explaining who founded what about the brain, explains more on how the brain controls our feelings

all of our thoughts and feelings are "material" because they come from our brain

Myth busted.

Areas of focus for biopysch

Nonverbal communication is exactly what is sounds, It's communication without speaking to another person. I can IMMENSELY connect this to my life outside the classroom. I can easily communicate to my mom in my house without having to speak to her, for example if she asks me about something I can simply give her a thumbs up.

Communication is the process of sending messages with meaning that could be received in multiple contexts. I can relate this to my life outside of the classroom. As funny as this sounds I struggle communicating with others because of my challenge with finding the right words. When I'm in a conversation sometimes I have a hard time finding the right words to go along with the conversation.

Oral communication is transmitted through one channel transmitting through sound and is picked up by our ears. Other people don't have a hard time understanding the information, but I do. As I said in previous annotations my brain has a hard time processing large amounts of information. So, It doesn't help my brain when there is a large amount of information that is communicated.

I believe everyone thinks this way because actions speak louder than words. If someone says they like you then goes and gossips about you. You're going to think they do not like you at all.

When people take lie detector tests, they often have body language analysis because their body is usually saying something they are not.

Posture is either our natural or intentional position our body places us in. When I'm giving a speech in class or outside the classroom my legs and hips tend to move outwards and lock ( there's a name for it I just can't think of it right now!). With knowing this about myself I'm hoping that I can improve this common movement while I give a speech.

Vocalics are study of paralanguage in vocal qualities. When I'm giving a speech all of these specific vocal qualities can't be control because of my nervousness. For instance my rate will be a quick pace (as I want to finish the speech as quickly as possible). My vocal quality will be in the area of low to medium.

I was taught this in my avid class. The class was on how to be successful in college. My teacher taught us to sit in front, we take in more information that way, sit up straight, and nod to show that we understand to the speaker.

👍🏼

lymph is formed

Again focusing on nutrition this week, it is important to know when children are not eating enough, especially when their appetites are changing. Their bodies are rapidly changing and because of this they deal with chemical imbalances and their taste buds are changing which means they are going to be a bit picky, so it is important to make sure they are eating enough by giving them food you know they like or introducing new foods to try. That wat they get a taste of something different as well as building their appetites and making sure they grow and development correctly.

I thought I would focus on nutrition this week because it is extremely important toward child growth and development. I selected this passage to annotate because I think it is important to know when infants can eat certain foods, especially solid foods. It is important to note that in order for infants to try new foods that they know how to sit up correctly because that way they will not choke or have a hard time swallowing. Same with the head control. I didn't realize that if food is offered the child will open his or her mouth. I found that pretty interesting because it is like they have an instinct. I believe infants are a lot smarter than we think, especially when it comes to trying new things.

Dialectical effect in identity shaping

A new and growing problem, how do we maintain and preserve the radical nature of ES when it becomes more heavily bureaucratized? How do we keep the democratic (the DOING democracy) nature of ES alive when it becomes further ingrained into the institution?

definitions of each type of amnesia that can cause issues with the process of long-term storage

satire can be used against people with a "higher power" to show how they're actions can be questionable and hypocritical.

A novel is a longer more complex book. Is also fictional.

Important key points to distinguish a short story.

Traits of Entrepreneuers

Our first duty, as a society, is to insure our own survival

By this logic, the argument could have worked if the author had mentioned whether the choices we we're given were one of the few good options.

This does give the author a negative view from the reader as there is more options, but we are only given two. We feel trapped by the author which could be a convincing decision or a damaging one.

This sentence interested me because I always viewed the word generalization as a negative definition. This is because this word is usually used in a negative context. Which is ironic for this context.

I really like using this resource of sample sentences that help me get started by just filling in the blanks with the criteria I am looking at.

This is a good reminder that exceptions do not have to be totally arguing against your claims.

These are great outline sentences to use and get started when pointing our exceptions.

the differences off ideas for each developmental theory(Piaget and Vygotsky)

Motifs being repeated in stories help the attention be caught by the reader more often.

The theme gives the story life and helps the reader become more intrigued.

Themes bring the whole story together because it is the idea that starts the story.

