Claude Sonnet 3.7 claiming to be wearing a blue blazer and red tie
这个括号里的小注脚出人意料地有趣:Claude 3.7 曾「声称自己穿着蓝色西装和红色领带」——作为 LLM 对非情绪类人类状态(如着装感)的一次出人意料的自发表达,被研究者用来说明情绪之外的人类属性也可能在模型中被激活,只是更为罕见。一个蓝西装红领带的 AI,堪称全文最令人会心一笑的事实。
Claude Sonnet 3.7 claiming to be wearing a blue blazer and red tie
这个括号里的小注脚出人意料地有趣:Claude 3.7 曾「声称自己穿着蓝色西装和红色领带」——作为 LLM 对非情绪类人类状态(如着装感)的一次出人意料的自发表达,被研究者用来说明情绪之外的人类属性也可能在模型中被激活,只是更为罕见。一个蓝西装红领带的 AI,堪称全文最令人会心一笑的事实。
He is the gloomy Lord of theDead in some, in others akind helpful spirit; he is animposing warrior and a littlefairy-king; he is fatal andterrible to people, and is saidto fetch them after theirdeath to his palace foreternal banquets; he is a black magician, a wicked demon, akin to andconfused with the devil, and he plays pleasant little tricks which show hisgood humour; he is quoted as an arbiter in disputes, and his name is usedin curses.
Inspired by this section, though not specifically suggested:
In Greek, Roman, and even Christian (saint) traditions, most gods (saints), were closely associated with one or potentially a few attributes which made it easier to give them short hand identifications and also to use them in mnemonic traditions. It would seem that in Celtic traditions, that the gods (or heroes) were better delineated people with broader and fuller characters which didn't play into this sort of mnemonic/oral piece in the same way.
Donn in Irish traditions seems to fit this mold. What other evidences could be brought to bear to back this up?
From what I understood of the theory is about how people see themselves on who they want to be, and how they feel about that difference such as self image and to find out who they wanna be and even with their self esteem
St. Francis de Sales is the patron saint of deaf individuals. He is also the patron of journalists and writers because of his many written religious works. Because of these publications, he is depicted with a book in the left hand and a quill pen in the right. His feast day is January 24th.
The HTMLLabelElement.htmlFor property reflects the value of the for content property.
The :empty selector refers only to child nodes, not input values. [value=""] does work; but only for the initial state. This is because a node's value attribute (that CSS sees), is not the same as the node's value property (Changed by the user or DOM javascript, and submitted as form data).
Types of Structure Outliners take advantage of what may be the most primitive of relationships, probably the first one you learned as an infant: in. Things can be in or contained by other things; alternatively, things can be superior to other things in a pecking order. Whatever the cognitive mechanics, trees/hierarchies are a preferred way of structuring things. But it is not the only way. Computer users also encounter: links, relationships, attributes, spatial/tabular arrangements, and metaphoric content. Links are what we know from the Web, but they can be so much more. The simplest ones are a sort of ad hoc spaghetti connecting pieces of text to text containers (like Web pages), but we will see many interesting kinds that have names, programs attached, and even work two-way. Relationships are what databases do, most easily imagined as “is-a” statements which are simple types of rules: Ted is a supervisor, supervisors are employees, all employees have employee numbers. Attributes are adjectives or tags that help characterize or locate things. Finder labels and playlists are good examples of these. Spatial/tabular arrangements are obvious: the very existence of the personal computer sprang from the power of the spreadsheet. Metaphors are a complex and powerful technique of inheriting structure from something familiar. The Mac desktop is a good example. Photoshop is another, where all the common tools had a darkroom tool or technique as their predecessor.
Structuring Information
Ted Goranson holds that there are only a couple of ways to structure information.
In — Possibly the most primitive of relationships. Things can be in other things and things can be superior to other things.
Links —Links are what we know from the web, but these types of links or only one implementation. There are others, like bi-directional linking.
Relationships — This is what we typically use databases for and is most easily conceived as "is-a" statements.
Attributes — Adjectives or tags that help characterize or locate things.
Metaphors — A technique for inheriting structure from something familiar.
I'm looking at https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#attributes-3 right now, and it seems that there are a few others that ought to be boolean but are not currently in this list: allowpaymentrequest, formnovalidate, hidden (is on the original list in the master branch), itemscope, nomodule, and playsinline.
This is a boolean attribute: the presence of a boolean attribute on an element represents the true value, and the absence of the attribute represents the false value.
Svelte currently has no opinion as to what you store in an exported class prop of a component. It will not necessarily be used a class attribute.
Shorthand attributes It's not uncommon to have an attribute where the name and value are the same, like src={src}. Svelte gives us a convenient shorthand for these cases: <img {src} alt="A man dances.">
Refactoring is intended to improve the design, structure, and/or implementation of the software (its non-functional attributes), while preserving its functionality.
First sighting: "non-functional attributes".
Hewson also identifies three properties of human beings that give rise to agency: intentionality, power, and rationality.
If you used browser JS DOM APIs (that have nothing to do with React itself), you know they don’t automatically update attributes
key attributes needed to produce a worthy PhD thesis are a readiness to accept failure; resilience; persistence; the ability to troubleshoot; dedication; independence; and a willingness to commit to very hard work — together with curiosity and a passion for research
"Element" SelectorsEach component has a data-reach-* attribute on the underlying DOM element that you can think of as the "element" for the component.
To support the extraction of themes, we refer to existent content analysis studies regardingTwitter, with a focus on theInformation-Community-Actionframework which is developed todescribe organization-public communication (Lovejoy and Saxton 2012).Informationtweetscontain factual information,community-buildingtweets reflect social engagement, andactiontweets are explicit calls for taking actions
Think of these as clusters. We will do cluster analysis in a week or so. These are attributes of nodes.
healthcare roles, yet thereis a considerable amount of conversations from healthcare providers to average consumers,and from average consumers to media
these are node attributes. I wonder how they derived them from twitter. Hopefully this will be spelled out in the methods.
node size indicates betweenness centrality.Colorsindicate conversational themes (redfor action,bluefor knowledge sharing andgreenfor community).Color figure online
Node attributes and betweenness centrality.
volume, velocity, and variety
volume: The actual size of traffic
Velocity: How fast does the traffic show up.
Variety: Refers to data that can be unstructured, semi structured or multi structured.
Implications for practice
This is where we could bring in Attributes and use to describe Implications ?
A system of relationships among the physical attributes is often shown to imitate or represent-by their configuration, content, and associations-conscious and unconscious aspects of social life.
What are some of these "physical attributes" and what "aspects of social life" are they representing?