2 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2021
  2. twitter.com twitter.com
    ReconfigBehSci on Twitter
    1
    1. Marlene_Wulf 01 Nov 2021

      ReconfigBehSci. (2021, October 30). Does there maybe need to be more distinction between points raised for discussion and any actual decision? Without knowing about votes etc., it’s maybe a bit strong to say ‘JCVI wanted x...’? I’ve sat on many bodies with minutes documenting positions I disagreed with [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1454488759785897987

      is:twitter lang:en JCVI infection children school deliberate adult protective measure testing discussion decision COVID-19
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1454488759785897987
  3. Jul 2020
  4. osf.io osf.io
    Ethical Guidelines for Deliberately Infecting Volunteers with COVID-19
    1
    1. ErikStuchly 15 Jul 2020

      Richards, A. D. (2020). Ethical Guidelines for Deliberately Infecting Volunteers with COVID-19 [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/jb7gq

      is:preprint lang:en COVID-19 ethics guideline transmission deliberate infection volunteer vaccine development inoculation clinical trial research analysis scientific practice philosophy
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/jb7gq/