehSciAsk—Behavioural science one year on. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved May 2, 2021, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciAsk/comments/mw8mdr/behavioural_science_one_year_on/
-
-
-
r/BehSciResearch - Behavioural Science one year on: How did we do? (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved May 2, 2021, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciResearch/comments/mw8ngy/behavioural_science_one_year_on_how_did_we_do/
-
- Apr 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
Please do not directly email any Sidekiq committers with questions or problems. A community is best served when discussions are held in public.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I'm closing this issue. If you have any problem, please comment to this issue :-)
-
- Mar 2021
-
news.ycombinator.com news.ycombinator.com
-
That said, I wish more people would talk both sides. Yes, every dependency has a cost. BUT the alternatives aren't cost free either. For all the ranting against micropackages, I'm not seeing a good pro/con discussion.
-
-
forum.paradoxplaza.com forum.paradoxplaza.com
-
This thread is more than 5 months old. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose. If you feel it is necessary to make a new reply, you can still do so though. I am aware that this thread is rather old but I still want to make a reply.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Reopening #162
https://github.com/rails/sprockets/issues/162 was already closed as duplicated (so this just creates another duplicate).
Technically this could be added there.
Oh, I see, it was from so long ago (2015), that it would probably be frowned upon to reopen such an old issue.
-
-
www.neoprofs.org www.neoprofs.org
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
I realize the question was asked 9 years ago, but this question is (still) ranked highly in search results and I came across it today
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
dawnlxh. (2020, October 30). Ideas for discussion: what is the role of open science is crisis knowledge management? [Reddit Post]. R/BehSciAsk. https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciAsk/comments/jkzooc/ideas_for_discussion_what_is_the_role_of_open/gbtktep/
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 5 March 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1326159560835555328
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
-
www.mdpi.com www.mdpi.com
-
Mazumdar, S., & Thakker, D. (2020). Citizen Science on Twitter: Using Data Analytics to Understand Conversations and Networks. Future Internet, 12(12), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12120210
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
World Health Organization (WHO). (2021, January 27). #COVID19 LIVE Q&A virus variants with Dr M. Ryan and Dr M. Van Kerkhove - #AskWHO of 27 January 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SxRq45yVFY
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Feb 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
Here's the last issue where source maps were discussed before the beta release.
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci. (2021, February 19). RT @DrTolullah: Last night @SliderCuts & I discussed qq his 95k+ followers have about #COVID19 vaccines. Went on > 1.5 hrs in the end!! Ppl… [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1363423504935366657
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci. (2021, January 18). Calling lawyers, historians, and political scientists. A thread on the value of life. I’m still stunned by Lord Sumption, ex-judge on UK’s Supreme Court, now anti-lockdown campaigner, publicly stating that the life of a woman with stage 4 bowel cancer was ‘less valuable’ 1/4 [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1351118909886312449
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
The modern sense of "an X about X" has given rise to concepts like "meta-cognition" (cognition about cognition), "meta-emotion" (emotion about emotion), "meta-discussion" (discussion about discussion), "meta-joke" (joke about jokes), and "metaprogramming" (writing programs that manipulate programs).
-
-
-
I think maybe the terms we're using are a bit confusing.
-
-
-
I close the issue but we can continue the discussion.
closing does not necessarily imply end of discussion
-
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
he first person in Britain to officially have air pollution listed as a cause of death,
How would this relate and compare to other countries in general? Or in more specific areas in places that have higher amounts of people dying from pollution?
-
-
via3.hypothes.is via3.hypothes.is
-
deconstructing Brazilian gender roles through their performances
An interesting concept I'd like to consider and interrogate. Does exacerbating and essentially parodying gender roles ACTUALLY work to dismantle those roles, or does it enforce them?
No strong opinion yet. Come back to this.
-
- Jan 2021
-
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
-
Group Rules from the Admins1NO POSTING LINKS INSIDE OF POST - FOR ANY REASONWe've seen way too many groups become a glorified classified ad & members don't like that. We don't want the quality of our group negatively impacted because of endless links everywhere. NO LINKS2NO POST FROM FAN PAGES / ARTICLES / VIDEO LINKSOur mission is to cultivate the highest quality content inside the group. If we allowed videos, fan page shares, & outside websites, our group would turn into spam fest. Original written content only3NO SELF PROMOTION, RECRUITING, OR DM SPAMMINGMembers love our group because it's SAFE. We are very strict on banning members who blatantly self promote their product or services in the group OR secretly private message members to recruit them.4NO POSTING OR UPLOADING VIDEOS OF ANY KINDTo protect the quality of our group & prevent members from being solicited products & services - we don't allow any videos because we can't monitor what's being said word for word. Written post only.
