Welcome to the 2021 Marginal Syllabus. This article by Dr. Ebony Elizabeth Thomas is part of the third Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN syllabus co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP) and the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), with support from Hypothesis.

Click "Show replies," below, to read more about the Marginal Syllabus.

Our thanks to partner author Sophia Sarigianides for contributing to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus! Dr. Sarigianides' bio is included at the end of this article.

Annotation is a form of conversation.

Using Hypothesis to read socially and publicly with other people is a unique learning opportunity.

We urge Marginal Syllabus participants to share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry.

Consider how your annotations might elicit dialogue rather than deliver a soliloquy.

Author annotations that open spaces for other people and multiple perspectives.

Please remember that discussing educational equity - and, specifically, topics that may be perceived as debatable or incompatible with personal experience - may be a challenging and new experience for some Marginal Syllabus participants. We welcome annotation that is:

• Civil. We can disagree. And when we do so, let’s also respect one another.
• Constructive. Share what you know. And build upon ideas that are relevant and informative.
• Curious. Ask honest questions and listen openly to responses.
• Creative. Model generative dialogue. Have fun. Contribute to and learn from the process.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you are using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• [Why annotate?] (https://s15138.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Why_-Infographic.pdf) Michelle King of the Western Pennsylvania Writing Project explores the “whys” of annotation with a focus on convening and curating dialogue, playing and noticing, and co-authoring professional learning.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group

Welcome to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus and our May conversation! This is the seventh article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." Our reading is part of the second LEARN syllabus co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus sparks and sustains public conversation about educational equity through collaborative technologies and partnerships. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech.

The Marginal Syllabus sparks and sustains public conversation about educational equity through collaborative technologies and partnerships. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech.

The 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus is titled "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN" and was co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis.

Our thanks to partner authors Ashley Boyd and Jacinda Miller for contributing to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus!

Annotation is a form of conversation.

Using Hypothesis to read socially and publicly with other people is a unique learning opportunity.

We urge Marginal Syllabus participants to share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry.

Consider how your annotations might elicit dialogue rather than deliver a soliloquy.

Author annotations that open spaces for other people and multiple perspectives.

Please remember that discussing educational equity - and, specifically, topics that may be perceived as debatable or incompatible with personal experience - may be a challenging and new experience for some Marginal Syllabus participants. We welcome annotation that is:

• Civil. We can disagree. And when we do so, let’s also respect one another.
• Constructive. Share what you know. And build upon ideas that are relevant and informative.
• Curious. Ask honest questions and listen openly to responses.
• Creative. Model generative dialogue. Have fun. Contribute to and learn from the process.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you are using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• [Why annotate?] (https://s15138.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Why_-Infographic.pdf) Michelle King of the Western Pennsylvania Writing Project explores the “whys” of annotation with a focus on convening and curating dialogue, playing and noticing, and co-authoring professional learning.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group

Welcome to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus and our April conversation! This is the sixth article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." Our reading is part of the second LEARN syllabus co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus sparks and sustains public conversation about educational equity through collaborative technologies and partnerships. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech.

important that this youth-led participatory action research was aligned with and supported by more formal curricular standards (state, federal)

Annotation is a form of conversation.

Using Hypothesis to read socially and publicly with other people is a unique learning opportunity.

We urge Marginal Syllabus participants to share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry.

Consider how your annotations might elicit dialogue rather than deliver a soliloquy.

Author annotations that open spaces for other people and multiple perspectives.

Please remember that discussing educational equity - and, specifically, topics that may be perceived as debatable or incompatible with personal experience - may be a challenging and new experience for some Marginal Syllabus participants. We welcome annotation that is:

• Civil. We can disagree. And when we do so, let’s also respect one another.
• Constructive. Share what you know. And build upon ideas that are relevant and informative.
• Curious. Ask honest questions and listen openly to responses.
• Creative. Model generative dialogue. Have fun. Contribute to and learn from the process.

Our thanks to partner author Dr. Sakeena Everett for contributing to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus! This is the second time that Dr. Everett has joined the Marginal Syllabus as a partner author, having previously done so during the 2017-18 Writing Our Civic Futures syllabus - please also read her co-authored article, and the associated annotation conversation, about pedagogies of healing and critical media literacy. Dr. Everett's bio also appears at the end of this article.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you are using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• [Why annotate?] (https://s15138.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Why_-Infographic.pdf) Michelle King of the Western Pennsylvania Writing Project explores the “whys” of annotation with a focus on convening and curating dialogue, playing and noticing, and co-authoring professional learning.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group

Welcome to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus and our March conversation! This is the fifth article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." Our reading is part of the second LEARN syllabus co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus sparks and sustains public conversation about educational equity through collaborative technologies and partnerships. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech.

Connected Learning- Academically Oriented

Connected Learning- Openly networked

Connected Learning- Peer Supported. Exchanges with peers, even thru social media, produces engaged and powerful learning

The Haves vs the Have Nots

Connected learning definition/ explanation

-Interest powered -Production centered -Peer Supported -Shared Purpose -Academically Oriented -Openly Networked

The desire to learn is fostered by a students interest

Definition of connected learning

Our thanks to partner authors Vaughn W. M. Watson and Alecia Beymer for contributing to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus! Brief bios for each partner author are included at the end of the article

Annotation is a form of conversation.

