7 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2026
    1. Illinois was also early to regulate biometric data collection, passing the Biometric Information Privacy Act in 2008.

      令人惊讶的是:伊利诺伊州在2008年就通过了生物特征信息隐私法,比许多州的AI监管立法早了近15年。这表明该州在技术监管方面一直处于前沿,从生物识别数据到AI,该州似乎总是提前应对新兴技术带来的隐私挑战。

  2. May 2022
    1. For example, we know one of the ways to make people care about negative externalities is to make them pay for it; that’s why carbon pricing is one of the most efficient ways of reducing emissions. There’s no reason why we couldn’t enact a data tax of some kind. We can also take a cautionary tale from pricing externalities, because you have to have the will to enforce it. Western Canada is littered with tens of thousands of orphan wells that oil production companies said they would clean up and haven’t, and now the Canadian government is chipping in billions of dollars to do it for them. This means we must build in enforcement mechanisms at the same time that we’re designing principles for data governance, otherwise it’s little more than ethics-washing.

      Building in pre-payments or a tax on data leaks to prevent companies neglecting negative externalities could be an important stick in government regulation.

      While it should apply across the board, it should be particularly onerous for for-profit companies.

  3. Oct 2020
  4. May 2020
  5. Mar 2020
  6. Sep 2017