Thank you for the additional clarification and for the considerable expenditure of explanatory effort represented by the preceding response. Before proceeding further with the underlying technical question, it may be useful to establish a more explicit shared understanding concerning the relationship between the quantity of information supplied, the extent to which that information is necessary for the immediate decision being made, and the finite amount of maintainer attention available for converting the supplied information into an actionable conclusion. For the avoidance of doubt, the concern being raised here is not that factual accuracy, reproducibility, technical precision, correction of earlier assertions, or sufficient evidentiary support are undesirable. Each of those properties is useful and may, under the appropriate circumstances, be necessary. The difficulty arises when the information required to establish the relevant fact is accompanied by additional explanation whose presence, although potentially interesting and perhaps even technically correct, does not materially alter the fact itself, the confidence with which that fact can be evaluated, or the action that follows from accepting it. Every response imposes what might be described as a comprehension obligation upon its recipients. That obligation consists not merely of reading the words presented, but also of determining which statements constitute factual claims, which function as evidence, which are qualifications, which are conjectures, which supersede earlier statements, which merely restate conclusions already established elsewhere, and which are included primarily to explain the circumstances under which some other statement came to be made. The cost of satisfying this obligation tends to increase with the length, density, and structural complexity of the response, even where the amount of information capable of changing the maintainer’s eventual decision remains constant. This consideration is particularly significant in the context of open-source maintenance, where the time required to read, classify, verify, and contextualize one response cannot simultaneously be used to reproduce another issue, review a pull request, investigate a regression, prepare a release, answer another contributor, evaluate a dependency update, improve documentation, or perform any of the numerous other activities competing for the same limited pool of attention. Consequently, verbosity is not entirely without cost merely because the information is supplied voluntarily, constructively, and with the intention of preventing misunderstanding. Its cost is transferred to each recipient who must determine which portions are operationally necessary and which portions can be disregarded without compromising the validity of the resulting conclusion. We would therefore ask that future responses be prepared according to something approximating a principle of minimum sufficient communication, by which a response contains the smallest collection of independently useful facts required to answer the question currently being asked or to establish the behavior currently under discussion. Information should not be included solely because it is adjacent to the subject, because it records the path by which a conclusion was reached, because it anticipates questions that have not yet been asked, because it exhaustively delineates the boundaries of claims whose ordinary interpretation is already sufficiently narrow, or because omitting it might leave some peripheral aspect of the subject less than comprehensively characterized. The use of the word “smallest” in this context should not be interpreted as a request for artificial abbreviation, unexplained assertions, incomplete reproduction instructions, or the omission of facts required to distinguish the reported behavior from another superficially similar behavior. It means, instead, that each sentence should justify the attention required to process it by contributing something without which a maintainer would be materially less able to verify the report or determine the appropriate next action. Where the removal of a sentence would leave the actionable meaning unchanged, that sentence should generally be presumed removable. Where several paragraphs can be replaced by a single concrete observation without sacrificing reproducibility, the concrete observation should be preferred. Where a mechanism can be demonstrated through a minimal configuration change and an immediately observable result, that demonstration should ordinarily take precedence over a comprehensive narrative describing the mechanism’s provenance, implications, surrounding implementation details, and hypothetical manifestations in configurations not yet tested. Qualifications should similarly be restricted to those that alter the reasonable interpretation of the principal claim. It is generally unnecessary to enumerate every proposition that is not being asserted, every environment that has not been tested, every alternative explanation that was considered and rejected, every inference that a sufficiently careful reader might otherwise draw, or every reason the author has for believing that an untested configuration may behave similarly. Where uncertainty is relevant, it is usually sufficient to identify the precise boundary of verification rather than narrating the broader epistemological status of all related propositions. One potentially useful standard for deciding whether information warrants inclusion is to ask whether the behavior that actually occurs, the smallest reliable procedure that causes it to occur, and any qualification without which those statements would become materially misleading remain understandable and reproducible after the information is removed. If they do, the removed material was probably not necessary for the immediate response. Background already available elsewhere in the issue, detailed explanations of standard language or bundler behavior, speculative generalizations beyond the verified reproducer, extended discussion of why an earlier reproducer was inadequate, descriptions of investigative paths that did not produce the final result, and multiple