Using Hypothesis to read socially and publicly with other people is a unique learning opportunity.

We urge Marginal Syllabus participants to share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry.

Consider how your annotations might elicit dialogue rather than deliver a soliloquy.

Author annotations that open spaces for other people and multiple perspectives.

Please remember that discussing educational equity - and, specifically, topics that may be perceived as debatable or incompatible with personal experience - may be a challenging and new experience for some Marginal Syllabus participants. We welcome annotation that is:

• Civil. We can disagree. And when we do so, let’s also respect one another.
• Constructive. Share what you know. And build upon ideas that are relevant and informative.
• Curious. Ask honest questions and listen openly to responses.
• Creative. Model generative dialogue. Have fun. Contribute to and learn from the process.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you are using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• [Why annotate?] (https://s15138.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Why_-Infographic.pdf) Michelle King of the Western Pennsylvania Writing Project explores the “whys” of annotation with a focus on convening and curating dialogue, playing and noticing, and co-authoring professional learning.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group

Welcome to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus and our February conversation! This is the fourth article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." Our reading is part of the second LEARN syllabus co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus sparks and sustains public conversation about educational equity through collaborative technologies and partnerships. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech.

Annotation is a form of conversation.

Using Hypothesis to read socially and publicly with other people is a unique learning opportunity.

We urge Marginal Syllabus participants to share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry.

Consider how your annotations might elicit dialogue rather than deliver a soliloquy.

Author annotations that open spaces for other people and multiple perspectives.

Please remember that discussing educational equity - and, specifically, topics that may be perceived as debatable or incompatible with personal experience - may be a challenging and new experience for some Marginal Syllabus participants. We welcome annotation that is:

• Civil. We can disagree. And when we do so, let’s also respect one another.
• Constructive. Share what you know. And build upon ideas that are relevant and informative.
• Curious. Ask honest questions and listen openly to responses.
• Creative. Model generative dialogue. Have fun. Contribute to and learn from the process.

Our thanks to partner author Alex Corbitt for contributing to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus! To learn more about Alex visit: https://www.alexcorbitt.com/

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you are using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• [Why annotate?] (https://s15138.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Why_-Infographic.pdf) Michelle King of the Western Pennsylvania Writing Project explores the “whys” of annotation with a focus on convening and curating dialogue, playing and noticing, and co-authoring professional learning.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group

Welcome to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus and our January conversation! This is the third article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." Our reading is part of the second LEARN syllabus co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus sparks and sustains public conversation about educational equity through collaborative technologies and partnerships. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech.

As an introduction to the article, you're very welcome to watch a webinar hosted by Christopher Rogers, featuring guest reader Latrice Ferguson, and both partner authors Mario Worlds and Cody Miller. https://youtu.be/qOyMmTrf_yo

Our thanks to partner authors Mario Worlds and Cody Miller for contributing to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus! Brief bios for both Mario and Cody are included at the end of this article. Also, the entire Marginal Syllabus team would like to congratulate Mario and Cody for winning the Paul and Kate Farmer English Journal Writing Award for their authorship of this article! The award was recently presented at the 2019 NCTE Annual Convention and recognizes outstanding English Journal articles written by classroom teachers - congrats!

Annotation is a form of conversation.

Using Hypothesis to read socially and publicly with other people is a unique learning opportunity.

We urge Marginal Syllabus participants to share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry.

Consider how your annotations might elicit dialogue rather than deliver a soliloquy.

Author annotations that open spaces for other people and multiple perspectives.

Please remember that discussing educational equity - and, specifically, topics that may be perceived as debatable or incompatible with personal experience - may be a challenging and new experience for some Marginal Syllabus participants. We welcome annotation that is:

• Civil. We can disagree. And when we do so, let’s also respect one another.
• Constructive. Share what you know. And build upon ideas that are relevant and informative.
• Curious. Ask honest questions and listen openly to responses.
• Creative. Model generative dialogue. Have fun. Contribute to and learn from the process.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you are using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• [Why annotate?] (https://s15138.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Why_-Infographic.pdf) Michelle King of the Western Pennsylvania Writing Project explores the “whys” of annotation with a focus on convening and curating dialogue, playing and noticing, and co-authoring professional learning.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group

Welcome to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus and our December conversation! This is the second article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." Our reading is part of the second LEARN syllabus co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus sparks and sustains public conversation about educational equity through collaborative technologies and partnerships. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech.

Annotation is a form of conversation.

Using Hypothesis to read socially and publicly with other people is a unique learning opportunity.

We urge Marginal Syllabus participants to share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry.

Consider how your annotations might elicit dialogue rather than deliver a soliloquy.

Author annotations that open spaces for other people and multiple perspectives.

