This is a tricky one because words in different regions of our own country have different meaning. For example when I moved to Tennessee for a couple years they use tabogins. I had to no idea what they were referring to, but turns out thats just a beanie. Moving to the south I had to basically learn a whole new vocabulary, Kinfolk which is family member or close friend. Holler, didint mean to yell but it means a valley or long road in the base of the hills where people live.

I feel like language has become so complex that it is again becoming a thing for the pepople of power and status. Think about taxes, or Wall Street, the language they use is so complex but it boils down to such simple meanings. I think they do this to keep normal people from being able to play the game by making it so complicated that the average person just gives up. Language is being used as a form of war on the average people.

conical flask

3.0

2.0

I pick nursing because of career growth

Why do you pick nursing?

I am in college to develop my skills in any workplace.

/z/

\(proj_v u \)

kebetulan

If ligand I weak field ligand then it will be S.P>

save

typo

My question would be, what expertise does the professional editor have. We have been living in a time where much of what we see has clear bias to it even from professionals. How can we determine who the experts are now a days. We have alot of comfirmation bias in our world and someone may be an expert but to someone else they are not.

I used to sell real estate, and before I would go to a potential clients house I would always look them up. The amount of information that can be learned about someone just by a google search is scary. Its also not polite to take the time out of someones day, not be prepared and ask them basic questions that are readily available.

There are many issues with using google and the internet in general. We have become so divided, it is almost impossible to know what is real. Research the researchers and dig deep to see if they are a credible source.

This is interesting to me because I feel that when I get up to give a speech, which I avoid like the plague, I lose my humor. I try to craft the speech as someone im not, and it adds so much more pressure to me. I try to write speeches without humor and it always felt so stiff. Reading this in the book has given me some reassurance that I can play to my strength even if it a small joke here and there.

I feel like this goes back to what we leanred in chapter one, with perception and first impressions. I think it is much easier to gain credibility with a newer audience vs one who knows you. In a new audience with professionals, you have to upper hand becuse you are on stage at the same event they are at. You must have some credibility to be on that stage. The credibility becomes yours to keep or yours to lose based on the supporting information you provide.

This sets the stage by explaining that under typical conditions, nitrogen and oxygen are stable and do not form compounds. This explains that high temperatures are needed for the reaction to occur and are key to forming nitrogen oxides.

asd

CALCUTION SAMPLE

.

Primordialism is the idea that nations or ethnic identities are fixed, natural, and ancient.

good lab thing for study

formula that shows the ratio of elements present in the compound

use like a method to prove or explain the relationship between inflation and unemployment

use like a method to prove or explain the relationship between inflation and unemployment

it should be 20kg (according to the answer)

All theory is a learning in the development of a child, therefore it helps us in the social, cultural, emotional, physical, cognitive growth, etc. For me, Vygolsky's theory is essential since through the cognitive we learn to develop within society also through our own experiences

If all members of the household collaborated in household chores, it would be of great help to everyone because we are all putting in the time, effort and attitude to have a clean healthy home and work together.

The main role I have in my family is to be a mother and a provider. I take care of my kids , help around the house, and bring income to the house. Some boundaries I wish I had is spending more time with my family, because communication and relationships is important to me, but I am always working, and my kids are always busy.

To me this has never even registered in my head. I am going to focus on this the next time my girlfriend is watching reality tv. I know that I am most aware that I tend to root for the underdogs in most scenarios. I want the one who was counted out to win. I wonder how that relates to my personality. I know I always admire the extroverts, but I felt like that was because I am not very extroverted and wanted to be like them. Intersting self observation for me to try in the coming days.

I am currently working on a construction site here in Boise. I am from Tennessee and all my coworkers are from Kentucky. One day a coworker told me the superindentent didnt like me. Obviously confused since we had only been working together for 3 days, I asked, Why? My coworker told me simply for the fact that I am not from Kentucky, he did not trust me or think I was a capable worker because of where I grew up. I know its not fair but the only thing I can do is prove him wrong and help him recognize his inherant bias is not always correct.

