The overall conclusion, therefore, is that AI for Science should be understood as both a scientific and a civilizational project.
大多数人认为AI在科学中的应用主要是技术层面的进步,而作者认为这应该被理解为科学和文明层面的项目。这一观点将AI科学提升到了前所未有的高度,暗示它不仅是工具变革,更是人类知识创造方式的根本转变。
The overall conclusion, therefore, is that AI for Science should be understood as both a scientific and a civilizational project.
大多数人认为AI在科学中的应用主要是技术层面的进步,而作者认为这应该被理解为科学和文明层面的项目。这一观点将AI科学提升到了前所未有的高度,暗示它不仅是工具变革,更是人类知识创造方式的根本转变。
Large language models (LLMs) sometimes appear to exhibit emotional reactions. We investigate why this is the case in Claude Sonnet 4.5 and explore implications for alignment-relevant behavior.
这篇论文的问题意识本身就极具洞察:大多数 AI 安全研究在追问「模型会不会说谎」,Anthropic 却在追问「模型为什么有情绪」。从「行为纠偏」转向「情绪机制」,意味着对齐研究的范式正在悄然转移——从控制外部输出,到理解内部动机结构,这是从行为主义到认知科学的跨越。
for - museum - science - display - planetary health - from - youtube - The Anthropocene Paradigm Shift - Nov 2025 - https://hyp.is/Ot-UntOhEfCX__eQaqeb2Q/www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ggpzwSI1qY
Kuhn shows how almost everysignificant breakthrough in the field of scientific endeavor is first a break with tradition,with old ways of thinking, with old paradigms.
All major breakthroughs in science stem from a form of epoche.
for: epoche - examples - science, quote - epoche - paradigm shift
quote
example: epoche scientific paradigm shift
These revolutions appear invisible in the history of science, Kuhn explained, because each successive generation learns science through the lens of the current paradigm.
As a result of Kuhn's scientific revolutions perspective, historians of science will need to uncover the frameworks and lenses by which prior generations saw the world to be able to see the world the same way. This will allow them to better piece together histories
How is this related to the ways that experts don't appreciate their own knowledge when trying to teach newcomers their subjects? What is the word/phrase for this effect?
At a general level there seems to be agreement in the literature that models for science communication can be divided into two paradigms. Some models view one-way transmission of information about science from experts to the public as the appropriate way to communicate science. Other models in contrast view dialogue and deliberation between the public, experts and decision-makers as the proper way of engaging in science communication
‘Trust the science’ is the mantra of the Covid crisis – but what about human fallibility? | Margaret Simons | The Guardian. (n.d.). Retrieved July 27, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jul/24/trust-the-science-is-the-mantra-of-the-covid-crisis-but-what-about-human-fallibility?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other