Please remember that discussing educational equity - and, specifically, topics that may be perceived as debatable or incompatible with personal experience - may be a challenging and new experience for some Marginal Syllabus participants. We welcome annotation that is:

• Civil. We can disagree. And when we do so, let’s also respect one another.
• Constructive. Share what you know. And build upon ideas that are relevant and informative.
• Curious. Ask honest questions and listen openly to responses.
• Creative. Model generative dialogue. Have fun. Contribute to and learn from the process.

Our thanks to partner author Samuel Jaye Tanner for contributing to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus! A brief bio is included at the end of this article, and you can also learn more by visiting Sam's website.

Welcome to the 2019-20 Marginal Syllabus and our November conversation! This is the first article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." Our reading is part of the second LEARN syllabus co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus sparks and sustains public conversation about educational equity through collaborative technologies and partnerships. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you are using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• [Why annotate?] (https://s15138.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Why_-Infographic.pdf) Michelle King of the Western Pennsylvania Writing Project explores the “whys” of annotation with a focus on convening and curating dialogue, playing and noticing, and co-authoring professional learning.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group

Dr. Baker-Bell was a Marginal Syllabus partner author during the 2017-18 "Writing Our Civic Futures" syllabus. Read "The Stories They Tell: Mainstream Media, Pedagogies of Healing and Critical Media Literacy" by April Baker-Bell, Raven Jones Stanbrough, and Sakeena Everett published in the January 2017 edition of English Education. Dr. Baker-Bell also recommended to the Marginal Syllabus team that we include this article in our current syllabus.

Dr. Johnson is a partner author with this 2019-2020 LEARN Marginal Syllabus. We'll be reading and discussing Dr. Johnson's article “Where Do We Go From Here? Toward a Critical Race English Education” in June of 2020 as the concluding conversation of this syllabus.

"When did you become white?" As a teacher educator, Sam asks some version of this question to his white pre-service English teachers during their coursework. The question serves as a prompt for a writing exercise and subsequent discussion. If you self-identity as white, you may want to consider, and perhaps also respond to, Sam's questions:

• When did you become white?
• And what and how have you learned from this?

I am interested in the power of events like #writeout to connecting both locally and globally alongside the tensions that rise between networked digital technologies (resource use, algorithms, AI, access, etc.) and our natural world.

I appreciate this focus on English teachers and I wonder, as folks who are in other disciplines connect here too, how do you feel positioned to guide these kinds of understandings and connections?

Our thanks to Amy Price Azano and NCTE publications for contributing to Write Out 2019. A short bio of the author is included at the end of this article.

Sounds a lot like connected learning.

Agenda (for research), learning theory (based on personal interest and passion) and model for design (connecting the spheres of home, school and peers).

This is a bold statement but we should also be aware of that with our choices as teachers, we are shaping the society of the 21st century as well. Also, not everything "old" is necessarily useless and bad, so we need to distinguish between "modern" and "valuable" as well as "old" and "worthless". I think one of the most important value that we need to teach to our students and to ourselves, too, is flexibility.

Sounds like a great learning opportunity for Chicago teens where they can experiment with technology and find their interest while connecting with each other not only in the digital space but in real life, face-to-face as well.

Did the author have connected learning principles explicitly in mind when creating this option (and the course in general)?

I'm interested to learn more about this "we" and how the group functions on an individual and collective level. I also read the title as a way for the members of the "we" to distinguish themselves and "how [they] do it" from other groups and how those groups do "it," which I'm assuming is teaching English with technology. Last note: I now have Montell Jordan's "This Is How We Do It" in my head as I begin the article, which is a plus.

A tangential thought that may be addressed elsewhere, but I'm curious how/if CL in its various forms affects whether or not a teacher remains in the profession. Given our nation's teacher shortage, can/is CL be(ing) used to create and maintain communities that help teachers stay and grow in their classrooms?

I'm fairly new to CL, so I'm curious: how is CL viewed in more "traditional," for lack of a better word, academic circles?

For me, this is the focus. "Design with gaps and holes"

Curious if there are thoughts by facilitators (or the authors of the study) to setting an open document for folks to add annotations and resources to, if they have some of their own? Just wondering how to put Connected Learning into action, here, as an extension of annotation on Connected Learning.

This is so important ... it's crucial that new folks feel not just welcomed but invited to participate or to just observe ... this requires diligence on the part of facilitators ...

This kind of curated work is important -- particularly in the kinds of spaces where information can get lost. There are lots of great ideas and resources but they seem to be all over the place, sometimes scattered, loosely connected. Perhaps more of this kind of weaving will help others see the possibilities of a Connected Learning underpinning.

Nicely articulated ... I guess we can't say this enough ... I am thinking here of Audrey Watters' work around how the technology industry has long influenced the educational systems in order to sell more stuff to schools, and how those relationships at the top have filtered down into the classroom -- so, more high-end technology seems to equate to deeper learning, and we know (right?) that is not true.

Experiment=Play

as if ...

I'm still pretty mixed on the value of digital badges. I have yet to be convinced that they mean anything in the long run ... can someone convince me otherwise?

