Preference falsification forces individual to accept values they don't privately believe in because of the compulsion to be accepted in the in group.

Garimella, K., Smith, T., Weiss, R., & West, R. (2021). Political Polarization in Online News Consumption. ArXiv:2104.06481 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06481

Sprengholz, P., Korn, L., Eitze, S., & Betsch, C. (2021). Allocation of COVID-19 vaccination: When public prioritization preferences differ from official regulations. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6na7t

Pleskac, T. J., Kyung, E., Chapman, G. B., & Urminsky, O. (2021, April 23). Single- or double-blind review? A field study of system preference, reliability, bias, and validity. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q2tkw

Blayac, Thierry, Dimitri Dubois, Sebastien Duchêne, Phu Nguyen-Van, Bruno Ventelou, and Marc Willinger. ‘Population Preferences for Inclusive COVID-19 Policy Responses’. The Lancet Public Health 6, no. 1 (1 January 2021): e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30285-1.

uploads/{y}{m}/{rand:6}/{origin}

The path is appended to the PicGo upload prefix.

Patrick Gruska. (2020, December 6). Impfbereitschaft nach Parteienpräferenz. Es ist noch ein weiter Weg. #zib2 https://t.co/13czb8FUIm [Tweet]. @PatrickGruska. https://twitter.com/PatrickGruska/status/1335689684358471682

Albrecht, R., Jarecki, J. B., Meier, D., & Rieskamp, J. (2020, December 1). Risk Preferences and Risk Perception Affect the Acceptance of Digital Contact Tracing. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4x5f3

Brañas-Garza, P., Jorrat, D., Espín, A. M., & Sánchez, A. (2020). Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence. ArXiv:2010.09262 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09262

COVID-19 and the Labor Market. (n.d.). IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved October 11, 2020, from https://covid-19.iza.org/publications/dp13625/

Cerase, A. (2020). From “good” intuitions to principled practices and beyond: Ethical issues in risk communication. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 508. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP508-2020-104

Gurung, R. A. R., & Stone, A. (2020, September 14). You Can’t Always Get What You Want and It Hurts: Learning During the Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wqdx8

Ehlert, A., Kindschi, M., Algesheimer, R., & Rauhut, H. (2020). Human social preferences cluster and spread in the field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(37), 22787–22792. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000824117

COVID-19 and the Labor Market. (n.d.). IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved 26 July 2020, from https://covid-19.iza.org/publications/dp13493/

Hameleers, M. (2020). Prospect Theory in Times of a Pandemic: The Effects of Gain versus Loss Framing on Policy Preferences and Emotional Responses During the 2020 Coronavirus Outbreak [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/7pykj

Garmendia, A., & Alfonso, S. L. (2020). Popular Reactions To External Threats in Federations. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/qyjtm

Bogliacino, F., codagnone, cristiano, Montealegre, F., Folkvord, F., Gómez, C. E., Charris, R. A., Liva, G., Villanueva, F. L., & Veltri, G. A. (2020). Negative shocks predict change in cognitive function and preferences: Assessing the negative affect and stress hypothesis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown mitigation strategy [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/qhkf9

Campos-Mercade, Pol, Armando Meier, Florian Schneider, and Erik Wengström. “Prosociality Predicts Health Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Department of Economics - University of Zurich, May 2020. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zur:econwp:346.

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054

Soutter, A., & Mõttus, R. (2020). Political Preferences, Personality Traits, and Environmentalism. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fm95k

Vanunu, Y., Hotaling, J. M., & Newell, B. R. (2020). Elucidating the differential impact of extreme-outcomes in perceptual and preferential choice. Cognitive Psychology, 119, 101274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101274

Grubbs, J. B., Warmke, B., Tosi, J., & James, A. S. (2020). Moral Grandstanding and Political Polarization: A Multi-Study Consideration. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k3ynj

Weinstein, N., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020, April 30). Motivation and Preference in Isolation: A test of their different influences on responses to self-isolation during the COVID-19 outbreak. Retrieved from psyarxiv.com/pbgq7

Romano, A., Sotis, C., Dominioni, G., & Guidi, S. (2020). COVID-19 Data: The Logarithmic Scale Misinforms the Public and Affects Policy Preferences [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/42xfm

selection and choices