Wow, that's strict.
-
-
support.google.com support.google.com
-
This question is locked and replying has been disabled.
-
-
discourse.ubuntu.com discourse.ubuntu.com
-
The best place to let the developers know, and track those bugs is in the bug tracker. There are hundreds of forums online, all over the place in many languages. We can’t be expected to read all of them. Anyone with a launchpad ID (thus, anyone who has an account on this discourse instance) has the capability to file a bug. I’d strongly recommend doing so, for each specific issue. Taking just a few minutes to do that will help tremendously.
-
When there are imperfections, we rely on users and our active community to tell us how the software is not working correctly, so we can fix it. The way we do that, and have done for 15 years now, is via bug reports. Discussion is great, but detailed bug reports are better for letting developers know what’s wrong.
-
- Dec 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Why do they punish the rest of us (can't even add a thumb up reaction) just because someone was "talking too much" or something on this issue?
-
-
hacks.mozilla.org hacks.mozilla.org
-
The exact form of the platform is yet to be finalized, and we want to involve you, the community, in helping to provide ideas and test the new contribution workflow!
-
-
files.zotero.net files.zotero.net
-
Onephonologicalenvironmentwheremoreofschwa’scentralizedvowelqualitiesarelikelytobeintactis inword-finalposition
I learnt a lot from this article's structure for introduction. The author started with the difference between stressed and unstressed vowel, and transitioned to the explanation of schwa's articulatory features, and to the phonological environments schwas occur.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Nov 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
In Rust, we use the "No New Rationale" rule, which says that the decision to merge (or not merge) an RFC is based only on rationale that was presented and debated in public. This avoids accidents where the community feels blindsided by a decision.
-
I'd like to go with an RFC-based governance model (similar to Rust, Ember or Swift) that looks something like this: new features go through a public RFC that describes the motivation for the change, a detailed implementation description, a description on how to document or teach the change (for kpm, that would roughly be focused around how it affected the usual workflows), any drawbacks or alternatives, and any open questions that should be addressed before merging. the change is discussed until all of the relevant arguments have been debated and the arguments are starting to become repetitive (they "reach a steady state") the RFC goes into "final comment period", allowing people who weren't paying close attention to every proposal to have a chance to weigh in with new arguments. assuming no new arguments are presented, the RFC is merged by consensus of the core team and the feature is implemented. All changes, regardless of their source, go through this process, giving active community members who aren't on the core team an opportunity to participate directly in the future direction of the project. (both because of proposals they submit and ones from the core team that they contribute to)
Tags
- open-source projects: allowing community (who are not on core team) to influence/affect/steer the direction of the project
- attracting contributors
- have discussion/feedback/debate in public (transparency)
- welcoming feedback
- soliciting feedback
- allowing sufficient time for discussion/feedback/debate before a final decision is made
- feeling blindsided
- change proposal workflow: RFCs
- build concensus
Annotators
URL
-
-
linuxfud.wordpress.com linuxfud.wordpress.com
-
I realise this is old, but as it isn’t a forum i see no problem in replying
-
-
-
Feel free to subscribe to the issue (there's button in the right hand column) but do not comment unless you are adding value to the discussion. "Me too" and "+1" are not valuable, nor are use cases that have already been written in the comments (e.g., we know that you can't put <tr> or <dd> elements with a <div>).
-
-
github.com github.com
-
The RFC repo (where the reaction was strongly positive) is the place for discussion about what features to add; the decision has been made.
-
- Oct 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
9 day bump
-
-
elearnmag.acm.org elearnmag.acm.org
-
then
Yes, I'm selecting this topic seeking perspective. Discussions in an online course is a manner of interacting with peers. Will ponder how I can use this in my paper.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
Schmid, P., Schwarzer, M., & Betsch, C. (n.d.). Weight-of-Evidence Strategies to Mitigate the Influence of Messages of Science Denialism in Public Discussions. Journal of Cognition, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.125
-
-
www.bmj.com www.bmj.com
-
Smith, G. D., Blastland, M., & Munafò, M. (2020). Covid-19’s known unknowns. BMJ, 371. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3979
-
-
-
Also, as a reminder to everyone, this thread is soft-locked and I will be marking as spam any comments that don't meet the criteria I described above.
-
-
-
@subfuzion That error looks unrelated to the existing discussion.
I assume they locked it in reaction to someone posting something unrelated / off-topic.
-
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
-
-
www.scientificamerican.com www.scientificamerican.com
-
Jackson, A. S., Ingrid Joylyn Paredes,Tiara Ahmad,Christopher. (n.d.). Yes, Science Is Political. Scientific American. Retrieved October 13, 2020, from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/yes-science-is-political/
-
-
-
Discussion is not necessary, but could be useful for critiquing a pattern. This would be useful for people who are proposing a pattern to the community or for people who want to gather feedback on an experiment.
-
-
medium.com medium.com
-
Feldman, J. (2020, October 11). The “herd immunity strategy” isn’t part of a scientific debate about COVID-19. Medium. https://medium.com/@jmfeldman/the-herd-immunity-strategy-isnt-part-of-a-scientific-debate-about-covid-19-abddf6bc7c13
Tags
- policy
- agenda
- debate
- lang:en
- is:blog
- herd immunity
- opinion
- campaign
- politics
- strategy
- discussion
- epidemiology
- accountability
- COVID-19
Annotators
URL
-
-
blogs.bmj.com blogs.bmj.com
-
Abraar Karan: Politics and public health in America—taking a stand for what is right. (2020, October 9). The BMJ. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/10/09/abraar-karan-politics-and-public-health-in-america-taking-a-stand-for-what-is-right/
-
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
The anti-lockdown scientists’ cause would be more persuasive if it weren’t so half-baked | Sonia Sodha. (2020, October 11). The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/11/the-rebel-scientists-cause-would-be-more-persuasive-if-it-werent-so-half-baked
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved October 12, 2020, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1314991301344014336
-
-
bookbook.pubpub.org bookbook.pubpub.org
-
Some researchers have referred to this type of learning arrangement as anchored discussion.23 When students “talk” with one another about a shared text through digital annotation, evidence suggests.d-undefined, .lh-undefined { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) !important; }.d-undefined, .lh-undefined { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5) !important; }3Lauren Zucker, Jeffrey Pomerantz, Maha Bali annotation affords richer conversation as students pay closer attention to the text, establish more proximal connections between their discussion and the source material, and embrace opportunities to elaborate their ideas, clarify, and learn from the viewpoints of their peers.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
It's really useful if your PR relates to an outstanding issue, so please reference it in your PR, or create an explanatory one for discussion. In many cases, features are absent for a reason.
-
-
-
instead of closing immediately, could we discuss some syntaxes that might work? I'm hardly an expert, so I'm not sure I can propose a syntax, but I can try to get the ball rolling:
-
-
www.americanyawp.com www.americanyawp.com
-
I am very intrigued by the arguments that are mentioned by Angeline Grimke'. These are perspectives that I have not considered other than the morality aspect situation. I do like the way that she compares America, where we enslave men, women, and children but even in Africa they would be free. Not only free but have many more inalienable rights in such a poor, egregious country, in my opinion of the times anyway. But here in the land of the free they can't control one single facet of their life. And how exactly does a person being born in America, that is as American as George Washington, lose his rights because one man says so and believes that he is subservient in nature. I would not have done well back then. The ignorance that they posses is devastatingly incredible. That total lack of consideration for other people and human life is utterly despicable. To think that the men could not even get it figured out. It was such a long lasting debate that women had to get involved and try to speak some sort of since to these so called men. I know it is a different time but I am unable to fathom treating someone so horribly. I am glad it is a different time!
-
-
www.pscp.tv www.pscp.tv
-
Inc, T. (n.d.). Independent SAGE @IndependentSage. Periscope. Retrieved October 2, 2020, from https://www.pscp.tv/IndependentSage/1PlKQNNlVDyGE
-
- Sep 2020
-
discuss.rubyonrails.org discuss.rubyonrails.org
-
You’re doing some things I’d like you to stop doing:
-
-
www.bmj.com www.bmj.com
-
COVID-19: Open, reasoned, detailed, discussion of the options is overdue and welcome. (2020). https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3702/rr-2
-
-
github.com github.com
-
No worries, I was just thinking that this issue should probably get necro'd back to open.