reformulations of the same conclusion at successively different levels of abstraction should normally be retained by the author unless and until a maintainer requests them. This request is not intended as a judgment concerning the effort, competence, thoroughness, or good faith involved in preparing the response. It concerns the format in which the result of that effort is presented. A technically correct response may nevertheless be disproportionately expensive to consume, in much the same way that a comprehensive diagnostic log may contain the relevant error while simultaneously making that error more difficult to locate. The objective is not to minimize the amount of investigation performed by the reporter, but to minimize the portion of that investigation which every subsequent reader must reconstruct before reaching the actionable result. We recognize that determining what is essential requires judgment and that contributors cannot invariably know in advance which detail a maintainer will consider relevant. In such circumstances, the preferred strategy is progressive disclosure, under which the shortest adequately supported factual answer is provided initially and further supporting detail is supplied only when a maintainer identifies a concrete need for it. It is substantially easier for a maintainer to request one missing fact than it is for multiple maintainers to independently identify and disregard several pages of facts that do not affect the decision being made. The appropriate optimization target is therefore not maximum completeness at the time of the first response, but minimum aggregate effort across all participants required to reach a sufficiently supported conclusion. A concise response that results in one targeted follow-up question may satisfy that target more effectively than an exhaustive response which attempts to preempt every conceivable follow-up but requires substantially greater processing time from every reader, including readers for whom most of the anticipated questions would never have arisen. Facts directly necessary to establish the reported behavior should be included. Evidence directly necessary to verify those facts should be included only to the extent that verification would otherwise be impractical or ambiguous. Context that may be interesting but does not change the facts, their verification, or the resulting action should be omitted unless specifically requested. Where several formulations communicate materially identical information, the shortest formulation should be selected. Where a direct statement is available, it should take precedence over a narrative account of how the statement was discovered. Where one verified claim is sufficient, it should not be surrounded by multiple hypothetical extensions. Where the answer to a question can be expressed as a concrete condition and an observable consequence, the response should ordinarily contain that condition and consequence without attempting to supply a general theory of every adjacent failure mode. It is also important to clarify that this does not mean providing a concise summary followed by the same extended explanation that the summary was intended to replace. The continued presence of the explanation preserves most of the reading, classification, and triage cost. A summary is not a substitute for removing unnecessary material when the unnecessary material remains directly beneath it. Supporting details can remain available to the author and can be supplied in a subsequent response if a maintainer determines that the initial facts are insufficient. Nor is it generally necessary to surround relevant facts with introductory courtesies, repeated apologies, rhetorical transitions, anticipatory defenses, summaries of prior misunderstandings, explanations of why the current answer differs from a previous answer, assurances about claims that are not being made, or concluding restatements of conclusions already expressed. Courtesy is appreciated, but its communicative footprint need not substantially exceed that of the technical substance. A correction is most useful when it makes the corrected claim immediately identifiable and permits the obsolete claim to be discarded without requiring the reader to reconstruct the entire history of the correction. Applied to the present exchange, the information that appears most capable of affecting maintainer action is that disabling HMR removes the React refresh preamble, that the resulting client bootstrap no longer causes the relevant environment initialization to occur before createClientRpc is evaluated, and that server-function construction consequently encounters a ReferenceError because process is unavailable. The precise import-order mechanics, the contrast with the initial theory concerning a relative URL, the implications for other plugins whose preambles may differ, the explanation of why the originally linked example does not exhibit the behavior under its default configuration, and the broader characterization of the problem as a dependency on an incidental ordering guarantee may become relevant during implementation, but they need not all be transmitted before maintainers have had an opportunity to evaluate the narrower verified condition and its immediate consequence. In consideration of the asymmetry between the effort required for an author to preserve additional material and the cumulative effort required for every recipient to inspect and classify that material, and with due regard for the limited and nonrenewable character of volunteer maintainer attention as it relates to the substantially renewable supply of potentially relevant contextual exposition, future participation would be most effective if each response were reduced, before submission, to only those empirically established statements whose omission would prevent reproduction, materially distort the reported behavior, or leave the specific question under consideration unanswered, with all supplementary narrative, speculative extension, duplicative reformulation, historical reconstruction, rhetorical cushioning, and otherwise nonessential elaboration withheld pending an explicit indication that its disclosure is required.

