15 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2019
    1. Many types of comment described in Reagle’s Reading the Comments - from likes and faves, to emojis and reactions, ratings, upvotes and downvotes - are contemporary kin of the small hands (☞) that twelfth century scribes drew while working in their scriptoriums to indicate importance.8Piper, Book Was There, 7.

      Could these be included in Edward Tufte's definition of a sparkline in some sense? If not included, they're certainly an interesting typographic precursor.

  2. May 2019
  3. May 2018
  4. Nov 2016
    1. , which are enforced by default in RASH,

      "(used by default by RASH)" in paranthesis

    2. just an empty link

      This functionality is sweet - but it seems to be partially broken in the PeerJ PDF for the section references (But not tables!)

    3. πr2

      This came out as just "r²" in the PeerJ PDF (pi symbol was missing).

    4. orthogonality

      Use italics on the new concepts orthogonality and assemblability

  5. May 2016
    1. Figure 6-1 shows how the font metrics apply to glyph dimensions, and Table 6-1 lists the method names that correlate with the metrics. See the various method descriptions for more specific information.

      Useful diagram illustrating the various metrics of fonts. Unfortunately many of these are not currently accessible using Web Platform APIs.

  6. Feb 2016
    1. Let’s instead choose numbers because they fit, because they look good, and because they serve the meaning of the design.
    2. In some ways it’s different from how we already work, but it feels more natural. Going from content out, rather than canvas in, to paraphrase Mark Boulton, is a more web native way of designing
  7. Jan 2016
  8. Sep 2015
    1. So to sum up: It should be an active design choice whether you want to enable users to change the font size independently to parts of or all layout and graphics. If so, pixels will probably not be your friend. If not, I’d say it’s mainly a matter of personal taste and/or project.

      This is good guidance on when/whether to use em vs. px sizing

  9. Apr 2015
    1. Set body copy as justified left, ragged right?

      I'm a huge fan of justified text. I don't know why a typography checklist would encourage "ragged right". I do understand that humans can sometimes make better decisions about stretching character spacing (or not) and breaking words with hyphens at line boundaries, but computers do pretty well and it's so nice.

    2. Limit line length to 350–550 pixels by splitting wide pages into two or more columns?

      Why would you measure line length in px rather than characters?