Yes, but to what version? A patch version only, e.g. you released 1.0.0, so the "next" version is 1.0.1? Why not 1.1.0? You don't know ahead of time what version you'll be releasing until it's actually released

Rupert Read has the best idea I have heard re international climate negotiations: countries that are serious should have their own conference where they collaborate on strong targets, plans, etc. Part of which should be recognising the dangers of remaining reliant on the petrostates, planning to transcend that reliance and sanctioning them

I think the real question then becomes: Where do Ruby classes, who I can't find a meaningful folder in app

Using quotes for i in "$(cat $1)"; results in i being assigned the whole file at once. What should I change?

ActiveStorage has a different approach than what is suggested by @dhh here. The idea there seems to be to rule out a default and to explicitly set ActiveStorage::Current.url_options or by include ActiveStorage::SetCurrent. I don't understand why and asked about it in the Rails Forum. Maybe someone here can point out why we don't use a sensible default in ActiveStorage?

Is the column a boolean column? (i.e. what does User.columns_hash[:admin_created].type return?)

I’ve heard-suggested that ActiveSupport, which does a ton of monkey-patching of core classes, would make potentially-nice refinements. I don’t hold this opinion strongly, but I disagree with that idea. A big value proposition of ActiveSupport is that it is “omnipresent” and sets a new baseline for ruby behaviors - as such, being global really makes the most sense. I don’t know that anyone would be pleased to sprinkle using ActiveSupport in all their files that use it - they don’t even want to THINK about the fact that they’re using it.

If so, then how is sending a link for password reset any more secure? Isn't logging-in using a magic link the same thing as sending a magic link for resetting a password?

How can this be called an adjective? The postmodifier here is a participle phrase, 'built into the library'.

Our test raises an ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound exception. We know that Rails has special handling to return a 404 status code in this case. However, the request spec still raises the exception.

I am a developer, and we are developing the app for the customer, that will not publish through the google play store. But when we distribute the app to the customer, customer get that error. I want to avoid that alert of the Play stored.I want to understand, exactly which security concern has been break by my app.

I would like to understand this design then. In my experience it has only served to limit what I can achieve, and gained me no additional benefit.

Is the Client absolutely trusted with user credentials?

Which OAuth 2.0 Flow Should I Use?

Why was the SIGSTOP-ed process not responding to SIGTERM? Why does the kernel keeps it in the same state? Why did it get killed the moment it received the SIGCONT signal? If it was because of the previous SIGTERM signal, where was it kept until the process resumed?

Are There Other Methods to Copy Something?

An interesting fact here is that Rails deliberately chose to override the #initialize_dup method instead of the #initialize_copy method. Why would it do that? Let's investigate.

First, to clarify - what is "code", what is "data"? In this article, when I say "code", I mean something a human has written, that will be read by a machine (another program or hardware). When I say "data", I mean something a machine has written, that may be read by a machine, a human, or both. Therefore, a configuration file where you set logging.level = DEBUG is code, while virtual machine instructions emitted by a compiler are data. Of course, code is data, but I think this over-simplified view (humans write code, machines write data) will serve us best for now...

Is there a problem or not?If there is a problem, on which side is it? On the client or on the server side?

How much do we really need constants, anyway?

What's wrong with a simple, feel good movie?

So it actually replaces the file, not update? If that file is hard-linked, the the other link is unaffected?

My question is, wye is a sanitary tee directional? I maintain that a two way sweep would be a more efficient vent.

Does this daemon benefit me in anyway or is it only used for mismatched resolutions like 1440p with a 1080p display?

Question: Why a cable for a wireless keyboard? Answer: .noScriptDisplayLongText { display : none; } <style> .noScriptNotDisplayExpander { display : none; } .noScriptDisplayLongText { display : block; } </style> because it is not a wireless keyboard...

Do you have practical skills? Can you build useful things?

What steps did you take to get to that point? Did you create a project from a template? Which template?

