- Dec 2017
I foresee a portable certification process for all kinds of professionals being available sometime very soon, especially after the first few iterations.
generated by research stemming back over the previous 20 years.
There should be unique identifiers on various levels of participant inputs, so that things from REF2014 can be referenced unambiguously in REF2021.
REF also stipulates precise measurement periods for the impact of research, broadly amounting to impact occurring in the seven years between assessments, generated by research stemming back over the previous 20 years. Impact however can take many years to achieve (Hughes and Martin, 2012) and reflections on the REF 2014 have thus raised concerns over short-termism
I think the REF2021 should have a "check-in" section for assessing the "change in impact" of research reported in REF2014.
disproportionately positive corpus of impact knowledge
Does "positive" mean "benefits given through research"? Does "positive" also include "mitigation of negative effects"?
Whilst commercialisation and technology transfer have become well-established practices globally since the passage of the US Bayh Dole Act in 1981, such unidirectional approaches cannot be simply replicated in non-commercial, socially complex settings
Many times, the non-commercial, socially-complex setting is exactly the setting in which a particular commercialized technology is meant to be deployed!
I've heard the term "tactical" used for short-term thinking and "strategic" used for long-term thinking.
- Jan 2016
international law system
Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_legal_system
Does an International legal informatics database exist yet?
Promote a biocentric instead of and anthropocentric paradigms.
Biocentric includes man and includes him in an appropriately prioritized order. An anthropocentric view should be a biocentric, ecocentric, charitable, human view simply because humans are (among other things) organisms, situated in ecosystems, capable of charity, love, humility and that is in fact what makes us human. What is best for the environment is what is best for humans and everything else.
Interesting idea. The only thing is that the science is not where we would like it to be. Most of the accusing will need to be done in retrospect. In that case, many will have lost culpability due to insufficient knowledge. I just wonder how this will hold up in a court of law for most practical cases. For some large-scale cases, I can see it working, as long as the effects are enormous.
Land defenders are dying but the news don’t talk about this. Most of media and politics are owned by companies so, we have to force them to serve the people instead. We can’t depend on these guys.
We need to recognize different values and think that people value land entitlements, family and community, the elderly, connectivity. If we value these, we will want to hear these things reported all the time. Marketing will follow suit. Perhaps marketing will be the first to move...
Here is a video of paul Watson's talk: video
Two great Mother Earth defenders were present on the last day of COP 21 in the public area.
Is there any way of finding he transcripts for this day?
- Public Scholars Initiative 2015-2016
- paul watson
- international law system
Matthew S. MacLennan
I am the author of this paragraph. I am also one of the scientists doing the metabolomic studies. I am in collaboration with many others in this project.
Matthew S. MacLennan
I am the first author of this scientific paper. I also performed the calculations, made the images and wrote the paper.