- Dec 2022
-
wordpress.org wordpress.org
-
Now I just have to figure out why Gmail isn’t showing the Unsubscribe option like everyone says it should.
-
- Sep 2022
-
github.com github.com
-
Yes, I understand that it had probably been tried. My question was more, "Why didn't twiddling the knob work?”
-
- May 2022
-
wordpress.com wordpress.com
-
"I'd want to learn a lot from Professor Zimmerman so that I may obtain as much information as possible and use it in reality. It's not about the work."
Tags
- (Shorter Piece) First two-sentences
- The backdrop of this annotation is that it was a late-semester free writing for an essay brainstorm. In this piece of writing, I mentioned how I didn't know what to expect going into the project and wanted to learn as much as possible for my own betterment.
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2022
- Jun 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
Configuration style is exactly the same for env_bang and env_setting, only that there's no "ENV!" method... just the normal class: EnvSetting that is called and configured.
-
- Apr 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
COPYRIGHT Rsync was originally written by Andrew Tridgell and is currently maintained by Wayne Davison. It has been improved by many developers from around the world. Rsync may be used, modified and redistributed only under the terms of the GNU General Public License, found in the file COPYING in this distribution, or at the Free Software Foundation.
Only answered:
- who maintains
- what the license is
-
-
boardgamegeek.com boardgamegeek.com
-
The central decision of the game is when to play your houses. And you didn't even really talk about that.
-
- Mar 2021
-
jangawolof.org jangawolof.orgPhrases1
-
Séentuwul woon ni dinañu ko alamaan.
Il ne s'attendait pas à ce qu'on lui inflige une amende.
"We didn't expect that we would be fined."
séentu+wul (séentu) v. -- to seek to see from afar 👀, to scrutinize 🧐, to expect.
woon -- he didn't (?).
ni -- formats a verb (?)
dinañu -- we will.
ko -- her, him, it.
alamaan v. -- (French: l'amende) give a fine.
-
- Feb 2021
-
unix.stackexchange.com unix.stackexchange.com
-
This didn't work for me. Answering "y" somehow causes the script to finish immediately, rather than letting children continue sleeping. (Same thing if I make the signal handler function an empty no-op.) Does anyone know why it doesn't work for me or how to get it to work? It's as if the interrupt gets propagated to the child processes too so that it's no longer waiting for them.
-
-
devel.ringlet.net devel.ringlet.net
-
A “warning” signal is sent first, then, after a timeout, a “kill” signal, similar to the way init(8) operates on shutdown.
-
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
if the process does not react on a normal kill, you may want to add an additional kill -9 a few seconds afterwards.
-
-
www.howtogeek.com www.howtogeek.com
-
We can ask timeout to try to stop the program using SIGTERM, and to only send in SIGKILL if SIGTERM didn’t work. To do this, we use the -k (kill after) option. The -k option requires a time value as a parameter.
-
- Oct 2020
-
-
I really dont need a solution to this problem! I can find many workararounds
Actually, the answer that was given was a good answer, as it pointed to the problem: It was a reminder that you need to:
assign to a locally declared variable.
So I'm not sure the answer was intended to "just" be a solution/workaround, but to help correct or fill in the misunderstanding / forgotten piece of the puzzle to help OP realize why it wasn't working, and realize how reactivity is designed to work (based on assignments).
It was a very simplified answer, but it was meant to point in the right direction.
Indeed, it pointed to this main point that was explained in more detail by @rixo later:
Personally, this also totally aligns with my expectations because in your function
fruitcan come from anywhere and be anything:
-
- Sep 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
Svelte will not offer a generic way to support style customizing via contextual class overrides (as we'd do it in plain HTML). Instead we'll invent something new that is entirely different. If a child component is provided and does not anticipate some contextual usage scenario (style wise) you'd need to copy it or hack around that via :global hacks.
Tags
- trying to prevent one bad thing leading to people doing/choosing an even worse option
- run-time dynamicness/generics vs. having to explicitly list/hard-code all options ahead of time
- workarounds
- Svelte: how to affect child component styles
- maintenance burden to explicitly define/enumerate/hard-code possible options (explicit interface)
- forced to fork/copy and paste library code because it didn't provide enough customizability/extensibility / didn't foresee some specific prop/behavior that needed to be overridable/configurable (explicit interface)
- forking to add a desired missing feature/change
- ugly/kludgey
- component/library author can't consider/know ahead of time all of the ways users may want to use it
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
They don't need to add a prop for every action. The action itself can be passed in as a prop. <script> export let action; </script> <div use:action>whatever</div> The argument for the action can be another prop or can be part of the same prop.
-