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: “having spent a few days looking at ‘debate’ about COVID policy on lay twitter (not the conspiracy stuff, just the ‘we should all be Sweden’ discussions), the single most jarring (and worrying) thing I noticed is that posters seem completely undeterred by self contradiction 1/3” / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved September 23, 2020, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1308340430170456064
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Sometimes answering a single question can be very time consuming (such as setting up a benchmark), but discussions tend to stall out if concerns don't get thoroughly addressed.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Further discussion can take place when this has a PR.
That's funny that he mentions a PR being a prerequisite for having further discussion, when elsewhere ( ), someone said that instead of talking about the
So is a specific proposed implementation (how to built it) necessary/useful in order to have a general discussion about a feature proposal? I would say no.
-
This conversation has been locked as too heated and limited to collaborators.
-
-
www.w3.org www.w3.org
-
GitHub Issues are preferred for discussion of this specification.
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
I took the liberty of editing this answer because it's already accepted
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
JNOLive | Multiplicity of Randomized Clinical Trials for Coronavirus Disease 2019. (2020, July 14). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-MWPqgLUvA&feature=youtu.be
-
-
github.com github.com
-
FreeOurKnowledge/discussion. (2020). Free Our Knowledge. https://github.com/FreeOurKnowledge/discussion (Original work published 2019)
-
-
docs.google.com docs.google.com
-
Hack-a-thons to improve the research culture. (n.d.). Google Docs. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScAlSb9XTdXznvI2GrOzsXgRn_ibRFHrDL5acodMnaUzubs2A/viewform?edit_requested=true&usp=embed_facebook
-
-
www.nature.com www.nature.com
-
Hu, Y., & Wang, R.-Q. (2020). Understanding the removal of precise geotagging in tweets. Nature Human Behaviour, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00949-x
-
-
ctbergstrom.com ctbergstrom.com
-
Bergstrom, T., Bergstrom, C. T., & Li, H. (n.d.). Frequency and accuracy of proactive testing for COVID-19. 20.
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
R/BehSciMeta—Introducing “Horizon Scanning”—A new scibeh.org activity. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved June 11, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/h0xhv8/introducing_horizon_scanning_a_new_scibehorg/
-
-
github.com github.com
-
locked as too heated and limited conversation to collaborators
-
Yarn also has an RFC process which may offer a better discussion platform compared to this GitHub issue.
-
-
news.harvard.edu news.harvard.edu
-
COVID-19 is evaporating casual connections and why that’s bad. (2020, August 27). Harvard Gazette. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/08/covid-19-is-evaporating-casual-connections-and-why-thats-bad/
-
- Aug 2020
-
openreview.net openreview.net
-
About | OpenReview. (n.d.). Retrieved May 30, 2020, from https://openreview.net/about
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Darren L Dahly, PhD on Twitter: “If you find @MicrobiomDigest’s spot the duplication challenges a bit tooooo challenging, I’ll give you an easy one. See if you can spot the batshit crazy in this table 1, which is supposedly describing a nationally representative sample. https://t.co/dDdsq0YjR7” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved July 11, 2020, from https://twitter.com/statsepi/status/1280995113439834114
-
-
www.journalofsurgicalresearch.com www.journalofsurgicalresearch.com
-
Chang, D. C., & Stapleton, S. M. (2020). Response: The Proliferation and Misinterpretation of “As Safe As” Statements in Surgical Science: A Call for Professional Discourse to Search for a Solution. Journal of Surgical Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.074
-
-
www.flashforwardpod.com www.flashforwardpod.com
-
Rose. (n.d.). The Very Big Sick. Flash Forward. Retrieved August 26, 2020, from https://www.flashforwardpod.com/2018/07/03/the-big-death/
-
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Nelson, N. C., Ichikawa, K., Chung, J., & Malik, M. (2020). Mapping the discursive dimensions of the reproducibility crisis: A mixed methods analysis [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/sbv3q
-
-
www.edsurge.com www.edsurge.com
-
Preprint Servers Have Changed Research Culture in Many Fields. Will a New One for Education Catch On? - EdSurge News. (2020, August 20). EdSurge. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-08-20-preprint-servers-have-changed-research-culture-in-many-fields-will-a-new-one-for-education-catch-on
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
