这一声明强调了在编辑团队中维护政策标准的共同责任，体现了集体承诺和团队协作的重要性。

这一规定表明Ars Technica对使用人工智能工具的人员有明确的责任要求，强调了准确性和完整性。

这一声明强调了Ars Technica在人工智能工具可用之前就制定了这些标准，表明其对新闻编辑的重视。

这篇政策声明强调了Ars Technica坚持人工写作的原则，质疑了人工智能在新闻报道和分析中的潜在作用。

大多数人认为AI写作缺乏批判性视角和严格编辑，但作者展示了一个由AI驱动的批评者团队，专门从不同角度撕碎她的作品。这挑战了人们对AI写作质量的担忧，表明AI可以被训练提供比传统编辑更全面、更严格的反馈，甚至可能超越人类编辑的一致性和广度。

Esta dinámica es común en el diseño editorial, Cuando se recomienda hacer la estructura de los textos de acuerdo a las ideas expresadas. Pero en sustratos fisicos es un poco mas difícil cuando hay de por medio conceptos como espacio, tintas y otros factores que afectan costos.

Depending on the edition of the poem, after the title, there is supposed to be in italics, and all capitalized the word/name FERRARA.

However, It is important to note that the poem did not always feature FERRARA as an epigraph—it was intentionally added by Browning in later editions of the poem, hence scholar Louis S. Friedland’s exploration of the history of the Duke Vespasiano Gonzaga, and comparison to Duke Alfonso II d’Este.

What was discovered was that despite both Dukes having multiple marriages and young wives, Gonzaga’s wife, Diana Folch de Cardona, did not die young, unlike Lucrezia de' Medici—a point the poem hints to the reader. Through Friedland’s comparisons of the histories between the two to the poem, the final verdict aligned with d’Este as the mysterious Duke.

The image is a painting of Lucrezia de' Medici, and though this was painted for her brother one year after her passing, this painting could be used as the stand-in for the image the Duke is describing. The Duchess' somber gaze is antithetical to how the Duke describes the Duchess as a person, which makes the reader question how much truth could the Duke be speaking. Is it possible that the Duke is imagining a smile on her face because he feels guilty? Is the Duchess' stoic look a reflection of her feelings, or was it "by design" as the Duke later states?

The Duke's final words being about another artpiece he has demonstrates how little he cared for the Duchess. The need to brag about more art being made for him not only shows his ability to display power, but it also shows a reflection of his true intentions. The bronze cast is of Neptune (a god) taming a seahorse--this reflects how the Duke views himself: a god taming a lesser creature; as he sees himself as a god, he will inevitably treat the new duchess similarly. There was never going to be a dual-respect and understanding between him and the Duchess as she was as useful as a seahorse to him. His calculated shift from a painting of his "beloved" wife, to a bronze cast displaying a feat of dominance demonstrates the Duke's ability for social politics and directs attention away from the gruesome end of the Duchess.

While looking up the Duchess, Lucrezia de' Medici, came a poem called "My Next Duchess" by a priest named Lawrence Jones in which a member of the envoy warns of the Duke as a means to save the next duchess from his grasp. While the poem does not follow all the same writing conventions as Browning's poem such as form and tone, it is effective in the way that provides a secondary perspective on the story within this poem. The break of such conventions lends a sort of response that is more human that the facade that the Duke puts on.

The poem aims to explore how the envoy reacted to the Duke's monologue, and the horror at which is deemed worthy enough to become a cautionary tale to future noblewomen about the Duke of Ferrara.

(https://youtu.be/91t7U1SjCTU)

In this YouTube video, “The Defence of Guenevere” is read by a female narrator whose soft, but firm tone highlights Guenevere’s resilience during her defense, making Guenevere appear more assertive. The narrator’s voice demonstrates Guenevere’s emotional state more vividly and convincingly, allowing listeners to better empathize with her defense against Sir. Gauwaine and other knights.

https://blogs.baylor.edu/19crs/2017/06/28/textual-revisions-and-constructed-narratives-in-elizabeth-barretts-the-cry-of-the-children/#:~:text=The%20first%20published%20version%20of%20Elizabeth%20Barrett,of%20signs%20of%20human%20or%20divine%20mercy**

This article has photos of the book, the poem, and images from the survey of children working in mines relating to "Cry of The Children".

