That means embedding process evaluations within impact evaluations, using mixed methods to understand the mechanisms behind the numbers, reviewing bodies of evidence systematically in systematic reviews that identify context-specific moderating factors, and treating the theory of change as a live hypothesis rather than a box-ticking exercise at proposal stage. None of that is in tension with rigor. It’s an expansion of what rigor means.
4 Matching Annotations
- Sep 2026
-
www.3ieimpact.org www.3ieimpact.org
-
- Jan 2022
-
eductive.ca eductive.ca
-
mauvais indicateurs comme gages de rigueur
Yes! Therein lies the rub. Sounds like arguments for Competency-Based Learning, which is officially what we have in Quebec's Cegep system.
-
L’un des thèmes récurrents pendant les discussions a été celui de la rigueur.
Not too surprising. It's an important consideration for the Academe. Almost part of the definition. And it's useful that learning pros are tackling such issues instead of jumping to conclusions. In a way, it's an extension of work done in the Sociology of Education since 1918.
-
- Apr 2021
-
leonidtiokhin.medium.com leonidtiokhin.medium.com
-
Tiokhin, L. (2021, April 21). Why indirect contributions matter for science and scientists. Medium. https://leonidtiokhin.medium.com/why-indirect-contributions-matter-for-science-and-scientists-6c9bf827bc7d
-