1,540 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2018
    1. %0#$!204%).!<&%!#0I!0'()4$*&#46!1*22,34%:(2$!50!%0J0%20'!*#$&!$.0!204%).!<&%!$.0*%!*#2$*$($*&#46!*#J0%20^!0'()4$*&#46!5,64%I.*).!.0*;.$0#!$.0!&BB&%$(#*$/!<&%!04).!&#0!$&!$%4#2<&%:!04).!:&:0#$!&<!.*2!6*J*#;!*#$&!&#0!&<!604%#*#;O!2.4%*#;O

      Networks (back and forth) not funnels (one way). If this isn't a summing up of CLMOOC, I don't know what is.

    2. J0%0$$!?0*:0%K!

      Reimer was good friends with Illich when they were both in Puerto Rico. Classic networking IRL. Here is a free copy of Reimer's book, School Is Dead.

  2. Mar 2018
    1. ti-blackness.

      and anti-everything-but-white-ness

    2. A pedagogy of healing

      I highlighted this callout text three time before I tried to comment here. pause I don't want to be a pedagogue. I am not a healer. I don't even know how to heal others. Most healers will tell you that mostly they just facilitate self-healing. Is this a possible healing? pause I haven't read all of this yet, but I am not sure I want the responsibility of 'transformative tools' that get applied to others. Maybe we can open up a space for all students to choose tools of transformation that are apt for them.

    3. A game to play as you begin this annotation or one to end with after you have done with it: an empathy map.

      Here is another set of directions.

    1. wintry fever

      the opposite of green fuse? simply another season? Two seasons:the quick and the dead, zero and one, love and death, time and ...nothingness?

    2. time has ticked a heaven round the stars

      omg, the heavens are a clock, there is a second hand ticking, as it ticks it creates the heavens. Time is the greater creator and destroyer. It ticks into the present and we are here and it ticks again and we are gone, to be replaced by another and another tick.

    3. heaven

      I thought of heaven as an eternity, no time, time out of time.

    4. The first stanza describes the human condition.

    5. The lips of time

      is the force, time?


    6. I am dumb

      I can speak.

    7. I am dumb

      I am dumb

    8. leech

      not a happy tone--parasitic. time is a parasite. it sucks time from us in order to live?

    9. I am dumb

      ironic--he isn't dumb is he? He is speaking out loud in a mysterioius way?

    10. The hand

      is this the force by another name?

    11. I am dumb

      The "I" could also be generalized to us all.

    12. The force

      It occurs to me that the poet is doing the opposite of what we usually think--the repetition is at the beginning of the line. And the poet is complaining and comparing constantly. What's with that?

    13. Drives my green age

      comparison between flower and poet.

    14. drives

      drives it like the spring in a clock? Driven? Suggests no choice.

    15. green fuse

      suggests a bomb?

    16. force

      suggests something powerful and abstract

  3. Feb 2018
    1. clothes.

      perfect rhyme, except for "clothes"?

    2. liquefaction

      Four silken syllables.

    3. Then, then

      The first "then" arrests our attention much like Julia in silk has arrested Herrick's attention. The second then starts time back again (methinks). LOL, he really isn't thinking very much is he?

    4. silks

    5. Julia

      And who is Julia?

    1. The aim of the laborer should be, not to get his living, to get "a good job," but to perform well a certain work; and, even in a pecuniary sense, it would be economy for a town to pay its laborers so well that they would not feel that they were working for low ends, as for a livelihood merely, but for scientific, or even moral ends. Do not hire a man who does your work for money, but him who does it for love of it.

      Quote in Miya Tokumitsu article "In the Name of Love"

    2. idler

      reminds me of The Idler magazine in UK

    3. yield more real profit, though but little money,

      LOve how he uses the language of business against itself.

    4. I think that there is nothing, not even crime, more opposed to poetry, to philosophy, ay, to life itself, than this incessant business.

      Thoreau is unstoppable in how he counters commerce. Still fresh.

    5. Let us consider the way in which we spend our lives.

      No bullshit.

  4. Jan 2018
    1. statewide budget cuts

      not just a wku problem

    2. To help increase enrollment,

      possible solutions to enrollment issues

    3. April as to the actual fiscal challenge.”

      Nothing will begin to happen until April and later.