The choice of stacking attributes should be based on:Do the attributes make sense when stacked vertically? and,When stacked vertically, does it save horizontal space?

What I don't understand is why you need to make it explicit? Given: function isBarAlsoFoo(obj: Bar): obj is Foo; Without resorting to any, how can we get any code to typecheck in which you pass an object that's not a Bar to isBarAlsoFoo()?

Is it possible to write a user defined type guard for a keyof string type such as keyOf foo when foo is defined ONLY as a type (and not in an array)?

Personally I think it is a very bad idea to leverage political views, even if I may share them, through software.

What if you only want to set the width though? I need "full site, at 1200px browser width", for example.

So why is it up to the developer (or content creator) to define whether or not a specific portion of the content can be linked to? When any page of content is created, there is no way of knowing which sections of the page are worthy of being identified.

CSS seems like the right place to put visual information. On the other hand, few would argue that image "src" should not be specified as an attribute and the height/width seem as tied to the binary image data as the "src" is.

What's the "correct" semantic way to specify image height and width? In CSS... width:15px; or inline... <img width="15" ?

Is there an OS agnostic way of doing this? I like the script command on macOS because you don't have to wrap the command in quotes. The script runs and sends output to the tty which is duplicated in the supplied file, but I can't seem to get the linux version to behave the same way... I'm probably doing something wrong. So what's the equivalent linux script command for this on macOS: script -q -t 0 tmp.out perl -e 'print "Test\n"' Test cat tmp.out Test

I just don't understand why a finished episodically released game is still offered episodic.

How is related /dev/ack with /dev/tty?

This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear or not useful Bookmark this question. Show activity on this post. I'm trying to filter the output of the mpv media player, removing a particular line, but when I do so I am unable to control mpv with the keyboard. Here is the command: mpv FILE | grep -v 'Error while decoding frame' When I run the command, everything displays correctly, but I am unable to use the LEFT and RIGHT keys to scan through the file, or do anything else with the keyboard. How do I filter the output of the program while retaining control of it?

When does “changed” not mean “modified”?

Which HTML tag I should use to enclose such notes to add a semantic meaning of a note that may be useful to read at a given point of a tutorial, but is not part of the main tutorial flow?

I respectfully disagree with your assessment. You are referencing the quote "It's not appropriate to use the aside element just for parentheticals, since those are part of the main flow of the document." However the OP specifically said that they are looking for a semantic element for "a note that may be useful to read at a given point of a tutorial, but is not part of the main tutorial flow". That is what "aside" is for. It's not part of the main content flow.

I have VIM on Mac & CentOS. So, I see people are writing about -xterm_clipboard, -lua, ... Is there an simple way to install it all? or we have to enable options one-by-one and compile/recompile it?

Does running nsgcepa by itself not then run the .desktop which in turn runs that command?

XDG stands for X Desktop Group aka freedesktop.org

Or even a simple 1-liner in the Contract that references an AR Model so you don't have to rewrite the validations again in that contract, or have to choose between writing the validations once either in the contract there or in the AR Model?

Essentially we're trying to figure out when it's appropriate for "my" code to become "everyones" code, and if there are steps in between. ("Standard library", for example.)

This semi-colon is added to prevent changing the code behaviour (the famous line ending with parentheses, etc) Most people will use a JS minifier If they don't, a single extra character is unlikely to change much If I'm right about all the above: Why don't we simply always add a semi-colon regardless of what the file ends with?

Thanks for posing that question @SamSaffron

When should I use link, vs dir, vs. tree?

To whom did you sell your keys and at what kind of rates? https://steamcommunity.com/id/playa131 for example resells them and might be the source for DIG's purchases.

Why then sending the SIGINT manually to the shell doesn't kill the child, e.g. 'kill -2 <shell-pid>' doesn't do anything to a child process while Ctrl-C kills it?

If you think you’ve conveyed something but the other person hears something completely different, is that their fault or yours? 

