Mike bunn stated that he realized that writing is more complexed than just writing words and sentences , That there is a process when it comes to writing.

This explains that there are different ways to learn and different ways to teach how to read

The title explains what we are about to read and also what the article is talking about .

Mike Bunn is saying that if we read somebody else's writing , we can learn how to write our own.

Begin Reading Here

What exactly are they trying to comminicate to one another? a sense of dominance?

enabling someone to discover or learn something for themselves:

This is interesting to me as my son with down syndrome developed at a very young age to suck on his fingers and I never did much to restrict him from it because I was told it was a way he self soothes, he is five now and struggles to break the habit.

Research this project for more info on data

a group of people with a shared characteristic: "a cohort of civil servants patiently drafting legislation"

Science is theoritical and we tend to forget that, I forget that around people that are more rigid in their thinking at times

Subjectivity in scientifical theories according to perception or bias

theses are good examples as they contain leading questions that imply a specific answer while supporting a particular viewpoint.

]no there is a limit too what you can say and can not

It's important to recognize generalizations in arguments and carefully examine them for any possible exceptions.

Strong definition of generalization. Will be useful in understanding context.

This is good in an argument because it doesn't force the reader/audience to agree with you by manipulation but rather instead it allows them to agree on their own beliefs as you guide them towards your point.

This shows that having a counterargument doesn't destroy one's claim but could instead help them out when using limits to show some counters still need to be backed by valid proof.

Throughout my life I was always told that making a generalized statement is good because it is general, It is not to account for everyone or everything but just a general amount. Of course, in an argument generalization is a bad thing.

in an argument the least harmful points will be made

counterarguments don't invalidate the argument; might help even

doesn't mean the statement will be accurate

False choice fallacy is when there are choices presented by an argument.

It should be emphasized that this is especially good just for groups.

Generalizing things won't reach the specific details you may need and could cause you to miss things.

This is a great example of why general statements are not always true since teachers do have the right to express themselves in a classroom it does not mean they have the right to be telling students "hate speech".

This comes to show that general statements does not make them entirely true.

This does not really specify. This is an example of equivocation.

False dilemma/false choice fallacy is when an argument present options when multiple options or resources are available.

General statements may have exceptions. While we can critique weak spots, some arguments can present broad examples or evidence that can withstand criticism.

Based on my understanding. Generalization is a statement that is not always true, or presents a weak statement and sounds plausible.

property,?!

similar to poverty..

I think this is true because when battling with addictions it's more of a psychological problem than anything. I'm learning this in psychology, there's more trauma, and conditioning that goes into humans. That causes the decisions of their everyday choices.

We want strong warrants because the whole point of your speech is to build credibility and make your audience interested. My struggle is finding credible sources to use in my speech. Normally takes me a while to find articles I truly like and want to share with others.

I think every speech you give should be important. You would be in front of a crowd of people, that are taking time out of their day to hear you out. When giving a speech, it should be exciting to you because if it's not why would it be interesting to anyone else?

error: group is 14 or 4A

P3,P2

Why do you have to shift the indices here? When n=0 or n=1, the term evaluates to 0, just like it does in the first summation above. So why can't you continue on with this term and evaluate it just like you did the others before it?

That's why I feel it's best to come up with a topic that you can talk about in an orderly fashion and just enough so that your audience will understand the information given.

I think this was one of the main things I was struggling with when coming up with a topic for my project. I wanted to do something that I was interested in, something the audience would be interested in, and of course a topic not too broad.

read this and the paragraph above to reread the evolutionary model of the mind

genotypes could suggest you may have a certain phenotype, but there can be multiple different outcomes of what you phenotype is?

i didn't realize what you eat can actually affect your DNA

interesting because when we see someone with only 1 arm we typically know it is because something happened to them, and we don't typically think anything other than that

understand that genes and environment work together, not against each other, and it seems they have equal reason for who we become

explains what and how psych evolution occurs and what is important to understand when thinking about psych evolution compared to physical evolution

we still have the same thoughts when it comes to relationships and showing others we care for them, although it may occur in different ways

interesting to understand this was the biggest difference between humans and other animals

evolution does not explain the origin of species on earth

natural selection may cancel out the good and bad alleles in an organism. just because you have a good allele doesn't mean that it will be passed on

important to understand that evolution typically occurs when change is needed for survival

I am a bit confused. If natural selection acts on random variation, has is it not random? Is it because the traits are not random?

important to understand our minds change over time as well as our physical features

its just saying that combustions yield certain products which are molecules that interfere with the radiation emitted from the source

This term should be $F=\pd{\vec{r}_\text{lab}}{t}$?

