We can think of theme, in its most basic definition, as the message the author tries to send their readers.
definition of theme, moral of the story
We can think of theme, in its most basic definition, as the message the author tries to send their readers.
definition of theme, moral of the story
anything that represents something larger than itself.
symoblism
An author often uses imagery to call attention to a particular idea, character, setting, or plot point. Imagery can also be used to create the mood of a text.
common purpose of use for imagery
Imagery is language that makes an appeal to the senses.
definition of imagery. appeals to 5 senses
f you see a word or phrase appear more than once, make a note of it – it is likely that the author included the repetition intentionally.
repetition usually is a means to emphasize something and add importance. meaning may come later
Two of the most common rhetorical devices are metaphors and similes. These are both means of comparison.
key thing to remember about rhetorical devices
. Rhetorical devices are words that serve a special function in the text. Authors include them in order to convey a meaning to the reader.
definition of rhetorical device
style as a way of organising and expressing narrative unique to the writer,
the authors form of creating an conveying a message or book
the authorial "voice" is one of the key distinguishing factors of a piece of writing
narrative voice. can convey tone
syntax – the order in which the sentence is put together grammatically.
definition of syntax. order can convey a message in a certain tone
diction, or the overall word choice,
what an author can use to create specific tones
Tone is the attitude writing can take towards its subject or audience
definition of tone
A connotation is the non-literal meaning we associate with words
definition of connotation
understand it at its most basic, literal level. This is called denotation.
a fact, literal, what it represents
dialogue gives the viewer an understanding of what is going on.
a more detailed description of a conversation to help understanding
An omniscient narrator is one that exhibits full knowledge of the actions, thoughts and feelings of each of the characters in the story
definition of omniscient narrator
multi-narrator text
be aware of who's speaking. provides insight to characters. tends to be very biased.
relates the story in third person but has access to all information in the story.
omniscient perspective
Some third-person narrators tell from a limited perspective. These narrators relate a story from one point of view, which is often the main character's point of view.
other third person perspective, can be slightly biased
A third-person narrator will not be a character in a story, but an outside entity relating the story's events.
key component to third person narration
Third-person narration is related by someone who does not refer to him or her self and does not use “I,” “you,” or “we” when addressing the reader. Here's the same story as above, told in third-person narration:
third person narration
limited perspective; he cannot tell what the other characters are thinking or doing, and his telling of the story is influenced by his feelings about the other characters
key component to keep in mind about first person narration
Paying attention to how a text is organized, divided, and sub-divided will provide you insight into the plot and theme.
a purpose of narrative organization
organized into large sections, while others are organized into chapters
type of narrative organization
Unreliable Narrators
not trustworthy characters to narrate a story or plot.
narrator and author are different.
key difference to keep in mind
various settings come to represent different values, ideas and attitudes.
straightforward example/definition of setting as time and place
Location can refer to wider geographical entities such as countries or cities as well as to smaller entities such as households or domestic interiors.
setting as geographical entity
internalized setting. In this kind of setting, an aspect of the story external to a character represents the character's internal development. For instance, the cracked face of the house can be said to represent the cracked minds of the Usher siblings.
Internalized setting - definition and example
Mood is the feeling we get from a story; tone is a way of getting that feeling across.
definition and difference of mood and tone
The frame of reference in which the story occurs is known as setting. The most basic definition of setting is one of place and time.
Definition of setting
The First Amendment guarantees the right of free speech to all Americans. Therefore, teachers have the right to express themselves freely in the classroom.
I teach in the public school system and I can understand why its recommended no to talk about certain subjects in the classroom. With that being said I do agree that teachers should have freedom of speech and it not be limited. Honestly the honesty could help students and adults understand people more and also if a threat to safety find the threat sooner. There are positives in that. I've noticed if you have more open views or seem like an open adult kids seem to gravitate and trust that energy which i deem more important.
If the writer is arguing for something that obviously has downsides, they may present it as the lesser of two evils
An argument with downsides can be tricky at times, but it is still important to find other things that will bring up the argument.
We can surely think of teachers who do not express political beliefs in the classroom.
In my opinion, this is entirely necessary. Teachers should not express political beliefs, just like how they don't express religious beliefs. I am religious myself, but i don't believe it to be right for teachers to teach these things. It is not their responsibility, and not right.
If there is an exception that the argument hasn’t accounted for, that may point us to a weak spot that we should mention in our assessment.
This makes lots of sense and sounds right. This quote proves that it is important to fully explain an argument so it can have as little weak spots as possible.
If we see a general statement, we should ask ourselves whether it is always true or whether we can identify any case that doesn’t fit the pattern.
This is very important to remember, because now on the internet there are so many people spreading misinformation.
"Hate speech" is also prohibited: a teacher does not have the right to spout racial slurs. A
This is a great example of there being a limit on freedom of speech
In order to make a point that is worth making, we may need facts or evidence,
I completely agree with this because I believe that it’s important to gather up facts or evidence to back up your statement
No one is allowed to call for immediate acts of violence. Teachers may not tell students to go out and shoot the president. "Hate speech" is also prohibited: a teacher does not have the right to spout racial slurs.
These are great example on the limits of free speech particularly when speech poses a threat to safety, promotes harm, or violates others rights.
But is the general statement always true?
I think this exercise is very important, as we need to improve our literacy to be able to identify what means authors are employing to sway our opinion.
deductive arguments.
I have heard of this before in the context of deductive learning types, also involving starting with a generalization and working towards the details.
