Michael Sonenscher

Sorry for the issue necromancy

(9 years later:)Both provided answers would fail on files without a newline at the end, this will effectively skip the last line, produce no errors, would lead to disaster (learned hard way:).

Did you really need to bump/hijack a 8 year old post?

And... next time create your own topic, this only illustrates your laziness!

The discussion here can get very fast-paced. I am trying to periodically pause it to allow new folks, or people who don't have quite as much time, to catch up. Please feel free to comment requesting such a pause if you would like to contribute but are having trouble following it all.

Guys, I'm sorry to revive an old discussion, and if there's a new one, point me to it please.

Hi Vic, I know this post is old but was hoping to get some help here.

This thread is more than 5 months old. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose. If you feel it is necessary to make a new reply, you can still do so though. I am aware that this thread is rather old but I still want to make a reply.

Reopening #162

I realize the question was asked 9 years ago, but this question is (still) ranked highly in search results and I came across it today

I realise this is old, but as it isn’t a forum i see no problem in replying

9 day bump

Discussion is not necessary, but could be useful for critiquing a pattern. This would be useful for people who are proposing a pattern to the community or for people who want to gather feedback on an experiment.

No worries, I was just thinking that this issue should probably get necro'd back to open.

I took the liberty of editing this answer because it's already accepted

"When an OP rejects your edit, please do not edit it back in!" Correspondingly, when a user repeatedly does try to edit, understand that something in your framing isn't working right, and you should reconsider it.

Thank you. I appreciate your reply after all this time.

VII, after the map block, consider arr.each_with_object([]) do |(converted_val, orig_val),uniques|...end.

I know you acknowledged your response was late and you're just trying to help but please don't resurrect very old threads.

I'm happy to try to reach agreement with you, but this isn't the right place. Feel free to invite me to a more appropriate forum.

We prefer Freshconnect for ticket related discussions because it maintains the context and always remains part of the ticket. In Slack, these discussions get lost in threads within channels.

View your discussions easily, without getting lost in multiple threads of conversations.

Is there a reason not to do caused-by stack trace printing? Or has it just not been implemented by anyone yet?

7 years after this question, I believe the correct answer is

I realize I'm 6 years late to this party, but

For every question you might have, please create a discussion thread, not a single comment. This makes it a bit easier to see and reply to the question, instead of questions and answers getting mixed together: