1,954 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2017
    1. The Russian dissident and chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov drew upon long familiarity with that process when he tweeted: “The point of modern propaganda isn’t only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth.”

      Very well said.

    1. Annotate

      As another example of the trend in annotated news, there are many things to like about this example, and some notable drawbacks as well. Pros: More interactive than NYTimes' previous annotation efforts, nudges reader use of layered commentary, content of annotation layer encourages perspective-taking and reminds reader that political is personal (and vice versa). I also think it's interesting that interview processes and outcomes become the content of the annotation layer. Cons: Confusing how annotations (i.e. refugee contributions via interview) are related to specific anchor text, the "Notes" are static (no ability for reader response, no links out to related information), and annotation "Notes" don't have tags (limiting association with other documents and annotated content). That's my rough assessment of an important step forward.

    2. Produced

      The NYTimes' in-house annotation efforts are iterating rather quickly - this approach is more interactive than what was publishing a week ago, yet still isn't participatory or open. I'm eager to see how their efforts continue to grow, whether or not they'll jump to a third party platform, and if they'll discuss their process publicly.

    3. asked refugees in Jordan

      To learn about these refugees - who they are, where they have come from, etc. - the reader must click on highlighted anchor text and read the annotation. The UX makes interaction with the annotation layer an essential quality of the reader's experience.

    4. for their responses to the president’s decision

      I'm curious about the relationship between interviewing and annotating. Su "asked refugees... for their responses," with answers then anchored to specific parts of the EO. What's the process linking new content (refugee responses) to the anchor text?

    1. almost like the golden snitch in quidditch

      In which we explain a common, real world sport, played by many around the world, with a fictional one—likely helpfully.

    1. “Judge Gorsuch has outstanding legal skills, a brilliant mind, tremendous discipline and has earned bipartisan support,” Mr. Trump said, standing beside the judge and his wife, Louise, as White House officials and Republican lawmakers looked on. “It is an extraordinary résumé — as good as it gets.”

      This seems questionable.

  2. Jan 2017
    1. In 2014, a group of Stanford researchers studied 19,000 SNAP participants and compared whether banning sugary drinks or incentivizing fruits and vegetables would affect obesity rates. The researchers found that the incentive program would not. But banning sugary drinks from SNAP, they said, “would be expected to significantly reduce obesity prevalence and Type 2 diabetes incidence, particularly among ages 18 to 65 and some racial and ethnic minorities.”

      Good for the health but there needs more comprehensive test to why people eat the way they do and teaching them how to eat better. Yes, banning soda would help but then some people may replace soda with something else.

    2. PepsiCo lobbied the federal government to prevent restrictions on food stamp purchases in 2011, 2012 and 2013, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit that tracks money in politics. Coca-Cola, Kraft Foods and the sugar industry lobbied against a Florida bill in 2012

      Should not let big companies have a say on what families eat or drink either.

    3. The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, better known as WIC, and the national school lunch program have strict nutrition standards. Medicare pays for necessary medical procedures but does not reimburse for ones it considers harmful, ineffective or unnecessary. SNAP, Dr. Ludwig said, should be structured similarly.

      The situations of one family should not be applied to another. The WIC program is different because it deals with more single and young mothers. While SNAP may deal with large families who all different needs

    4. One limitation of the report was that it could not always distinguish when SNAP households used their benefits, other money or a combination of the two to pay for transactions.

      This is an important variable/flaw of the study because having the perception that tax payers money is going to soft drinks may make people anger but the study does not distinguish if the food stamps is actually paying for it

    5. the U.S.D.A. said it was unfair to single out food stamp recipients for their soft drink consumption.

      USDA states that non-SNAP families have similar soft drink percentages and that families should not be judged for their purchase.

    6. The findings show that the No. 1 purchases by SNAP households are soft drinks, which accounted for 5 percent of the dollars they spent on food. The category of ‘sweetened beverages,’ which includes soft drinks, fruit juices, energy drinks and sweetened teas, accounted for almost 10 percent of the dollars they spent on food. “In this sense, SNAP

      soft drinks accounted for 5% of dollars spent on food. By knowing this tax payers may be skeptical of SNAP.

    1. “It was a huge crowd, a magnificent crowd. I haven’t seen such a crowd as big as this,” Mr. Hoyer told CNN, quoting Mr. Trump. He added that Mr. Trump did not “spend a lot of time on that, but it was clear that it was still on his mind.”

      Whoa.