    4. an additional $10 million is being counted toward the deficit to account for “proposed fixed costs and enrollment changes.”

      final 10 million here. So vague: what are tixed costs and what kinds of enrollment changes?

    5. current deficit is due to enrollment issues.

      enrollment is due in part to decreasing enrollment in general.

    6. a decrease in international enrollment,

      problem: decrease in international enrollment will mean more deficit in the future.

    7. used one-time dollars

      solution: but not sustainable.

    8. “A $40 million lift for an institution of this size is five times the magnitude of any reduction we’ve experienced,” Caboni said. “Eight million dollars is the largest cut the institution has negotiated through.”

      An amazing fact: this is five times the problem we have ever had.

    9. add $9 million to the budget deficit.

      here is another 9 million. that gets it up to 30 million. Where is the rest?

    10. Caboni said there will be difficult decisions that have to be made, including looking at a “reduction of staff.”

      Consequences: staff cutbacks. How is "staff" defined?

    11. President Timothy Caboni estimated that WKU could have a budget deficit of almost $40 million, if statewide budget cuts proposed by Gov. Matt Bevin go into effect.

      Our problem: a large deficit.

    1. “To be completely cured of newspapers, spend a year reading the previous week’s newspapers.”— Nassim Taleb

      So true. I was raised in a time when the speed of news was accurate. The tempo between news and its making was roughly the same. Now...Taleb has got it right.

    2. “What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention, and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it.”

      This quote, standing alone, utterly re-imagines my role and the need from my role in teaching and learning. Bring it.

    1. seeps inthrough thecracks

      I don't know whether it is the dark that seeps through or the light. Or both.

    2. a fear more friend thanfoe in the knowledgeit seems to knowof me.

      This is a glorious line, shining with truth and aid. thanks.

    3. It's small wonder

      a small wander, too, a random walk in the fields and woods, the landscape and the inscape.

    1. seeps inthrough thecracks

      I don't know whether it is the dark that seeps through or the light. Or both.

    2. a fear more friend thanfoe in the knowledgeit seems to knowof me.

      This is glorious line, shining with truth and aid. thanks.

    3. It's small wonder

      a small wander, too, a random walk in the fields and woods, the landscape and the inscape.

    1. My apologies to great questions for small answers.

      Humans are so very...lame. We mostly are only capable of small beer and badly played pub trivia. Our lives are often small answers to great questions.

    2. May my dead

      Whose dead? His dead. Who is dead? Depends on your life. Who is dead in your own life? We forget. We all forget. We all forget even those who we loved the most. That is worth begging forgiveness for, dontcha think?

    3. necessity. My apologies to necessity

      Linking necessity to chance and apologizing to both if mistaken. Mistaken about what?

    4. My apologies

      Emotional tone of apology. Apology for what? to whom? These are the templates implied by the word 'apology'.

    5. Under One

      Classic assonance under and one. Why do that? Because it hints at another inner rhyme--sun, a small star.

    1. what kind of ‘productive interruptions’ and pauses might come our way in 2018.

      Some of my most productive pauses are destructive ones that are part of the path toward creating. For example, I get to teach a composition class of 24 with more than half of my students being Saudi. I have always had international students in my classes. My department head says it is because I am a softie. That is not a compliment in the unholy land of 'rigor'. So this class gives me great pause. How the fuck can I rise to this challenge? I think I have to break a great many sacred pedagogical icons along the way, but I don't know for sure how to go about it. Knowing political conditions in Saudi Arabia right now, a 'rigorous' approach might will be an indirect death sentence. Now that gives me pause.

  5. Dec 2017
    1. Much happens in dreams that tests the boundaries of believability

      Dreams don't care 'bout no verisimilitude. Dreams are psycho-stress tests? Dreams are bullies that make us believe in them. We bully ourselves. Teasing out the consequences of this sentence makes me realize how deep and rich and ...consequential it is. This sentence stands alone as a meaning rich objects much like a sculpture.

    2. an accusation made when you’re running out the door?

      Yeah, this is the last refuge of passive-aggressive personality.

    3. Style

      Style is a cool word. I think of it as having a couple of different senses--shallow and deep. I think Dyer is warning us to adopt the deeper sense of it--an organic characteristic emerging from the depths of one's self.

