A favorite image that kings chose forthemselves in statues from the Early Dynastic period shows themonarch with a basket of earth for construction on his head. Hemight be a mighty ruler, but he was also a builder, erectingmonuments to his gods and taking care of his people.
- Jan 2026
-
Local file Local file
-
-
Surprisingly,though, the Mesopotamians rarely wrote about the afterlife. Literarydescriptions suggest that the netherworld was a gloomy place—dark, with bad food, and no way out—and there was little about itthat suggested either a reward or punishment. It simply existed.And yet, since these kings (and many commoners whose burials alsocontained gifts and food) took their worldly possessions with them,perhaps they believed that they could improve their lot in theafterlife.
-
The king of Kish even sometimes enforced order inSumer. For example, Enannatum’s son, Enmetena, wrote that theborder between Lagash and Umma had been determined by thegreat god Enlil himself and had been confirmed by the king of Kish:“Mesalim, king of Kish, at the command of (the god) Ishtaran,measured the field and set up a (boundary-) stone there.” Theauthority of the king of Kish was therefore acknowledged, at leasttemporarily, by both the king of Umma and the king of Lagash.
There is an interesting example of the mnemonic use of stone here in ancient Sumer. It serves as a boundary/border marker by its physical presence, but apart from any (other local) mnemonic uses, it also carries an inscription as a secondary form of long term written memory.
-
At around the same time that they invented inscriptions by which tocommunicate with gods and with future kings, the kings’ scribesbegan to use writing for addressing those at a different kind ofdistance from themselves—kings of other lands.
Note the shifts in potential audience(s) of early writing.
-
Not far from the Ibgal temple of Inanna where the dedicatory tabletwas found, archaeologists excavated the earliest known breweryanywhere in Mesopotamia (a tablet found there even mentioned thebrewer).
-
all of the 1,700administrative tablets that were found at the later capital of Lagash,called Girsu, came from the queen’s palace.
-
The kings had, however, begun to realizeits potential for extending communication, in an almost magical way,beyond what could be accomplished with the spoken word. Writingcould perpetually and eternally address an audience on a king’sbehalf; the words were always there, even when the king was notthinking about them. Given that the population was almost entirelyilliterate, such an audience was mostly made up of gods. Thestatuette of the king’s personal god (or sometimes of the kinghimself), inscribed with the same text as the tablet, could thereforepray continuously in a way that a real person could not.
Is there stronger evidence that this form of permanent writing to an audience of gods was being done? Sources?
-
The scribes did not, however, try toexpress every part of speech; their script was still a shorthandversion of language.
the shift from proto-cuneiform to early dynastic cuneiform showed greater complexity, but was still a variation of shorthand which didn't attempt to express all parts of speech as converted from spoken language. Verbs weren't always appropriately conjugated.
-
The tablet wasfound by archaeologists in the foundations of the temple of Inannain Lagash, called the Ibgal. This extensive complex was oval inshape, as were many Early Dynastic temples in other cities, with alarge courtyard and a platform on which Inanna’s temple wasconstructed.
What is the general history of oval-shaped architecture? Is there an explicit link between the Oval shape of the complex at Ibgal, the temple (or house) of Inanna in Lagash and the oval office at the White House?
Keep in mind that modern knowledge of large portions of the Ancient Near East only surfaced after the 1800s, so the tradition would have required intermediaries from the ANE into other cultures to be passed down to the building of the White House in 1792.
-
Lagash (modern Al Hiba in Iraq), hometo the god Ningirsu and to a dynasty of kings who squabbled forgenerations with their counterparts in the neighboring city-state ofUmma.
-
Every human alive, the king included, was just a servant to thegods, and those gods could choose to treat him or her however theywanted.
At what point in history did it seem apparent to a larger portion of the populace that "god(s) anointed the king" was no longer a presumed reality? When did it seem that way to the kings themselves? Or have they always believed the myth?
-
And just as professions tended to run in families, the kingmight have trained his son in the arts of leadership, grooming himfor the throne.
It certainly makes some sense that in a diversifying economy familial connections of passing down trades from father to son by dint of closeness, teaching, and familial connection that the job/title of king should be passed down in the same way.
-
The Sumerian term for king, “lugal,” literally meant “big man.”
-
Order was maintained in the universe because the king of the godspossessed an object called the “Tablet of Destinies” on which wereinscribed theme (pronounced “may”). Theseme were never writtendown on any earthly tablet, as far as we know, for humanedification. But they encompassed all that kept chaos at bay.
-
Eventhe gods themselves had a king—the great god Enlil, who lived inthe city of Nippur.
-
ngship seemed so obvious and right to the Mesopotamians thatthey believed that it had been invented by the gods, that it hadcome “down from heaven.” Some later scribes made a grand list ofall the kings from the beginning of time to their own era. Theycalled it “When kingship came down from heaven,” which was itsfirst line. To modern scholars it is the Sumerian King List.
-
Yet othersdeveloped the skills to carve intricate cylinder seals used bymembers of the elite to identify their goods.
-
Other men and womenwent off to distant lands and set up smaller versions of Uruk,certainly keeping in touch with home through messengers, andpresumably sending goods that could be useful to their mothercities.
Can one discern specific colonialist policies that the Uruk had as their culture spread in the Ancient Near East?
-
Whereas earlier peoples had manufactured their pottery by hand,adding eye-catching designs and glazes, the Uruk craftsmen mostlyproduced pottery on the newly invented wheel, rarely adding anyadornments. Quantity, now possible with a type of mass production,seems to have taken priority over quality in ceramic manufacture.
-
The sign for “food” (also for“bread”) in proto-cuneiform is the shape of a beveled-rim bowl.
-
A cylinder seal was a stone cylindrical beadcarved in relief with a scene, so that when rolled on a piece of clay itproduced an endless tiny frieze of figures or patterns.
