Log in Sign up
1 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2020
  2. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
    Forensic Mental Health Practitioners’ Use of Structured Risk Assessment Instruments, Views About Bias in Risk Evaluations, and Strategies to Counteract It
    1
    1. edampf 28 Apr 2020
      in BehSci

      Kamorowski, J., de Ruiter, C., Schreuder, M., Ask, K., & Jelicic, M. (2020, April 16). Forensic Mental Health Practitioners’ Use of Structured Risk Assessment Instruments, Views About Bias in Risk Evaluations, and Strategies to Counteract It. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/te5c2

      is:preprint lang:en cognitive bias debiasing strategy risk assessment forensics mental health evaluation the Netherlands bias blind spot
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    • mental health
    • lang:en
    • bias blind spot
    • the Netherlands
    • cognitive bias
    • forensics
    • risk assessment
    • evaluation
    • is:preprint
    • debiasing strategy

    Annotators

    • edampf

    URL

    psyarxiv.com/te5c2/
Share:
Group. Only group members will be able to view this annotation.
Only me. No one else will be able to view this annotation.
Hypothes.is
  • About
  • Blog
  • Bioscience
  • Education
  • Jobs
  • Help
  • Contact
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy