Carl Heneghan on Twitter. (2020). Twitter. Retrieved 2 March 2021, from https://twitter.com/carlheneghan/status/1329861848573861888

Covid-19 pandemic was not planned by Rockefeller Foundation. (16:48:50.595211+00:00). Full Fact. https://fullfact.org/online/covid-19-pandemic-was-not-planned-rockefeller-foundation/

Carl T. Bergstrom. (2021, April 27). 6. In the right column, we are given weighted averages. But these are nonsense as well, because the data are not collected in a way that allow for meaningful comparisons. Most critically, THESE ARE TOTAL DEATHS, NOT VACCINE ASSOCIATED DEATHS. [Tweet]. @CT_Bergstrom. https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1387153003824648196

ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: ‘@ToddHorowitz3 I think that attribution is hard to make. I have no doubt they’re systematically promoted by bad faith actors, but I think it’s much harder to feel confident about all those who repeat them. But the rather extensive public discussion of efficacy does make this case seem unlikely’ / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved 15 July 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1415364895046963205

For what I expect to be a coming description of Jonathan Edwards' commonplace book, I'm surprised that the page doesn't use the word or even florilegium.

Everhard here makes in one breath a common error I'm coming to notice. While it might be true that Edwards had some organizational genius, I think it's disingenuous to attribute his output to his intellectual genius. More and more I'm seeing that throughout history those who were thought of as intellectual geniuses really relied on the organization structures of their commonplace books (or similar devices). By writing, thinking, and producing in a commonplace tradition they were able to do far more, think more clearly, and accomplish more.

This can be linked with the idea also espoused in Robert Greene's Mastery which seems to have some of the similar flavor.

Bunker, C. J., & Varnum, M. E. W. (2021). How Strong is the Association Between Social Media Use and False Consensus? [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/eyjaq

Covid-19 Conspiracies: How Can We Deal With Misinformation? (n.d.). Retrieved June 28, 2021, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/sunitasah/2021/01/07/covid-19-conspiracies-how-can-we-deal-with-misinformation/?sh=526aa35b2b3f

Lyons, Benjamin A., Jacob M. Montgomery, Andrew M. Guess, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. ‘Overconfidence in News Judgments Is Associated with False News Susceptibility’. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 23 (8 June 2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019527118.

Fact Check-COVID-19 vaccines are not ‘cytotoxic’ | Reuters. (n.d.). Retrieved June 25, 2021, from https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaccine-cytotoxic/fact-check-covid-19-vaccines-are-not-cytotoxic-idUSL2N2O01XP

Laukkonen, R., Kaveladze, B., Protzko, J., Tangen, J. M., von Hippel, B., & Schooler, J. (2021). The ring of truth: Irrelevant insights make worldviews seem true [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zq3vd

Henderson, E. L., Simons, D. J., & Barr, D. J. (2021). The Trajectory of Truth: A Longitudinal Study of the Illusory Truth Effect. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.161

Wadman, M. (2021). Antivaccine activists use a government database on side effects to scare the public. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj6981

Covid: India tells social media firms to remove ‘India variant’ from content. (2021, May 22). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-57213046

Greene, C., & Murphy, G. (2020). Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories for COVID-19 fake news. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rvec8

Isabella Eckerle on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 26 February 2021, from https://twitter.com/EckerleIsabella/status/1329060111571103744

Nathan Young. (2021, February 3). Can we gather all covid tweets from large UK accounts, anonymise them put them on a website, let the public score them true to false then rank the accounts? [Tweet]. @NathanpmYoung. https://twitter.com/NathanpmYoung/status/1356928462565564416

The Last Crusidual. (2021, February 2). @SciBeh @MichaelPaulEdw1 @ToddHorowitz3 @richarddmorey you can’t have any form of evidence. If you concider any form of evidence, than what is talked about than isn’t anymore what the falacy sais. [Tweet]. @islaut1. https://twitter.com/islaut1/status/1356529266519924736

ReconfigBehSci. (2020, November 26). The critical question is whether the summary ‘study shows face masks have no significant effect’ is “misinformation”. First off, the title is ambiguous. It could be paraphrased in two different ways: A) is telegraphic version of a longer sentence "study showed that face.. [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1332008460825878529

