• for: climate science - for policymakers, climate science - for citizens, leverage point, leverage point - climate science, missed opportunity - citizen movement

• comment

  • has anyone thought about the idea of writing a science report - FOR THE CITIZEN? It seems that there is a potentially large missed opportunity by NOT seriously engaging the public with climate science and thinking that the policymakers are the only ones who can make the system change.
  • question
    • what if
      • climate science reports and studies can ALSO be written for THE GENERAL PUBLIC?

Shouldn't have had to ask. But fortunately, link posted below

https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/legitimize lists validate but https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/validate doesn't list legitimize

TTY is right there in the name, but this article makes no attempt to clarify what exactly the relationship between a pseudoterminal and a TTY. I feel like a whole paragraph about the relation to TTY would be warranted, including a link to TTY article, of course, which does link [back] to and explain some of the relation to pseudoterminal:

In many computing contexts, "TTY" has become the name for any text terminal, such as an external console device, a user dialing into the system on a modem on a serial port device, a printing or graphical computer terminal on a computer's serial port or the RS-232 port on a USB-to-RS-232 converter attached to a computer's USB port, or even a terminal emulator application in the window system using a pseudoterminal device.

.

How can they miss the opportunity to explain/describe the relationship/similarity/difference to/from graphs, graph theory, and/or graph data??

How is it that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_theory links to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_(model_theory) but the latter does not have any link to or mention of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_theory

Neither mentions the relationship between them, but both of them should, since I expect that is a common question.

This should link to / explain the relationship to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_(computer_programming) (which I believe is a way of expressing / codifying semantic classes into source code).

It should also link to / explain the relationship to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_theory

why not make this a link too?

What is the replacement? What should one use instead?

https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs/blob/style-properties/text/0000-style-properties.md

This Account Support section only includes one possible problem related to account support

If you haven't received your confirmation email, you can request to resend your confirmation instructions via our confirmation page.

What about if you have any other issue with your account? How would you get support then? This would be a good opportunity/place to describe what to do in that case.

Presumably the answer is to submit support requests at <del>https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support-forum</del> (to be shut down) or in the community forums.

missed opportunity: provide links explaining the difference between "ga.js" and "analytics.js and gtag.js". They're used as headings here like we ought to already know what they're talking about.