I remember in middle school, the class would always say "Theme is the universal idea or the heart of the story." It's a lesson on life and mankind.

Motifs can also act as symbols too. It can be a place, object, sound, statement, anything that repeats itself.

These types of comparisons give the reader a better way to compare and contrast the visual things.

Repeated words are very common in a story especially if there are images in the story.

Showing images in story speaks volumes to the eyes.

I'm unsure about this meaning but it may suggest that the meaning stays the same throughout many abstract ideas.

Imagery can recall the object in detail and set the mood for the text. I sometimes, find it difficult to make a connection on imagery. But I will pay attention to some key words that evoke senses.

Authors use rhetorical devices to develop meaning in their story. The reader will discover the author's overall purpose.

Italicized words helps with reading the scenes if there are different tones.

When you can hear the tone in your head it can help you understand the story better.

Tone is all about the author's attitude on the story. Mood is about our feelings upon the story.

Connotation is the interpretation of a symbol or word. It could represent something as well.

Denotation is a flat description of the object.

Many people tend to get it confused and think just because the narrator is saying the story they wrote it.

Having a narrator is a good addition to those who can't read well or like audio books.

This is an example of an unreliable narrator.

I find this true because it will be helpful to both the reader and writer.

When there is a setting it helps with visualizing the story.

Midnight's Children notes the importance of the setting for the narrator's birth.

An external feature shows the character's own thoughts and emotions.

By following the elements it will help make a great storyline.

If there is no plot then the story will not be able to flow the way it is supposed to.

Useful guideline to follow when writing a story. This helps analyze the structure of the story to assure it makes sense to the reader.

Identifying the plot is an important step to understanding the story.

This makes it easier to understand characterization because a character can be anything.

I always seem to find the secondary character more interesting than the main character.

In many stories the antagonist is always another person never a idea or a group of people.

A conflict is needed to make the story and to build up characterization.

Most stories have a protagonist who is the main character of the story.

This is can be helpful to provide a different perspective.

Key point to Characterization. It could be internal or external conflict

This is important to get the readers attention and be able to have them connect to the character or story.

I would think how the character's overall personality can be related to everyday life.

"Flat" characters only serve one minor purpose. They are much like static characters.

Minor characters can give a different perspective on the main character.

These are called Dynamic characters. They often grow and change a lot throughout the story.

This clearly states where to focus on in fictional writing.

Fiction is clearly defined here along with the genres that fall into this category.

eating too much causes a lot more fat that can cause issues.

triglycerides, Can not dissolve in water.

important 3 parts in signaling moledules. they serve as structural components of cell membranes, function as energy storehouses, and function as important signaling molecules.

that's a great way to say that it's okay to be be fat in times of need.

As I said in one of my last comments in avid class we were taught to sit in the front row because we take in more information, and nod. This shows the speaker you are interested and understand the information given. Avid was about leadership and using the tools and techniques given to better our learning. I've been using these techniques most in college and very happy I started thinking about my education earlier on.

My sister is so shy and she tends to aim her head to the ground to avoid eye contact. I think this makes her feel more comfortable but other people probably think she doesn't want to talk to them.

同构的

陆块

阐述了图论的基础

聘请；参加

使公式化

基础

规划

利用

反之亦然

结构式

连接表和行符号

计划

成分

琐碎的，不重要的；容易解决的，不费吹灰之力的；（人）务小的，浅薄的；

模棱两可

实际上

why is it that they don't listen to how she feels and what she thinks is wrong?

She feels a sense of freedom and relief now that the wallpaper is gone. It symbolizes her abolishing the control she felt John had over her.

She thinks she has been delivered from the wallpaper...

Once again contradicts herself and openly admits him to be right.

She is contradicting herself and only proving their predictions to be right, if she is over-exhorting herself while having this disorder she will only worsen.

Two physicians agree with one another, she probably just is temporarily depressed with anxiety.

She has a psychosomatic disorder.

He is belittling her

It is a rare occasion when she and John can afford a nice house for the summer.

our dice have more sides so you can get even wilder, but it isn't odd at all since all the dice are even.