    1. Self-organization here means the agents interacting “locally”, following their own rules and intentions, without any steering from outside that particular event. All influence takes place in the layered, local events.
    2. The network is a complex system consisting of a large number of agents/nodes behaving according to their own principles of local, self-organizing interaction. No one agent or group of agents, determines how the system as a whole behaves. It is about self-organization.
    3. We often think of individuals as independent and self-contained. The view suggested here sees individuals as nodes of the complex networks they form when interacting with others, co-creating themselves and the reality in which they participate.
    1. Still at a starting point, we have neither ‘advanced’ nor remained unmoved.

      The cover of Ken Macrorie's textbook, The I-Search Paper, has a moebius strip on it, reflecting this sentiment nicely.<br>

      But the conceit of the moebius strip extends from the back cover as well

      So, you start reading this book on the back cover, nice twist, just like in a moebius strip. You work through the text by doing. Then when you are done, you get to the end and out the back of the book you go onto the back cover, to enter again. Escher would approve. That is what I see happening here. In the end this process serves the product, the text that is produced for anyone concerned.

    2. a pedagogy of small

      I love this phrase. I am reminded of Robert Twigger's splendid book Micromastery. The subtitle to his book is "learn small, learn fast", i.e. pedagogies of small.

      That takes me in a natural way to Buckminster Fullers metaphor of the "trim tab". Ho loved that idea so much, he put it on his grave stone.

      Let's find the trim tabs, the micromasteries, the small pedagogies that might work as we learn together. That is the kind of we-search I can support. Wholly.

    1. We need a new kind of public sphere: a platform in the cloud where data and metadata would be our common good, dedicated to the recording and collaborative exploitation of memory in the service of our collective intelligence. The core values orienting the construction of this new public sphere should be: openness, transparency and commonality

      A manifesto if ever I saw one.

  6. Nov 2017
    1. I hate to seem greedy—I have so much to be thankful for already.

      Thankfulness can be a declaration of privilege, of shouting to the heavens, "Look at me and what all I gots." Thankfulness could be like Raymond Carver says, just waiting for the glory of what happens next in a state of wonder. Agog.

    1. This grasshopper, I mean-

      Did he who made the swan and the bear make thee? All things bright and beautiful, All creatures great and small, All things wise and wonderful: The Lord God made them all.

    2. Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?

      A "one-two" jab, right cross combination to the head. I am down for the count.

    3. Who made the world? Who made the swan, and the black bear? Who made the grasshopper?

      Reminds me of William Blake's "The Tyger"


    1. Sing, birds, in every furrow!

      I have seen this I have seen these spare birds Sparrows Feasting in a furrow of newly plowed ground then with utter seeming joy lift their heads and thrill and shrill.

    2. I love the repetition.

    3. and re-inspired by Dogtrax.

      Inspired-breathed in re-inspired-and again in

    4. Blackbird and thrush in every bush,

      the thump of this line delivers

    5. shrill

      I love what the OED brings to this poem.

      shrill, v.


      Also 4 schrille, 4–6 shrille, 5 shrelle, [skrille], 6–7 shril.

      [f. shrill a. Cf. G. schrillen.]

      1.1 intr. Of a voice, cry: To sound shrilly. Hence of noises, the wind, or the like, or a place echoing with sound.

         13‥ K. Alis. 777 Bulsifal neied so loude, That hit schrillith into the cloude!    1582 Stanyhurst Æneis ii. 35 The inner lodgins dyd shrille with clamorus howting.    1591 Spenser Virg. Gnat 518 Their mightie strokes so shrild, As the great clap of thunder.    1647 H. More Song of Soul ii. App. iii, Its tearing noise so terribly did shrill, That it the heavens did shake.    1782 Mickle Proph. Q. Emma iv, When the female scream ascended, Shrilling o'er the crowded lawn.    1811 Scott Don Roderick ii. xix, First shrill'd an unrepeated female shriek!    1842 Tennyson Morte d'Arthur 201 A wind, that shrills All night in a waste land.    1884 L. Wallace Ben-Hur iv. iv. 166 His voice shrilled with passion.