    1. Our audience inhabits a complex, polluted information environment; our role is to help them navigate it — not to pretend it doesn’t exist. The need to show our work and earn trust has never been more important, since once reliable official sources are peddling “alternative facts” — as the White House press secretary did Saturday.

      The first half of this statement could be reworked as a pedagogical call for digital literacy.

    1. Or — worse — Mr. Trump’s vow to end “political correctness” and make this, at least rhetorically, the same white man’s America it was in Jackson’s time?

      I don't think that will happen, too many people, civilians, will stand in his way; standing up for what they believe in

    2. I don’t buy it. Hillary Clinton’s campaign wasn’t that bad, and Mr. Trump was exposed enough for any thinking adult to see exactly what he is.

      I agree, people tend to get stuck on useless little issues rather than working on change

    3. a man who says he has never asked God for forgiveness, who refers to the Eucharist with characteristic humility (“I drink my little wine, which is about the only wine I drink, and have my little cracker"), who mocks our military heroes, who lumbers about a stage proclaiming, “I alone can fix it!,” who dismissed a working man after the election with a tweet that read in part, “Spend more time working — less talking”

      definitely not in favor of donald trump - these are some new ones I haven't heard of

    4. It’s inescapable, considering what we are: the first republic of the modern age, a nation of immigrants, haven to so many peoples from around the world. We have, like no other country, for better and for ill, dominated the modern world through both our hard power and our soft, our weapons but also our ideas.

      This is a really a good sentence and idea/explanation

    1. On several dozen of campuses, remarkably, fewer students hail from the entire bottom half of the income distribution than from the top 1 percent.

      That's so so crazy oh my goodness

    1. We will build new roads, and highways, and bridges, and airports, and tunnels, and railways all across our wonderful nation. We will get our people off of welfare and back to work rebuilding our country with American hands and American labor.

      The Republican Congress will not fund a New Deal. Is the new President lying or delusional?

    2. You came by the tens of millions to become part of an historic movement, the likes of which the world has never seen before. At the center of this movement is a crucial conviction that a nation exists to serve its citizens.

      There is no movement. That was demonstrated by the turnout on the National Mall during the Inauguration.

    3. Every four years, we gather on these steps to carry out the orderly and peaceful transfer of power

      Inaccurate. Only Carter and Bush 41 transferred power after four years, since Hoover in 1933.

    4. a great national effort to rebuild our country

      Not likely from the party that hates the government and obstructs every effort to improve our lives. They are taking apart the Federal government not rebuilding anything.

    5. The Bible tells us how good and pleasant it is when God's people live together in unity

      No one comments on any of the religious comments in this speech, all by a man who has never shown a sign of religiosity in his entire life.

    6. Mothers and children trapped in poverty in our inner cities, rusted-out factories scattered like tombstones across the landscape of our nation; an education system flush with cash but which leaves our young and beautiful students deprived of all knowledge; and the crime and the gangs and the drugs that have stolen too many lives and robbed our country of so much unrealized potential.

      This is an absurdly bleak picture.

    1. Mr. Díaz

      [Repeat] At the John Jay Library:

      • The brief wondrous life of Oscar Wao, located at Stacks PS3554 .I259 B75 2007
      • Drown, located at Reserve PS3554 .I259 D76 1997
    2. Zadie Smith

      At the John Jay Library:

      • On Beauty, located at Stacks PR6069.M59 O5 2006b
      • White Teeth, located at Stacks PR6069 .M59 W47 2001 and the Browsing Collection
    3. Jhumpa Lahiri

      At the John Jay Library:

      • The namesake, located at Stacks PS3562 .A316 N36 2003
      • Interpreter of maladies: stories, located at Stacks PS3562 .A316 I58 1999
    4. Emerson

      At the John Jay Library:

      • Essays & lectures, located at Stacks PS 1605 1983
      • The works of Ralph Waldo Emerson (essays, lectures, letters), located at Special Collections (open shelves) PS 1600 .E83
    5. Nietzsche

      At the John Jay Library:

      • The Portable Nietzsche (essays, letters, notes), located at Stacks B3312.E52 K3 1968
      • The will to power, located at Stacks B3313 .N5 1968
    6. Wright

      At the John Jay Library:

      • Native Son, located on Reserve PS3545 .R815 N25 2005
      • Works (several novels and other writing) by Richard Wright, located at Stacks PS 3545 .R815 1991
    1. An actor’s only job is to enter the lives of people who are different from us, and let you feel what that feels like.