Definitely helpful to use technology to spread the learning, but there are also other ways -- newspapers, fliers, forums, etc. https://letters2president.org/

I've seen this happen and been one asking for help via networks -- either through classroom connections or through adult mentors or through gathering resources. Leveraging networks can be powerful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNcet150S5A&list=PLB494592AA0A4AE1F&index=5&t=0s

This is where the technology might play a role -- making it easier to make connections with mentors who live elsewhere ... global connections ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9xyrAsCe0M&list=PLB494592AA0A4AE1F&index=6&t=0s

Get 'em playing ...

Our thanks to partner authors Jemimah Young, Marquita Foster, and Dorothy Hines for contributing to the 2018-19 LEARN Marginal Syllabus! Bios for each partner author are included at the end of this article.

Welcome to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus and our Month conversation! This is the second article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." LEARN has been co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech. Read the full 2018-19 syllabus here.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in social learning analytics? View visualizations of this conversation and gain deeper insight into collaborative reading and discussion. Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

And thank you CITE! CITE is an open-access and peer-reviewed journal whose support for the 2019 Marginal Syllabus is most appreciated.

Thank you Kira Baker-Doyle! The Marginal Syllabus is most appreciative of partner authors who agree to have their scholarship publicly annotated to support openly-networked and interest-driven professional learning. Read more about Marginal Syllabus author partnerships.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in social learning analytics? View visualizations of this conversation and gain deeper insight into collaborative reading and discussion. Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

Welcome to the summer 2019 Marginal Syllabus and our fourth conversation! This is the fourth article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Connected Learning in Teacher Education." This Marginal Syllabus has been co-developed in partnership with the Connected Learning in Teacher Education (CLinTE) network, the journal Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open and collaborative web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education.

What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial educational technology. Thanks for joining us this summer!

And thank you CITE! CITE is an open-access and peer-reviewed journal whose support for the 2019 Marginal Syllabus is most appreciated.

Thank you partner authors! The Marginal Syllabus is most appreciative of partner authors who agree to have their scholarship publicly annotated to support openly-networked and interest-driven professional learning. Read more about Marginal Syllabus author partnerships.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in social learning analytics? View visualizations of this conversation and gain deeper insight into collaborative reading and discussion. Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

Welcome to the summer 2019 Marginal Syllabus and our third conversation! This is the third article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Connected Learning in Teacher Education." This Marginal Syllabus has been co-developed in partnership with the Connected Learning in Teacher Education (CLinTE) network, the journal Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open and collaborative web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education.

What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial educational technology. Thanks for joining us this summer!

And thank you CITE! CITE is an open-access and peer-reviewed journal whose support for the 2019 Marginal Syllabus is most appreciated.

Thank you Betina Hsieh! The Marginal Syllabus is most appreciative of partner authors who agree to have their scholarship publicly annotated to support openly-networked and interest-driven professional learning. Read more about Marginal Syllabus author partnerships.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in social learning analytics? View visualizations of this conversation and gain deeper insight into collaborative reading and discussion. Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

Welcome to the summer 2019 Marginal Syllabus and our second conversation! This is the second article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Connected Learning in Teacher Education." This Marginal Syllabus has been co-developed in partnership with the Connected Learning in Teacher Education (CLinTE) network, the journal Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open and collaborative web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education.

What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial educational technology. Thanks for joining us this summer!

And thank you CITE! CITE is an open-access and peer-reviewed journal whose support for the 2019 Marginal Syllabus is most appreciated.

Thank you partner authors! The Marginal Syllabus is most appreciative of partner authors who agree to have their scholarship publicly annotated to support openly-networked and interest-driven professional learning. Read more about Marginal Syllabus author partnerships.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in social learning analytics? View visualizations of this conversation and gain deeper insight into collaborative reading and discussion. Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

Welcome to the summer 2019 Marginal Syllabus and our first conversation! This is the first article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Connected Learning in Teacher Education." This Marginal Syllabus has been co-developed in partnership with the Connected Learning in Teacher Education (CLinTE) network, the journal Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open and collaborative web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education.

What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial educational technology. Thanks for joining us this summer!

Our thanks to partner authors Everardo Pedraza and Joseph Rodriguez for contributing to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus! A short bio of each author is included at the end of this article. And a Connected Learning TV webinar with both partner authors, and regular Marginal Syllabus participants, will go live on Tuesday, May 7th (and will be included in this annotation, too).

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in learning analytics? Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

Welcome to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus and our Month conversation! This is the second article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." LEARN has been co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech. Read the full 2018-19 syllabus here.

An excellent example of this, also in Chicago, is the Mexican-American area known as Pilsen. One way the community has taken control is through the development of street murals, described here: https://interactive.wttw.com/my-neighborhood/pilsen/art-as-activism.

This open access version of "Cultivating urban literacies on Chicago's South Side through a pedagogy of spatial justice" is being publicly read, annotated, and discussed as a part of the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus. To learn more about this project and discussion, click Page Notes (above) to access additional information and linked resources.