What does this term equal to?

n

affects them mentally

affects them socially

mental health ^^

mental health

What are three uses of chlorine? It acts as Disinfectant Pesticides Medical products

definition of biopsychology

This quote captures two different mindsets of a woman!

The narrator's husband was isolating her assuming that it would prevent overstimulation.

This such a scary position to be in. It's a recipe for anyone to lose their mind.

The narrator has a colonial mansion, yet is not amused by that.

how neuroscience is connected to pysch

gage was changed after his accident but still remain functioning. this is showing that damage to the frontal lobe is clearly a sign that it affects our behavior

explaining why neurons are important and how they work together to create communication in the brain and body

are all things regarding how our skull is shaped true to how we behave? or are there exceptions?

explaining who founded what about the brain, explains more on how the brain controls our feelings

all of our thoughts and feelings are "material" because they come from our brain

Myth busted.

Areas of focus for biopysch

Nonverbal communication is exactly what is sounds, It's communication without speaking to another person. I can IMMENSELY connect this to my life outside the classroom. I can easily communicate to my mom in my house without having to speak to her, for example if she asks me about something I can simply give her a thumbs up.

Communication is the process of sending messages with meaning that could be received in multiple contexts. I can relate this to my life outside of the classroom. As funny as this sounds I struggle communicating with others because of my challenge with finding the right words. When I'm in a conversation sometimes I have a hard time finding the right words to go along with the conversation.

Oral communication is transmitted through one channel transmitting through sound and is picked up by our ears. Other people don't have a hard time understanding the information, but I do. As I said in previous annotations my brain has a hard time processing large amounts of information. So, It doesn't help my brain when there is a large amount of information that is communicated.

I believe everyone thinks this way because actions speak louder than words. If someone says they like you then goes and gossips about you. You're going to think they do not like you at all.

When people take lie detector tests, they often have body language analysis because their body is usually saying something they are not.

Posture is either our natural or intentional position our body places us in. When I'm giving a speech in class or outside the classroom my legs and hips tend to move outwards and lock ( there's a name for it I just can't think of it right now!). With knowing this about myself I'm hoping that I can improve this common movement while I give a speech.

Vocalics are study of paralanguage in vocal qualities. When I'm giving a speech all of these specific vocal qualities can't be control because of my nervousness. For instance my rate will be a quick pace (as I want to finish the speech as quickly as possible). My vocal quality will be in the area of low to medium.

I was taught this in my avid class. The class was on how to be successful in college. My teacher taught us to sit in front, we take in more information that way, sit up straight, and nod to show that we understand to the speaker.

👍🏼

lymph is formed

Again focusing on nutrition this week, it is important to know when children are not eating enough, especially when their appetites are changing. Their bodies are rapidly changing and because of this they deal with chemical imbalances and their taste buds are changing which means they are going to be a bit picky, so it is important to make sure they are eating enough by giving them food you know they like or introducing new foods to try. That wat they get a taste of something different as well as building their appetites and making sure they grow and development correctly.

I thought I would focus on nutrition this week because it is extremely important toward child growth and development. I selected this passage to annotate because I think it is important to know when infants can eat certain foods, especially solid foods. It is important to note that in order for infants to try new foods that they know how to sit up correctly because that way they will not choke or have a hard time swallowing. Same with the head control. I didn't realize that if food is offered the child will open his or her mouth. I found that pretty interesting because it is like they have an instinct. I believe infants are a lot smarter than we think, especially when it comes to trying new things.

Dialectical effect in identity shaping

A new and growing problem, how do we maintain and preserve the radical nature of ES when it becomes more heavily bureaucratized? How do we keep the democratic (the DOING democracy) nature of ES alive when it becomes further ingrained into the institution?

definitions of each type of amnesia that can cause issues with the process of long-term storage

satire can be used against people with a "higher power" to show how they're actions can be questionable and hypocritical.

A novel is a longer more complex book. Is also fictional.

Important key points to distinguish a short story.

Traits of Entrepreneuers

Our first duty, as a society, is to insure our own survival

By this logic, the argument could have worked if the author had mentioned whether the choices we we're given were one of the few good options.

