- Aug 2024
-
-
how do you know if, if, and when you are part of a larger cognitive system, right?
for - question - how do you know when you are part of a larger cognitive system? - answer - adjacency - synchronicity - lower level example - two neurons talking to each other - Michael Levin - Mark Solms foundation theory of affect
question - how do you know when you are part of a larger cognitive system? - answer - adjacency - synchronicity - lower level example - two neurons talking to each other - Michael Levin - Mark Solms foundation theory of affect
adjacency - between - answer - synchronicity - lower level example - two neurons talking to each other - Michael Levin - Mark Solms foundational theory of affect - adjacency relationship - This is a very interesting question and Michael Levin provides a very interesting answer - First, it is very interesting that Mark Solms points out that affect is foundational to cognition - This is evident once we begin to think of the fundamental goals of any individual of any species is to optimize survival - The positive or negative affects that we feel are a feedback signal that measures how successful we are in our efforts to survive - Hence, it is more accurate to ask: - How do you know if and when you are part of a larger affective-cognitive system? - Levin illustrates the multi-level nature of simultaneous consciousness by looking at two neurons "in dialogue" with each other, and potentially speculating about a "higher level of consciousness", which is in fact, the level you and I operate at and take for granted - This speculative question is very important for it also can be generalized to the next layer up, - Do collectives of humans, each one experiencing itself a unified, cohesive inner perspective, constitute a higher level "collective consciousness"? - If we humans experience feelings and thinking whilst we have a well defined physical body, then - what does a society feel and think whilst not having such a well defined physical body?
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Nov 2023
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Moreover, social logins are often implemented in an insecure way. Users, in this case, have to trust every application which implemented this feature to handle their identifier confidentially.
-
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
the average person when they meet a stranger and start a conversation with him they accurately 00:10:44 understand what's going on in that person's head 20% of the time with friends and family it goes up to 35% of the time some people are pretty good they're 55% of the time and some people are zero% of the time but think they're 00:10:57 100% of the time we're often strangers to each other
-
for: statistic - how little we know each other
-
statistic: how little we know each other
- the average person when they meet a stranger and start a conversation with him they accurately understand what's going on in that person's head 20% of the time
- with friends and family it goes up to 35% of the time
- some people are pretty good they're 55% of the time
- some people are zero% of the time but think they're 100% of the time
- we're often strangers to each other
-
-
my book is 00:10:19 simply an attempt to walk us through the skills it takes to be to know another human being and make them feel known seen and heard
-
for: purpose of David Brooks' book
-
paraphrase
- the purpose of his book is to advocate and spread the skills it takes to know another human being and make them feel known, seen and heard
-
-
- Sep 2022
-
andysylvester.com andysylvester.com
-
There has been much discussion about “atomic notes”, which represents the key ideas from a person’s research on some topic or source (sources one and two). These are not the kind of thing I am interested in creating/collecting, or at least not what I have been doing. A far more typical thing for me is something I did at work today. I was trying to figure out how to convert the output of a program into another format. I did some searching, installed a tool, found a script, played with the script in the tool, figured out how to use it, then wrote down a summary of my steps and added links to what I found in my search. Since I am not doing research for a book or for writing academic papers, the idea of an atomic note does not fit into my information world. However, capturing the steps of a discovery or how I worked out a problem. is very real and concrete to me. I used to know a fellow engineer who wrote “technical notes” to capture work he was doing (like a journal entry). Maybe that is how I should consider this type of knowledge creation.
Andy Sylvester says his engineering type of notes don't fit with the concept of atomic note. A 'how to solve x' type of note would fit my working def of 'atomic' as being a self-contained whole, focused on a single thing (here how to solve x). If the summary can be its title I'd say it's pretty atomic. Interestingly in [[Technik des wissenschaflichen Arbeitens by Johannes Erich Heyde]] 1970, Heyde on p18 explicitly mentions ZK being useful for engineers, not just to process new scientific insights from e.g. articles, but to index specific experiences, experiments and results. And on p19 suggests using 1 ZK system for all of your material of various types. Luhmann's might have been geared to writing articles, but it can be something else. Solving problems is also output. I have these types of notes in my 'ZK' if not in the conceptual section of it.