This bit of information reminds me of a few studies and lawsuits that have occurred in the last decade or two regarding names on job applications. The inquiries focused on the concept that someone's name being less culturally familiar to a recruiter would negatively bias an applicant's chances of getting to the interview stage. This effect was studied using identical resumes with different names associated to measure employer responses. This seems like a great example of the primacy effect making biases that are sometimes difficult to identify more obvious.

The mentality of “I hit the game winning shot because I’m the best” vs “I missed the game winning shot because you didn’t get me the ball fast enough” Fascinating to see these examples from life be put into a structured explanation.have a coworker who, if there is a mistake, will always be the last to get back to the office and then proceed put the blame on someone else. If the job is completed on time, looks good and mistake free he will be the first one in the office reporting to the boss how good he did on the job.

This fundamental attribution error seems to be a rabbit hole our society is falling down. I had always referred to it as victim culture. We as a society are unable to see how our external attribution to a situation plays a role in the outcomes in life. Everything bad that happens to us is because somebody else is bad and out to get me. It is much easier to blame someone else, for reasons your assuming, then it is to realize the mistakes that were made.

Listening to the thoughts and opinions of people with differing cultures or political opinions with the intention to understand, instead of respond, is such a powerful tool. It can help dismantle prejudices, make you a better advocate for your own values, and/or help practice giving people room to communicate what they really intending to say rather than giving preloaded responses. I think most people would benefit greatly from engaging in this kind of practice on a regular basis.

I have experienced this kind expectation to reality relationship in some of my personal relationships. These people had an idea of what they could be if they could just stop being inadequate that only served to generate shame and guilt. Often, there was never any real grounding for the things they expected of themselves, but they felt the weight of those expectations as if they were an undeniable reflection of their potential. I am sure many of this is related to external social expectations that are later internalized. These expectations seem to rarely serve as drivers for someone to be more productive and more often seem to break people down and make them overall less likely to engage with life.

One of our recent lectures identified the importance of an improvement mindset. Tools like these could help avoid developing unrealistic expectations that ultimately dissuade attempts at self improvement. They could provide an interpretive lens to contextualize feedback in ways that are more constructive.

I can see this effect happen where you may not think expectation would matter very much. There are many times where someone has stopped to say something to me, but the content of the statement is outside of my current mode of thinking. A perfectly understandable statement can become completely unintelligible purely because the context of the message did not prepare the receiver to comprehend it. If something like this can happen in the case of straight forward comprehension, the effect must me exacerbated by the complexity or obscurity of the intended communication.

Since I was younger I’ve known that we have beliefs that are instilled dingo us, knowingly and unknowingly. The part that is always difficult for me is how do I notice them, and how do I change them. One of the Schemata I have realized is the way I perceive money. I have always felt like I never had enough, and it was going to run out. However, after 10 years of working, I have never gone without, been homeless or starved. I recognize the schema now I am focused on changing that database.

There is something similar in the psychology realm called Baader-Meinhoff. This is the phenomenon where you buy something, say a new silver Toyota Camery. All of a sudden it feels like every car you are seeing on the roads is a silver Toyota Camery. This happened to me when I bought my new truck, it made me think I made a good decision because of how many other people had the same truck. I wasn’t looking for the truck but it seemed like it was the only vehicle on the road that ever caught my attention.

A covalent link (or covalent bond) occurs when two atoms share electrons, forming a stable connection between them. In DNA, covalent bonds link the deoxyribose sugar of one nucleotide to the phosphate group of the next,

He is the only noble gas with 2 valence e and not 8

It’s easier for Non metals to gain electrons (become anions) to make the shell full aka octet rule

I have dealt with many experiences like this in my professional life. At one time I was a manager for a large, multinational bank, and part of my duties was taking calls that escalated for whatever reason above the agent that made first contact with the customer. We employed many people from the Philippines and also some from India in addition to our local American representatives. There were countless times that customers would completely pass up one of the offshore representatives and demand to speak to someone at my level because they assumed someone with their accent couldn't complete the task. There were even many American representatives that had immigrated to the United States later in life that would get the same treatment if there was any detectable foreign accent. For many of these customers, something I thought to be inconsequential, was enough to write someone off completely as a competent professional. Those calls always left me thinking about that dynamic after they were over.