This does give the author a negative view from the reader as there is more options, but we are only given two. We feel trapped by the author which could be a convincing decision or a damaging one.

This sentence interested me because I always viewed the word generalization as a negative definition. This is because this word is usually used in a negative context. Which is ironic for this context.

I really like using this resource of sample sentences that help me get started by just filling in the blanks with the criteria I am looking at.

This is a good reminder that exceptions do not have to be totally arguing against your claims.

These are great outline sentences to use and get started when pointing our exceptions.

the differences off ideas for each developmental theory(Piaget and Vygotsky)

Motifs being repeated in stories help the attention be caught by the reader more often.

The theme gives the story life and helps the reader become more intrigued.

Themes bring the whole story together because it is the idea that starts the story.

These types of comparisons give the reader a better way to compare and contrast the visual things.

Repeated words are very common in a story especially if there are images in the story.

Showing images in story speaks volumes to the eyes.

Italicized words helps with reading the scenes if there are different tones.

When you can hear the tone in your head it can help you understand the story better.

Many people tend to get it confused and think just because the narrator is saying the story they wrote it.

Having a narrator is a good addition to those who can't read well or like audio books.

I find this true because it will be helpful to both the reader and writer.

When there is a setting it helps with visualizing the story.

By following the elements it will help make a great storyline.

If there is no plot then the story will not be able to flow the way it is supposed to.

Useful guideline to follow when writing a story. This helps analyze the structure of the story to assure it makes sense to the reader.

Identifying the plot is an important step to understanding the story.

This makes it easier to understand characterization because a character can be anything.

I always seem to find the secondary character more interesting than the main character.

In many stories the antagonist is always another person never a idea or a group of people.

A conflict is needed to make the story and to build up characterization.

Most stories have a protagonist who is the main character of the story.

This is can be helpful to provide a different perspective.

Key point to Characterization. It could be internal or external conflict

This is important to get the readers attention and be able to have them connect to the character or story.

This clearly states where to focus on in fictional writing.

Fiction is clearly defined here along with the genres that fall into this category.

eating too much causes a lot more fat that can cause issues.

triglycerides, Can not dissolve in water.

important 3 parts in signaling moledules. they serve as structural components of cell membranes, function as energy storehouses, and function as important signaling molecules.

that's a great way to say that it's okay to be be fat in times of need.

As I said in one of my last comments in avid class we were taught to sit in the front row because we take in more information, and nod. This shows the speaker you are interested and understand the information given. Avid was about leadership and using the tools and techniques given to better our learning. I've been using these techniques most in college and very happy I started thinking about my education earlier on.

My sister is so shy and she tends to aim her head to the ground to avoid eye contact. I think this makes her feel more comfortable but other people probably think she doesn't want to talk to them.

同构的

陆块

阐述了图论的基础

聘请；参加

使公式化

基础

规划

利用

反之亦然

结构式

连接表和行符号

计划

成分

琐碎的，不重要的；容易解决的，不费吹灰之力的；（人）务小的，浅薄的；

模棱两可

实际上

why is it that they don't listen to how she feels and what she thinks is wrong?

She feels a sense of freedom and relief now that the wallpaper is gone. It symbolizes her abolishing the control she felt John had over her.

She thinks she has been delivered from the wallpaper...

Once again contradicts herself and openly admits him to be right.

She is contradicting herself and only proving their predictions to be right, if she is over-exhorting herself while having this disorder she will only worsen.

Two physicians agree with one another, she probably just is temporarily depressed with anxiety.

She has a psychosomatic disorder.

He is belittling her

It is a rare occasion when she and John can afford a nice house for the summer.

our dice have more sides so you can get even wilder, but it isn't odd at all since all the dice are even.

Given the conditions there is a low probability that there is a high chance that this sentence makes no sense.

Given that this word is the statistical operative word it is likely that it will appear 100% of the time in my future writing.

