Ask five people at Every where their Plus One falls on the tool-to-coworker continuum and you'll get five different answers.
同一家公司、同样密集使用 AI 的五个人，对「AI 是工具还是同事」有完全不同的答案——而且使用频率与这个判断无关（Austin 用 Montaigne 最多，却坚持视其为「工具」）。这说明人类对 AI 的认知框架不是由使用量决定的，而是由个人哲学和心理边界决定的。这个多元共存的现象将是未来 AI 工作场所最复杂的管理挑战之一。
Phenomenal consciousness is only seemingly private because in order to measure it one needs to be in the appropriate cognitive frame of reference. It is not a simple transformation to change from a third-person cognitive frame of reference to the first-person frame, but in principle it can be done, and hence phenomenal consciousness isn’t private anymore.
Contents 1 Overview 2 Reasons for failure 2.1 Overconfidence and complacency 2.1.1 Natural tendency 2.1.2 The illusion of control 2.1.3 Anchoring 2.1.4 Competitor neglect 2.1.5 Organisational pressure 2.1.6 Machiavelli factor 2.2 Dogma, ritual and specialisation 2.2.1 Frames become blinders 2.2.2 Processes become routines 2.2.3 Resources become millstones 2.2.4 Relationships become shackles 2.2.5 Values becomes dogmas 3 The paradox of information systems 3.1 The irrationality of rationality 3.2 How computers can be destructive 3.3 Recommendations for practice 4 Case studies 4.1 Fresh & Easy 4.2 Firestone Tire and Rubber Company 4.3 Laura Ashley 4.4 Xerox 5 See also 6 References
Wiki table of contents of the Icarus paradox