Vgl [[Ambachtelijke engineering 20190715143342]] artisanal engineering, Lovelock Novacene 2019, plays a role here too. Keeping a know-how notes collection in an environment where also your intuition can play a creative role is useful. I've done this for coding things, as I saw experienced coders do it, just as Andy describes, and it helped me create most of my personal IndieWeb scripts, because they were integrated in the rest of my stuff about my work and notions. Vgl [[Vastklik notes als ratchet zonder terugval 20220302102702]]
-
- May 2022
-
wordpress.com wordpress.com
-
"I'd want to learn a lot from Professor Zimmerman so that I may obtain as much information as possible and use it in reality. It's not about the work."
Tags
- The backdrop of this annotation is that it was a late-semester free writing for an essay brainstorm. In this piece of writing, I mentioned how I didn't know what to expect going into the project and wanted to learn as much as possible for my own betterment.
- (Shorter Piece) First two-sentences
Annotators
URL
-
- May 2021
-
hiphopfoundations.org hiphopfoundations.org
- Apr 2021
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
A good heuristic is to not trust the libraries you did not write either.
-
- Mar 2021
-
store.steampowered.com store.steampowered.com
-
This games a scam. Reviews are fake.
-
-
www.chevtek.io www.chevtek.io
-
he goes on to talk about third party problems and how you're never guaranteed something is written correctly or that even if it is you don't know if it's the most optimal solution
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I don't even know how to tell if they're working 100%, I'm getting mixed signals ..
-
Should it only contain link* calls?
-
When should I use link, vs dir, vs. tree?
-
but I still have no idea if I'm writing this new file correctly.
-
- Feb 2021
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
that's a point, but I would say the opposite, when entering credit card data I would rathre prefer to be entirely in the Verified By Visa (Paypal) webpage (with the url easily visible in the address bar) rather that entring my credit card data in an iframe of someone's website.
-
- Jan 2021
-
askubuntu.com askubuntu.com
-
I'm very (VERY!) tempted to use that ppa, but without offense to it's maintainers... it's just some random ppa. If it had more "traction" I'd use it. Right now it has only 3 maintainers.
-
-
askubuntu.com askubuntu.com
-
How do you know this? I've looked all over the internet and can't find any proof that Lightdm is more "lightweight" (whatever this means) or faster.
-
- Nov 2020
-
www.styled-components.com www.styled-components.com
- Sep 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
Svelte will not offer a generic way to support style customizing via contextual class overrides (as we'd do it in plain HTML). Instead we'll invent something new that is entirely different. If a child component is provided and does not anticipate some contextual usage scenario (style wise) you'd need to copy it or hack around that via :global hacks.
Tags
- trying to prevent one bad thing leading to people doing/choosing an even worse option
- component/library author can't consider/know ahead of time all of the ways users may want to use it
- workarounds
- Svelte: how to affect child component styles
- ugly/kludgey
- maintenance burden to explicitly define/enumerate/hard-code possible options (explicit interface)
- forced to fork/copy and paste library code because it didn't provide enough customizability/extensibility / didn't foresee some specific prop/behavior that needed to be overridable/configurable (explicit interface)
- run-time dynamicness/generics vs. having to explicitly list/hard-code all options ahead of time
- forking to add a desired missing feature/change
Annotators
URL
-
- Jul 2020
-
lwn.net lwn.net
-
"that text has been removed from the official version on the Apache site." This itself is also not good. If you post "official" records but then quietly edit them over time, I have no choice but to assume bad faith in all the records I'm shown by you. Why should I believe anything Apache board members claim was "minuted" but which in fact it turns out they might have just edited into their records days, weeks or years later? One of the things I particularly watch for in modern news media (where no physical artefact captures whatever "mistakes" are published as once happened with newspapers) is whether when they inevitably correct a mistake they _acknowledge_ that or they instead just silently change things.
-
- May 2020
-
www.collinsdictionary.com www.collinsdictionary.com
-
This corpus became the largest collection of English language data in the world
-
- Mar 2020
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
I thought I understood Ruby error handling until this week and ran across this question.
-