Multiple people can observe the same situation and perceive different problems associated it, although there is likely to be some commonly agreed upon issue that is given greater priority. Usually well-structured problems cause us to limit ourselves in thinking about what the solution is because there is likely only one or two possible correct answers. Such is the case in mathematics with algebraic questions that may only have one correct answer. However, with ill-structured problems one is forced to think more critically and thoroughly, outlining every aspect of the situation and figuring out all the possible ways to address the issue. This causes debate amongst people who are trying to solve the problem because they likely don't have the same solutions in mind. This is due to each individual's unique experience in life, whether it be with handling a similar situation to the one presented or having no experience at all with dealing with this specific problem. Having no experience may seem to bring nothing to the table, but a fresh perspective on a commonly encountered situation is often beneficial in finding a new and lasting solution to the problem because it will likely acknowledge other problems that the more experienced problem-solvers could not see. Perhaps they could not see the other problems because they weren't expecting it or because they were already hardwired into fixing the situation in a certain manner. In that sense, it's important to have both people with little and lots of experience with a certain situation in order to find an effective solution. Usually this is done through agreeing to prioritize one specific aspect of the situation because it is causing the most damage or seemingly has the biggest influence on the situation.

I remember telling a professor I could not see the "course materials" on their canvas website. What I meant was that I could not see the assigned readings, but other course materials were visible. This frustrated my professor greatly because they thought that none of the course materials were uploaded and accessible on their canvas website, and thus none of the students in their course could utilize them. I could have prevented a great deal of stress from falling on my professor by specifying what course materials were not visible on the site instead of speaking in broad terms and making them think that all of the course materials were not visible.

In a writing class my professor encouraged the use of anthropomorphism in scientific writing to help explain complex scientific subjects to the general public. He assigned a reading excerpted from American Wolf, written by Nate Blakeslee. In the book, Blakeslee constantly designates human emotions and traits to a pack of wolves that reside in Yellowstone National Park. In order to portray the idea of an alpha wolf in a pack, Blakeslee often described the alpha as having leader-like characteristics - such as being brave, smart, and caring - often those that we associate with human leaders. This helped me understand that an alpha stood out amongst its pack and took on important responsibilities. However, these descriptions can be a bit dramatic considering we have no way of knowing what wolves are actually thinking, if they think at all, or what emotions they are or aren't feeling, and therefore we should be careful when comparing animal behavior to that of humans.

Mental models represent a foundation of knowledge to draw inspiration from in order to answer new questions or solve related problems. They can be important for learning because they demonstrate a fundamental understanding of a concept by the individual using mental models, and also help develop inspire new models when new problems present themselves.

It is definitely possible that people can perceive the same situation and see different problems with it. As a person with naturally curly hair, every once in a while I decide to straighten in. People will often come up to me and say it looks much better that way and that I should wear it that way always or more often. This always kind of hurts because to them, it is like a compliment. They are calling me pretty. However, to me, it feels like they are putting down something that is an inherent part of me, literally saying I would look better if I damaged my hair every day rather than curate it. In an environment that is predominately Eurocentric features, straight hair has stereotypically been seen as the standard and so the "sleek" look over the "messy" look is preferred. Therefore, to people commenting on my hair, they see a solution, just straighten my hair. For me, I now see a problem. Do I take them as correct and start straightening my hair, see them as correct and continue as I am, or ignore their comments entirely? Depending on your background and environment the way you see the world is coded entirely differently.

I believe that multiple people can observe the same situation but with different mindsets and how to interpret it. If 2 people were to encounter someone that is hurt, one would try to help by talking to the person in pain, while the other person calls for professional help. These are 2 different ways to react towards a sitation. It is okay for people to interpret and react in different. ways as long as there is a reasonable explanation to why they reacted to it.

I think a good example of this is when people use the words affect and effect without knowing the true definition of the words. Affect is verb and is defined as, "to change something or someone." While the word effect is a noun and is defined as, "the result of change."

As a Starbucks barista, people often don't know what they are asking for. For example, someone has come through before asking for a hot green tea. Therefore, we gave them a tea bag green tea. However, quite frustrated, when we gave it to them, they said it was usually actually green. Turns out they wanted a hot matcha latte (which technically still is a hot green tea). The confusion could have been avoided if we clarified when taking the order, or if the customer took the time to actually know their order (since they clearly had had it before).

I'm a person who works out pretty often and It is safe for me to say that many people that I know who hit the gym don't know or understand the biology behind working out. There are certain goals that people want to meet and to achieve those goals they must eat and workout a certain way. Some need to diet for weight loss and muscle gain. Understanding how foods breakdown in our body to give us energy and protein is very important to me!

In my high school chemistry class, my teacher described how when elements became ions, anions wanted electrons and cations were trying to get rid of them. It worked because it helped explain the basic process of what makes an ion, but it was limited in how it explained how ionic compounds are formed since there is more push and pull there.

