ingeniería del conocimiento

Pokemones e información a partir de datos en JSON

Los mensajes son la forma en que los objetos se comunican entre sí y en que nosotros, los humanos, nos comunicamos con el sistema de cómputo. Hay tres tipos de mensajes: unary (unarios), binary (binary) y keyword.

Feminismos

3 + 2.

EXPRESIÓN VERBAL Y CIRCULACIÓN DISCURSIVA

asemos, a continuación, como segundo paso imprescindible, a la re-presentación esquemática de los rasgos/marcas constitutivos/diferenciadoresdel cuento —mejor entendidos como estratos narrativos o los distintos pla-nos de elaboración, organización y presentación que el texto viene a ofre-cer— para afrontar, de esta manera, una más precisa y apreciable visiónpanorámica téorico-estructural de la cuentística en nuestro careo con el mi-crorrelato:

... psychoanalysis can and should make a basic contribution to a politics of autonomy. For, each person's self-understanding is a necessary condition for autonomy. One cannot have an autonomous society that would fail to turn back upon itself, that would not interrogate itself about its motives, its reasons for acting, its deep-seated [profondes] tendencies. Considered in concrete terms, however, society doesn't exist outside the individuals making it up. The self-reflective activity of an autonomous society depends essentially upon the self-reflective activity of the humans who form that society.[140]

Los tipos

Literatura canónica

La finalidad de la presente investigación es analizar los mecanismos que provocan un «enganche» a ciertas lecturas actuales en la literatura juvenil y que se convierten en un tiempo relativamente corto en éxitos de ventas

La estructura

Contempla

Silencioso, tremendo, irresistible

es decir, formas difusas y casi microbianas e intermitentes de poder.

Thisindividualisautonomousnotbecauseitisseparateorindependentfromsocietybutasitsproductretainsthecapabilitytoquestionitsowninstitution.Castoriadissaysthatthisnewtypeofbeingiscapableofcallingintoquestiontheverylawsofitsexistenceandhascreatedthepossibilityofbothdeliberationandpoliticalaction.

Theoretically informed sociological analyses of digital life can challenge the often implicit assumptions of those approaches which reinscribe divisions between humans and technologies, online and offline lives, agency and structure, and freedom and control. While these may be old dichotomies for some, they continue to have force and need to be challenged.

To Mills, the imagination was activated according to the structure of society, conceptualization of “the mechanics by which it is changing” (p. 6), and prevailing “varieties” of individuals of the period. Individuals have personal troubles that can be connected with issues of a public matter. The civic imagination has the potential to be activated around deep societal problems, which may involve institutional crises. The civic imagination is closely connected with participation. Castoriadis (1987)diverged from Marx by believing that not all futures were determined by history.Castoriadis believed that society’s future was collectively created and given traction through the imagination. That is, it was only “through the collective agency of the social imaginary that a society is created, given coherence and identity, and also subjected to auto-alterations” (Gaonkar, 2002, p. 7). To Appadurai (1996), the imagination was also intimately related to action because it was only in the service of fulfilling an as-yet unproven goal that we are driven to act.

I do not believe she was necessarily re-treading the intractable sociological debate between "structure and agency." Rather, she was suggesting a sensory-oriented theory of collaborative design rooted in feminism and media studies.

Echoing an old observation in activism about the “tyranny of structurelessness” (Freeman, 1972), power became difficult to contest when you remove the mechanisms to contest action. New visitors who didn’t immediately resonate with the space were turned off from the cold vision of geeks silently co-working next to each other. Longstanding members became frustrated by frequent clashes between hotheaded personalities. Then there were issues about what went where. Who didn’t put the hand drill back in the bin? Technology was a source of drama, particularly when commitments were discussed on email lists or in passing and then forgotten. Who said they would get the laser cutter running? Although sufficiently meta and informal to be palatable to members, it was hardly a smooth way to run an organization.

características