Flat Earth “Science”—Wrong, but not Stupid. (2020, August 22). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8DQSM-b2cc
-
-
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
-
Salaamedia. (2020, June 23). The Special Focus with Zahid Jadwat—Understanding the dangers of misinformation. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/salaamedia/videos/the-special-focus-with-zahid-jadwat-understanding-the-dangers-of-misinformation-/261866155076824/
Tags
- expert
- psychology
- lang:en
- is:webinar
- 5G
- is:webpage
- webinar
- conspiracy theory
- discussion
- misinformation
- social media
- COVID-19
- research
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
The Cost of Correcting Bad Science. (2020, July 9). RIOT Science Club - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZBHGzQ8lVg
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Andrew Althouse on Twitter: “@brnichols8744 @JeremySussman @FinancialGonzo @venkmurthy Many scientists use Twitter to carry on conversations (with varying degrees of formality) about published papers, the good, bad, and ugly. The people in this conversation all do this frequently. None of us are anti-science (cont...)” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 18, 2020, from https://twitter.com/ADAlthousePhD/status/1295168734219337738
-
-
docs.gitlab.com docs.gitlab.com
-
New information that would be useful toward the future usage or troubleshooting of GitLab should not be written directly in a forum or other messaging system, but added to a docs MR and then referenced, as described above.
-
When you encounter new information not available in GitLab’s documentation (for example, when working on a support case or testing a feature), your first step should be to create a merge request (MR) to add this information to the docs. You can then share the MR in order to communicate this information.
-
-
www.idecorp.com www.idecorp.com
-
BenchmarkDiscussion
What is a Benchmark Discussion? Why is it capitalized?
-
Students continue working ondifferentiated learning activities.(Remote only? Hold discussionswith half of the class at a time.)
Sounds like great use of a fishbowl model.
-
-
www.tandfonline.com www.tandfonline.com
-
Walter, N., Brooks, J. J., Saucier, C. J., & Suresh, S. (2020). Evaluating the Impact of Attempts to Correct Health Misinformation on Social Media: A Meta-Analysis. Health Communication, 0(0), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1794553
-
-
-
-
As a result, I end up quoting multiple people, sometimes quoting several people back-to-back, before even writing my reply. In those instances it feels like I'm not properly citing those individuals. I feel like it might seem I'm not providing new readers appropriate context for a given quote. It might also be implied that separate quotes are from the same person, leading to mis-attribution.
-
-
unix.meta.stackexchange.com unix.meta.stackexchange.com
-
"When an OP rejects your edit, please do not edit it back in!" Correspondingly, when a user repeatedly does try to edit, understand that something in your framing isn't working right, and you should reconsider it.
-
- Jul 2020
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
Thank you. I appreciate your reply after all this time.
-
-
-
Luscombe, A., & McClelland, A. (2020). Policing the Pandemic: Tracking the Policing of Covid-19 across Canada [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/9pn27
-
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Frega, R. (2020). Out of the lockdown: Democratic trust in the management of epidemic crises [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xcm7y
-
-
-
What It Will Take to Reopen Cities, with Richard Florida. (2020, May 28). SPUR. https://www.spur.org/events/2020-05-28/what-it-will-take-reopen-cities-richard-florida
-
-
-
Perrott, D. (2020, May 26). Is Applied Behavioural Science reaching a Local Maximum? Medium. https://medium.com/@DavePerrott/is-applied-behavioural-science-reaching-a-local-maximum-538b536f7e7d
-
-
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
-
How Taiwan became a coronavirus success story. (2020, June 8). The Institute for Government. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/events/how-taiwan-became-coronavirus-success-story
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region. (2020, June 23). Webinar: COVID-19 pandemic – an opportunity or barrier to health as a bridge for peace?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNurBUky8s0
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
UCL. (2020, May 28). One crisis leads to another: Challenges and responses across emerging economies during COVID-19. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCXpg2iqYlM&feature=youtu.be
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
FSI Stanford. (2020, May 26). COVID-19 and its Impact on Democracy, with Nate Persily and Larry Diamond. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmPih3Wz1_8
-