When I think of a mental model I think of it as a certain lens through which we see the world and function. I feel like the word model, whether or not it is, has the connotation of being a bit rigid. However, when it comes to learning I think it is important for your mental model to be flexible so that you are able to understand concepts on all scales.

When I think of a mental model I think of it as a certain lens through which we see the world and function. I feel like the word model, whether or not it is, has the connotation of being a bit rigid. However, when it comes to learning I think it is important for your mental model to be flexible so that you are able to understand concepts on all scales.

My interpretation of a "mental model" is a level of understanding a subject thoroughly. To use a metaphor, rote memorization can be considered a 2D understanding of information. The knowledge is there and accessible, but in only a shallow way. Mental models facilitate a deeper, 3D understanding of a subject. This type of knowledge is complex and can be approached from different angles.

Yes, it is possible for multiple people to see the same thing and interpret it differently. Example is I see water recurring on the bathroom floor and think "huh, water", while my mother comes and thinks "leak". It was in fact a leak. In this case, my mother had the background of many years of experience dealing with similar matters and knew what to look for. I percieved the fact that water was on the floor, but lacked the background and brainpower to connect it to a pipe. A random thought here, without well-structured problems, we cannot have well-structured solutions. And without well-structured solutions, we cannot have a universal application of this knowledge and therefore becomes a standalone concept, unable to be associated with other concepts or situations, even if the problems are virtually identical. The real world is full of ill-structured problems and I wonder what makes them ill-structured to begin with? Is it the sheer amount of variables involved? Probabilities? Or something else? If our models are advanced and comprehensive enough, can we actually make all ill-structured problems into structured? I am thinking specifically of the mathematical model created to simulate how people on the street walk and how they change their paths based on where other people are. Ok, thats enough.

In my life, it happens quite often. Just the other day I was chatting with someone and told them I had to leave and do some work. Later I realized that they thought I a job instead of me having to finish cleaning. This had an unintented consequence of misleading this person into thinking I was a diligent, hardworking individual, and that I had my own income. The use of vague language led to a misunderstanding as we both have different definitions of what work is.

I think I remember my Chemistry class often saying that a "molecule likes to be with another molecule", or that water doesn't like oil, for example. For everyday surface level discussions, this type of language is alright because it gets the point across in a way that everyone can understand. People are humans after all, so the easiest way to describe something is to use human interactions and terms. However when one wishes to dive a little deeper, these descriptions are very vague and do not actually say much about why something is happening. Taking the water and oil example, there are a lot of details being skipped, such as the atomic structures, the polarizations, the electron configurations etc etc that are not even being mentioned in the anthropomorphic terminology. Basically, when explaining something in terms of human behavior, one must sacrifice details and levels of deeper understanding.

I interpret "mental models" as a unique way for each individual to perceive a complex system in a more easily digestible way. Basically, a condensation of information to better break down a big idea into smaller chunks. I think it is quite important because the real world is infinitely complicated, so by visualizing little pieces of the bigger picture, can one eventually see the whole system.

Mental models are critical to deeper understanding. I am a visual learner and I have come to realize that when I am capable of visualizing what I am expected to know, I can recall the information faster. For instance, I find chirality in chemistry difficult to comprehend when looking at drawings on paper. However, as soon as I am able to take a look at that same compound using a model kit, I am able to better visualize the compound on paper. With practice, mental models help increase my learning exponentially.

Nail polish remover and rubbing alcohol or both "inflammable" liquids that are a common household item. While many people might already know that the "inflammable" and "flammable" may be interchanged, there are some who may think that "inflammable" would mean not-flammable. Hopefully, the majority would already know that nail polish remover and rubbing alcohol are flammable items. However, to ensure that the confusion does not occur, the vocabulary word flammable or ignitable could be used in the place of "inflammable".

When taking the UCDFD EMT course, my instructors would use anthropomorphism to help explain type I diabetes. They explained that in type I diabetes, the body does not produce enough insulin. Insulin was the "key" and "carrier" that allowed glucose to enter the bloodstream. Insulin would "unlock" the passageway that would allow glucose to be absorbed and used throughout the body. The use of anthropomorphism to describe type I diabetes was extremely helpful as it allowed me to understand how insulin works in the body, and not just memorize what happens. A limitation to this analogy is that insulin is not technically a "key" in the body, it is a hormone which helps regulate the amount of glucose entering the bloodstream.

right before them and they were shunned

aka, an act of genocide

an example of Appeal to Heaven fallacy- an abandonment of logic & reason. The Will of God is not knowable, but the person arguing knows

Like other professional associations, places a strong emphasis on integrity and scientific responsibility. Sociologists are expected to conduct their research with honesty, transparency, and ethical rigor.