Given the conditions there is a low probability that there is a high chance that this sentence makes no sense.

Given that this word is the statistical operative word it is likely that it will appear 100% of the time in my future writing.

Multiple people can observe the same situation and perceive different problems associated it, although there is likely to be some commonly agreed upon issue that is given greater priority. Usually well-structured problems cause us to limit ourselves in thinking about what the solution is because there is likely only one or two possible correct answers. Such is the case in mathematics with algebraic questions that may only have one correct answer. However, with ill-structured problems one is forced to think more critically and thoroughly, outlining every aspect of the situation and figuring out all the possible ways to address the issue. This causes debate amongst people who are trying to solve the problem because they likely don't have the same solutions in mind. This is due to each individual's unique experience in life, whether it be with handling a similar situation to the one presented or having no experience at all with dealing with this specific problem. Having no experience may seem to bring nothing to the table, but a fresh perspective on a commonly encountered situation is often beneficial in finding a new and lasting solution to the problem because it will likely acknowledge other problems that the more experienced problem-solvers could not see. Perhaps they could not see the other problems because they weren't expecting it or because they were already hardwired into fixing the situation in a certain manner. In that sense, it's important to have both people with little and lots of experience with a certain situation in order to find an effective solution. Usually this is done through agreeing to prioritize one specific aspect of the situation because it is causing the most damage or seemingly has the biggest influence on the situation.

I remember telling a professor I could not see the "course materials" on their canvas website. What I meant was that I could not see the assigned readings, but other course materials were visible. This frustrated my professor greatly because they thought that none of the course materials were uploaded and accessible on their canvas website, and thus none of the students in their course could utilize them. I could have prevented a great deal of stress from falling on my professor by specifying what course materials were not visible on the site instead of speaking in broad terms and making them think that all of the course materials were not visible.

In a writing class my professor encouraged the use of anthropomorphism in scientific writing to help explain complex scientific subjects to the general public. He assigned a reading excerpted from American Wolf, written by Nate Blakeslee. In the book, Blakeslee constantly designates human emotions and traits to a pack of wolves that reside in Yellowstone National Park. In order to portray the idea of an alpha wolf in a pack, Blakeslee often described the alpha as having leader-like characteristics - such as being brave, smart, and caring - often those that we associate with human leaders. This helped me understand that an alpha stood out amongst its pack and took on important responsibilities. However, these descriptions can be a bit dramatic considering we have no way of knowing what wolves are actually thinking, if they think at all, or what emotions they are or aren't feeling, and therefore we should be careful when comparing animal behavior to that of humans.

Mental models represent a foundation of knowledge to draw inspiration from in order to answer new questions or solve related problems. They can be important for learning because they demonstrate a fundamental understanding of a concept by the individual using mental models, and also help develop inspire new models when new problems present themselves.

It is definitely possible that people can perceive the same situation and see different problems with it. As a person with naturally curly hair, every once in a while I decide to straighten in. People will often come up to me and say it looks much better that way and that I should wear it that way always or more often. This always kind of hurts because to them, it is like a compliment. They are calling me pretty. However, to me, it feels like they are putting down something that is an inherent part of me, literally saying I would look better if I damaged my hair every day rather than curate it. In an environment that is predominately Eurocentric features, straight hair has stereotypically been seen as the standard and so the "sleek" look over the "messy" look is preferred. Therefore, to people commenting on my hair, they see a solution, just straighten my hair. For me, I now see a problem. Do I take them as correct and start straightening my hair, see them as correct and continue as I am, or ignore their comments entirely? Depending on your background and environment the way you see the world is coded entirely differently.

I believe that multiple people can observe the same situation but with different mindsets and how to interpret it. If 2 people were to encounter someone that is hurt, one would try to help by talking to the person in pain, while the other person calls for professional help. These are 2 different ways to react towards a sitation. It is okay for people to interpret and react in different. ways as long as there is a reasonable explanation to why they reacted to it.

I think a good example of this is when people use the words affect and effect without knowing the true definition of the words. Affect is verb and is defined as, "to change something or someone." While the word effect is a noun and is defined as, "the result of change."