      2.2 To speak, cry, or sing with a shrill voice; to make a shrill noise. a.2.a Of persons or animals.

         [c 1400 Anturs of Arth. xlviii, Þene his lemmane one loft skrilles and skrikes.]    c 1440 Floriz & Bl. (MS. T) 756 Þe mayde, al for drede, Bygan to shrelle [earlier MSS. crie, schrichen] and to grede.    1595 Spenser Epithal. 82 The Ouzell shrills, the Ruddock warbles soft.    1598 Florio, Querulare‥to shril, to‥chirp.    1639 H. Ainsworth Annot. Ps. v. 12 To showt, shrill, or cry aloud for sorrow.    1837 Carlyle Fr. Rev. III. ii. vi. (1872) 81 The Tribune drones,‥the whole Hall shrilling up round it into pretty frequent wrath and provocation.    1896 A. Austin England's Darling i. ii, The misselthrush That shrilled so gleefully.

      b.2.b Of an instrument of music, whistle, etc.

         1579 Spenser Sheph. Cal. Nov. 71 Breake we our pypes, that shrild as lowde as Larke.    1590 ― F.Q. ii. iii. 20 A horne, that shrilled cleare Throughout the wood.    1710 Philips Pastorals iv. 56 Thro' all the Wood his Pipe is heard to shrill.    1842 Tennyson Sir Galahad 5 The shattering trumpet shrilleth high.    1879 E. Gosse New Poems 100 The first sharp snow is shrilling through the trees.    1903 Kipling Five Nations 114 The whistle shrills to the picket.

      3.3 trans. To utter, give forth (a sound, cry, words) in shrill tones; to exclaim or proclaim with a shrill voice. Also with out.

         1595 Spenser Epithal. 129 Harke, how the Minstrels gin to shrill aloud Their merry Musick.    1606 Shakes. Tr. & Cr. v. iii. 84 Harke‥How poore Andromache shrils her dolour forth.    1613 Heywood Silver Age iii. i, Through all th' Abysse, I haue shril'd thy daughters losse.    1613 ― Brazen Age ii. ii, What better can describe his shape and terror Then all the pittious clamours shrild through Greece?

         1801 Lusignan I. 173 The terror of the feathered tribe, shrilled in the omens of an approaching tempest.    1817 Coleridge Biog. Lit. xxi. (1882) 205 Gnats, beetles, wasps,‥may shrill their tiny pipes‥unchastised and unnoticed.    1837 Carlyle Fr. Rev. I. v. ii, ‘Messieurs’, shrills de Brézé.    1904 M. Hewlett Queen's Quair i. vii, Lethington likened her to Diana on Taygetus shrilling havoc.    1947 A. Ransome Great Northern? i. 16 Roger's voice shrilled out, ‘Sail HO!’    1975 New Yorker 16 June 97/3 It was a lapse on Miss Sills' part to shrill out a high E flat at the end of the first finale, but otherwise she was tender, touching, and sensitive.

      4.4 To render shrill. rare—1.

         1772 Foote Nabob Prol. Wks. 1799 II. 285 If age contracts my muscles, shrills my tone.

      5.5 To summon with a shrill sound. rare—1.

         1859 Masson Brit. Novelists iii. 204 The pibroch shrills them to the work they do.

    6. Wings from the wind to please her mind,

      wings...wind..her mind

    1. The heart of the world lies open, leached and ticking with sunlight

      I am reminded of Tom Waits' "Heart of a Saturday Night", a song of gratitude. I want this sung at my funeral.



    2. Two ravens circle and twist.                 On the borders of heaven, the river flows clear a bit longer.


      Just magix.

      Ravens casting their familiar spell.

      The margins of heaven responding.

      The river clearing, the mind untroubled.

      Now and for a little longer.

    3.  some sway, some don’t sway.

      glad for the delightful ambiguity--the pines, the readers, the poet

    4. evening feed                                                                             into

      love the caesura here. the pause in phrasing aloud and the pause in print as well.

      I am grateful to know that matters to the poet. It matters to me.

    1. berries not by the work of our hands, berries not by the work of our fingers.


      what have you been given today?

      is your blood warmth breathing and pulsing?

      Is there a solid road under you?

      is there a dog adoring you?

      is there thick crusted bread?

      is there sense being made nearby?

      is there a garden feeding you?

      is your air, unmediated and pure?

      is your water cold and good?

      what have you been given?

      if that was taken,

      what would you still have?

      of that,

      what would you still need?

