Beest, I. van. (2020). Editorial. Social Influence, 0(0), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2020.1783758

Scott, S., Rivera, K., Rushing, E., Manczak, E., Rozek, C. S., & Doom, J. (2020). “I hate this”: A qualitative analysis of adolescents’ self-reported challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4ctb7

Bhatia, S., Walasek, L., Slovic, P., & Kunreuther, H. (2020). The More Who Die, the Less We Care: Evidence from Natural Language Analysis of Online News Articles and Social Media Posts. Risk Analysis, risa.13582. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13582

Embracing the slowdown. (n.d.). Retrieved August 30, 2020, from https://marketing.twitter.com/emea/en_gb/insights/embracing-the-slowdown

Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2020). Which Retail Outlets Generate the Most Physical Interactions? (Working Paper No. 27042; Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27042

Hong, Jihoon, Ikjae Jung, Mingeol Park, Kyumin Kim, Sungook Yeo, Joohee Lee, Yujin Hong, Jangho Park, and Seockhoon Chung. ‘The Attitudes of Medical Students for Their Roles and Social Accountability in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era’. Preprint. PsyArXiv, 19 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/478ef.

‎Deep Background with Noah Feldman: How to Have a Life in the Pandemic on Apple Podcasts. (n.d.). Apple Podcasts. Retrieved August 12, 2020, from https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/how-to-have-a-life-in-the-pandemic/id1460055316?i=1000478585036

Should We Cheer Together? Gender Differences in Instantaneous Well-​Being during Joint and Solo Activities. COVID-19 and the Labor Market. (n.d.). IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved July 29, 2020, from https://covid-19.iza.org/publications/dp13306/

Cook, D. (2020 May 07). Five workplace trends will shape life after lockdown. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/five-workplace-trends-will-shape-life-after-lockdown-138077

Morgan, L., Protopopova, A., Birkler, R. I. D., Itin-Shwartz, B., Sutton, G. A., gamliel, alexandra, Yakobson, B., & Raz, T. (2020). Human-dog relationships during COVID-19 pandemic; booming dog adoption during social isolation [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/s9k4y

Chatterjee, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Managing through uncertain times: A study to understand the effects of conducting socio-academic life online during COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vcbrw

Columbus, S., Molho, C., Righetti, F., & Balliet, D. (2020). Interdependence and cooperation in daily life [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e8bhx

Plosz J. (2020, June 22). How the Coronavirus Recovery Is Changing Cities. Bloomberg.Com. https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2020-city-in-recovery/

Page tags

Page tags

Tingley, K. (2020, June 10). How Architecture Could Help Us Adapt to the Pandemic. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/09/magazine/architecture-covid.html

Buecker, S., Horstmann, K. T., Krasko, J., Kritzler, S., Terwiel, S., Kaiser, T., & Luhmann, M. (2020). Changes in daily loneliness during the first four weeks of the Covid-19 lockdown in Germany [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ytkx9

Snyder-Mackler, N., Burger, J. R., Gaydosh, L., Belsky, D. W., Noppert, G. A., Campos, F. A., Bartolomucci, A., Yang, Y. C., Aiello, A. E., O’Rand, A., Harris, K. M., Shively, C. A., Alberts, S. C., & Tung, J. (2020). Social determinants of health and survival in humans and other animals. Science, 368(6493). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax9553

Li, A., Zhou, L., Su, Q., Cornelius, S. P., Liu, Y.-Y., Wang, L., & Levin, S. A. (2020). Evolution of cooperation on temporal networks. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16088-w

Twenge, J., & Joiner, T. E. (2020, May 7). Mental distress among U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wc8ud

Lades, L., Laffan, K., Daly, M., & Delaney, L. (2020, April 22). Daily emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pg6bw

Salganik, M. J., Lundberg, I., Kindel, A. T., Ahearn, C. E., Al-Ghoneim, K., Almaatouq, A., Altschul, D. M., Brand, J. E., Carnegie, N. B., Compton, R. J., Datta, D., Davidson, T., Filippova, A., Gilroy, C., Goode, B. J., Jahani, E., Kashyap, R., Kirchner, A., McKay, S., … McLanahan, S. (2020). Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915006117

​Technology is in constant motion. If we try to ignore the advances being made the world will move forward without us. Instead of trying to escape change, there needs to be an effort to incorporate technology into every aspect of our lives in the most beneficial way possible. If we look at the ways technology can improve our lives, we can see that technology specifically smartphones, have brought more benefits than harm to the academic and social aspects of teenagers lives, which is important because there is a constant pressure to move away from smart devices from older generations. The first aspect people tend to focus on is the effect that technology has on the academic life of a teen. Smartphones and other smart devices are a crucial part of interactive learning in a classroom and can be used as a tool in increasing student interest in a topic. For example, a popular interactive website, Kahoot, is used in many classrooms because it forces students to participate in the online quiz, while teachers can gauge how their students are doing in the class. Furthermore, these interactive tools are crucial for students that thrive under visual learning, since they can directly interact with the material. This can be extended to students with learning disabilities, such as Down Syndrome and Autism,​ research has shown that using specialized and interactive apps on a smart device aids learning more effectively than technology free learning. Picture Picture Another fear regarding technology is the impact it has on the social lives of young adults, but the benefits technology has brought to socializing outweighs any possible consequences. The obvious advantage smartphones have brought to social lives is the ability to easily communicate with people; with social media, texting, and calling all in one portable box there is no longer a struggle to be in contact with family and friends even if they are not in your area. Social media can also be used for much more In recent years, social media has been a key platform in spreading platforms and movements for social change. Because social media websites lower the barrier for communicating to large groups of people, it has been much easier to spread ideas of change across states, countries, or the world. For example, after Hurricane Sandy tore apart the northeastern United States, a movement called "Occupy Sandy" in which people gathered to provide relief for the areas affected was promoted and organized through social media. Other movements that have been possible because of social media include #MeToo, March for Our Lives, #BlackLivesMatter, and the 2017 Women's March. ​

Could just imagine how that went. And how it might have gone, had Russell complied.

What are some of these "physical attributes" and what "aspects of social life" are they representing?