As a Starbucks barista, people often don't know what they are asking for. For example, someone has come through before asking for a hot green tea. Therefore, we gave them a tea bag green tea. However, quite frustrated, when we gave it to them, they said it was usually actually green. Turns out they wanted a hot matcha latte (which technically still is a hot green tea). The confusion could have been avoided if we clarified when taking the order, or if the customer took the time to actually know their order (since they clearly had had it before).

I'm a person who works out pretty often and It is safe for me to say that many people that I know who hit the gym don't know or understand the biology behind working out. There are certain goals that people want to meet and to achieve those goals they must eat and workout a certain way. Some need to diet for weight loss and muscle gain. Understanding how foods breakdown in our body to give us energy and protein is very important to me!

In my high school chemistry class, my teacher described how when elements became ions, anions wanted electrons and cations were trying to get rid of them. It worked because it helped explain the basic process of what makes an ion, but it was limited in how it explained how ionic compounds are formed since there is more push and pull there.

When I think of a mental model I think of it as a certain lens through which we see the world and function. I feel like the word model, whether or not it is, has the connotation of being a bit rigid. However, when it comes to learning I think it is important for your mental model to be flexible so that you are able to understand concepts on all scales.

When I think of a mental model I think of it as a certain lens through which we see the world and function. I feel like the word model, whether or not it is, has the connotation of being a bit rigid. However, when it comes to learning I think it is important for your mental model to be flexible so that you are able to understand concepts on all scales.

My interpretation of a "mental model" is a level of understanding a subject thoroughly. To use a metaphor, rote memorization can be considered a 2D understanding of information. The knowledge is there and accessible, but in only a shallow way. Mental models facilitate a deeper, 3D understanding of a subject. This type of knowledge is complex and can be approached from different angles.

Yes, it is possible for multiple people to see the same thing and interpret it differently. Example is I see water recurring on the bathroom floor and think "huh, water", while my mother comes and thinks "leak". It was in fact a leak. In this case, my mother had the background of many years of experience dealing with similar matters and knew what to look for. I percieved the fact that water was on the floor, but lacked the background and brainpower to connect it to a pipe. A random thought here, without well-structured problems, we cannot have well-structured solutions. And without well-structured solutions, we cannot have a universal application of this knowledge and therefore becomes a standalone concept, unable to be associated with other concepts or situations, even if the problems are virtually identical. The real world is full of ill-structured problems and I wonder what makes them ill-structured to begin with? Is it the sheer amount of variables involved? Probabilities? Or something else? If our models are advanced and comprehensive enough, can we actually make all ill-structured problems into structured? I am thinking specifically of the mathematical model created to simulate how people on the street walk and how they change their paths based on where other people are. Ok, thats enough.

In my life, it happens quite often. Just the other day I was chatting with someone and told them I had to leave and do some work. Later I realized that they thought I a job instead of me having to finish cleaning. This had an unintented consequence of misleading this person into thinking I was a diligent, hardworking individual, and that I had my own income. The use of vague language led to a misunderstanding as we both have different definitions of what work is.

I think I remember my Chemistry class often saying that a "molecule likes to be with another molecule", or that water doesn't like oil, for example. For everyday surface level discussions, this type of language is alright because it gets the point across in a way that everyone can understand. People are humans after all, so the easiest way to describe something is to use human interactions and terms. However when one wishes to dive a little deeper, these descriptions are very vague and do not actually say much about why something is happening. Taking the water and oil example, there are a lot of details being skipped, such as the atomic structures, the polarizations, the electron configurations etc etc that are not even being mentioned in the anthropomorphic terminology. Basically, when explaining something in terms of human behavior, one must sacrifice details and levels of deeper understanding.

I interpret "mental models" as a unique way for each individual to perceive a complex system in a more easily digestible way. Basically, a condensation of information to better break down a big idea into smaller chunks. I think it is quite important because the real world is infinitely complicated, so by visualizing little pieces of the bigger picture, can one eventually see the whole system.

