4 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2024
    1. wie wärs mit selbsthilfe?!

      diese passive "wir sind konsumenten" scheisse ist doch genau das problem...

      ich hab mir das print buch gekauft für 22 euro, hab den buchrücken aufgeschnitten mit ner kreissäge, und hab die 208 seiten durch meinen ADF scanner gejagt (Brother ADS-3000N, 150eur gebraucht). ohne vorbereitung ist das vielleicht ne halbe stunde arbeit. dann noch die scans rotieren, croppen, leveln, und durch tesseract jagen. für tesseract braucht man ne schnelle CPU.

      aktuell tu ich die hocr dateien von tesseract korrekturlesen, später werd ich ne pdf draus machen und über libgen.rs auf annas-archive.org hochladen - ein problem weniger.

      hocr dateien hab ich hochgeladen auf https://github.com/milahu/enteignung - vielleicht mag wer helfen beim korrekturlesen, dann gehts 1 oder 2 tage schneller.

      mann mann mann... als "IT insider" bin ich so gelangweilt von den normies, die beim thema IT vor 20 jahren stehen geblieben sind, kein plan haben von linux, git, python, torproject, monero, ... aber hauptsache scheisse labern in telegram >: (

  2. Apr 2024
  3. Aug 2022
    1. https://occidental.substack.com/p/the-adlernet-guide-part-ii?sd=pf

      Description of a note taking method for reading the Great Books: part commonplace, part zettelkasten.

      I'm curious where she's ultimately placing the cards to know if the color coding means anything in the end other than simply differentiating the card "types" up front? (i.e. does it help to distinguish cards once potentially mixed up?)

  4. Nov 2021
    1. Though firmly rooted in Renaissance culture, Knight's carefully calibrated arguments also push forward to the digital present—engaging with the modern library archives where these works were rebound and remade, and showing how the custodianship of literary artifacts shapes our canons, chronologies, and contemporary interpretative practices.

      This passage reminds me of a conversation on 2021-11-16 at Liquid Margins with Will T. Monroe (@willtmonroe) about using Sönke Ahrens' book Smart Notes and Hypothes.is as a structure for getting groups of people (compared to Ahrens' focus on a single person) to do collection, curation, and creation of open education resources (OER).

      Here Jeffrey Todd Knight sounds like he's looking at it from the perspective of one (or maybe two) creators in conjunction (curator and binder/publisher) while I'm thinking about expanding behond

      This sort of pattern can also be seen in Mortimer J. Adler's group zettelkasten used to create The Great Books of the Western World series as well in larger wiki-based efforts like Wikipedia, so it's not new, but the question is how a teacher (or other leader) can help to better organize a community of creators around making larger works from smaller pieces. Robin DeRosa's example of using OER in the classroom is another example, but there, the process sounded much more difficult and manual.

      This is the sort of piece that Vannevar Bush completely missed as a mode of creation and research in his conceptualization of the Memex. Perhaps we need the "Inventiex" as a mode of larger group means of "inventio" using these methods in a digital setting?