Q1: Null - Tomato plant height is not positively correlated to sunlight exposure. Alt - Tomato plant height is positively correlated by the amount of sunlight they are exposed to. Q2: A shade structure is created to test the predicition that the shade contraption tomatoes will be shorter than the full sun tomatoes. I predict the shady contraption tomatoes will be shorter than the full sun tomatoes. Q3: The mirror contraption is to test the opposite of the shade contraption in order to ensure that sunlight is variable affecting height. Q4: This experiment shows that there might be a confounding variable that is affecting the tomato plant height, since the shade and mirror contraptions did not make the tomato plants shorter and taller (respectively) when compared to their full shade/sun counterparts as the alt hypothesis assumed. Q5: This scenario also does not support the alternative hypothesis because the plants under the shade structure were the same height as those in the sun. This suggests that there needs to be further trials conducted and more control variables added to reduce the amount of confounding variables that might be affecting the results. Q6: I am assuming that the plant height measurements are taken from overall plant heigh rather than stem length, as well as the shade and mirror contraptions giving the same amount of sunlight as the shade and sun areas. I am also assuming that the soil is not even being considered as a variable, hence why the results seem to not be lining up as I would expect. My prior knowledge of photosynthesis is also another assumption that is affecting my judgement, since it influences how I would assume the plants to react to sunlight.

It means that the experiment has leaned towards supporting the alt hypothesis rather than the null (I believe alt is like the 1 supports the stated hypo and null the opposite/nothing happened?), but hasn't proven it to be true or false. Falsifying hypotheses is an acknowledgment that even if the outcome seems to support one claim more than the other, it does not necessarily mean it is true because we don't know if it actually is. It also leaves space for people to question the seemingly supported conclusion and maybe even prove it wrong. A good example is people believing leeches were a good way to keep healthing. Now we have contradicting evidence to that claim thanks to our advancements.

Since there was no difference in height between plants in the direct sunlight, regardless if they were under the shady structure, and plants in the shade (even with the extra light shined on them), we can accept our null hypothesis. We could attempt to test another variable of plant height, such as the nutrients in the soil. Tomato plants could be planted in their original spots in the shady and sunny part of the yard and a third and fourth group of plants could be planted in 2 separate plots of new soil in both the shade and sun.

The null hypothesis would be that the height of tomato plants are not affected by whether or not they are in the shade or direct sunlight. The alternative hypothesis is that tomato plants in direct sunlight will grow taller than tomato plants growing in the shade.

will travel

Smiling while talking is a huge point in speaking, even when the audience can't see you. At my call center job, we're instructed to answer the phone with a smile on our faces, because even though the customer can't see us, they can hear the expression in our voice when we answer the phone. I think it would be even more important in a speech where the audience can see you, because not only can they see your enthusism in your topic, they can hear it as well.

I feel like this is important in any speaking situation, because if you speak in a monotone voice or don't adjust your vocals at all, you can sound like a droning recording or a robot, which is not what you want when speaking to a group of people. Another thing is sounding like you are just reading a script, rather than speaking naturally.

I remember a time I had to give a presentation/speech to our a group of adults after a trp in 8th grade. We were told to give a speech about something we learned on our trip. I'd typed up my speech on my iPad and practiced a few times with my dad, trying to memorize what I could in the short amount of time I had. When I gave my presentation, I'd look down to remember my points and relay my speech to the audience. Using a manuscript delivery method was benefcial for my situation, and my speech went really well.

reflecting on a point I made earlier, practicing your speech can be very beneficial for several reasons. One, you can get a feel for what your speech will be like when you give it, helping to reduce speaking anxiety. Another reason is solidifying your talking points and making sure your word flow is consistent. Another benefit would be finding weak points or flaws in your speech.

I've always understood fear as a lack of control. Peopple don't like things that they can't control, and the fear with public speaking is that you can't control the opinions of other people. The best way I overcome my fear of public speaking is mentally reminding myself that other people's opinions are their own and don't directly effect me. While in the case of a persuasive speech, its important to get a feel for your audience's opinions, you shouldn't let them get the best of your emotions.

Cuidadosamente

Sensatamente

They have an outer layer of skin one cell long.