- Dec 2020
- Nov 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
Supersedes (and first sighting at): https://github.com/wycats/javascript-decorators
-
It took us a long time for everyone to get on the same page about the requirements spanning frameworks, tooling and native implementations. Only after pushing in various concrete directions did we get a full understanding of the requirements which this proposal aims to meet.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
-
If the document is uncontroversial and agreement is reached quickly it might be committed directly with the "accepted" status. Likewise, if the proposal is rejected the status shall be "rejected". When a document is rejected a member of the core team should append a section describing the reasons for rejection.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I'd like to go with an RFC-based governance model (similar to Rust, Ember or Swift) that looks something like this: new features go through a public RFC that describes the motivation for the change, a detailed implementation description, a description on how to document or teach the change (for kpm, that would roughly be focused around how it affected the usual workflows), any drawbacks or alternatives, and any open questions that should be addressed before merging. the change is discussed until all of the relevant arguments have been debated and the arguments are starting to become repetitive (they "reach a steady state") the RFC goes into "final comment period", allowing people who weren't paying close attention to every proposal to have a chance to weigh in with new arguments. assuming no new arguments are presented, the RFC is merged by consensus of the core team and the feature is implemented. All changes, regardless of their source, go through this process, giving active community members who aren't on the core team an opportunity to participate directly in the future direction of the project. (both because of proposals they submit and ones from the core team that they contribute to)
-
Tags
- software projects: governance
- soliciting feedback
- attracting contributors
- yarn
- build concensus
- governance
- open-source projects: allowing community (who are not on core team) to influence/affect/steer the direction of the project
- open-source projects: process
- change proposal workflow: RFCs
- allowing sufficient time for discussion/feedback/debate before a final decision is made
- welcoming feedback
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
-
Another possible syntax is {#slot bar}<Foo/>{/slot}, which would also allow a bunch of DOM nodes and components inside the slot, without them needing to be from a single component
I like it
-
-
github.com github.com
-
The RFC repo (where the reaction was strongly positive) is the place for discussion about what features to add; the decision has been made.
-
- Oct 2020
-
corelab.blog corelab.blog
-
Proposing a PSA-affiliated paid translation service with a first focus on Africa. (2020, October 14). https://corelab.blog/psatranslation/
-
-
-
-
instead of closing immediately, could we discuss some syntaxes that might work? I'm hardly an expert, so I'm not sure I can propose a syntax, but I can try to get the ball rolling:
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I'm suggesting there should be a way to write lifecycle related code that also responds to changing props, like how useEffect works. I think how React handles this could be a good source of inspiration.
-
- Sep 2020
-
discuss.rubyonrails.org discuss.rubyonrails.org
-
Happy to discuss all the concrete proposals on how to make things better.
-
Insisting on a specific implementation, rather than proposing a clear problem, suggesting a possible solution, and “not being married” to your initial preferred solution.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
The feature is highly likely to be implemented, the API and implementation are the only real topics of discussion right now.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Please focus on explaining the motivation so that if this RFC is not accepted, the motivation could be used to develop alternative solutions. In other words, enumerate the constraints you are trying to solve without coupling them too closely to the solution you have in mind.
Tags
- contribution guidelines: should explain motivation for change
- iterative process
- defining the problem clearly is as valuable coming up with specific implementation/solution
- answer the "why?"
- okay for proposal to not be accepted
- iterative process: building on previous attempts/work
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
Syntax-wise, I would like to be able to pass id, style and class DOM attributes as well as (ideally) svelte props to whatever the slot was replaced with, so prefixing everything with attr in the slot that should be passed sounds like a good idea. Examples: <slot attr:class=“test” attr:class:active={true} /> or <slot attr:style=“color: red” attr:id=“henlo” />
-
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
r/BehSciMeta - Comment by u/dawnlxh on ”A completely re-imagined approach to peer review and publishing: PRINCIPIA”. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/if03sk/a_completely_reimagined_approach_to_peer_review/g4nnuc5
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Yarn also has an RFC process which may offer a better discussion platform compared to this GitHub issue.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Many changes, including bug fixes and documentation improvements can be implemented and reviewed via the normal GitHub pull request workflow. Some changes though are "substantial", and we ask that these be put through a bit of a design process and produce a consensus among the Yarn core team. The "RFC" (request for comments) process is intended to provide a consistent and controlled path for new features to enter the project.