-
The scribes do not seem to have thought of this scriptthat they had invented as a representation of language.
-
The people of Uruk started out with at least thirteen differentnumerical systems; they counted differently depending on what theywere counting, and the signs indicated different numbers fordifferent commodities. And about 30 percent of the signs they firstcreated to represent nouns had no later equivalents, so scholars donot know how to read them.
-
This proto-cuneiform tablet from Uruk includes signs forsheep and the goddess Inanna, but its meaning is unclear.
Potentially an early historic form of a receipt?
-
The investment of time and manpower devoted to the constructionof this complex would have resembled the work on a medievalcathedral. As early as 3600 BCE work had begun on the so-calledLimestone Temple in the Eanna precinct. Quarrymen and masonsremoved limestone from a rocky outcrop around fifty kilometers (31mi) to the southwest. Other men transported the stone to Uruk. Stillothers formed hundreds of thousands of mud bricks and clay cones,and set them out to harden in the sun. Others brought timber fromfar to the north for the roofs. Someone supervised all the workmenwho set the bricks and stones and mosaic cones in place. The menwould have been fed and provided for during the construction. Thebuilders were all probably residents of Uruk, united in their desire tocreate a magnificent home for their beloved divine queen.
Possibility that even with proto-cuneiform (writing) evolving here that such temples were local memory palaces for the culture of the inhabitants who would have been primary orality-based?
-
It is writtenin a script known as proto-cuneiform, a script that did not representsounds or even language at all; signs served as memory aids.
-
facts that no one couldconceivably commit to memory.
This statement belies the power of orality and the size of built communities without literacy. It's more a question of understanding how it was done and how communities either trusted (or didn't) those who memorized the materials.
Another factor is how long one needed to remember various facts, especially if for commerce and over what spaces?
Were there stratifications of society based on the power of memory here? Compare the anthropology and archaeology with the studies by Lynne Kelly.
-
Datesafter ca. 1400 BCE are fairly reliable and uncontroversial (the morerecent, the less controversial). For dates before 1500 BCE, however, adebate revolves around the Middle Chronology. Some scholars proposelower dates (from eight years to as much as a century later). But until aconsensus is reached, it seems best to use the dates that are familiar, ifprobably wrong.
-
The widely used Middle Chronology—which gives the dates ofHammurabi’s reign as 1792 to 1750 BCE—is followed in this book.
-
Later letters, inscriptions, and prayers, in which one mightexpect to see frequent references to flooding if it had been a majorconcern, mostly describe the rivers as a blessing.
-
cuneiform was occasionallyemployed in both Canaan and Egyp
-
These lands were Mesopotamia (modernIraq, with its variously named regions: Sumer, Akkad, Babylonia, andAssyria), Syria, Elam (part of what was later known as Persia), andAnatolia (modern Turkey).
-
The ancient Near East is defined here as comprising the “cuneiformlands,”
-
to the waysthat documents were organized in archives,
Find archaeological papers which described how Mesopotamians in the ANE organized their documents.
Mention via @Podany2013
-
Law, for example,once invented in Mesopotamia around 2100 BCE, was never forgotten,even though the actual laws of the Mesopotamians bear littleresemblance to those in use today.
-
For example, women in early times had many rights andfreedoms: they could own property, run businesses, and representthemselves in court.
-
The popularimage of history as a story of progress from primitive barbarism tomodern sophistication is completely belied by the study of the ancientNear East.
Statement in support of Graeber and Wengrow's thesis in The Dawn of Everything, though predating it.
-
Podany, Amanda H. 2013. The Ancient Near East: A Very Short Introduction. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Ancient-Near-East-Introduction-Introductions/dp/0195377990/ (January 1, 2026).
Tags
- stones for memory
- standing stones
- long distance memories
- literacy
- the elite
- property
- ownership
- writing to gods
- Girsu (capital of Lagash)
- stelae
- gods
- wheels
- afterlife
- Hammurabi
- David Graeber
- Canaan
- commerce
- The Oval Office
- logograms
- filing methods
- queens
- audience
- Nippur
- Ancient Near East
- House of Inanna
- proto-cuneiform
- r/AYearOfMythology
- temples
- stone inscriptions
- open questions
- Enmetena (King)
- breweries
- kingship
- Mesopotamian art
- "cuneiform lands"
- early writing
- Umma
- big men
- Rebus principle
- laws
- Ibgal
- -XXXVIII to -XXXI
- bread
- geoforming
- Sumerian King List
- social stratification
- Eanna ("house of heaven")
- Mesalim (king of Kish)
- Uruk
- early writing purposes
- ideograms
- builders
- Lagash
- history of alcohol
- leadership
- orality
- mass production
- Great Man theory of history
- semantics
- anti-oral perspectives
- Mesopotamia
- political development
- laws, invention of
- orality transition to literacy
- cuneiform
- feminism
- Tablet of Destinies
- chaos
- writing to rulers
- References
- food
- alcohol
- definitions
- -XXI
- diplomacy
- Egypt
- Amanda H. Podany
- iconography
- Al Hiba, Iraq
- primogeniture
- history
- myth
- colonialist policies
- number systems
- pottery
- rivers
- Middle Chronology
- divine right of kings
- writing as memory
- spoken language
- beveled-rim bowls
- construction
- political evolution
- primary orality
- The Dawn of Everything
- kings
- law
- inventions
- receipts
- colonialism
- memory palaces
- ovals in architecture
- Ningirsu
- archaeological dating
- cylinder seals
- ceramics manufacture
- administrative tablets
- pictograms
- Mesopotamian religion
- Sumerian gods
- praying
- memory aids
- Enlil
- White House
- ovals
- potter's wheel
Annotators
-