- Jan 2021
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
best-available evidence—ie, in formal evidence synthesis.
-
-
synthesistraining.github.io synthesistraining.github.io
-
The courses span a suite of synthesis methods, including systematic review and systematic mapping, stakeholder engagement in evidence synthesis, and evidence synthesis technology.
-
- Sep 2020
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Hennessy, E. A., Acabchuk, R., Arnold, P. A., Dunn, A. G., Foo, Y. Z., Johnson, B. T., Geange, S. R., Haddaway, N. R., Nakagawa, S., Mapanga, W., Mengersen, K., Page, M. J., Sánchez-Tójar, A., Welch, V., & McGuinness, L. A. (2020). Ensuring Prevention Science Research is Synthesis-Ready for Immediate and Lasting Scientific Impact [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/ptg9j
-
- Jun 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2020). Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/epsqt
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Maier, M., Bartoš, F., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis: Addressing Publication Bias with Model-Averaging [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u4cns
-
- May 2020
-
bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com
-
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
-
- Apr 2020
-
blogs.lse.ac.uk blogs.lse.ac.uk
-
says, D. S. (2020, April 7). “Inundated, overloaded and bombarded” – Seven insights for communicating research to busy policymakers. Impact of Social Sciences. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/04/07/inundated-overloaded-and-bombarded-seven-insights-for-communicating-research-to-busy-policymakers/
Tags
- is:blog
- lang:en
- research
- support
- government
- communication
- policy
- decision
- reputation
- synthesis
- UK
- network
- evidence
- policymaker
- language
Annotators
URL
-
- Sep 2017
-
regroup-production.s3.amazonaws.com regroup-production.s3.amazonaws.com
-
ynthesizing qualitative research enables reviewers to ask questions that inform the development of, or the implementation of, interventions. For example, in the context of intervention evaluation, they can help define relevant and important questions, help determine appropriate outcome measures by looking at “subjective” outcomes, look in detail at issues concerning implementation or the acceptability or appropriateness of an intervention, identify and explore unintended consequences, contribute to service delivery and policy development by describing pro-cesses and contexts, and inform and illuminate quantitative studies, for example, by contributing to the design of struc-tured instruments, assessing the fairness of comparisons in experimental studies, or unpacking variation within aggre-gated data (Davies, Nutley, & Smith, 2000).
Summary of purposes of QES
-