ReconfigBehSci on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 19 February 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1356525692700291072

Harford, T. (2021, May 6). What magic teaches us about misinformation. https://www.ft.com/content/5cea69f0-7d44-424e-a121-78a21564ca35

ReconfigBehSci. (2021, February 1). Great list, but I think one of the main problems with “absence of evidence fallacy” is its phrasing: “absence of evid. Is not the same as evidence of absence” is a true statement, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence” is literally false @richarddmorey [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1356172673651503104

And thus draconian methods for making the distribution unnecessarily complicated, siloed, surveillance capitalized, and over-monitized beyond all comprehension are beyond the reach of one or two for profit companies who want to own the entire market like monopolistic giants are similarly limited. (But let's just stick with the creators we're pretending to champion, shall we?)

you mean mobile app game?

Fischer, H., Said, N., & Huff, M. (2021). Insight into the accuracy of COVID-19 beliefs predicts behavior during the pandemic. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/x2qv3

What, then, is the difference between a semantic domain and a semantic field? The way they are used here, it's almost as if they are listing them in order to emphasis that they are synonyms ... but I'm not sure.

From the later examples of basketball (https://hyp.is/ynKbXI1BEeuEheME3sLYrQ/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_domain) and coffee shop, however, I am pretty certain that semantic domain is quite different from (broader than) semantic field.

Ball, P., & Maxmen, A. (2020). The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories. Nature, 581(7809), 371–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01452-z

ReconfigBehSci. (2020, November 3). As debate on ‘saving the economy versus saving lives’ marches on, it’s worth noting that this type of contrast actually has a name in fallacy research: Https://t.co/N8U4ABWTuh it’s also worth noting that there is now a substantial number of research articles on the topic. 1/n [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1323603017179013130

Imperial College London. ‘Report 34 - COVID-19 Infection Fatality Ratio Estimates from Seroprevalence’. Accessed 12 March 2021. http://www.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/departments/school-public-health/infectious-disease-epidemiology/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/report-34-ifr/.

Levine-Tiefenbrun, M., Yelin, I., Uriel, H., Kuint, J., Schreiber, L., Herzel, E., Katz, R., Ben-Tov, A., Patalon, T., Chodick, G., & Kishony, R. (2020). Association of COVID-19 RT-qPCR test false-negative rate with patient age, sex and time since diagnosis. MedRxiv, 2020.10.30.20222935. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.30.20222935

Health Nerd. (2021, February 1). The story continues—After @ikashnitsky and I pointed out that this paper was mathematically impossible, and had numerous errors, it was partially corrected Now, the lead author is calling us ‘trolls’ [Tweet]. @GidMK. https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1356085063998267398

BU Epi COVID Response Corps on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 21 February 2021, from https://twitter.com/EpiCOVIDCorps/status/1362099096102854657

Joe. (2021, January 26). Crystal Prison Zone: I tried to report scientific misconduct. How did it go? Crystal Prison Zone. http://crystalprisonzone.blogspot.com/2021/01/i-tried-to-report-scientific-misconduct.html

The BMJ on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 18 February 2021, from https://twitter.com/bmj_latest/status/1361179689130356736

first sighting: meta-issue 

Boytchev, H. (2021). Why did a German newspaper insist the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine was inefficacious for older people—Without evidence? BMJ, 372, n414. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n414

This whole page assumes/presumes that your site is using PHP. That hardly seems like a safe assumption to me. This page should at least qualify, "If your site uses PHP, then you can do..."

If you're designing a web app, you still have hover.

There seems to be an artificial pressure and a false assumption that the version that gets printed and included in the box be the "magic number" 1.00.

But I think there is absolutely nothing bad or to be ashamed of to have the version number printed in the rule book be 1.47 or even 2.0. (Or, of course, you could just not print it at all.) It's just being transparent/honest about how many versions/revisions you've made. 

David Spiegelhalter and False Positives. (2020, October 14). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmiEzi54lBI&feature=youtu.be

Their trailer said "A video game for the home computer". Not sure why they said that instead of PC, but it was a refreshing new term for it.