The concept of a unique communication pattern being held within small groups, families, or communities is something I have often wondered about. How much of my communication with my wife of 10 years is functionally unintelligible to the general population? This must be an example of the way the regional dialects and, eventually, entirely new languages come to be. The continual compartmentalization of customs that is so isolated for so long that is truly does become an entirely new system.

Building foundational knowledge in any specialized field you want to engage with is often necessary to being able to properly engage. What happens when the specialized field is government and people with differing levels of ability from differing backgrounds all have to be able to engage with this "specialized field". There are so many barriers to just exercise your rights and freedoms that are likely underappreciated. Tailoring communication strategies surrounding these issues to include as many different kinds of people can have massive effects on the political engagement of a population and their ability to get access to services they need and have a right to access.

This specific sentence, more than anywhere in the following paragraph, brings stark attention to one of the biggest professional struggles I have personally come across. This speaks to trainability in general, which is not only useful for the aspiring student, but also critical for an effective member of a team. The ability to be receptive to information is often so much more important that the ability to send information.

He used a hook a way to grab the audience attention

I have always found the philosophy of categories to be super interesting. It seems than no matter how hard we try, humanity is completely incapable of providing all encompassing, categorical explanations for abstract concepts. Its appears like a constant reminder of our inability to grasp the scope of our own cognition. This problem becoming a central issue of AI development seems to speak to the eternal struggle against the systemic imperfections in our communication methods.

As someone who is returnng back to school after being in the workforce for 10+ years I see this play out all the time. Although it is a group project and a common goal is shared, there must be someone who can communicate within the group to delegate tasks. If you are not good with communication, active listening, problem solving, you will be passivley participating in the group and seen as dead weight. Being able to direct and communicate effectively can be the difference between the best group project, or a flat out nightmare.

As someone who has massive stage fright, I can attest that seperating public speaking and communication is a necessary. I do exceptionally well in a group of 2-5. I realize that being a good public speaker you have to be able to communicate, but being able to conduct small meetings and get a message across is needed in the workforce. These are two very different skill sets, but at the foundation is communication. So, thank the National Communication Association for seperating the performance aspect of communication.

I find it fascinating that all history before us was done in Manuscript and here we are as a society with this new form of technology. This digital communication style has been interesting to watch unfold, but it seems we always revert back to the Manuscript era for guidance. We are living in an uncharted time as far as communication goes, and we are lucky to be on the forfront of societial changing technology. It will be interesting to see if we stay the course or revert to the old way of communicating.

I can speak from personal experience on the issue of CMC related anxiety. About 3 years ago I decided to delete my instagram from my phone. In the first few days after I realized I was opening my phone about every 20 minutes to check my instagram, only to remember I had deleted it. This was almost a nervous habit for me. After about 3 months without the app i decided to re download it, and after opening Instagram, I had immediate anxiety. All my friends lives looked perfect, they had done so much, been so many places, good relationships, and I was immediately comparing my life to theirs. I instantly deleted it again from my phone, and have not gotten it back since.

I have never thought of communication as being so intentional. This simple section made me stop and reflect about how I am communicating. What message do i try and get across as I am speaking. There has not been a time I can remember where I stopped and intentionally processed what I was going to say. I have always seen myself as an “off the cuff” person but I’m starting to rethink that mentality.

assay

Définition d'un sous-culture!

2x²+6x³-2

This is my favorite, I like how straightforward it is, I will probably use it on my own essay.

I agree with this point of view, it's important to be open minded and consider what we can gain, even from arguments we disagree with. This reminds me of a class discussion we had about critical thinking in my last English class, where we talked about how every argument, no matter how flawed, can teach us something.

I like how the text highlights the importance of considering different perspectives. It shows a good effort to include different views which makes a better and more balanced discussion.

Looking for strengths in a flawed argument helps you understand it better. Even if it's flawed, there could be good points worth considering. This balanced approach makes your critique more constructive, helps you find ways to improve the argument, and shows empathy for other perspectives.