Our thanks to partner authors Andrea Vaughan, Rebecca Woodard, Nathan Phillips, and Kara Taylor for contributing to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus! Additional biographical information about the authors is included at the end of this article. And a Connected Learning TV webinar featuring all the authors will be broadcast on Tuesday, April 2nd and also embedded in our annotation conversation, too.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in learning analytics? Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

Welcome to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus and our April conversation! This is the sixth article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." LEARN has been co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech. Read the full 2018-19 syllabus here.

Greetings everyone, I'm excited about CLX developing this connected learning guide! If you are participating in the feedback activities via Hypothesis annotation, and if you'd like to see analytics about the collaborative activity associated with this guide, please click here. This link will take you to the "crowd layers" dashboard, where you can view a summary of who is annotating, what types of annotations have been added, when annotations were written, if annotations are tagged, and more. I hope this is a useful tool that complements the broader feedback process.

This open access version of "Critical Indigenous Literacies: Selecting and Using Children's Books about Indigenous Peoples" is being publicly read, annotated, and discussed as a part of the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus. To learn more about this project and discussion, click Page Notes (above) to access additional information and linked resources.

Click here to read the latest tweets tagged #OwnVoices.

"Established in 2006, American Indians in Children's Literature (AICL) provides critical perspectives and analysis of indigenous peoples in children's and young adult books, the school curriculum, popular culture, and society." Visit the site to read book reviews, Native media, and more.

Our thanks to partner author Debbie Reese for contributing to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus! A short biography of Debbie Reese is included at the end of this article, and you can also learn more about her here.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in learning analytics? Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

Welcome to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus and our March conversation! This is the fifth article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." LEARN has been co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech. Read the full 2018-19 syllabus here.

Intrest motivates

What connected learning combines

Here's our Connected Learning TV webinar with partner authors Valerie Kinloch, Tanja Burkhard, and Carlotta Penn, also featuring regular Marginal Syllabus participants Michelle King and Cherise McBride - enjoy! https://youtu.be/XzK4jD3QaaY

Our thanks to partner authors Valerie Kinloch, Tanja Burkhard, and Carlotta Penn for contributing to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus! A Connected Learning TV webinar featuring all three partner authors will be broadcast on Tuesday, Feb 5th, with the video also embedded here in our annotation conversation. Brief bios for all three partner authors are also included at the end of this article.

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in learning analytics? Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

Welcome to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus and our February conversation! This is the fourth article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." LEARN has been co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech. Read the full 2018-19 syllabus here.

Thinking about working within the system to make change. Perhaps the two philosophies can co-exist. Learning outcomes with their linear path learning could be complimented by a student-decided outcome. The student could look at the syllabus for what faculty hope they will learn in the course, but then choose a final outcome or goal they personally have for taking the course. Then they could also propose how they are going to demonstrate their learning.

The chat rooms are always so interesting. This space can really allow someone like this student to be a bit bolder.

I've never attended a conference virtually before, but I can see how motivation is essential. In fact, it requires a plan for setting up the right space, computer connectivity, limiting distractions and joining with the intent to learn.

This is a great distinction to make. I wish I would have been introduced to the digital realm with some understanding of what commentary is appropriate in different contexts.

I'm sure this can really stretch some of the participants. Various comfort levels with putting themselves out there.

There are murmurings of letting the instructional designers from Pedago.me participate in a #digPINS session.

Yes! This a brilliant way to build faculty's digital literacy. Provide and model the experience in order to build confidence.

I've never heard it put so plainly. Perhaps any time one challenges the status quo it is political. This also helps explain why making change can be so hard. It could be a really uncomfortable position especially when you factor in the different ages of faculty development that an educator might be in at the time of critical reflection and asking for change.

This is an important point: mentors & collaborators outside of a program's hierarchical relationship. I am much more likely to be authentic about my personal/professional growth when there is no hidden agenda or expectations.

I love how the ages of teaching are broken down here. There is almost an unfair expectation for all educators to be fully evolved right out of the gate, but as with all things expertise takes time. Being able to somewhat gauge where an educator is on their journey is a nice indicator to have, especially as an instructional designer who works hard to meet faculty where they are in their journey and not overwhelm them.

It's an honor to be cited by Maha and Autumm in their paper! This particular article was published at the end of 2018 as "Equity-oriented design in open education." Here's the journal's version as well as an open access preprint.

Looking forward to this connected and collaborative annotation jam. Feel free to jump in anytime, but be sure to join January 31 from 6-8pm to connect with the live Denver audience.

A big thank you to Maha and Autumm for creating and sharing these ideas; ones we will all collectively benefit from.

Our thanks to partner authors Allison Skerrett, Amber Warrington, and Thea Williamson for contributing to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus! A short bio for each scholar is included at the end of this article. Also, all partner authors joined Marginal Syllabus readers and facilitators in a Connected Learning TV webinar about this article that will be available to view via Educator Innovator on Tuesday, January 8th - please watch as a complement to reading and annotating this important article!