    2. I love how the writer bookends the observation: "I wonder what I am, that anyone should note me." with the end of the poem: "Here there are blueberries, there is no need to note me." Problem and solution. Call and response.

    3. bright clouds

      blueberry sky quince clouds bread thick with life meadow margins a blanket of "I am" in a meadow of "No need"

    4. wonder

      What we are given

      in this one sweet life

      is what we have already earned

      by virtue of being alive.

      Do not wonder at that.

      Do not sow.


    5. And for this, I did nothing, not even wonder.

      From Matthew 6:24–33 (King James Version "KJV"): No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment? Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

    1. this God, this laughter of the morning


      Laughter is spoken.

      God speaks Through laughter.

      Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make laugh.

    2. I am reminded of how grateful I am that she lived as long as she did before her suicide. I feel the same feelings toward David Foster Wallace and his Kenyon commencement address. Grateful...then sad, but mostly grateful and glad to be alive to read and share their genius.

    3. The Joy that isn’t shared, I’ve heard,dies young.

      Every morning we can

      My wife and I

      on our front porch swing


      the news that stays news

      at the end of our eyes

      and ears

      and nose

      and tongue

      and finger tips.

      This is not capital

      of any kind,

      not interest

      or dividend earned

      or profit plowed back

      It is the ante

      we pay each other

      to play

      this infinite game.

    4. though often forget,to give thanks

      We are alive



      and to


      but not to

      the inscape of God

    1. Try to praise

      You must

      You should


      the mutilated world

    2. the gentle light that strays and vanishes
    3. returns

    4. the gray feather a thrush lost

    5. nettles

      nettles and exiles, nettle because of exiles, mutilated lives, one rising from the other

    6. wild strawberries

      the tang of wild blackberries dancing that tango on my tongue.

    7. mutilated world.

      I am grateful for memory even though it incomplete, perhaps mutilited.

  7. Oct 2017
    1. Forsaken

      To sake? for someone else's sake? before saken?

      Forsaken=morally abandoned?

    1. embedded

      I like this word. Why? Because it reminds me of 'embodied'. Writing is complex, networked, social, and apt. Although something that is appropriate might be variable. YMMV.

    2. Composing
    3. many purposes

      And many audiences...only one direct ref to audiences-"the relationship between readers and writers". I think audience and awareness for audience is even more important than purpose or rather it is intertwined with purpose. Did I miss it here?

    1. Face-time is over-valued.

      Face time needs to be redefined.

    2. we are the campus.

      Sometimes our words are so confining. "Campus" ties us down to so many associations. It is part of a larger system. Is distance learning a part of the system or is it an emerging something else with its own set of connections? And should it be? And can it be both/and?

  8. Sep 2017
    1. How does a close technical study of the machinery of a poem — and for the New Criticism it was poetry that defined literature — advance any larger project?

      This question should be at the heart of literary work whatever that is. We have failed to realize that self-justification is only part of the duty we owe our discipline and our society. And because we ignore it governors like Matt Bevin in Kentucky can remark with impugnity that we just need to get rid of 'subjects' that don't make with enough majors. Darwinism in the classroom. More like slaughter. If you don't pushback at every opportunity, if you don't make the case, then you lose.

    2. Somehow all this had been settled.

      Yes, settled in its own irrelevance.

    3. become credentialed in this pastime and then employed so I could teach others to experience the same pleasure I did in the presence of great literature

      I only came to this later in my life. But it is now part of what I want to do with all of the rest of my life.

    4. all this is to experience at once a sense of weightlessness, of a liberating distance from oneself and the here and now, and an exhilarating feeling of power.

      This is what I feel when I use online social annotation tools like Hypothes.is. Shared sense with the author and with other readers working their way through.

    5. Teaching textual interpretation is crucial to forming citizens

      The assertion should be obvious, but is it?

    6. Geoffrey Galt Harpham
  9. tachesdesens.blogspot.com tachesdesens.blogspot.com
    1. Quite naturally during our conversation, we moved from a submission to a conference, from informal conversation to agreement that we would capture our conversation, to agreement that we work together on reflective practice and extend our conversations within our local community.