This does make sense since it can solve another truth to gets to the main point of the argument

This statement to me doesn't make sense because if we don't agree with the topic then how does it get us closer to the truth?

This doesn't make sense to me because even if I don't agree with the statement, I have to agree with some things?

This statement is true because when I read argumanative essays, I consider the author's argument and decide whether I agree with certain points or not.

This statement is accurate because when I read an essay, I notice all the claims and reasons, and when I write an essay, we need to include our reasons and claims. Which helps us understand what the essay or articles are about.

I agree, sometimes I pick a specific topic because the argument can be helpful.

This ensures we are keeping the argument fair, and helps to better convince the reader.

Praising the part of the arguments that make sense is a good part to include in a persuasive essay.

This is a significant piece of information to understand because it is very powerful knowledge. Therefore, if we show the authors positives and negatives, it will help demonstrate we took all sides into consideration.

This article is clearly on the side of not supporting or merely recognizing transgender identity. Yet, transgender activists haven taken this article as as opportunity to shine their own light against this argument and clarify some misconceptions. This is the perfect example of taking an argument and use it to engage in more critical thinking.

This whole article seems to trickle down to this overall main point. No matter how subjectively flawed an argument may seem, they serve the purpose of creating critical thinking and discussion even if it's to refute the original argument.

This shows us that an argument doesn't necessarily need to be convincing or even relevant but that it sheds validity on the topic itself. It can lead to more conversations of the main ideas or opposing the argument itself.

This line of thinking can prove useful in analyzing upcoming essays in this class. It could also help us see gaps in asn argument.

I think this means that an arguments value can be derived from the way it goes about addressing a particular issue.

Sometimes the argument of a topic may be completely incoherent but it is possible that there is something of value that we can take away from the argument.

With this example being used in the reading, I can see know how an argument can point towards an idea worth considering.

I think inductive arguments is a key phrase to remember because if readers are able to recognize these arguments, might help them understand the whole concept of what the author is trying to say.

Based on this statement, I think this is one of the main ideas from the author. Finding weaknesses in a argument can be both good and bad for the reader. By the reader being able to apply this to essay writing can help influence their argument more.

I think that this is another main idea that the author is sharing. This is saying that if we ask questions or praise arguments into questions, it keeps the conversation going. It keeps the conversation rolling by opening up the topic for more ideas and things that need further studies.

It is important to hear out what the opposing side has to say by going through their claims and reasons. Even if we do not agree with it we should listen to what is being said.

I believe that this is one of the main ideas the author has to share. The author is saying that if we see what the opposite argument says and assess that, our readers will see that we are staying open minded while sharing our argument.

Even though they do not present a compelling argument with relevant data to back up their argument about gun control with mental ill people. We see that some light is shown on getting mental ill people help so in a way this was insightful.

So even if we do not agree with the authors argument we need to point out sone good points they made ?

I highly agree with this statement, as I have experienced it being used. some individuals rather win the argument by making a statement or question that baits the listener onto agreeing with the individual, it can be seen as a form of manipulation.

it guarantees the right of free speech but it doesn't free the person from the potential of consequences. an example of this could be yelling fire at a theater.

I highly agree with this statement, strong arguments need well researched facts. recently I saw a lot of arguments that are not backed up by facts are often misleading, I see a lot of arguments that obtain personal bias rather than facts.

I like that it points out, here and above, phrases good to be used for exceptions. This is because in the past while writing I have felt like I'm being too wordy, vague, or that my statement just isn't true when I change the claim. If I wrote something like "some teachers" or "most LGBT people" I felt like I wasn't writing the most efficiently.

It's crazy how people think they can hide their intentions in writing, as if writing isn't completely about putting your thoughts and opinions on paper. It's deceitful that writers try to use these kinds of statements, you should win someone over to your side of an argument fairly rather than manipulating them into thinking it's the best and only option.

I think people need to do this more in general, especially when making generalizations about people. A lot of the disrespect or microaggressions towards people include false assumptions about their group of people. You should take a moment to think about how it is possible that someone may not fit a generalization.

真核生物保护mRNA不被降解手段，RNA稳定蛋白，5’加帽，3’添尾

mRNA维持时间

细菌RNA聚合酶组成

Inductive arguments are described as strong or weak not good or bad. Somewhat like looking at a balance between the two in the examples provided.