If you are joining a Marginal Syllabus conversation for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to annotate for the first time, here are a few useful notes and resources:

• Reading with other people is a unique learning opportunity. Share annotations that spark conversation and deepen our collective inquiry. Consider how you might listen with your annotations. Create space for other people and multiple perspectives. Remember that discussing controversial topics is challenging and may be a new experience for some participants.
• Here’s how to get started with Hypothesis and a great collection of education resources
• Are the margins getting crowded? Here’s how to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Want to annotate privately within a group? You’re very welcome to use this article for private conversation, so here’s how to create a private Hypothesis group
• Interested in learning analytics? Follow this conversation via CROWDLAAERS

Welcome to the 2018-19 Marginal Syllabus and our January conversation! This is the third article we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Literacy, Equity + Remarkable Notes = LEARN." LEARN has been co-developed in partnership with the National Writing Project (NWP), the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE), and Hypothesis. The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation via open web annotation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education. What's "marginal" about the Marginal Syllabus? We partner with authors whose writing is contrary to dominant education norms, we read and annotate in the margins of online texts, and we discuss educational equity using open-source technology that’s marginal to commercial edtech. Read the full 2018-19 syllabus here.

This article adds to my information on some specific kids that digital storytelling really helps and will add LD students to my post. The ideas in this post also reflect a lot of those from my previous articles so it helps hold those ideas solid for my post.

With digital storytelling, students are able view their own stories as an audience member as many times as they want to be able to see how their story is being portrayed and if it is not being portrayed as the author would have hoped, it is accessible so that they can go in and fix it.

Confidence is a big factor, especially with LD students. If they believe that they can't create good writing then they won't and vise versa. We must employ strategies and activities to allow all students to feel confident and know that they can create amazing pieces of work.

Digital storytelling provides these students with a stepping stool and provides them with support for creating pieces of writing.

when you take out the physical act of writing, the students are able to express themselves in ways that they are more comfortable with and enjoy

with technology in their hands, they are able to do so much that helps them get into their own story

This article is so full of information on how digital storytelling helps struggling writers and goes in to detail about some specific types of kids and how digital storytelling helps them directly with the part of writing that they struggle with. This article will be great for the details and direct example of how digital storytelling helps many types of students who are struggling in different areas as well as all students.

This text provides the general information and benefits of storytelling that I will be able to use to help back up digital storytelling in which my project will be about.

LOVE

Social side

especially students who are easily frustrated or consider themselves "bad" writers.

Both of which are important for young writers to develop

Students are able to self regulate their learning and be in control which is something all people desire to do. When they do this, they are more motivated because they are able to do what they want to do and in turn do it better.

Giving students a mode that they are unafraid of they are more likely to take risks and not hold back from telling the story that they want to tell, and not changing it in fear that they wont be able to spell all the words or make the sentences.

You always learn better through doing

All important for children's learning and understanding

storytelling=better attitudes=better reading and writing

Building off of each other and creating a community of strong writers. Building this kind of relationship can go a long way with their confidence which can in turn lead to better writing and the cycle will just keep going.

Children are very social beings and love to share about all kinds of things with you, we should extend this excitement to writing.

I guess I never really viewed storytelling through writing as social but even in writing it allows the writer to have their voice and share their voice with others.

Reading and writing have a close tie and because reading progresses faster than writing we should use it to help progress our writing as well. A lot of what children read in their early grades are stories and so by writing stories they can match what they are reading, we can help them achieve greater success in writing.

While this number can't completely disappear but we should be working toward finding ways to make this number smaller and smaller.

By taking out the writing, we are able to see how students can create stories and see how they can compose a story. When you take out the worry of the writing, the students feel free to be as creative as they want to and can because they feel like they can be successful at that creative level.

Another example of how digital storytelling can help students who struggle with adding the details to create flow in a story, visualizing seeing it through pictures in the storyboard.

Students can learn a lot from each other and can grow their own ideas just from talking to others and the computer screen is an easy way for others to view others work to get ideas of what they're doing.

With structure, digital storytelling keeps easily distracted and disengaged kids on task an engaged with the tasks and active learning and collaboration.

When the students have others compliment them, especially their insecurities, they become more sure of themselves and confident and then when they are confident they enjoy the tasks more because they believe that the product will be great so they are more likely to want to create things on their own for fun which in turn gives them more practice so that they can become even better and this can just form a cycle of improvement.

When the student is able to create exactly what they want, they are more connected to the piece and able to take more ownership of it. When given only a certain set of things to choose from they are less excited about it, especially if there isn't an option that directly elicits what they are trying to portray and that leads to frustration and they settle with less.

Allows them self correct to make sure it sounds to others how they want it to sound.

One good example of how digital storytelling helps one group of struggling students.The idea that this can be viewed by may makes them want to write so that everyone can read and understand and make meaning and then they get to add the illustrations as well.

Allows them to view themselves differently so that when they are traditionally writing, their new attitudes about writing will show in their work. Believing that they are good writers will allow them to be more confident in their writing and their writing will improve.