I’ll be honest — tracking finances is boring. It’s the flossing of adulthood. Everyone knows they should do it, almost nobody actually does.

Right now, selection effects mean that actual cooperators are disproportionately autistic.

Men are simple apes who enjoy booba booba and various lubricated holes, no?

There were dedicated spaces for married red pill men, but almost all of them were miserable in their marriages (And of course they were. A happily married man who’s getting laid five times a week has no need for TRP!)

Yes, it’s a little confusing that the enhance action and <form action> are both called ‘action’. These docs are action-packed. Sorry.

Node_modules is the heaviest object in the universe for a reason.

Copyleft Richard Towers 2025. All wrongs reserved.

By which I mean, don’t do it.

The solution is to not do this. When working with fenced code blocks, do not indent them. This isn’t an issue that can really be worked around, even if the parser did make assumptions about what you meant. Because code blocks are designed to respect whitespace, any fix would simply result in a different but equally frustrating failure. Don’t indent code blocks.

Did anyone else notice this question is basically how different notions of "approximate equality" are only approximately equal?

The word people is best not used with words of number, in place of persons. If of ‘six people’ five went away, how many ‘people’ would be left? Answer: one people.

I’d love to see more lists of self-evident phenomena we can’t explain; not “how do we reduce scores on the Modern Racism Scale by 10%” but “people do this weird thing…WHY.”

I don't know what this Ruby thing is, where are my Rails? I'll drive you right to the tracks.

like honest, by-the-book bureaucrats.

Ruby, as a community, unfairly discriminates against false, and it needs to stop.

her first remark upon embarking would no doubt be "on a scale from one to on a boat, we're on a boat!

Someone whose true identity is a gamer doesn’t have difficulty trolling people online, having a doomer mindset, and ruining their health in front of a screen for 8-10 hours a day.

People stopped dreaming of a future they can design.

HBO's Rome | News Updates - Roman Style 1080p HD

yeah - it is basically half the stuff you don't want autoloaded and half app/lib but it is not called app/lib because DHH does not want app/lib"

Answers are identical because Questions are identical too !

if at all possible, you should send MIME attachments instead, unless you specifically strive to be able to communicate with the late 1980s.

Back in the day, the de facto standard for sending binaries across electronic mail was uuencode. It still exists, but has numerous usability problems; if at all possible, you should send MIME attachments instead, unless you specifically strive to be able to communicate with the late 1980s.

However, one crucial question remains that has not yet been settled, and it is not a technical, but a social or political question: with everybody locked-in, who is to act in which way to ensure the redirection of funds from the legacy system to the replacement solution, i.e. an open scholarly infrastructure?

so a formula is like a dead equation?

The way to do this with Capybara is documented on StackOverflow but, unfortunately, the answer there is buried in a little too much noise. I decided to create my own tiny noise-free blog post that contains the answer. Here it is:

“So superior mechanically to other crowdsourced games, it was banned on Kickstarter and Gamefound!”

but I literally posted a screenshot of it working. So you must be doing something wrong.

“Trying to squeeze a few more drops of freedom from the rotting carcass of the industrial era is not going to help us abolish human nature.” (Sometimes, reading this book, one wishes for a conversation between Harrington and Ted Kaczynski.)

--ignore-unmerged When restoring files on the working tree from the index, do not abort the operation if there are unmerged entries and neither --ours, --theirs, --merge or --conflict is specified. Unmerged paths on the working tree are left alone. Holy smokes! I guess the git-ish fix for the user interface problem here will be to rename the option from --ignore-unmerged to --ignore-unmerged-except-in-cases-where-we-do-not-want-to-allow-that--consult-documentation-then-source-code-then-team-of-gurus-when-you-cannot-figure-it-out---and-wait-while-half-of-them-argue-about-why-it-is-right-as-is-while-the-other-half-advocate-adding-four-more-options-as-the-fix.

When was the last time you got a 5x productivity boost from anything that didn’t involve some sort of chemicals?

But first, an important note — friends don't let friends use SMS 2FA.

Don't be a lump on a log. See an issue? Have a suggestion? Want to help? Well git in there!

It used to be a lot more common for people to have work and personal phones before the internet made it possible for work to take over every aspect of your day to day life.