Very interesting topic! This is something that I would enjoy furthering my knowledge about.

This is what makes an argument more intriguing and interests the reader, because when we genuinely are interested about the topic we willingly read. We usually pick up more information on the topic and more likely to remember it.

This is the answer to the main topic question, "why look for strengths if the argument is flawed?" This can be useful for general conversations and keeps it going rather than shutting it down.

tRNA氨基酸及mRNA结合位点

细菌顾君可以边转录边翻译，真核生物不行，这使特定的蛋白质可以在细菌细胞中迅速达到高浓度

蛋白合成方向

细菌和真核生物核糖体组成

Sometimes, when I read arguments, I find out that there are more than three, and I don't always notice it. I might get confused thinking there's only one argument being made.

We should definitely be cautious, as not all statements are always true. You can verify to see if it is true or not by looking at the details and patterns.

I believe this statement is true because teachers should be able to express themselves, but to an extent. At the end of the day, they are teaching children.

This kind of confuses me. I'm wondering what exceptions are? And how the example follows up with it...

Super true! Nowadays people will begin their argument based off of whatever they see on the internet. No research prior. Facts, evidence, and connecting the dots are very important when it comes to arguing.

Although the First Amendment still exists, I feel as if it isn't really implemented into society til this day. Even in the classroom, some opinions/beliefs are limited.

I believe that if we trying to make a point to an audience we need to have facts and evidence to validate our claims. Otherwise, the reader will not feel as if they have sufficient evidence to side with us.

I believe this is right as long as they are not trying to impose their beliefs on the students who may have different ones. For example, if a teacher believes in God, she is able to speak about them; however, what she can't do is force a student to believe in God when they don't.

I have never given it that much thought about how our employers do this to us. I've only really considered my first amendment when I am told that I can't speak Spanish at the work place but never about anything else. Definitely food for thought.

This impacts the readers right away with their opinion on the author’s claim

Very important

Freedom to what extent? This is why this a generalized statement. It’s true to a certain extent.

Academic writing is supposed to be satisfying both to read and write.

thus phase contrast can be obtained

.

Important

这里应该是“毛利”

这里应该是“毛利为3057美元”

这里应该是“毛利”

这里应该是“毛利”

这里应该是“毛利”

这里应该是“毛利为1980美元”

这里应该是“毛利为4140美元”

这里应该是“毛利为4080美元”

Hi this is Arleth Lucero,

I have a question regarding the catalyst, since its a substance that simply increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself being consumed by the reaction. Would it appear in the products?

The only thing I was confused about in thsi part of the calculation was the answer is m=2 or is it the second order from A. If so why would it be the second order in A

这可不就是 RAG的处理过程么。 而 xfeel 可以再进一步，对情绪进行提取。

• "average" potential
• hint: nucleons "move fast" inside the nucleus zone

• Not the "static" image from the textbooks!!!

• Ideal Fermi gas model: free nucleons, without potential

• QM: Nucleons cannot be "static"

• Very good explanation

Self-identified; family does not require children.

Includes all no gender left behind

BORDERLANDS CONCEPT IS THAT SHE IS SUFFERING LEAVING EVERYTHING BEHIND JUST TO JUMP THAT BARBE WIRE FENCE SHE IS GIVING DETAIL AND VISION SO ONE CAN INVISION.

Even your appearance can send an unintentional message to the audience.

eye color experiment video

for mi raza

ANOTHER NAME FOR HETERO MIX

function domain & range definition

1.Preparing 2.Reading 3.Capturing the key ideas 4.Reviewing. I think that reading will take the most time

Typically, I feel more prepared for an assignment of reading when I know what I am looking for.

My living room, the foyer at my school, and my kitchen table are all great. The foyer at school is the best because it has the least distractions.

My phone can be a distraction so I can put it on a charger away from me.

I can use the Cornel method.

Preparing, reading, capturing key ideas, and reviewing. Reading will take the most time because it is the most tedious.

