- May 2024
-
-
generally 00:58:40 speaking the answer has been zero no response no attempt I wrote an article just two years ago outlining the 00:58:52 four Illusions as I call of the mod senses including the S of Dogma the vican barrier the self-replication of genomes and nobody's answered it there's something funny 00:59:05 going on
for - adjacency - scientific revolution in action - paradigm shift - ignored by scientific community - critique of gene centricity
adjacency - between - scientific revolution - paradigm shift - critique of gene centricity - ignored by scientific community - adjacency relationship - Ray and Denis Noble's work advocating for an alternative to gene centricity demonstrates scientific revolution in realtime. - They are at the stage of being ignored by the peers for scientifically invalid reasons. That's a good indicator of the early stages of a paradigm shift. - As they point out, this refusal to openly debate has realworld consequences. - The entire medical community is oriented towards the wrong direction, looking for medical interventions in gene therapies which aren't going to happen because the science does not allow it.
-
- Sep 2023
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
So whatever problem you have in your knowledge, and suddenly you think, oh, that doesn't fit, there is a problem, and so on, what do you do? You stop projecting your attention onto the set of theoretical object you have, and you come back where you are. Where are you? In the laboratory observing dots on the screen. 00:24:54 And then you think, is my picture adequate to the dots I'm seeing now in the screen? That's what occurs at each scientific revolution. Suddenly, if things, scientists say, poof, finished, all this theory, I have to think everything again from what is given to me.
-
for: scientific revolution, incremental science, science - epoche
-
quote
- So whatever problem you have in your knowledge, and suddenly you think, oh, that doesn't fit, there is a problem, and so on, what do you do?
- You stop projecting your attention onto the set of theoretical object you have, and you come back where you are.
- Where are you? In the laboratory observing dots on the screen.
- And then you think, is my picture adequate to the dots I'm seeing now in the screen?
- That's what occurs at each scientific revolution.
- Suddenly, if things, scientists say, poof, finished, all this theory,
- I have to think everything again from what is given to me.
- author: Michel Bitbol
-
-
- Sep 2020
-
journals.sagepub.com journals.sagepub.com
-
Spellman, B. A. (2015). A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 886–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615609918
-
- Jun 2017
-
www.atlasobscura.com www.atlasobscura.com
-
there was, essentially, no “scientific revolution” during the Renaissance, only a continuation of work that was already happening in the “dark ages” of medieval thought.
This puts my whole minor field of study thought in question!
-