Mental models are critical to deeper understanding. I am a visual learner and I have come to realize that when I am capable of visualizing what I am expected to know, I can recall the information faster. For instance, I find chirality in chemistry difficult to comprehend when looking at drawings on paper. However, as soon as I am able to take a look at that same compound using a model kit, I am able to better visualize the compound on paper. With practice, mental models help increase my learning exponentially.

Nail polish remover and rubbing alcohol or both "inflammable" liquids that are a common household item. While many people might already know that the "inflammable" and "flammable" may be interchanged, there are some who may think that "inflammable" would mean not-flammable. Hopefully, the majority would already know that nail polish remover and rubbing alcohol are flammable items. However, to ensure that the confusion does not occur, the vocabulary word flammable or ignitable could be used in the place of "inflammable".

When taking the UCDFD EMT course, my instructors would use anthropomorphism to help explain type I diabetes. They explained that in type I diabetes, the body does not produce enough insulin. Insulin was the "key" and "carrier" that allowed glucose to enter the bloodstream. Insulin would "unlock" the passageway that would allow glucose to be absorbed and used throughout the body. The use of anthropomorphism to describe type I diabetes was extremely helpful as it allowed me to understand how insulin works in the body, and not just memorize what happens. A limitation to this analogy is that insulin is not technically a "key" in the body, it is a hormone which helps regulate the amount of glucose entering the bloodstream.

right before them and they were shunned

aka, an act of genocide

an example of Appeal to Heaven fallacy- an abandonment of logic & reason. The Will of God is not knowable, but the person arguing knows

Native Americans were determined to co-exist However the English decide to go for more and as Native Americans conformed with less the English took advantage of this

Like other professional associations, places a strong emphasis on integrity and scientific responsibility. Sociologists are expected to conduct their research with honesty, transparency, and ethical rigor.

Q1: Null - Tomato plant height is not positively correlated to sunlight exposure. Alt - Tomato plant height is positively correlated by the amount of sunlight they are exposed to. Q2: A shade structure is created to test the predicition that the shade contraption tomatoes will be shorter than the full sun tomatoes. I predict the shady contraption tomatoes will be shorter than the full sun tomatoes. Q3: The mirror contraption is to test the opposite of the shade contraption in order to ensure that sunlight is variable affecting height. Q4: This experiment shows that there might be a confounding variable that is affecting the tomato plant height, since the shade and mirror contraptions did not make the tomato plants shorter and taller (respectively) when compared to their full shade/sun counterparts as the alt hypothesis assumed. Q5: This scenario also does not support the alternative hypothesis because the plants under the shade structure were the same height as those in the sun. This suggests that there needs to be further trials conducted and more control variables added to reduce the amount of confounding variables that might be affecting the results. Q6: I am assuming that the plant height measurements are taken from overall plant heigh rather than stem length, as well as the shade and mirror contraptions giving the same amount of sunlight as the shade and sun areas. I am also assuming that the soil is not even being considered as a variable, hence why the results seem to not be lining up as I would expect. My prior knowledge of photosynthesis is also another assumption that is affecting my judgement, since it influences how I would assume the plants to react to sunlight.

It means that the experiment has leaned towards supporting the alt hypothesis rather than the null (I believe alt is like the 1 supports the stated hypo and null the opposite/nothing happened?), but hasn't proven it to be true or false. Falsifying hypotheses is an acknowledgment that even if the outcome seems to support one claim more than the other, it does not necessarily mean it is true because we don't know if it actually is. It also leaves space for people to question the seemingly supported conclusion and maybe even prove it wrong. A good example is people believing leeches were a good way to keep healthing. Now we have contradicting evidence to that claim thanks to our advancements.

Since there was no difference in height between plants in the direct sunlight, regardless if they were under the shady structure, and plants in the shade (even with the extra light shined on them), we can accept our null hypothesis. We could attempt to test another variable of plant height, such as the nutrients in the soil. Tomato plants could be planted in their original spots in the shady and sunny part of the yard and a third and fourth group of plants could be planted in 2 separate plots of new soil in both the shade and sun.

