5 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2021
  2. www.slideshare.net www.slideshare.net
    De Finetti meets Popper
    1
    1. emilybiggs 03 May 2021

      Stephen Senn. (19:12:01 UTC). De Finetti meets Popper [Data & Analytics]. https://www.slideshare.net/StephenSenn1/de-finetti-meets-popper

      is:webpage lang:en presentation statistics inference hypothesis falsification view de Finetti Popper
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    slideshare.net/StephenSenn1/de-finetti-meets-popper
  3. Apr 2021
  4. en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
    Historical negationism - Wikipedia
    1
    1. TylerRick 15 Apr 2021
      Historical negationism,[1][2] also called denialism, is falsification[3][4] or distortion of the historical record. It should not be conflated with historical revisionism, a broader term that extends to newly evidenced, fairly reasoned academic reinterpretations of history.
      historical negationism not to be confused with important distinction false conflation historical revisionism falsification distortion re-interpretation history
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_negationism
  5. Mar 2021
  6. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    There is no generalizability crisis
    1
    1. NatasjaDerbyMcCabe 17 Mar 2021

      Lakens, D., Tunç, D. U., & Tunç, M. N. (2021). There is no generalizability crisis. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tm8jy

      is:preprint lang:en psychology metascience social and behavioural sciences quantitative methods statistical methods generalizability crisis operationalizations methodological perspectives falsification theories
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/tm8jy/
  7. Aug 2020
  8. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    The Fallacy of Manipulation "Checks" in Psychological Experiments
    1
    1. katietaylor_99 24 Aug 2020

      Gruijters, Stefan L.K. ‘The Fallacy of Manipulation “Checks” in Psychological Experiments’. Preprint. PsyArXiv, 20 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fkzv5.

      is:preprint lang:en fallacy manipulations checks psychological experiments confidence validity causal explanation causality inferential confidence internal validity uninformative compromise interpretations experimental results falsification
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/fkzv5/
  9. May 2020
  10. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    Replication Under Underdetermination: Introducing Systematic Replications Framework
    1
    1. edampf 20 May 2020

      Uygun Tunç, D., & Tunç, M. N. (2020, May 13). Replication Under Underdetermination: Introducing Systematic Replications Framework. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pdm7y

      is:preprint lang:en auxiliary hypotheses Duhem-Quine Thesis replication empirical underdetermination falsification uncertainty framework research
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/pdm7y/