At some point, somebody has to say “You know, maybe freeing Cthulhu from his watery prison is a bad idea. Maybe we should not do that.”

As always when dealing with high-level transhumanists, “all available hardware” should be taken to include “the atoms that used to be part of your body”.

how do you profit from an enslaved philosopher?

Any human with above room temperature IQ can design a utopia.

Every two-bit author and philosopher has to write their own utopia. Most of them are legitimately pretty nice. In fact, it’s a pretty good bet that two utopias that are polar opposites both sound better than our own world.

Premium MOC tax support. Yaay, taxes. I think this one takes the award for most effort required to implement a feature that no-one really wants.

It includes some nice HTML sanitizers, which are based on HTML5lib's safelist, so it most likely won't make your codes less secure. (These statements have not been evaluated by Netexperts.)

Chérizier has denied that his nickname “Babekyou” (or “Barbecue”) came from accusations of his setting people on fire. Instead, he says it was from his mother's having been a fried chicken street vendor.

The job of a historian is to figure out what really happened, not to beat his political enemies over the head with tendentious, emotional, juvenile propaganda. Again, though—in 2023, it’s easy to see why someone might get that impression.

Regex can do many things, but unbaking a cake isn't one of them.

In an episode of Seinfeld, Elaine’s favorite contraceptive stops being sold, and now for every potential lover she has to weigh in whether he is ‘spongeworthy’. An economics professor at Princeton wrote a paper on this, and it was actually published in Economic Inquiry (Dixit, 2012).

Every Bay Area person who has jogged past this plaque with their golden retriever, read it, and thought some happy thought about the Jalquin/Irgin (dollars to donuts that the Jalquin massacreed the Irgin at least more than once, presumably after much wrangling over whose brand sounded more like a birth-control pill), has figured out how to believe in blood-and-soil nationalism.

I'm glad this isn't a lego set because it would cost you an arm, a leg, a nose, a kidney, your children, your siblings, your siblings-in-law, a boat, a lot of money, the London Borough of Haringey, the Eiffel Tower, your 1st cousins, a pool, Poole, a guy named Paul, Long Island, your life savings, nuclear launch codes, another lego set, thirteen domestic cats (Scottish Fold), most of your house, Birmingham, AL, your daily income, everyone who died in the Napoleonic Wars, $30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 and £30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Angola, Namibia, Ethiopia, Mauritania, Canada, Cuba, Jamaica, The Bahamas, Georgia (country), Georgia (US state), every single person from Bosnia and Herzegovina and your time. Luckily, it doesn't.

I have yet to see a Snapd or Flatpak build of Audacity that I'm happy with. Those builds are beyond our control as they are made by 3rd parties. I do find it mildly annoying that Flatpak direct users that have problems with their builds to us.

Indeed, but the proliferation of general purpose keyboards with OS/2 logo keys has never come to pass... I think most of the keys are either windoze or half-eaten apples...

Well, actually, some ligatures do have legacy codes, but solely for backwards compatibility with outdated encodings from the long-gone, dark ages of eight-bit computing. E.g. f_f can have the U+FB00 LATIN SMALL LIGATURE FF code point. If ‘eight-bit’ does not tell you anything, please erase everything you read within these parentheses from your memory immediately, keep calm and continue reading.

I know this is older but I'm surprised by the "Is redrawing 110K glyphs (with metrics and kerning and combining attributes and hinting) too hard?" I used to do typography. A plain, unoriginal typeface with 255 straightforward latin-# oriented letters is at least a couple days of work; probably a couple weeks; couple months for truly good work. 110K is the equivalent of 400+ faces with much harder metrics and such. 15,000 hours of work or drastically more; so at least 7 or so years. So, kinda hard.

As a kid, I had cobbled together a version of “me” using parts from different sets, but it never looked exactly right (though I did have two lightsabers and a hoverboard, which is definitely just like the real me).

“reality has a well-known liberal bias,”

I'm afraid you missed the joke ;-) While you believe spaces are required on both sides of an em dash, there is no consensus on this point. For example, most (but not all) American authorities say /no/ spaces should be used. That's the joke. In writing a line about "only one way to do it", I used a device (em dash) for which at least two ways to do it (with spaces, without spaces) are commonly used, neither of which is obvious -- and deliberately picked a third way just to rub it in. This will never change ;-)

:w saves.