The null hypothesis would be that the height of tomato plants are not affected by whether or not they are in the shade or direct sunlight. The alternative hypothesis is that tomato plants in direct sunlight will grow taller than tomato plants growing in the shade.

will travel

Smiling while talking is a huge point in speaking, even when the audience can't see you. At my call center job, we're instructed to answer the phone with a smile on our faces, because even though the customer can't see us, they can hear the expression in our voice when we answer the phone. I think it would be even more important in a speech where the audience can see you, because not only can they see your enthusism in your topic, they can hear it as well.

I feel like this is important in any speaking situation, because if you speak in a monotone voice or don't adjust your vocals at all, you can sound like a droning recording or a robot, which is not what you want when speaking to a group of people. Another thing is sounding like you are just reading a script, rather than speaking naturally.

I remember a time I had to give a presentation/speech to our a group of adults after a trp in 8th grade. We were told to give a speech about something we learned on our trip. I'd typed up my speech on my iPad and practiced a few times with my dad, trying to memorize what I could in the short amount of time I had. When I gave my presentation, I'd look down to remember my points and relay my speech to the audience. Using a manuscript delivery method was benefcial for my situation, and my speech went really well.

Fluency hiccups are pause within the speech. I can HEAVILY connect this into my life outside the classroom. Just in general while I would give presentations I would sometimes pause for sometime (highschool). Then I realized after I was done with presenting that I had a pause in the speech that I didn't intend to have.

reflecting on a point I made earlier, practicing your speech can be very beneficial for several reasons. One, you can get a feel for what your speech will be like when you give it, helping to reduce speaking anxiety. Another reason is solidifying your talking points and making sure your word flow is consistent. Another benefit would be finding weak points or flaws in your speech.

I've always understood fear as a lack of control. Peopple don't like things that they can't control, and the fear with public speaking is that you can't control the opinions of other people. The best way I overcome my fear of public speaking is mentally reminding myself that other people's opinions are their own and don't directly effect me. While in the case of a persuasive speech, its important to get a feel for your audience's opinions, you shouldn't let them get the best of your emotions.

Vocal warm-up exercises is exactly what it sounds like, these exercises help prepare the mouth for a presentation. I can connect to this in my life outside the classroom. Almost everybody uses this exercise before a presentation. In this class I will be using this as a tool before I have to present our speech.

Physical relaxation exercises help to reduce the anxiety of public speaking by breathing and stretching. I can connect this into my life outside the classroom. I don't often use these exercises before a presentation. But for this class i'm going to be more aware and use this tool.

Skills training is a way to help ease the anxiety of public speaking. I can connect this to my life outside of the classroom. Like I said before Public speaking is the one thing that I fear the most because of talking in front of others I don't know making me nervous. I'm hoping that this will be able to help with my fear of public speaking.

Public speaking anxiety is reactions when one is faced with a presentation. Me and several other people have this particular anxiety. This can be GREATLY connected to my life outside the classroom. In my case public speaking anxiety is the one thing that I fear the most, because I have to talk in front of people that I don't know, which makes me nervous.

Cuidadosamente

Sensatamente

They have an outer layer of skin one cell long.

NO, this is again ambiguity. Their is no low amount of DNA that account for "race" difference. Their is low amount of DNA that account for physical traits, but these little amounts are not distributed within a "race". - please watch "The power of an Illusion!"

Yes

It is not doubting the biological basis... it their is no biological basis... please be more clear! It is ok, we know that science is also context based, it uses scientific method but what is studied, how it is questioned, framed, funded is context dependent. The goal of science is to have theories, and constantly question them... it is a social construct to think of science as the proved truth, it is not the purpose of science... So it is not saying science is not worth to say that the "theory of race" was a fraud and that current research have proven with many means it is not based on facts and evidences. People that say that if we question the biological base of racism it means we have que question science are, to my mind, misunderstanding what science is.

OK it is written here.... but the previous paragraphs, to my, are hiding this last paragraph in euphemism about the concept of race. There is NO scientific evidence that it is based on biology - let's be more clear about that!

highlighting the subject, making it appears to be outstanding in the sentence. Through adverb and adjectives lying placed before it, it becomes very clear and concise.

Furthermore, it makes the sentence much more pleasing, or rather, interesting to hold readers' attention onto the lines.

the second sentence is less emphasized.