      The teflon of abstraction vs. the velcro of the real. This summing up must seem real to you and not an abstraction, but for me it slides off like butter on a non-stick pan. And of necessity, too. Working out loud is a difficult form of writing for the reader. Protracted, drawn out, painfully detailed. Perhaps sliding off just like abstraction. Observing here the paralysis of conversation.

    2. Can you hear the beauty?
    3. I hear a blackbird sing
    4. How do we situate our practice in a world governed by platform capitalism?

      http:////zeega.tellio.club/33 (Play it twice if you have a slow net connection.)

    5. "What are we/they ACTUALLY doing? That's what matters." Peter Goodyear.
    6. We are born, we move, we die and then we know no more.
    7. [Chorus]

      For most of us, all by the light of the accident of DNA and migration and the forces in history.

    9. IN DEED.

    10. Where is the space for those without voices?

      Somewhere else. Not here. Lots of somewheres, not here. Weeping. Numb. Alive?

    11. Sir John Franklin
    12. Bonnie's keynote
    13. "What are we/they ACTUALLY doing? That's what matters." Peter Goodyear.

      Something adjacent to this by the late Graham Nuthall,"It really cut me when I found out that there were things happening in the classroom between the children and I didn't know it was happening...they were talking in a voice I could not hear." The Hidden Lives of Learners (12)

  10. Aug 2017
    1. “The Draize eye test,

      Stringing quotes together as nuggets of argument. Asking quotes to speak for themselves. Better, more particular sources needed.

    2. There are

      Sentences stand alone and don't work as a team. Unlike the one in the gif below.

  11. Jul 2017
    1. This is a fascinating discussion? What are the next steps in the process of annotation?Of course, the first level of notes is an important part of the conversation, but is a deeper and wider version of the conversation implied here? Some signals amped up, some damped down? Where happens next as a flashmob? Love how hypothes.is is such a powerful tool for connected learning. Further connections?

    1. Learners “apprentice” themselves to a group of people who share a certain set of practices

      Apprenticeship invokes reciprocated duties and rights. You really need these to flow both ways or you get master/slave, colonizer/colonized relationships. These asymmetric power relationships are easy to abuse.

    1. guidelines

    2. rules

    3. respond to others

      This has so many ways of working.

    4. Feel free to introduce yourself

      Or un-troduce yourself. You are invited.

  12. Jun 2017
    1. something we’d do

      It's something I might do if it was a public person making public utterances.

    2. hat apply to tweets containing a particular hashtag

      Yes, but only as it applies to those who agree to be bound by it. Hashtag wars? Not really seeing this yet.

    3. can I request


    4. owned by individuals or groups of individuals?

      Governed by the idea of usufruct. We can use the fruit of the tree but we can't own the tree. And we must not use the fruit exclusively.

    5. the status of hashtags

      they are part of the commons

    1. Mastodon has a lot of echo.

      Mastodon has been a convivial tool for me, but not for anything having to do with #digciz.

    2. "Hello, Hello, Anybody there?"

      I felt this way the first week in #digciz and it was downhill from there on except for a few blips on the heart monitor.

    1. what honouring is

      Acknowledging others as being on the same boat in the same storm and working to make sure those others understand that.<br> Not ignoring or worse giving a little begrudging flick of attention. Oh my, that is the worst.

    2. Worthy of a page note: https://youtu.be/RYlCVwxoL_g

    1. persona

      What is a persona? A mask? Purposeful or just practical?

    2. Week 2 of #digciz June 2017 is coming to and end.

      Should they end? Maybe we should consider the "long tail" here? Or is that game worth the candle? A good facilitating citizen might just cast their eye to those who participated and continue to encourage a connection.

    1. Virtually connecting, we were massive.

      Not really. Not really virtual. Ghostly, yes. Transparent, no. Opaque? Mos' def'

    2. We lived in the gaps between the stories.” 

      Marginaliacs, the marginalized, precarity to the edge.

    3. “I want everything back, the way it was. But there is no point to it, this wanting.” 

      The arrow of time is a bitch. You can't go home again. Suffering is often our only recourse.