I used to write code. I still do, but I used to, too.

Write code for human, not for God

This latter pathway — cancelling someone — is the feminine version of the Male School Shooter

OK, I am really, truly, for real working on this next week. Stay tuned... and feel free to mock me if I don't get anything done

When we read EA literature we are struck by the same sense of wonder that the young Freud felt, when he thought he had discovered the cure for depression. It was actually just… cocaine.

Dude: please at least ask if your ideology of good is making you into, like, an asshole.

Third: as we’ll see, altruism is like meth. No one is questioning two facts: that you should clean your room, and that meth helps you clean your room. No one ever did their first hit of meth, or even their nth hit, with the goal of becoming a methhead. Nor does everyone who does meth become a methhead. Many people can chip meth!

is it better to save a child in Laos, or wash your underwear—assuming that these have the same cost?

In my former position as a university extension specialist, I would tell people the best time to seed is this fall. The second-best time to seed? Next fall…

  high school kids vs. high-school kids (school kids on pot, or kids in high school)   one armed bandit vs. one-armed bandit (an armed bandit alone, or a bandit with one arm)   criminal law professors vs. criminal-law professors   small animal veterinarian vs. small-animal veterinarian   old boat dealer vs. old-boat dealer   bad weather report vs. bad-weather report   big business owner vs. big-business owner

then I saw your code, now I'm a believer 🎶

I feel very happy about them indeed because they take me to the destinations they promise (they're all nouns). Login doesn't take me to my login, which makes me sad. It does take me to a place where I can log in, however.

oh I'm fine with defective verbs. I'm not fine with inconsistency, though. Make it "Signup and login", and make it that on every SE page everywhere ever, and you can countin me.

"you can verb any noun". :) Though, comparing "ssh into a workstation" to "login to host.com", where "log in" exists, it's a bit like saying "entrance the building" when "enter the building" already works

Don't disregard it because it's cute.

Obviously, no one has time to read all those comments (if you do, please get a job).

I am ScaredDon't be :).

If “slow reading” is so liberating, why has every lit major with a Twitter feed written a thread about how they once loved big Russian novels such as Anna Karenina but now struggle to make it through lifestyle articles in the newspaper?

If you had solved this any faster, it would have been in the past. Maybe going forward you can start helping us before we ask? vim-oracle plugin?

Update 2 - I have confused myself as well.

This is one of the games ever made

One of a number of modern era movies where bank robbers wear funny faced masks. These films include 'Money Movers' (1980), 'BMX Bandits' (1983), 'Point Break' (1991) and 'Restless Natives' (1985).

The only thing we observe is that my organism was subjected to acute stress.

Since factory_bot_rails automatically loads factory definitions as your application loads, writing a definition like this would cause another Daniel to get added to your database every time you start the server or open a console. I like Daniels and all, but there is a limit.

The finding is supported by a related spike in face-lifts when elective surgeries opened last summer.

I have an idea: trigger a BSOD on unhandled promise rejection... just to teach users

I invite even the most cantankerous among you to review it.

A co-operative card game about assembling flat-pack furniture with your partner, and definitely not about your collapsing relationship.

Flatpack is just a slightly less crappy snap.

I've tried using my caveman logic

Question: Why a cable for a wireless keyboard? Answer: .noScriptDisplayLongText { display : none; } <style> .noScriptNotDisplayExpander { display : none; } .noScriptDisplayLongText { display : block; } </style> because it is not a wireless keyboard...

The classic SPA example is a to-do list. But, you know what? I don't like to-do lists. They make me think about all the things I have to do, many of which I don't want to do.So why don't we make a To-Don't List app? That way we can list all the things we're not going to do. Ever.

This sucks!I agree. Go complain on the Webpack issue tracker. They caused this.

If you don't learn from history, you're doomed to rebase it.

If width: 100% is your friend, then width: 100vw is the kid who only pretends to be your friend, so that he can swim in your pool. (I’ve never had a pool, but I know this kid exists from friends of mine who grew up with pools. Also, I am this kid)

I'll stop spamming contributing to this thread now and wait for official word from a TS repo maintainer.

