"this is a bug of the mail provider" Seriously, Drupal community bring less and less value. Unfollow this issue, but I perhaps time for me to delete my D.O. account. It's a critical issue that can lead to the impossibility for user to log-in. In the real world, nobody care if Microsft server "should" act differently.

The method name is generated by replacing spaces with underscores. The result does not need to be a valid Ruby identifier though — the name may contain punctuation characters, etc. That's because in Ruby technically any string may be a method name. This may require use of define_method and send calls to function properly, but formally there's little restriction on the name.

We're going to define a has-many relationship for a user's second factors, to be able to support multiple second factor types, e.g. TOTP, backup codes, or hardware keys.

You can train a rat to run pretty complicated mazes. You’re never going to train a rat to run a prime number maze — a maze that says, “turn right at every prime number.” The reason is that the rat just doesn’t have that concept. And there’s no way to give it that concept. It’s out of the conceptual range of the rat. That’s true of every organism. Why shouldn’t it be true of us? I mean, are we some kind of angels? Why shouldn’t we have the same basic nature as other organisms? In fact, it’s very hard to think how we cannot be like them. Take our physical capacities. I mean, take our capacity to run 100 meters. We have that capacity because we cannot fly. The ability to do something entails the lack of ability to do something else. I mean, we have the ability because we are somehow constructed so that we can do it. But that same design that’s enabling us to do one thing is preventing us from doing something else. That’s true of every domain of existence. Why shouldn’t it be true of cognition?

yield is a bit of laguage level magic that only works in the context of a method.

I think RSpec should provide around(:context)/around(:all). Not because of any particular use case, but simply for API consistency. It's much simpler to tell users "there are 3 kinds of hooks (before, after and around) and each can be used with any of 3 scopes (example, context and suite)". Having some kinds of hooks work with only some kinds of scopes makes the API inconsistent and forces us to add special case code to emit warnings and also write extra documentation for this fact.

ordre public, ou pour protéger la santé

The difficulty is that the square brackets accessor doesn't allow a straightforward way to access items from the end of the array, and also doesn't accept a negative index.

Epics can contain both issues and epics as children

This kind of error handling does express error state (either via HTTP 500 or by the top-level "errors" key), but it doesn’t take advantage of GraphQL’s type system and can only express one error at a time.

The primary branch in git can have any name by design.

To set multiple cookies in a single set of response headers, you can return an array:

Already Signed InThis session has ended because the account has been signed into from another browser window on 04/11/2021 04:30:09 PM. This happens when you sign in to your account on more than one browser screen. You can't be signed into your account on two or more browser windows at the same time. Just close your browser and sign back into your account.

The guard name defaults to default and can be set via name:. This allows having multiple guards.

# Yes, you can use lambdas as steps, too! step ->(ctx, params:, **) { params.is_a?(Hash) }

A nested activity doesn’t have to have two ends, only.

Please note that I/O works for both “simple” tasks as well as nested activities.

Note that it's perfectly fine to add errors during execution. Not all errors have to come from type checking or validation.

*initialize* also supports passing resources (also attributes if you would # like to) manually

It must be called during the component's initialisation (but doesn't need to live inside the component; it can be called from an external module).

C) ) ) ) La règle du «La règle du «La règle du «La règle du « non bis in idemnon bis in idemnon bis in idemnon bis in idem »»»» (pas de double sanction)(pas de double sanction)(pas de double sanction)(pas de double sanction) Il est impossible de sanctionner un élève deux fois pour le ou les même(s) fait(s). Pour autant, cette règle ne fait pas obstacle à la prise en compte de faits antérieurs pour apprécier le degré de la sanction qui doit être infligée en cas de nouvelle faute, plus particulièrement en cas de harcèlement

Fixes #1037 allow slotted components via making <Component> <Inner slot="foo" /> </Component> as a sugar syntax for <Component> <svelte:fragment slot="foo"> <Inner /> </svelte:fragment> </Component>

It's possible to have multiple event listeners for the same event

Brazil

More than one subscriber can subscribe to the same field.

Jordan Peterson on The Necessity of Virtue

more advanced recording techniques, higher numbers of electrodes placed, and better artifact control may be responsible for the differences from earlier results

few studies attributing violent crime tofrontal lobe dysfunction adequately addressconcurrent psychosocial variables

grossmeasures of brain function with low specificityand questionable clinical significance, whilefailing suYciently to relate the clinical data tothe specific aggressive behaviours in question

do not mirror the gen-eral population or even the larger criminalpopulation.

lack of prospective data, small subjectnumbers and lack of adequate controls forknown violence risk factors

however only one user can open and work with the project at any point in time.

reasonable expectation that it will be utilised

required by Java

Financial caps linked to the level of fees charged for the work are (in our view) less likely to pass the test. 

It is always us that is holding onto some comfortable sense of limitation with which we feel some sense of familiarity. The active agent which holds us back is actually our own refusal to let go of the known for the Unknown. This reluctance is entirely due to an adopted belief that we are what we appear to be—finite, separate, an independent “intelligence” that exists “inside” this finite object called a body, a potential victim of an unpredictable environment. Yet, the finiteness, separateness, independence, and unpredictability are entirely inherent in the partial view of the Actual conscious experience of Being which is going on. If it weren’t going on, there couldn’t be a misinterpretation or misidentification!