    4. Who will be having to revise the lesson?

      Yes, revising the very idea of a lesson. V. Rao notes:

      34/ There is perhaps a distinction between a n00b and an expert, but it is highly localized around specific corners of the rhizome. You can go from n00b to expert and back to n00b in 2 steps. 44/ If you can only navigate well-paved paths and clean, well-lit spaces, you'll likely spend a lot of time in low-value, or even futile, ritualized behaviors while getting nothing done.

      45/ You must be willing to adopt an opportunistic approach to navigating complexity, and switch from ugly hack to elegant beauty, from amateurish fumble to expert flourish, in an instant.

    5. A guy from the STASI listening through walls to the lives of others. A guy from Facebook collecting data on the interests, the emotions, the friendships, the movements, of others.

    6. “A rat in a maze is free to go anywhere, as long as it stays inside the maze.” 

      Free speech zones

    7. I will your existence

      I 'won't' your existence. I am 'notting' your existence. as always for a purpose.

    8. whooping with joy

      virtual killing...sounds a lot like ritual killing.

    9. You have to create an it

      A word "it". A language "it". Does the cat create an 'it' just before she pounces on the mouse? Is language a way to transmogrify? For what purpose do we turn stuff into "its",

    1. toughest

      I look forward to learning what "toughest" means--as a character attribute or as a teacher characterization expressing how difficult Abaham was to 'teach' or...?

  13. May 2017
    1. no clear absolute orientation around an up, and no clear distinction between horizontal and vertical.

      0, 1, and 'don't care'.

    1. a writer with a large audience

      I am surprised that someone who puts forth such a pugilistic attitude on her webpage could be so thin-skinned about public annotation. She says she is: a troublemaker, a rabble rouser, picks fights on the internet, and says she's not afraid. Yet...she begs to be left alone, our own edtech Greta Garbo. Maybe her problem is not hypothes.is but instead hypocri.sy?

    2. Here is what I wrote in the comment section:

      Anyone who shuts down their comments or margins because of a troll has just enabled that particular troll to rob us all of the benefits of that channel.

      I love how in discussions I have had that the commenting behavior in the margins is characterized as "non-consensual annotation". Annotation as rape. What a concept. That is concept creep of the first magnitude and an outrage to all the folks who are just wanting to share and talk and learn.

      I consider publicly published materials to be part of the intellectual commons and as such useable, remixable, quotable, and annotateable by all. To nix comments and annotations is the same as enclosing the commons. That was the death of freehold agriculture in England and it is the death of the internet in the 21st century. We are closer every day to that.

      What bothers me is that those who are trolled do not call on their communities for the mutual aid they should be able to expect. I have belonged to forums that have been harassed by trollish members and those trolls have gotten their asses handed back to them by the community. Sometimes in ways both unexpected and delightfully karmic. I am happy to slide in spikes up in aid to any legit member of my community.

      But here's the problem--I suspect that rather than engage and rally against the trolls we would rather just ban any activity that might be 'irksome' in the slightest. The internet is an agora, a marketplace to share and defend and find the best ideas. It is a place for the evolution of views. How can we know the difference between trolls and gadflies if we don't have a place to share together.

      As a resident of flyover country and the rough and tumble precariat of Trumpland, I suspect that shutting off incoming channels is just another way to secure the echo chamber rather than to engage, to ask for help from the 'rough' folk out there like me. And make no mistake I know some shit about 'rough'. I am the kinda guy you really want to have your back, but folks who cancel these open channels will never know that. Why? Because the writer never asked for the mutual aid that is her due. We all have obligations as public writers, but we are also also owed security and mutual aid from our communities.

      I feel abandoned when someone removes commenting and annotating, especially if I (like you) have invested not only money but more importantly time and attention in that writer. I see it more and more especially among those who seem to have gotten above their "raisings". Too good to reciprocate, too important to have to take any risks in the wild.

    3. Ironically, when you use a hypothes.is link (via. hypothesis....) it knocks out the commenting. Maybe just for me. Interesting.

    1. Treasure maps
    2. "Once you see the boundaries of your environment, they are no longer the boundaries of your environment."

      Well...yes and no. A hedgerow is still a boundary even if you have seen a Google Earth view of the world. Our place on the planet is still bounded even if you have seen the big blue pebble from the moon. And I might argue that the boundaries one sees are always more permeable and in flux than McLuhan intimates here. YesNoWrongRight.