They are able to visually see the story to watch it flow. With the composition simply in words, they are less likely to be able to picture it in their head and watch the flow to see if it has any gaps. When they are able to put it into a storyboard they can see it and it also gives them a way to solve the issue before they do the final product, and with writing it always feels more final especially for kids and they are less inclined to fix the problem if there is one because it is more intimidating because it all seems like one piece. In a storyboard it is all broken up so its easier to fix the small pieces of the whole.

Gives them more confidence

I feel like this is true throughout all ages. Even now, knowing that something has the possibility of being seen by any, I pay really close attention making sure everything I do makes me sound smart. I am more likely to read over it multiple times to make sure everything is right.

Children are proud of their creations, there is sometimes a fear of sharing writing, especially those seen as not great writers. I never viewed myself as a good writer and I still don't like letting others read my work.

Create a greater tie to the piece

Much like written composition, point of view, dramatic question, emotions, even economy and pacing, all fall into written compositions. Digital story telling adds the gift of voice and a soundtrack. These ideas allow the student to get creative and feel more connected to piece of work that they are creating. Young student sometimes struggle with the idea that you have a voice in writing because to them, its just words on a page, but through digital storytelling they feel like they really are telling their story and they are doing it out loud.

Students more likely to take risks and try new things with technology then on paper?

using literacy to build upon literacy. By allowing them to use a mode that they are more interested in or are seen as higher achievement in, they will be more motivated in the terms of traditional literacy.

"Teaching to the test" this is something that has has become a huge thing in the class but is it the best way to truly prepare them? Can we use methods besides directly what is on the test to get the same ideas across and maybe even move farther for a better understanding?

As stated earlier in the article, it talks about how lack of interest influences the quantity and quality of the work. By giving all students the same prompt, some may have a bigger interest or connection to whatever the prompt may be so it may, before the writing has even started, already separated into two groups of students. How else could we check for kids writing level? how can we address the idea of giving all kids an assessment that is more up their alley.

"lack of interest" how can we help peak their interest and give them something that they are excited about while still having this idea of a composition? can digital storytelling combat this lack of interest to help improve the quality of a composition for these learners?

Why is this? Misconception about good writers? Expectations of themselves?

Helpful for all students

Students who don't learn best through traditional means, and therefore are at a high risk of falling behind, can benefit from creating these digital stories to help them become more engaged in the content.

Connected learning allows learning to be more personalized to the individual student. It connects their academics to their interests, learners to peers & mentors who are interested in the same thing (digital world) and education goals to higher goals and skills.

I really like the idea of connected learning. Linking children's interests to what they are learning is a great tool. I feel like if you give children freedom to explore what they want but somehow prompt them into achieving what you, as the teacher want, the learning process will be great and exciting.

This is so powerful as a future teacher learning the importance and how to incorporate students' interests into the classroom. When interest is sparked this motivation is created and as this model states it can create somewhat of a chain reaction that can open the doors to so many relationships and opportunities in the future. I think I can incorporate interest into my PBL unit plan and hopefully motivate the students to engage in the learning and collaborate with peers.

This can be a notoriously hard task. In part of an awesome address to K-State, Jim Groom spoke about his experiments teaching with Wikipedia. (at 16:50 of the video below) https://youtu.be/Ne6jV1kefp4 His talk is an important one for folks thinking about how where these OER OEP conversations have been, are now, and should be headed.

I appreciate the production centered nature of this approach, they learn about OER by using them, critiquing them and helping to create them.

When we were in elementary grades, connected learning wasn't needed due to not a lot of interactive content being used by us and it wasn't a common interest. Now, traditional education IS failing without technology because of the increase of interactive contact and younger students need to stay engaged with communication in order to be interested in what they are learning.

And the inevitable high tech options that can be out of reach for a lot of families and school districts. The IEP requires, if it is agreed upon by the committee, that the school does everything possible within reason to get the device.

The next level of tech that includes battery operated devices. With growing inclusion of smart devices in classrooms, I could see this being an easily accessible option for a lot of students. Apps and programs are often easily purchasable and accessible.

This article caught my eye with the categories of assistive technology it presents. It displays low tech, mid tech, and high tech options. This can be crucial to not only finding which is appropriate for non verbal ASD students, but what is also within economic and accessible boundaries.

Low tech options include everyday material that you can find in everyday classrooms. Easily accessible and easily used.

Interesting note here. Defining what it means to be non verbal and determining the degree to which one is non verbal. Each individual are a separate case by case instance that can make results vary.

ASD is a relatively new disorder without a lot of research behind it, leading to a lack of information of how to best help this group of people.

This is a large portion of ASD, not including those that are limitedly verbal that could also use assistive technology.

I like how this article shines light on how assistive technology can aid the transition for ASD people to have success in the real world. Microsoft here invests in ASD people and they are able to exhibit their strengths in the work place and with the abilities show in this text.

The need for assistive technology goes beyond the classroom as seen here. IEP research that I have done indicates that students who require assistive technology through the school can request for the service to be taken home as well. This decision is made in the ARD meeting and can be discussed as an option.