The first and the last word of the sentence are the ones that stand out to the reader more

Connecting sentences can make the writing easier to read / flows better.

Adverbs will add variety in the sentence and the text wont be repetitive and will be more interesting to the reader

You DON'T have to always start the sentence with the subject. Sometimes it is more effective to start with an adverb, prepositional phrase, or verb.

Avoid choppy, repetitive sentences in your writing.

repetition can be tiring to the reader

嵌合生物

thesis example for a standard problem

为了纪念

范例

人工产物

首要的范式

最好的

术语

创造

进化

Should be "The absolute value of any non-zero real number is positive" OR: "The absolute value of any real number is non-negative".

Energy = Calories

Dissolved oxygen in a solution DECREASES the intensity of the fluorescence by photochemically inducing oxidation of the fluorescing species. Quenching also results from the paramagnetic properties of molecular oxygen which promotes intersystem crossing and converts the excited molecules to triplet state. Paramagnetic species and dissolved oxygen tend to quench fluorescence and phosphorescence.

these observations on technology are merely the latest form of a long history of critics of errors being looked for

the main idea, the idea that new form of writing or information gathering system will damge the current one.

Bold

further oxidise the aldehyde products

The final part in in the scientific method is the conclusion. In this part you see if your hypothesis and prediction was correct and if they were wrong you should run the experiment again.

One of the last parts in the scientific method is measuring all of your data. You take all of your statistics together and analyze if your experiment has changed anything.

An Observational study means that you examine multiple samples without the presumed cause. A repeatable study’s ensures that any observed pattern is due to treatment rather than naturally occurring differences between individuals.

A manipulative experiment is when the scientists can manipulate the independent variable. Basically, the scientists apply treatments to the subject to see what happens. They then compare that data with a control group which doesn’t get any treatment.

The next step in the scientific method is designing an experiment. This involves figuring out the independent variable which can be manipulated by the scientist. But the dependent variable is the response to the independent variable. The controlled variables are used to compare the dependent to see the results of the experiment.

Hypotheses are tentative explanations and are different from scientific theories. It is widely accepted and have an explanation for a set of observations and describes elements of nature. But it does not explain why they occur.

Hypothesis and predictions must be able to be tested and be able for it to be proven false. For example “The sun gives off light” will be impossible for it to be proven false. Also, an hypothesis can be proven false but I can never be proven. IF the experiment proves that the hypothesis fails to e false then we find support for the explanation.

“Predictions stem from the hypothesis” the prediction is going to explain what would happen and would support the hypothesis. The prediction is more specific than the hypothesis.

The Hypothesis is what you expect the answer is going to be. A good hypothesis explains what you think the cause of the experiment is and then explaining it a bit. If you have two or more hypotheses that meet the standard, the simpler one is preferred.

The question step in the scientific method is the stage of asking questions about your experiment. You begin to question what you are about to experiment and what is the cause of you doing the experiment.

Observations start with “noticing a pattern, either directly or indirectly from the literature”. Finding something directly could be like finding a leak in your roof because a pipe broke. And an indirect observation could be like finding 3 bee hives in your backyard.

An increase in birth defects located in North Vietnam was an indirect observation which lead to the U.S. questioning this data. When someone notices this it brings us to the next stage in the Scientific process, the question.

negative poins of using cell phone

positif pain of using cell phone

I am having trouble with Question 7, 8, 9, and 10 on "Test Yourself." I don't seem to know how to wright out the equation for the answer. So if you could help me with the steps that would be helpful.

Amyloplasts(Statoliths) is a way where plants actually kow its direction to grow. For example plants are usually gwoing horizontally right? however when you put the plant vertically the amyloplast that was accumulated downward will be accumulated in the side of plasmids which will grow downwards

Fast-releasing carbohydrates are also known more simply as “sugars.” Fast-releasing carbohydrates are grouped as either monosaccharides

dissacharides: dissacharides. Monosaccharides include glucose, fructose, and galactose, and the dissacharides include, lactose, maltose, and sucrose.

glucose Is important for all Life.

Greek word “saccharide,” which means sugar.

SLOW RELEASING