    1. But around an inexorable trend, the goal is to not to blindly pay off commitment debts simply because you think it's "execution discipline" but to constantly question the reality of the debt.

      what does this mean?

    2. The reason 10 experiments around an inexorable trend is NOT spreading yourself too thin is that you're creating potential for serendipitous focus.

      yes. in practice?

    3. ergodicity

      Rajeev Mahajan, adding Entropy since 1994 Answered Apr 7 Suppose you are concerned with determining what the most visited parks in a city are. One idea is to take a momentary snapshot: to see how many people are this moment in park A, how many are in park B and so on. Another idea is to look at one individual (or few of them) and to follow him for a certain period of time, e.g. a year. Then, you observe how often the individual is going to park A, how often he is going to park B and so on.

      Thus, you obtain two different results: one statistical analysis over the entire ensemble of people at a certain moment in time, and one statistical analysis for one person over a certain period of time. The first one may not be representative for a longer period of time, while the second one may not be representative for all the people.

      Ergodicity is usually described in terms of objective properties of an ensemble of objects.

      The importance of ergodicity becomes manifest when you think about how we all infer various things, how we draw some conclusion about something while having information about something else.

      For example, one goes once to a restaurant and likes the fish and next time he goes to the same restaurant and orders chicken, confident that the chicken will be good. Why is he confident? Or one observes that a newspaper has printed some inaccurate information at one point in time and infers that the newspaper is going to publish inaccurate information in the future. Why are these inferences ok, while others such as "more crimes are committed by black persons than by white persons, therefore each individual black person is not to be trusted" are not ok?

      The answer is that the ensemble of articles published in a newspaper is more or less ergodic, while the ensemble of black people is not at all ergodic.

      Or take an even clearer example: In an election each party gets some percentage of votes, party A gets a%, party B gets b% and so on. However, this does not mean that over the course of their lives each individual votes with party A in a% of elections, with B in b% of elections and so on.

      A similar problem is faced by scientists in general when they are trying to infer some general statement from various particular experiments. When is a generalization correct and when it isn't? The answer concerns ergodicity. If the generalization is done towards an ergodic ensemble, than it has a good chance of being correct.

    4. agile development/DevOps

      "DevOps is “a cross-disciplinary community of practice dedicated to the study of building, evolving and operating rapidly-changing resilient systems at scale.”"

    5. Taleb's written extensively about it


    6. Betting on inexorables is the equivalent of dollar cost averaging in experiment-design space. You spread bets across things you can't predict.

      You spread bets across things you can't predict. So what are the bets you can make around the inexorability of rising tuition or of the number of majors in English rising or falling or that student load debt will be forgiven.

    7. Let’s call this approach betting the spread on inexorables. You don’t plan, but you also don’t experiment/play entirely chaotically. You try multiple things around individual inexorable forces.

      General instructions on betting on the future

    8. Not enough for detailed planning, but enough to bias random actions away from an informational zero mean.

      Can someone explain this to me? Has to do with variance. Not assume that variance is zero? If variance is zero, then any choice is good as any other since they all result in the same 'answer'.

  14. Apr 2017
    1. The full text of By Any Media Necessary

      link on this page won't load. Wanted to look at the sources referenced in this chapter.

    2. It is a death cult.

      I have heard the same argument made against Christianity.

    3. these humorous comments told a story of storytelling and surveillance

      Isn't this more of a double bind than a paradox?

    4. Sangita Shresthova
    1. Academics are responsible for unpacking complex ideas in the public space while using research and education as a means to enact change.

      This is a big ask. It goes well beyond the substructure of teaching how to sum up, analyze and evaluate these complex ideas. We are all responsible. Is it irresponsible to put all of this on academics. Isn't it an academic's goal to share the burden and hope of citizenship with everyone? And isn't it a grave danger to rely on the expertise of academics? I am not seeing all that many profiles in courage among the tenured. Why not? Because the bread-being buttered- is hard to turn down.

    2. pedagogy of wakefulness

      The Pedagogy of Woke always prompts my big question: now what? Listening to the suffering hardly seems enough, but pragmatically speaking even this seems like a burden on top of the five classes I teach each semester. Hypocrisy is baked into the DNA of that system. Good to see Ian is considering (at least in the most general terms) the "now what?" Which begs the question: now what specifically?