      Really this should be all out jobs. Everyday.

    1. Our writing is more relaxed than it used to be — that’s intentional. I actually think some newspaper writing of a generation ago was too stilted, was too hard to follow, too hard to understand

      Could it be because their audience has gained some younger members?

    2. I sat down with the executive editor, Dean Baquet

      He's obviously a man of power in the NYT, it makes the article worth reading - what we're hearing isn't passed down a chain of people

    1. Nicholas Reville, a board member of the Participatory Culture Foundation who has worked with the Sleeping Giants

      I like how he brings the Sleeping Giants back in, it ties the story together

    2. it’s about using corporations as shields to protect vulnerable people from bullying and hate crimes.

      I've read many articles about cyberbullying between individuals or a group. It's new to read about such large scale cyber hate.

    3. I expected that other companies would want to trumpet their own Breitbart departures. It seemed an easy win for corporate P.R. to distance itself from Klan-rally-like riffs like this one — “every tree, every rooftop, every picket fence, every telegraph pole in the South should be festooned with the Confederate battle flag.” (Telegraph poles!?)

      This article is interesting but difficult to follow.

    4. Programmatic ads can also follow individuals around the internet, based on their browsing history, as happened with Mr. Philips. A single targeted ad could cost just a fraction of a penny, but the pennies add up to a billion-dollar industry.

      It's very interesting to know how this all works.

    5. Within hours, they received their first response, and they realized that they had stumbled across a potentially powerful tactic.

      It's interesting to think how anyone can make a change in the world. Just by creating a twitter account these people have started something powerful.

    1. In the short and medium term, we must step up assistance to climate refugees and sufferers, both to provide relief and to assist with new livelihoods that adjust to new climate realities

      call to action

    2. She broke off cactus pads, scraped off the thorns and boiled them briefly, and the boys ate them — even though they provide little nutrition. “My heart is breaking because I have nothing to give them,” Fideline said. “I have no choice.”

      He doesn't mention himself much, although it was his own story of when he was there he focuses on what will apply to readers emotions.

    3. Those of us in the rich world who have emitted most of the carbon bear a special responsibility to help people like these Madagascar villagers who are simultaneously least responsible for climate change and most vulnerable to it.

      I like this statement. It's clear and to the point. Not too wordy

    4. Trump has repeatedly mocked climate change, once even calling it a hoax fabricated by China.

      This makes Trump look like the bad guy, making it seem like he's working against dying children

    5. overseas governments that don’t want to curb carbon emissions.

      He states "curb carbon emissions" like it's a very simple thing to solve. Is it? I'm not sure but usually a problem of such a large scale cannot be "curbed" with ease

    6. For the next half century or so, we will see students learning less in school and economies held back, because in 2017 we allowed more than a million kids to be malnourished just here in southern Africa, collateral damage from our carbon-intensive way of life.

      More new information

    7. Now they understand there is a far broader toll: When children in utero and in the first few years of life are malnourished, their brains don’t develop properly. As a result, they may suffer permanently impaired brain function

      He presents something new, we know children are starving in Africa. But this is different information readers haven't heard before

    8. Sonjona realizes that it is wrong to marry off a 10-year-old, but he also knows it is wrong to see his daughter starve.

      Such a sad struggle, a decision that a man should not have to make about his daughter.

    9. because no one can afford the bride price of about $32.

      Many people have $32 in their wallets at any given time. Again, we will never know what it's like to live in those conditions.

    10. Not one of the children in the village has ever had a bath.

      This shows the audience that even though they're reading about these impoverished people they will never know what it is actually like to experience these conditions.

    11. a related drought has devastated East Africa and the Horn of Africa and is expected to continue this year. The U.N. World Food Program has urgently appealed for assistance, but only half the money needed has been donated.

      Translation: It's not going away and Americans are selfish, will you be like the rest of them and let these kids die on your watch?

      Reminds me of the "Arms of the Angel" dog commercials. I can't watch them without crying

    12. “I feel so powerless as a mother, because I know how much I love my child,” she said. “But whatever I do just doesn’t work.”

      I am not a mother and this still hits me hard, it must hurt mothers very deeply

    1. Students need two skills to succeed as lawyers and as professionals: listening and communicating. We must listen with care, which requires patience, focus, eye contact and managing moments of ennui productively — perhaps by double-checking one’s notes instead of a friend’s latest Instagram. Multitasking and the mediation of screens kill empathy.