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YdWLxoHYR1E

This video shows how close, cramp, and claustrophobic the mines would be. Also, the ground is sometimes lined with rails, other times consists purely of mud and even imbedded with large rocks. This little clip is an attempt to let the readers see the harsh conditions the children working in mines had to deal with daily.

Elizabeth Browning was friends and frequent correspondent with Richard Hengist Horne. RH Horne was the assistant commissioner to an inquiry that reported the "Physical & Moral Conditions of the Children and Young Persons Employed in Mines and Manufacture." The horrific conditions that Horne related to EBB spurred her to write "Cry of the Children" (Robertson).

When heard aloud, like in this reading of "Childe Roland" the irregularity of this stanza becomes more noticeable. For instance, heavy stresses pile up in “Crouched like two bulls locked horn in horn in fight,” and the abrupt pauses throughout break the poem’s forward rhythm. The rhyme sequence (once/right/fight/Dunce/nonce/sight) echoes unevenly, giving the language a tense, unstable energy. Essentially, at the precise moment of Roland’s recognition of “the place,” where there should be triumph, the poem loses composure, creating dissonance between narrative climax and emotional collapse. Heard this way, Browning’s form enacts the poem’s theme of meaning arriving through struggle, a quality that has made its strangeness continually compelling to later readers.

This 1859 painting by Thomas Moran, inspired directly by Browning’s “Childe Roland,” visualizes the poem’s barren and hostile terrain. Turbulent clouds, jagged rocks, and desolate expanses dramatize the emotional weight of the quest. Additionally, the fiery, ominous sky evokes Romantic and Sublime traditions, but instead of ennobling Roland’s journey, the natural grandeur seems to overwhelm him. Rather than a knight striding toward a glorious destiny, the lone figure of Roland, dwarfed by the vast landscape, gazes toward the distant, looming tower. By pairing the poem with such imagery, anthology audiences can more fully experience the poem’s tension between heroic aspiration and environmental hostility. This artistic reimagining also shows how the Tower’s imagery quickly began to shape visual as well as literary culture.

When Roland recalls “the knights who to the Dark Tower’s search addressed,” he gestures toward a centuries-old literary tradition. The name Roland first appears in the eleventh-century La Chanson de Roland, a French chanson de geste celebrating the knight’s heroism at Roncevaux Pass under Charlemagne. In 1595, George Peele revived the name in The Old Wives’ Tale. Then, Robert Jamieson recorded a folk version of the tale and placed it within Arthurian legend, making Roland the son of Arthur and Guinevere. Joseph Jacobs’s English Fairy Tales, pictured below, adopted Jaimeson’s version and introduced the “Dark Tower” as the dwelling of the King of Elfland, where Roland must save his sister. Where earlier Rolands fought or rescued, Browning’s hero merely endures, stripped of glory or divine purpose. With this history in mind, this scene helps capture part of why “Childe Roland” continues to haunt later writers. Its hero perseveres not because he hopes to succeed, but because turning back would mean erasing the meaning of every struggle that came before.

Shouldn't there be some additional explanation for path? E.g., difference with network, naming, main relations, etc. The other elements have this, and there also was an explanation when Path was still in the technology layer (although this text will have to be modified because the use of Path has been extended).

Henk

In some areas it is also common to describe instances, like departments are instances of an actor and very ofthe the technology domain describes the instances too (particular servers).

First, by means of the specialization of concepts, as described in (AP)

Is there some more detailed guidance on this? I would never think of it this way. If I have a department it would consists of sub-departments, application component of functions (assignment) etc.

Not an expert in data modeling, for me the concept is more familiar from Zachman framework in which some more levels are defined but more importantly word physical means the physical implementation and is not limited to data storages etc.

Physical here has different meaining than physical elements and should be explained.

Not only - see my previous comment to 3.4

I thin "also called" has slightly different meining. I understand interface as on of potential many external active structure elements (they could be specializaed in parallel to interface) nut also called means that they are the same. The same applies to services below.

depicted in the metamodel figures in white boxes with label in italics (AP)

Add explanation on meaning of the relationships too. They should not be understood as ArchiMate relationship. Then each of them should be explained. I would also consider removing the composition for the model to concept as the composition is on later metamodels depicted by using normal link (triggering like one - see 4.3)

I would add some statement to this chapter about naming the concepts. That similar to spoken language concepts have names where for elements is almost always specified (also exchange file format requires elements to have names) while fot relationships and junctions they are allowed but used rarely.

Maybe example showing the same difficulty between IT and physical may help as well. E.g. printer can be expressed both device and equipment.

maybe "conceptual" instead of "global" (AP)

I would rephrase it to active tense which is more natural and will be consistent with realization description below.

I suggest to remove this part as: 1) material is missing, and 2) the following paragraphs provides similar (but accurate) information. (JB)

We should avoid using blue for service part in A. When changing the picture, please set the height of service A to the same as for the process B to make it more consistent. Please swhitch the order of the right part to behaviour - passive (left to right).

Please move the active element (interface) to the left to keep active-behaviour-passive order. Also replace composition with aggregation. I would also change the applicaiton's ambiguous name Finance to something like Financial application, ERP, ...

I would add "and domains"

We should add a requirement to support the Exchange FIle Format to make it explicit

comprises both information technology and operational (physical) technology that enable and support the enterprise operating model

depicts the applications' structure and behavior (AP)

depicts the organization structure and behavior (AP)

Is this statement needed? I would limit links to TOGAF to minimum. Also the statement is not true as the ArchiMate definitions are many time intentionally different to TOGAF counterparts.

I would also add something like: Those who would like to create easy to understand structured visualizations and/or models.

The word application might be confusing for non-native speakers as they would think it somehow relates to application domain. I would rephrase it or remove the word application here.

In all previous chapters description of an element always ends with its notation picture. In this chapter some texts are present below the notation picture so it is inconsistent to the rest of the document

Not needed here as it is also not stated at the other elements.

singular should be used

This chapter uses statements like you can which is the other style than the one used in previous chapters.

not only railways so I would add "e.g." or something similar.

The word elements is twice in the sentence, should be removed or rephrased.

Should be with capital letters as all previous examples.

singular should be used

The word application might be confusing for non-native speakers as they would think it somehow relates to application domain. I would rephrase it or remove the word application here.

In all previous chapters description of an element always ends with its notation picture. In this chapter some texts are present below the notation picture so it is inconsistent to the rest of the document

Not needed here as it is also not stated at the other elements.

This chapter uses statements like you can which is the other style than the one used in previous chapters.

The word application might be confusing for non-native speakers as they would think it somehow relates to application domain. I would rephrase it or remove the word application here.

In all previous chapters description of an element always ends with its notation picture. In this chapter some texts are present below the notation picture so it is inconsistent to the rest of the document

not only railways so I would add "e.g." or something similar.

Not needed here as it is also not stated at the other elements.

The word elements is twice in the sentence, should be removed or rephrased.

Should be with capital letters as all previous examples.

singular should be used

This chapter uses statements like you can which is the other style than the one used in previous chapters.

What does that even mean? Ok, I can imagine some specific things that are both "distraction" and inherently "digital", but how are those significant compared to specific non-digital distractions, like drugs and whatever type of music not in your particular taste?

seemingly more often labelled as Promethean gap

A dimension is quantifiable, which seems not the relevant feature here.

Perhaps better use aspect or group?

Commonly, sure, but are digital technologies really categorically insignificant for tentacular learning?

Seems that certain set of digital technologies are supportive of tentacular thinking by design, and thus potentially significant if used as per their intended design.

better phrased as "embark on the path"

seems more correct here to write "reflecting on".

Hyperlink is broken (links to front page of the website). Content link is broken as well (bogusly contains spaces).

Hyperlink is broken (links to front page of the website). Content link is broken as well (bogusly contains spaces).

This seems to imply - unsubstantiated! - that intended purpose of technologies is inherently about oppression, whereas unintended secondary uses of technology is where liberation from oppression should be sought.

