Thus, thechallenges mentioned emphasize the necessity of new delivery systems and formulationstrategies
all of these clinical issues connect to issues w/ traditional drug development
Thus, thechallenges mentioned emphasize the necessity of new delivery systems and formulationstrategies
all of these clinical issues connect to issues w/ traditional drug development
many AI tools do not cover the five levels of AMP discovery and design [
what are these levels? basic screening to clinical trials?
Consequently, additional modifications (e.g., cyclization, DAAs) are oftenrequired, making the screening process more time-consuming and the manufacturingprocess more costly and complex
Yeah, I remember this. takes so mych longer than you would intitially expect
ESKAPE pathogens
Didn't know about C.auris that was new info to me
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
Using AI to combat it is so cool!
From a biochemical perspective, the plasma membrane controlsfluidity, permeability and possesses the ability to respond to stress
basic membrane functions
there is protein synthesis,phospholipases, capsular polysaccharides, lipopolysaccharides, membrane and QS pro-teins, metal absorption, cytokines and biofilms [ 152 ,156 ].
not as familiar w/ these AB virulence factors
In the case of biofilms, QS is important for biofilm formation andcommunication or coordination within the biofilm
QS can dictate which EPS components are excreted and what gene expression is up/down regulated to maintain biofilm
Another mechanism of resistance against AMPs is biofilm formation, which is acommon virulence factor from ESKAPE pathogens
biofilms would prevent AMPs from accessing the membrane
ackbone sampling, side-chainoptimization and energy-based refinement
more details on these methods?
antimicrobialactivity emerges not only from amino acid composition but also from structural elementssuch as secondary structure, amphipathicity, solvent accessibility and conformational stabil-ity
a variety of interacting factors impact antimicrobial capabilities
nonlinear interactions between features
'nonlinear interactions' is thrown around often; just a behavior that causes exponential or multi-faceted consequences?
ecision trees trained on bootstrapped subsets of the data
maybe familiar? random forests use decision trees -> like a flow chart?
k-mer frequencies, dipeptideand tripeptide motifs, pseudo-amino acid composition
are these all bad for AMP effectiveness?
Featureextraction,
vaguely familiar; just looking for specific qualities? generating specific qualities?
de novo peptide design and multi-objective optimization, integrating activity, selectivityand stability considerations into the design process
not very familiar with these; have heard of de novo peptide design and selectivity/stability considerations
toxicity toward mammalian cells, poor serum stability, limited bioavailability
familiar/can explain this in the context of traditional drug development; translational barriers are significanrt
I'm using this logic as as to build spacetime. But I think it's going to give an even more powerful approach. I don't have to minimize some free energy principle. I I have a more direct computational way
for - future project - building a model to explain spacetime using Active Inference - Donald Hoffman - use Active Inference to minimise surprise using Markov chains - this model assumes consciousness is fundamental - this is going to be a model of intelligence based entirely from a model which takes consciousness as fundamental. - it goes back to game theory again. - back to the idea of a simulation - If you're able to create a piece of software that - is able to replicate and - is built on the fundamentals of consciousness. - Then it's potentially, it's going to think it's conscious
rather than to zero-argument functions
For a thunk, do
def lazyHello : Thunk String :=
fun () => "world"
-- abbrev Thunk (α : Type) := Unit → α -- built-in
who would have known this that your tracheal epithelial cells if expplanted if if liberated from the rest of the body they will make a self motile little uh construct that among other things knows how to heal neural wounds.
for - quote - no evolutionary history explains form and behavior - Michael Levin
observation - evolution alone is insufficient to explain life - These novel, artificial life forms behave in novel emergent ways, there is no natural selection at play here
if Consciousness were to go floating around how the hell do you explain how it can see anything without eyes
for - Youtube - Techdenkers: Anil Seth - Exploring the Possibility of Artificcial consciousness - out of body experience - Anil Seth - good point - how do you explain seeing without eyes?
Instance methods Instances of Models are documents. Documents have many of their own built-in instance methods. We may also define our own custom document instance methods. // define a schema const animalSchema = new Schema({ name: String, type: String }, { // Assign a function to the "methods" object of our animalSchema through schema options. // By following this approach, there is no need to create a separate TS type to define the type of the instance functions. methods: { findSimilarTypes(cb) { return mongoose.model('Animal').find({ type: this.type }, cb); } } }); // Or, assign a function to the "methods" object of our animalSchema animalSchema.methods.findSimilarTypes = function(cb) { return mongoose.model('Animal').find({ type: this.type }, cb); }; Now all of our animal instances have a findSimilarTypes method available to them. const Animal = mongoose.model('Animal', animalSchema); const dog = new Animal({ type: 'dog' }); dog.findSimilarTypes((err, dogs) => { console.log(dogs); // woof }); Overwriting a default mongoose document method may lead to unpredictable results. See this for more details. The example above uses the Schema.methods object directly to save an instance method. You can also use the Schema.method() helper as described here. Do not declare methods using ES6 arrow functions (=>). Arrow functions explicitly prevent binding this, so your method will not have access to the document and the above examples will not work.
Certainly! Let's break down the provided code snippets:
In Mongoose, a schema is a blueprint for defining the structure of documents within a collection. When you define a schema, you can also attach methods to it. These methods become instance methods, meaning they are available on the individual documents (instances) created from that schema.
Instance methods are useful for encapsulating functionality related to a specific document or model instance. They allow you to define custom behavior that can be executed on a specific document. In the given example, the findSimilarTypes method is added to instances of the Animal model, making it easy to find other animals of the same type.
methods object directly in the schema options:javascript
const animalSchema = new Schema(
{ name: String, type: String },
{
methods: {
findSimilarTypes(cb) {
return mongoose.model('Animal').find({ type: this.type }, cb);
}
}
}
);
methods object directly in the schema:javascript
animalSchema.methods.findSimilarTypes = function(cb) {
return mongoose.model('Animal').find({ type: this.type }, cb);
};
Schema.method() helper:javascript
animalSchema.method('findSimilarTypes', function(cb) {
return mongoose.model('Animal').find({ type: this.type }, cb);
});
Imagine you have a collection of animals in your database, and you want to find other animals of the same type. Instead of writing the same logic repeatedly, you can define a method that can be called on each animal instance to find similar types. This helps in keeping your code DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) and makes it easier to maintain.
```javascript const mongoose = require('mongoose'); const { Schema } = mongoose;
// Define a schema with a custom instance method const animalSchema = new Schema({ name: String, type: String });
// Add a custom instance method to find similar types animalSchema.methods.findSimilarTypes = function(cb) { return mongoose.model('Animal').find({ type: this.type }, cb); };
// Create the Animal model using the schema const Animal = mongoose.model('Animal', animalSchema);
// Create an instance of Animal const dog = new Animal({ type: 'dog', name: 'Buddy' });
// Use the custom method to find similar types dog.findSimilarTypes((err, similarAnimals) => { console.log(similarAnimals); }); ```
In this example, findSimilarTypes is a custom instance method added to the Animal schema. When you create an instance of the Animal model (e.g., a dog), you can then call findSimilarTypes on that instance to find other animals with the same type. The method uses the this.type property, which refers to the type of the current animal instance. This allows you to easily reuse the logic for finding similar types across different instances of the Animal model.
This overarching goal is stated in the U.S. Constitution, Article I section 8, clause 8, “The Congress shall have Power ... To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”
Then, the article quote the U.S. Constitution, Article I section 8, clause 8, and then explains that, in the 18th century, this constitutional law gave the congress the power to grant exclusive rights to authors and inventors for their work, in order to boost creativity and innovation in the USA (U.S. Const., 1787). Later, the article claims that in the 1975, the U.S. Constitution, Article I section 8, clause 8 keep having the purpose of fostering innovation and creativity in the society, throughout economic incentive. Subsequently, the article supports this statement by quoting the law "Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken," which was created in 1975 with the purpose of boosting creativity and innovation in society throughout the economic incentive of assuring that creators receive a payment for their intellectual property that equates to the cost of producing it.
Some people eventually realize that the code quality is important, but they lack of the time to do it. This is the typical situation when you work under pressure or time constrains. It is hard to explain to you boss that you need another week to prepare your code when it is “already working”. So you ship the code anyway because you can not afford to spent one week more.
To see if you are writing good code, you can question yourself. how long it will take to fully transfer this project to another person? If the answer is uff, I don’t know… a few months… your code is like a magic scroll. most people can run it, but no body understand how it works. Strangely, I’ve seen several places where the IT department consist in dark wizards that craft scrolls to magically do things. The less people that understand your scroll, the more powerfully it is. Just like if life were a video game.
Code explains what and how Documentation explains why.
So make sure to write your documentation, but do not explain your spells.
This is so clear that you don’t even need comments to explain it.
Another type of comments are the ones trying to explain a spell.
Do not explain your spells, rewrite them.
"I didn't fully understand it at the time, but throughout my time as a freshman at Boston College I've realized that I have the power to alter myself for the better and broaden my perspective on life. For most of my high school experience, I was holding to antiquated thoughts that had an impact on the majority of my daily interactions. Throughout my life, growing up as a single child has affected the way am in social interactions. This was evident in high school class discussions, as I did not yet have the confidence to be talkative and participate even up until the spring term of my senior year."
Check both execution plans (using explain (analyze, verbose) and you'll see
I hope you'll forgive me for defaulting to the documentation: I think it will do a better job of explaining it than me.
I am wondering if it wasn't faster for maintainers/developers who know the glib code to just provide a fix instead of writing comments on this issue.
do I really have to do something like that in order to have my local modules working? it's quite impracticable to explain it to a team! there's nothing a little bit more straightforward?
Please focus on explaining the motivation so that if this RFC is not accepted, the motivation could be used to develop alternative solutions. In other words, enumerate the constraints you are trying to solve without coupling them too closely to the solution you have in mind.
Description explains the issue / use-case resolved
factors
vivo
Explain major differences between poems, drama, and prose, and refer to the structural elements of poems (e.g., verse, rhythm, meter) and drama (e.g., casts of characters, settings, descriptions, dialogue, stage directions) when writing or speaking about a text.
For this standard, students would have to read a variety of poems, plays and prose to understand the structural differences. Then the students must use the structural knowledge to properly write and speak about poems and plays. A good play for this standard would be Annie and a good collections of poems to understand structure would be from poet Roald Dahl.
science will produce improved results and better serve the community.
How will the results be improved and in what way will the community be better served?
I expect you explain how later in the document and provide examples, but to strengthen the intro and capture your readers give the a teaser of what's to come if they continue reading.