I feel more prepared to read this assignment because I am aware of what to be looking for. I feel more confident, less overwhelmed, and more focused.

Since we have been growing up we have seen categories that now as we progress in society people find new catories to identify to.

This should be an infinite, not 0

Tell yourself that is the most important thing right now. Put away all distractions and address what could be prohibiting you from studying. Eliminate anything that restricts you.

Sachito should have the sister come babysit monthly so that they get time together. She should talk to her husband about not leaving daily for his friends to that she can actually get some studying done at home.

James should ask someone to hold on to his computer so that he doesn't become distracted by it.

Becky needs to decide where to put her time and what would help her the most in the long run. She could also reschedule the service project or talk to her professor and see if he'll adjust the due date for her.

Juan needs to talk about the situation with his mother. They need to develop a schedule to prioritize certain aspects of his life.

If I sat down with the positive one, he would not goof off and ensure that we studied enough to pass the exam. For the other one, however, he would just listen to music and encourage us not to study, as he thinks that he can make it in life without doing anything.

They can be careless towards their work and think that college is just a waste of time.

2.

Long-term goals: After college, I want to become a lawyer, I'd like to get a wife, and I want to maintain good fitness. I would also like to start a family.

Midterm goals: This year, I want to be able to bench press 130 pounds, write a short book and attempt to publish it, and be a better football player. During high school, I want to be valedictorian. While in college, I want to get a degree in law.

Short-term goals: Today, I want to eat healthy, protein rich meals. This week, I want to work out daily, finish week three of this class, and get better at throwing a football. This month, I would like to finish reading Psalms, finish this course, and win the state Civics Bee.

should be plus

A constant by which an algebraic term is multiplied.

you learn through growth in debates

Ask the instructor if there are any other sections of the class that you can review, use the online notes posted (if there are any), and ask another classmate for possible notes they have.

The problems with using an online device is that it is very easy to get distracted and surf the web; also, if you cannot type fast it is much harder to keep up. However, it also has lots of tools and benefits to help you like blank documents that can be used for notes

Lets you write more information, leading to better and more effective notes.

The listing method and cornell method help me better understand and keep track of what I am learning and help me better retain information given.

Three ways to make up for notes is to ask a friend who takes notes, research the topic online using reliable sources, or ask the teacher if the topic is going to be on the test because if not, you may not even need notes.

The benefit of a laptop is that it has many tools and features to make note taking easier. The problems are that you have the potential to accidentally lose the notes and it is much easier to become distracted on a computer.

The Cornell method lets you write more information and it is a better way to memorize the important things.

Using the Cornell method, I can retain information more efficiently and focus much better.

Most professors will signal important material by repeating things, raising ad lowering their voice and emphasizing things written on the board.

In the front row in order to make the professor that you take the class with serious intentions

Repeat phrases said, lowering their voice, and write words related on the board.

They emphasize the word or definition, repeat the material, or just tell you straight forward that the information is important.

You should sit in or near the front of the classroom so that the teacher can see that you are paying good attention to the lesson.

To prepare yourself for active listening, you should get your mind in the right place and get yourself in the right space.

I would consider my friend to be an excellent listener. If something is going on in my life, he cares and shows it in his body language by doing things like making eye contact. A poor listener would be my grandmother, as when I start talking, she won't pay attention and makes it clear that she'd rather be the one talking.

I have good eye contact, but sometimes I zone out a little bit.

Yes i agree.

enterprising

realistic

socal

PERIOD

fighting is healthy, able to share opinions

couples have a hard tike to construct their feelings into words

My toughest course is probably personal finance. I would include my friends that care about the class and won't goof off at inappropriate times.

I would like to get better at not studying the night before a test, as this is something that I do regularly. I can develop a study schedule the week of a test or quiz to assist be in remembering.

Find all of your resources over a topic such as notes and homework. These are great tools for studying.

Beta oxidation

la

El

El

Even though it is summer, I was reading about simple machines in physics before school ended. Many of my questions are similar, and the author was able to answer most of my questions. My textbook is better written, as it is intended to go very in depth.

interesting

Important

I am a traditional student and one advantage is that I am used to staying up and finishing work

X

X

X