I really hope they keep breaking it. Being the lead on a library for several years, most of the forced refactors were pretty straight forward and in almost every case made our code either more sound or easier to be consumed. Now I work on a runtime that embeds TypeScript and 3.5.1 has broken some code, thought it took me all of about 15 minutes to make the changes to adopt it, and in every case, it broke because we were being a bit loose with the types. While it didn't find any bugs, it made the code more "safe".

The Cat & Dog says meowoof?

What happens when you look it up in a dictionary rather than as a phrase in Google? Google just catalogues other people's [mis-]uses

I'm often asked to give talks at conferences, from which I've inferred that I'm a pretty good speaker - which is ironic since I really hate giving talks.

Have your wife stand on the handles of a bakers rolling pin, while you push and pull her around!

I'm glad I never got a master's degree in college!

In real life I ride a Ninja, the last in a line of many bikes over more than forty-five years. However, within this game I've apparently never ridden a sport bike. Or any motorcycle. Or a bicycle. Or watched people ride. Or walked upright. I'm playing with a Thrustmaster joystick, but frankly I might as well be controlling the bike with a Ouija board. If I can not hit a wall, it's a personal victory. Personal victories do not occur often. Instead of the feeling that I'm controlling an exquisitely balanced, steep fork angle sport bike, or even a full dress Harley with an enormously fat passenger and two flat tires, I feel like I'm controlling a rocket-powered lawnmower with several missing tires. Perhaps towing a couple trailers connected with springs. Dying fish don't flop around like me. In forty minutes I've not come close to anything resembling control, much less fun, and I've hit my limit on time I'm willing to throw at it. Wasted money for me; time to acknowledge my mistake, uninstall and get on with my life.

Using unfinished software to build an app that will be seen by millions of people is a risk, and in general I don't recommend it. But it has enabled us to develop the app much faster, and has made the framework itself much stronger than it otherwise would be.

Without links, the World Wide Web would be more appropriately called the World Wide Set Of Unrelated Pages, or, incidentally, WWSOUP.

I used to pull stunts like this all the time as soon as tables came. Really ugly, and may seriously embarrass any validator you run it trough: overlapping table cells. Works in most browsers though and even without css.

Anyway it's difficult to write too much about the game because it crashes on launch. Broken games don't get thumbs up. I have a dream that one day I'll play an indie game where they bothered testing it. Either way, don't buy broken games. Impossible to recommend.

This game gives me anger issues when i can't complete a level. And doing that over and over again is not good for your health. If you like having anger issues get the game.

But this answer does do exactly what is needed by some people who googled for this. And for that, we thank you.

Sustainable DistributionGavin uses an electric scooter to transport the games to the drop off points. He would use his electric bike but he is nervous of someone nicking it when He is in the post office. Gavin has a plant based diet. The diet reduces his carbon footprint and his emissions, which his wife is very happy about.

Environmentally friendly factoriesGavin uses the Cubiko Games workshop ‘factory’. Yes, it is a bit cold in the winter but, hey, I built it myself. Transporting goods from the ‘factory’ is very economical, it is about 20 metres from the factory to Gavins house via the garden. The worker in the ‘factory’ (Gavin) is committed to looking after the environment and tries his best to use every piece of wood to the best of his ability. The working conditions are great. (Flexi-time, unlimited food and drink breaks). No child labour. (Samuel sometimes ventures into the factory but we don’t put him to work).

Bugs The man page is longer than the program.

Developer of things

Yogi also said that "Half the lies they tell about me aren't true"

Dry humor is a delivery technique. As such, it shouldn't be confused with specific types of humor or with sarcasm. Sarcasm is delivered without humor because it's generally not funny but intended to mock or convey contempt. Dry humor pertains to something funny.

Certainly, if for some reason Python doesn't suit you either you can install, let us say, PHP language. Well, I think you realize that the searching of suitable solution can go on for a long time and may be only MS Visual Basic will be lacking in the list of results. So, I believe the time has already approached to put it all aside and come to to the Point.

If you'll sell it in the U.S. for less than 3948098 dollars, I'll pre-order. I've been wanting this game for quite a long time.I've got a copy of Fjords, I guess I should list it on the marketplace for 3948097 dollars.Only if you want to get rid of it for such a ridiculously low price!

If you want to know how your Parents/Grandparents raced before you are born or if you just want to make a travel back to good old Times before you got Children then this is absolutly for you.