So the hard and unsolvable problem becomes: how up-to-date do you really need to be?

the most productive environment possible for people that use their computer to create.What is a productive environment?How do you measure productivity in an operating system environment?How do you compare YOUR distribution to other distributions when it comes to productivity?Is the way in which 'people that use their computer to create' (creators) the same across all professions and activities?Does a photographer have the same requirements for a productive environment as a software engineer?Why do you think your distribution will be the best for delivering a productive environment than any other Linux distribution?

It isn’t always guaranteed to be a single root element, in that case it could return an array of elements?

The use:action method seems cleaner, but aside from that, are there any underlying differences between these two methods that would make one preferred over the other in certain situations?

Get back to Chromium : how its evolution will be handled by Debian ? How its cousin-sister-child projects will be handled ( vivaldi, brave, electron… ) ?

What if your download UI element isn’t just for a single static asset, but is actually generating a custom file when you press it? For example, if you have a list of files, you can check as many as you want, and pressing a download UI element zips those files together and then downloads that one file. In this case, we’d be using JS anyway, and the UI element is triggering more than just the link, it is ‘performing actions’, so a button would make sense, right?

What best describes a download? Is it a triggered action, and therefore should be in the domain of the <button> element? Or is it a destination, and therefore best described using an <a> element?

Man, for some reason, I really like this answer. I recognize it's a bit more complicated, but it seems so useful. And given that I'm no bash expert, it leads me to believe that my logic is faulty, and there's something wrong with this methodology, otherwise, I feel others would have given it more praise. So, what's the problem with this function? Is there anything I should be looking out for here?

But many of these systems continue to re-request the same DTDs from our site thousands of times over, even after we have been serving them nothing but 503 errors for hours or days. Why are these systems bothering to request these resources at all if they don’t care about the response?

Could you please explain why it is a vulnerability for an attacker to know the user names on a system? Currently External Identity Providers are wildly popular, meaning that user names are personal emails.My amazon account is my email address, my Azure account is my email address and both sites manage highly valuable information that could take a whole company out of business... and yet, they show no concern on hiding user names...

Why not Template Literals?

Could I get your intuition for why that rule of thumb applies to svelte components but not Javascript functions? I tend to make heavy use of let x = e when writing normal Javascript, as I do in most other languages (though unlambda is a notable exception). How is svelte different?

Why do I need a global variable? Is the global requirement from ES6 modules (I'd have thought modules would be in a functional scope) or rollup?

<slot ref:img data-visible="{{visible}}" /> In the above everything on <slot> is lost since slot is a space in the HTML, not an actual element. How could we translate this to zero or ten elements inside the slot?

Is there a good way to do this given the compiler won't know at build time what events are needed? Should I make a wrapper that does addEventListener myself with a bind:this? Would be nice if Svelte could handle dynamic events though.

"When an OP rejects your edit, please do not edit it back in!" Correspondingly, when a user repeatedly does try to edit, understand that something in your framing isn't working right, and you should reconsider it.

So, which is better? t.inspect # => "2007-11-01 15:25:00 8483885939586761/68719476736000000 UTC" t.inspect # => "2007-11-01 15:25:00.123456789000000004307366907596588134765625 UTC"

So why isn't there an easy way to remove an element from such an array in a way that respects both the order and number (count) of each element? Why do all methods for removing elements from an array assume that you always want to remove all matching elements from the receiver, with no option to do otherwise?

In this case, we notice that comment.post and post should belong to the same database object. But, is Rails smart enough to know that the comment should be removed from both of the associations? Or are comment.post and post different representations of the same database row?

shouldn't a MR be treated as an unit of work, independent from master?

Over the years, many people have said "well, the data is public anyway by virtue of it having been breached, what's the problem if you now store the password in your system?" Here's the philosophical problem I have with that:

What data is being collected? How is that data being collected?

For which specific purposes are the data collected? Analytics? Email Marketing?

What is the Legal basis for the collection?

According to man bash, however, non-interactive shells don't even read these files:

How Does Olive Oil Lose It's Virginity?