for
- adjacency - I-me relationship - William James - subject-object dualism - experience vs conceptualisation of experience - finger pointing to the moon - subject / I am phenomenologically mysterious - Indyweb annotation vs Innotation - object-of-study focal shift - definition - potential vs kinetic adjacencies
adjacency
- between
- I-me relationship
- William James
- subject-object dualism
- the eye cannot see itself
- self consciousness
- experience vs conceptualisation of experience
- Indyweb annotation vs Innotation
- object-of-study focal shift
- definition potential adjacencies
- definition kinetic adjacencies
- adjacency relationship
- William James's I-me relationship is about the paradox of self consciousness
- modern humans distinguish themselves through excelling in cognitive abilities
- but what happens when we turn this cognitive abilities onto ourselves?
- Self consciousness is what results
- reasoning about the reasoner
- Just as the eye cannot truly see itself, the reasoner who reasons about him/her self cannot really do so because the "I" is NOT really the same as the "me"
- the subject is not the object,
- the act of framing is not the frame
- the qualia is NOT the same as the idea that represents the qualia
- the moon is not the finger pointing to the moon
- hence the I, the act of framing the subject is phenomenologically mysterious
- In contrast, in indyweb, we can replace annotation with Innotation, an inline version of annotation
- This is because of the recursive nature of learning of ideas
- When we digest an idea, that has an externalised (re)presentation, and it triggers the emergence of a new idea,
- We can capture the newly inspired idea a an inline Innotation instead of a side bar annotation.
- The reason why we would do this is because this is more homeomorphic to how knowledge context switches its role
- from an active new insight
- to an existing cultural artefact / object that can be digested by another mind
- The difference is the idea
- as a spontaneous emergent, embodied, enactive real-time
, LIVING experience, which then becomes, post experience, an idea that is
- a DEAD cultural artefact that is ready to be digested and potentially evoke a new strong LIVING response in another consciousness
- The idea as a linguistically constructed cultural artefact is DEAD
- until it interacts with another consciousness,
- and at such time, the cultural artefact can deliver upon itz intended promise and potential, and trigger a LIVING learned experience.
- Innotation converts the once LIVING experience of the idea at the moment of birth / Inception to the form of existing, timebound knowledge test to do the same in the future, when new minds may stumble upon it
- Learning from linguistic cultural artefacts is thus
- the act of conversion of
- potential adjacencies into
- kinetic adjacencies