David Rothschild on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved October 17, 2020, from https://twitter.com/DavMicRot/status/1316429651988877312

I remember the false positive Leo Laporte reported in his home security system when it thought a balloon floating by was an intruder in his home.

Burel, Gregoire; Farrell, Tracie; Mensio, Martino; Khare, Prashant and Alani, Harith (2020). Co-Spread of Misinformation and Fact-Checking Content during the Covid-19 Pandemic. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Social Informatics Conference (SocInfo), LNCS.

I cannot stress how much this pisses me off. They gave black people "half freedom." That's how vicious and cruel slave owners were. They couldn't even fathom giving them full freedom.

Surkova, E., Nikolayevsskyy, V., Drobniewski, F. (2020). False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30453-7

Is this the second wave? (2020, September 22). UnHerd. https://unherd.com/2020/09/do-we-need-a-second-lockdown/

Graham Cooke on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved September 23, 2020, from https://twitter.com/grahamscooke/status/1308132497822281728

Kouzy, R., Jaoude, J. A., Garcia, C. J. G., Alam, M. B. E., Taniguchi, C. M., & Ludmir, E. B. (2020). Characteristics of the Multiplicity of Randomized Clinical Trials for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Launched During the Pandemic. JAMA Network Open, 3(7), e2015100–e2015100. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15100

JNOLive | Multiplicity of Randomized Clinical Trials for Coronavirus Disease 2019. (2020, July 14). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-MWPqgLUvA&feature=youtu.be

Lewis, T. (n.d.). Nine COVID-19 Myths That Just Won’t Go Away. Scientific American. Retrieved September 11, 2020, from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/nine-covid-19-myths-that-just-wont-go-away/

Gratton, C., Gagnon-St-Pierre, É., & Markovits, H. (2020). When forewarned is not forearmed: The paradoxical effect of single warnings attached to repeated fake news [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h5cxp

Washington, D. of C. 1100 C. A. N. S. 1300B, & Dc 20036. (n.d.). PolitiFact - Fact-checking ‘Plandemic 2’: Another video full of conspiracy theories about COVID-19. @politifact. Retrieved August 27, 2020, from https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/18/fact-checking-plandemic-2-video-recycles-inaccurat/

Peter English #FBPE on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 24, 2020, from https://twitter.com/petermbenglish/status/1296730819420196864

Califf, Robert M., Adrian F. Hernandez, and Martin Landray. ‘Weighing the Benefits and Risks of Proliferating Observational Treatment Assessments: Observational Cacophony, Randomized Harmony’. JAMA 324, no. 7 (18 August 2020): 625–26. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.13319.

Natalie E. Dean, PhD on Twitter: “Thanks, @MelissaKariWard, for capturing the since deleted tweets. This is why I expressed concern.” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 2, 2020, from https://twitter.com/nataliexdean/status/1285033748283654146

Dr. Angela Rasmussen on Twitter: “@jan7681 If I was asked to comment on the intricacies of the luxury electric car market or how to secure NASA contracts, I’d defer to him.” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1278346632254259200

Maier, M., Bartoš, F., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Robust Bayesian Meta-Analysis: Addressing Publication Bias with Model-Averaging [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u4cns

20200611_China_Report.pdf | Con la tecnología de Box. (n.d.). Retrieved June 18, 2020, from https://stanford.app.box.com/v/sio-twitter-prc-june-2020

Fung, D. J. (2018, April 10). The Corruption of Evidence Based Medicine—Killing for Profit. Medium. https://medium.com/@drjasonfung/the-corruption-of-evidence-based-medicine-killing-for-profit-41f2812b8704

Bergstrom, C. T. (2020, June 14). "1. Another day, another blog post of #COVID19 misinformation making the rounds." Twitter. https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1272007583222513664

☣️ Michael Ç̸̠͎͉̹̼̠͔̗̓̐̐̓̓̀͝͝. Bazaco ☣️ on Twitter: “The amount of experts who used to cry foul about people acting like experts in their field that have now chased the COVID story pretending to be virologists, ID epidemiologists, ID physicians, and/or infection control specialists to try and brand build is creepy and ghoulish. 😑” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved June 15, 2020, from https://twitter.com/mcbazacophd/status/1271597829065187328