On visiting a site with a “cookie consent” notice, I don’t feel empowered just irritated.

Because humans hate being bored or confused and there are countless ways to make decisions look off-puttingly boring or complex — be it presenting reams of impenetrable legalese in tiny greyscale lettering so no-one will bother reading

While these roles are very important, the ability to innovate from an “outside-in” standpoint may be even more valuable. How do we get people who  experience ‘customer reaction” or people who work in factories to surface and take action on the things that they observe? If you don’t provide the tools for that and enable that, then you have the danger of 1) the signal for innovation not reaching the source 2) the signal being transformed on the way to the source. A signal loss can change the idea entirely and alter the impact of the innovation.

fixing the source of employee disengagement by helping them with tools that optimize their workflows ultimately led to employee empowerment.

"I have read and agree to the terms and conditions” may well be the most common lie in the history of civilization. How many times do you scroll and click accept without a second thought? You’re not alone. Not only they go unread, but they also include a self-updating clause requiring you to go back and review those documents for changes. You’re agreeing to any changes, and their consequences, indefinitely. 

And, frankly, we’re abetting this behavior. Most users just click or tap “okay” to clear the pop-up and get where they’re going. They rarely opt to learn more about what they’re agreeing to. Research shows that the vast majority of internet users don’t read terms of service or privacy policies — so they’re probably not reading cookie policies, either. They’re many pages long, and they’re not written in language that’s simple enough for the average person to understand.

But in the end, they’re not doing much: Most of us just tediously click “yes” and move on.

The site invites you to read its “cookie policy,” (which, let’s be honest, you’re not going to do), and it may tell you the tracking is to “enhance” your experience — even though it feels like it’s doing the opposite.

Un aneddoto della vita di Jules Verne narra che lui, da ragazzino, si volesse imbarcare come mozzo su una nave diretta nelle Indie. Bloccato dal padre pronunciò le fatidiche parole “D’ora in poi viaggerò solo con la fantasia!” E così fece.

In Italia è una figura professionale non riconosciuta e non esiste neppure un organismo preposto alla formazione.

denunziato come eretico dal suo ospite, fu nel 1592 arrestato dall'Inquisizione e processato.

gli scolari disertavano le sue lezioni e affollavano quelle di Hegel, allora nel pieno della sua fama.

non molto fortunata nonostante la sua reale vivacità e grazia.

Which is included in the question, but bears repeating for the "I can't read this /whole/ page" folks.

To Put Yourself Out There and Make Connections

To Collaborate With My Peers

there’s a strong overlap between the representation of queer, or otherwise marginalized authors, and this very welcoming, open format

TC39 urges caution when using Stage 2-or below proposals, as it might result in inadvertent pressure from the community to keep the implementation as-is instead of improving it for fear of breaking existing code or ecosystem fragmentation (e.g. using a different symbol like # instead of @ for decorators).

It's completely understandable that this happens without realizing it, but continuing to do so sets different expectations for how the language progresses. It's nothing to feel guilty about — we learn as a community and remind one another of how JavaScript works.

Therefore, it's easy to search around for tweets/blog posts/talks that say "ES7 Decorators" and find that it's become the accustomed name for it.

I'm considering this, although I'm still leaning towards not including it and I'd love to just get rid of first if it wouldn't break so many peoples tests. Newcomers to Capybara don't understand (or aren't willing to learn) the issues that all/first (and last if added) have and massively overuse them. Yes the fact that all and first now wait by default will prevent some of the new user issues/confusion, but it won't fix the non-reloadability issue.

Humu empowers every individual to do better—and be better

I am confused by the fact that people do not seem to be discussing which one to use according to these criteria. Most article I find are talking about arguments like speed or compatibility. But is this not the most relevant point?

what does surveillance mean in this case? It could easily mean "oversight by citizens"

Hubert Humphrey

Yuan Cao 3rd degree connection3rd

Mohammad Norouzi

I, a straight man, did not belong.

Cambridge Pla­tonism,

Macho

“Why are some people more able to manage complexity?”

A school friend might call him between 2 and 4 in the afternoon causing “an alarm signal

Thevenot

Pasqua

Celsus

Theodosia

Martinus

Pliny

Dryads

wood-nymphs

Negroes

Christobelle

Depoinci

Tournefort

sons of Jewry

Ray

Linnaeus’s

Ulloa

Edwards

Vitruvius

Neptune

Procyon

Cyclops

Peleus’ Son

Columbus

Eurus

Homer

Eurus

slaves

Auster

Rhea

Eurus

Pliny the Elder

Eurus

Sloane

Sir Hans Sloane

Neptune

Virgil

King of Pontus

Pliny

Mithridates king of Pontus

Spaniards

Spaniards

Pontus’ King

Negroes

Dr. Lewis

Jesuit

Pere Labat

Negroes

Britons

Gallia’s sons

Ibbos

Ulloa

Ibbos

Durante

Pope Sixtus Quintus

Gallic

Albion

Pere Labat

SHENSTONE

SHENSTONE

Vulcan

WILLIAM SHENSTONE, Esq

Jove

George Townshend

Tyrtaeus

Bellona

Phoebus

Iris

White

Percy

Pomona

Ceres

Avaro

Waller

Danae

Xantippe

physician

De la Condamine

Ulloa

Romney

Naiads

Machaon

Sebastian Cabot

Walter Raleigh

Obia-men

negroe-conjurers, or Obia-men

Lusitania’s chiefs

Columbus

Eurus

Ceres

Sylvanus

Strabo

vast Asia’s King

the sons of Attic’s sterile land

polish’d Tyrians

Libya’s sons

sons of Guinea

the Aethiop-kind

those poor slaves, Who, whilom, under native, gracious chiefs, Incas and emperors, long time enjoy’d [185] Mild government, with every sweet of life, In blissful climates? See them dragg’d in chains, By proud insulting tyrants, to the mines Which once they call’d their own, and then despised!

With what intense severity of pain Hath the afflicted muse, in Scotia, seen THe miners rack’d, who toil for fatal lead? What cramps, what palsies shake their feeble limbs, [180] Who, on the margin of the rocky Drave, Trace silver’s fluent ore? Yet white men these!

Lybians

Machaon

Ethiop

Who from Mundingo sail

The Moco-nation

slaves from Minnah

a Cormantee

the numerous tribes, that skirt the shore, From rapid Volta to the distant Rey

the Pawpaws

children of the Golden Coast

those from Congo’s wide—extended plains

funny Libyan

Melvil