A comma is crucially missing after "knowledge", to make it clear that "turn on my device" is an action, rather than "knowledge turn" being a weird thing to search for on my device.

comma seems inappropriate here

There is an "in" missing, as it is required both for what "they place us in" and also for how that placement is in our activity: "the new situation they placed us in in our learning activity".

Hyperlink is broken (links to front page of the website). Content link works.

seems ambiguous to leave out negation for the last part of a repeated list. Also, feels confusing albeit technically correct to tie the parts with "and" when negated. Together, seems better to rephrase like this: "there is no fulfilling learning, <del>no</del> creativity, <del>and</del>or innovative thought". Alternatively, if the intent is to emphasize stronger each part, then it feels better to at least explicitly negate the last part, like this: "there is no fulfilling learning, no creativity, and no** innovative thought".

sentence seems incomprehensive - perhaps replace with "those", or is something else misread or wrong?

grammatical error: Change to either "is [...] described" or "can [...] be described".

Search indicates the word "later" appears in this book 123 times, about half of them (57 by a quick count) are in contexts of the author saying he'll explain something later in the book. This is an annoying habit and would be better replaced with links to the exact pages where the material occurs.

Alternately/in addition to, an index could be immensely helpful here.

How does a book which speaks so heavily of indices and their value not have an index?

https://www.techdirt.com/2022/11/15/new-techdirt-policy-no-more-embedded-tweets/

Dear god I really hate when publishers do their references/notes like this. Sitting here at the end, unlinked to the actual text. There's a special place in hell for editors that do this in the digital age.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-complicated-legacy-of-e-o-wilson/

I can see why there's so much backlash on this piece.

It could and should easily have been written without any reference at all to E. O. Wilson and been broadly interesting and true. However given the editorial headline "The Complicated Legacy of E. O. Wilson", the recency of his death, and the photo at the top, it becomes clickbait for something wholly other.

There is only passing reference to Wilson and any of his work and no citations whatsoever about who he was or why his work was supposedly controversial. Instead the author leans in on the the idea of the biology being the problem instead of the application of biology to early anthropology which dramatically mis-read the biology and misapplied it for the past century and a half to bolster racist ideas and policies.

The author indicates that we should be better with "citational practices when using or reporting on problematic work", but wholly forgets to apply it to her own writing in this very piece.

I'm aware that the magazine editors are most likely the ones that chose the headline and the accompanying photo, but there's a failure here in both editorial and writing for this piece to have appeared in Scientific American in a way as to make it more of a hit piece on Wilson just days after his death. Worse, the backlash of the broadly unsupported criticism of Wilson totally washed out the attention that should have been placed on the meat of the actual argument in the final paragraphs.

Editorial failed massively on all fronts here.

This article seems to be a clear example of the following:

Any time one uses the word "problematic" to describe cultural issues, it can't stand alone without some significant context building and clear arguments about exactly what was problematic and precisely why. Otherwise the exercise is a lot of handwaving and puffery that does neither side of an argument or its intended audiences any good.

Waterson, J. (2022, January 11). BBC does not subscribe to ‘cancel culture’, says director of editorial policy. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/jan/11/bbc-does-not-subscribe-to-cancel-culture-says-director-of-editorial-policy

One of the most complex questions in journalism in the past decade or more is how can one best align editorial mission with the business model? This is particularly difficult because the traditional business model(s) have been shifting in the move to online.

The power of editorial is its ability to focus attention on what the editors deem to be important.

The View from Somewhere

Hallin’s spheres

At 11 minutes into this podcast episode, David Mindich provides an overview of Hallin’s spheres.

Hallin divides the world of political discourse into three concentric spheres: consensus, legitimate controversy, and deviance. In the sphere of consensus, journalists assume everyone agrees. The sphere of legitimate controversy includes the standard political debates, and journalists are expected to remain neutral. The sphere of deviance falls outside the bounds of legitimate debate, and journalists can ignore it. These boundaries shift, as public opinion shifts.

