The snapport is the area of the scroll container to which the snap areas are aligned. By default, it is the same as the visual viewport of the scroll container, but it can be adjusted using the scroll-padding property.

#gallery { scroll-snap-type: x mandatory; overflow-x: scroll; display: flex; } #gallery img { scroll-snap-align: center; }

This works somewhat well in practice, but there are many cases where the inference is incorrect. As a particularly egregious example, :not(#foo) targets all elements except one, yet enjoys the same high specificity as #foo.

minmatar: #653834 gallente: #366565 caldari: #4a6c7f amarr: #7f6c50

They do provide one, via CSS tab-size (which sites and user styles can both set). also, GitHub will obey .editorconfig in a repo and display tabs at the resulting width (via that CSS), so nobody has had to use spaces on GitHub.com for many many years.

Use box-shadow for UI elements like cards and buttons, and drop-shadow() for images or elements with transparency, ensuring the shadow follows their shape.

The drop-shadow() function applies shadows to images while respecting transparency, whereas box-shadow applies to the entire bounding box of an element.

when an element has a valuedefined using a length (px, em, rem, and so forth), its computed value is inherited bychild elements.

Determine if the content of an element is overflowing

Positions the dropdownmenu below the togglebutton

On the absolutely positioned dropdown-menu, you used left: 0 to align its left sidewith the left side of the dropdown. Then you used top: 2.1em to place its top edgebeneath the label (with the padding and border, the label is about 2.1 em tall). A

remove the word close from your markup and replaceit with an ×, but this would introduce an accessibility problem: a

inset-inline: 20%

Its initial value is auto,

inline style

a selector has more IDs,

hree different types, or origins, of stylesheets

remain below

RandomTimeline

This tip works well on small sites that don’t have a lot of CSS. Inlining your CSS removes an external request from your critical path and speeds up page rendering times! If your CSS file is small enough, this is a simplification/end-around for Critical CSS approaches

word-wrap

I think this is one of those situations where it's easy to confuse “familiar” with “simple”. You're probably much more comfortable with min-width than flex-shrink, but that doesn't mean flex-shrink is more complicated!

✅ We can actually use a neat trick which basically consists in making a CSS grid with a single grid item. All we really have to do then, is taking our grid-template-rows and make it transition from 0fr to 1fr: this way, our grid item will transition from 0 to its "natural" height. It's THAT simple:

In addition to that issue, too many new developers also jump into learning frameworks too early in their education; the prospect of not having to practice writing vanilla CSS is very tempting. As a result, many developers do not get enough CSS practice under their belts to solidify the fundamentals of this very important language.

I’m sure you can imagine, the ability to shift an element around based on its regular position is pretty useful. I find myself using this to line up form elements many times that have a tendency to not want to line up how I want them to.

The default positioning mode that you’ve gotten used to is position: static.

Welcome to CSSBattleThe funnest multiplayer game with 300K+ web designers & developers. Replicate the target images using CSS - the shorter your code, the higher your score! Happy coding!

It’s become very popular to use viewport units for responsive typography – establishing font-sizes that grow and shrink depending on the current viewport size. Using simple viewport units for font-size has an interesting (dangerous) effect. As you can see, fonts scale very quickly – adjusting from unreadably small to extra large in a very small range.

So to reiterate my conclusion: I definitely prefer using relative units to define font-size so that you can respect the user’s settings, but I don’t personally think it’s a big deal if your layout is complex enough that you cannot support it. If you’re using rem for fonts, then I slightly prefer using pixels for elements such as margin and padding, but there is nothing wrong with using rem for that, if you prefer that scaling effect.

I don't particularly recommend that you just use this in its unaltered state in your own projects. It should be tweaked, edited, extended, and otherwise tuned to match your specific reset baseline.

To counter this, many developers start their projects with a “CSS Reset”; a file that undoes browser defaults, so that every element behaves the same in every browser.

The problem with this is that there is no guarantee that different browsers will style everything the same. In general, inconsistencies are going to be pretty minor, but they DO exist.

It was an intentional decision to make the items in the dropdown of content editor span two lines instead of one. The reason being that sometimes the text can get too long and the dropdown spans the entire width of page which isn't ideal. Also, a slimmer dropdown looks better on mobile devices.

CSS-generated content is not included in the DOM. Because of this, it will not be represented in the accessibility tree and certain assistive technology/browser combinations will not announce it. If the content conveys information that is critical to understanding the page's purpose, it is better to include it in the main document.