-
- Aug 2020
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
Horton, R. (2020). Offline: A novel solution to live with coronavirus. The Lancet, 395(10241), 1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31416-1
-
-
-
Starominski-Uehara, M. (2020). Reducing the Risks of New Coronavirus in Vulnerable Areas in Brazil [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4739g
-
-
www.medrxiv.org www.medrxiv.org
-
Herper, M. (2020, July 1). Covid-19 vaccine from Pfizer and BioNTech shows positive results. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/01/coronavirus-vaccine-from-pfizer-and-biontech-shows-positive-results-report-says.html
-
- Jul 2020
-
www.cambridge.org www.cambridge.org
-
Al-Ubaydli, O., Lee, M. S., List, J. A., Mackevicius, C. L., & Suskind, D. (undefined/ed). How can experiments play a greater role in public policy? Twelve proposals from an economic model of scaling. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.17
-
-
bugs.ruby-lang.org bugs.ruby-lang.org
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Starominski-Uehara, M. (2020). Governance in Crisis: Institutionalizing Reflective Report to Guide Decision Making Under Uncertainty [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/y3nsa
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Tijdink, J. K., Luykx, J. J., van Veen, S., Vinkers, C., & Veltman, E. (2020). Challenging COVID-19 times for older psychiatric patients: Potential implications and solutions [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/z4puv
-
- Jun 2020
-
edgeguides.rubyonrails.org edgeguides.rubyonrails.org
-
Sometimes, the line between 'bug' and 'feature' is a hard one to draw. Generally, a feature is anything that adds new behavior, while a bug is anything that causes incorrect behavior. Sometimes, the core team will have to make a judgment call.
-
- May 2020
-
-
Crchartier, ~. (2020, March 13). The PSA Calls for Rapid and Impactful Study Proposals on COVID-19. Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/2020/03/13/the-psa-calls-for-rapid-and-impactful-study-proposals-on-covid-19/
-
-
docs.google.com docs.google.com
- Apr 2020
-
www.ukri.org www.ukri.org
-
NIHR and UKRI launch call for research on COVID-19 and ethnicity—UK Research and Innovation. (n.d.). Retrieved April 24, 2020, from https://www.ukri.org/news/nihr-and-ukri-launch-call-for-research-on-covid-19-and-ethnicity/
-
-
www.axa-research.org www.axa-research.org
-
Exceptional Flash Call for Proposals: Mitigating risk in the wake of the... (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2020, from https://www.axa-research.org/fr/page/call-for-proposals-mitigating-risk-in-the-wake-of-the-covid-19-pandemic
-
-
-
Callaway, E. (2020). Should scientists infect healthy people with the coronavirus to test vaccines? Nature, 580(7801), 17–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00927-3
-
- Feb 2020
-
about.gitlab.com about.gitlab.com
-
Make a proposal If you need to decide something as a team, make a concrete proposal instead of calling a meeting to get everyone's input. Having a proposal will be a much more effective use of everyone's time. Every meeting should be a review of a proposal.
-
- Nov 2019
-
github.com github.com
-
I often wish for this. I don't understand why this hasn't been added.
Ugly workaround for now:
# Note, even though we don't need or use arguments passed to this selector, you *must* pass in an # argument to prevent it from matching the :id selector and giving a "Unable to find id :parent (Capybara::ElementNotFound)" error. # Example: el.first(:parent, 1) # You may also need match: first if el matches multiple elements to avoid Capybara::Ambiguous Capybara.add_selector(:parent) do xpath { ".//.." } end
-
-
github.com github.com
- Oct 2019
- Aug 2019
-
www.heritage.org www.heritage.org
-
Under the Sanders proposal, for example, cost control is secured by a global budget and by imposing Medicare payment rates. Blahous, a former Medicare trustee, estimates that under the Sanders proposal, provider payments would be cut by an estimated 40 percent by usingMedicare payment rates. Using Medicare payment rates throughout the entire American health care economy would hurt patients. Already, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services projects that “nearly half of hospitals, approximately two-thirds of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), and over 8 percent of home health agencies (HHAs) would have negative total facility margins.”
The system does not keep a balance between suppliers and consumers. Make up the economy of health care disorders.
-
- Jul 2017
-
www.elatewiki.org www.elatewiki.org
-
proposal vs prospectus
-
- Mar 2017
-
tachesdesens.blogspot.com tachesdesens.blogspot.com
-
With only an hour face-to-face meeting with my friend Claude Tregoat we set up connections for 500 students in a project which would become to be known as CLAVIER.
Taking the risk to be open.
Feeling of being uncomfortable when first confronted with explaining a potential project - that reminds me of conversations with Maritta and Leena.
-
-
hack.allmende.io hack.allmende.io
-
Non-confirmed partner proposals
Could it be good to have partners with existing mapping experience?
-
- Jan 2017
-
www.gutenberg.org www.gutenberg.org
-
and when his approbation of Rosamond's engagement was asked for, he gave it with astonishing facility, passing at once to general remarks on the desirableness of matrimony for young men and maidens, and apparently deducing from the whole the appropriateness of a little more punch.
Again, making light of marriage. Is George Elliot making fun of how quickly people get married and how expected that is?
-
and speak less incompletely. Rosamond had to make her little confession, and he poured out words of gratitude and tenderness with impulsive lavishment.
I feel like the narrator is down playing everything to accentuate its haste and rashness. Why? Is it simply to hook in the reader before going back to Featherstone in the next chapter? Or will their marriage be like Dorothea and Casaubon's too?
-