Wikipedia: Hallin's spheres

I learned about this podcast from Sandy and Nora in their episode, Canada’s democratic deficit.

This is an untested statement and does not take into account the perspectives of those contributing to the publishers' revenue. The Rights Retention Strategy (RRS) relies on the author's accepted manuscript (AAM) and for an AAM to exist and to have the added value from peer-review a Version of Record (VoR) must exist. Libraries recognise this fundamental principle and continue to subscribe to individual journals of merit and support lucrative deals with publishers. From some (not all) librarians' and possibly funders' perspectives these statements could undermine any mutual respect.

(2021). How epidemiology has shaped the COVID pandemic. Nature, 589, 491-492. Doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00183-z

Smith, G. D., Blastland, M., & Munafò, M. (2020). Covid-19’s known unknowns. BMJ, 371. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3979

Health, T. L. P. (2020). COVID-19 in Spain: A predictable storm? The Lancet Public Health, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30239-5

The key words being "free press" with free meaning that we're free to exert intelligent editorial control.

Editors in the early 1900's used this sort of editorial control not to give fuel to racists and Nazis and reduce their influence.Cross reference: Face the Racist Nation from On the Media.

Apparently we need to exert the same editorial control with respect to Trump, who not incidentally is giving significant fuel to the racist fire as well.

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

mlbb

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial

http://purl.org/spar/fabio/Editorial,http://purl.org/spar/fabio/BibliographicDatabase

Just a food for thought: wouldn't it be a better style to use a neutral form? I.e., "Because the user controls" instead of "Because we control"

I am not sure this is well formulated. The specification does not require, but implementation does require a bunch of particular technologies. I think the intention here is to say something like "This specification does not depend on any particular technology..."

I do not understand this statement. The DID subject is defined as:

The entity identified by a DID and described by a DID document. A DID has exactly one DID subject. Anything can be a DID subject: person, group, organization, physical thing, digital thing, logical thing, etc. The document cannot contain a person…

Strictly speaking, they are not. They are URI-s and there is a thing called DID URL…

This is only an abstract, but it should still be precise…

Diseases, T. L. I. (2020). Curing COVID-19. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30706-4

r/BehSciMeta - Comment by u/dawnlxh on ”A completely re-imagined approach to peer review and publishing: PRINCIPIA”. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/if03sk/a_completely_reimagined_approach_to_peer_review/g4nnuc5

Thorp, H. H. (2020). Persuasive words are not enough. Science, 368(6498), 1405–1405. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd4085

Rheumatology, T. L. (2020). COVID-19: A time to reflect. The Lancet Rheumatology, 2(6), e309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30102-8

Beest, I. van. (2020). Editorial. Social Influence, 0(0), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2020.1783758

Lancet, T. (2020). Research and higher education in the time of COVID-19. The Lancet, 396(10251), 583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31818-3

The Trump administration must stop sidelining the CDC. (2020). Nature, 583(7818), 660–660. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02231-6

Scally, G., Jacobson, B., & Abbasi, K. (2020). The UK’s public health response to covid-19. BMJ, m1932. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1932

Editorial: COVID-19 will not leave behind refugees and migrants. The Lancet. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30758-3

Jamieson, R. K., & Pexman, P. M. (2020, April 20). Moving Beyond 20 Questions: We (Still) Need Stronger Psychological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000223

unidad_COVID2019

Recursos para revisión por pares

The majority of this letter is a carbon-copied typescript. Text in blue indicates handwritten emendations by Schlauch.

Cette récente initiative (2018) montre combien ce système universel d'annotation du Web est prometteur.

J'espère que la méfiance croissante des internautes à l'égard des réseaux privatifs, suite à l'Affaire Cambridge Analytica, les encouragera à regarder ce qui se fait dans le monde du libre : hypothes.is, en l'occurrence, mais aussi Friendica, diaspora et le reste du Fediverse et de la Fédération, du côté des réseaux sociaux conventionnels.

Before correcting those inaccuracies or instead?

Should be "A"

Best of luck with that. The Future of Journalism requires better headlines. #FoJ

This should be moved to Column-2, under the line "Blocks IL-2 production"

change to "Binding"