Some direct examples of apps that are being used as assistive technology for students who are non verbal. The app is a medium between the students and to those whom they are trying to communicate with. It taps emphasis into visual skills to compensate for verbal deficiencies. A growing trend in schools as this article advocates.

If you are joining the Marginal Syllabus for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to publicly annotate an online text for the first time, here are a few useful resources:

• Getting started with Hypothesis
• Hypothesis education resources
• KQED's Digital Annotation with Hypothesis course, a great step-by-step primer
• How to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Information about the Marginal Syllabus and our 2017-18 Syllabus hosted by the National Writing Project

Welcome to the 2017-18 Marginal Syllabus and May’s conversation! This is the eighth and final text we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Writing Our Civic Futures." The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education. The project's name, Marginal Syllabus, embraces a political and technical double entendre; we partner with authors whose writing may be considered marginal—or contrary—to dominant education norms, and online conversations with authors occur in the margins of their texts using web annotation. The Marginal Syllabus is a partnership with the National Writing Project, who is hosting the 2017-18 syllabus, and Hypothesis, an organization building an open platform for web annotation.

Not just for school use only, but instead an emphasis on improving all facets of life.

Key vocabulary and terminology for Special Education and for parents to know about when entering their child's IEP/ARD meetings. It is so important for parents to know their rights, demanding for the law to be held up in their schools.

Technology creating a pathway for easier lifestyles and for students to achieve and succeed. Technology used in concept of fairness, giving a child what he or she needs to achieve success in the classroom.

Networks (back and forth) not funnels (one way). If this isn't a summing up of CLMOOC, I don't know what is.

Our thanks to partner author Erica Hodgin for contributing this important text to the 2017-18 Marginal Syllabus! Erica and guest reader Paul Oh joined Marginal Syllabus co-founders Joe Dillon and Remi Kalir for a CLTV webinar discussion about this text - it will air "live" on Tuesday, April 3rd at 4p PT.

If you are joining the Marginal Syllabus for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to publicly annotate an online text for the first time, here are a few useful resources:

• Getting started with Hypothesis
• Hypothesis education resources
• KQED's Digital Annotation with Hypothesis course, a great step-by-step primer
• How to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Information about the Marginal Syllabus and our 2017-18 Syllabus hosted by the National Writing Project

Welcome to the 2017-18 Marginal Syllabus and April's conversation! This is the seventh text we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Writing Our Civic Futures." The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education. The project's name, Marginal Syllabus, embraces a political and technical double entendre; we partner with authors whose writing may be considered marginal—or contrary—to dominant education norms, and online conversations with authors occur in the margins of their texts using web annotation. The Marginal Syllabus is a partnership with the National Writing Project, who is hosting the 2017-18 syllabus, and Hypothesis, an organization building an open technology for web annotation.

A game to play as you begin this annotation or one to end with after you have done with it: an empathy map.

Here is another set of directions.

Our thanks to partner authors Drs. April Baker-Bell, Raven Jones Stanbrough, and Sakeena Everett for contributing this important text to the 2017-18 Marginal Syllabus. A conversation with our partner authors will air "live" on Tuesday, March 6th at 4 pm PT/7p ET - watch it here, it's a really amazing conversation.

If you are joining the Marginal Syllabus for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to publicly annotate an online text for the first time, here are a few useful resources:

• Getting started with Hypothesis
• Hypothesis education resources
• KQED's Digital Annotation with Hypothesis course, a great step-by-step primer
• How to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Information about the Marginal Syllabus and our 2017-18 Syllabus hosted by the National Writing Project

Find a supporting conversation on Educator Innovator's Connected Learning TV, where Joseph Kahne talks in depth about some of these findings and implications for educators: https://educatorinnovator.org/webinars/educating-for-democracy-in-a-partisan-age/

Our thanks to partner authors Joe Kahne and Ben Bowyer for contributing this important text to the 2017-18 Marginal Syllabus! Joe also joined a number of educators for a Connected Learning TV webinar that will air on February 6th at 4p PT. You can watch it here.

If you are joining the Marginal Syllabus for the first time, or if you're using Hypothesis to publicly annotate an online text for the first time, here are a few useful resources:

• Getting started with Hypothesis
• Hypothesis education resources
• KQED's Digital Annotation with Hypothesis course, a great step-by-step primer
• How to join an annotation conversation with crowded margins
• Information about the Marginal Syllabus and our 2017-18 Syllabus hosted by the National Writing Project

Welcome to the 2017-18 Marginal Syllabus and February’s conversation! This is the fifth text we will read and publicly annotate as part of "Writing Our Civic Futures." The Marginal Syllabus convenes and sustains conversation with educators about issues of equity in teaching, learning, and education. The project's name, Marginal Syllabus, embraces a political and technical double entendre; we partner with authors whose writing may be considered marginal—or contrary—to dominant education norms, and online conversations with authors occur in the margins of their texts using web annotation. The Marginal Syllabus is a partnership with the National Writing Project, who is hosting the 2017-18 syllabus, and Hypothesis, an organization building an open platform for web annotation.