If we see a general statement, we should ask ourselves whether it is always true or whether we can identify any case that doesn’t fit the pattern.
This is a very important skill to learn especially nowadays where there is so much misinformation and generalized statements on the internet.
deductive arguments
I think learning about deductive and inductive arguments is something that is really going to help me with my next essay.
If it isn’t always true that the First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, then we cannot necessarily conclude that teachers in classrooms are guaranteed freedom of speech.
I've never really thought about it this way, but this statement definitely something to think about.
"Hate speech" is also prohibited: a teacher does not have the right to spout racial slurs.
I thought that this was a great example of an exclusion from the First Amendment.
The onset of symptoms occurs one to seven days after eating
why after seven days of eating?
flashback (not shown in the diagram) is a device used to give the reader background information that happened in the past.
can also be part of a plot. Can give key information and/or foreshadows the future
The dénouement can also leave the story and characters in the same state they were in before the story began.
Another form of denouement
It serves as the unraveling of a plot – a resolution to a story. In the dénouement, the central conflict is resolved. However, conflicts aren't always resolved. Some stories leave secondary conflicts unsettled
Different forms of denouement.
Falling Action: The events that take place after the climax are called the falling action.
results of climax
These sub-climaxes can be minor turning points in the main conflict that help build and release suspense during the rising action. They can also be the main turning points for secondary conflicts within a story.
Sub-climaxes occur as part of more complex plots.
the incident that allows the main conflict of a story to resolve. The climax allows characters to solve a problem.
definition of climax, the "turning point" of a story
The rising action is comprised of a series of events that build up to the climax of the story. It introduces us to secondary conflicts and creates tension in the story.
Definition of Rising Action. Series of events leading to climax.
Exposition: This is the part of the story that tells us the setting. We find out who the main characters are and where the story takes place. T
definition of Exposition. Hints at future events as well
so you will have to identify the main conflict before you can identify the inciting incident. Remember, the inciting incident and conflict are two separate things – the inciting incident is a moment in a story that starts the main conflict.
Definition and component required to identify an Inciting Incident - can happen before a story begins (past event)
A plot has several main elements: inciting incident, exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, and dénouement.
The main components of a basic plot line in order
A plot is a storyline. We can define plot as the main events of a book, short story, play, poem, etc. and the way those events connect to one another. Conflicts act as the driving forces behind a plot.
Definition of Plot and what supports it.
"Round" characters, by contrast, are described and developed in such a way as to achieve three-dimensionality, a physical and psychological complexity that mimics that of the real people we come to know in our everyday lives.
well developed characters, have depth and complexity, constantly evolving
"flat" characters were those who are largely taken to represent a particular idea, human trait, or set of values,
can be easily described, not much depth or complexity
archetype
I would like ore clarity on an archetype especially for the examples listed. I feel like the definition can't be clearly interpreted.
important type of minor character is called a foil.
meant to accentuate traits or personality of main character in a different light (contrast, polar opposites)
they can illustrate a different side of the main conflict, or they can highlight the traits of the main characters.
purpose of secondary and minor characters
The antihero is a protagonist who does not embody traditional “heroic” values. However, the reader will still sympathize with an antihero.
definition and main idea of an antihero
protagonist and antagonist
protagonist is main character(s) in conflict. Antagonist is the opposition to protagonist. Not always a person - can be nation, group, set of ideas
Characters and Characterization
Character description and development done in multiple unique ways for readers to connect with character. Development (amount, type, and POV) determined by their importance to the central narrative. Dynamic characters undergo several essential changes while Static characters not so much.
characterisation to describe the strategies that an author uses to present and develop the characters in a narrative.
Definition of characterisation.
ground state
What the flip does ground state mean
Thus, understanding the structure of the nucleosome is key to understanding the precise and stable control of gene expression and regulation, providing a molecular interface between genes and environmentally induced changes in cellular activity.
Being able to figure out what the epigenome does and how it works will be able to tell us how the different cells work but also how our environment can change our genes.
A similar study examining newborns showed that methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter maybe an early epigenetic marker of maternal mood and risk of increased hormonal responses to stress in infants 3 months of age
This is a very interesting study that shows giving a newborn the physical touch it needs may improve better moods and less stress.
The difficulties with finding clear-cut solutions to nature–nurture problems bring us back to the other great questions about our relationship with the natural world: the mind-body problem and free will.
The nature vs nurture will be a forever debate but I think that both genetics and environment play a significant role in how person turns out to be.
The message is clear: You can’t leave genes out of the equation. But keep in mind, no behavioral traits are completely inherited, so you can’t leave the environment out altogether, either.
I believe that physically genetics explains the most but behavioral traits I believe mostly come from someone's environment.
In individualistic cultures, such as the United States, status is heavily determined by individual accomplishments.
I have noticed that living in the United States people view status through individual accomplishments rather than contributing to a group.
In response to problems in our environment, we adapt both physically and psychologically to ensure our survival and reproduction.
It is quite surprising how much humans have adapted to the world over time from finding a way to create fire to now have self driving cars.
Do you feel better prepared to read this assignment? How?
Yes, I feel more prepared to read assginments. I am well aware what I am looking for and i feel confident and not too stressed.
The EEG has been used extensively in the study of sleep.
Is the EEG only used to study sleep or what other situation would an EEG be used?
Electroencephalography (EEG) is one technique for studying brain activity. This technique uses at least two and up to 256 electrodes to measure the difference in electrical charge (the voltage) between pairs of points on the head. These electrodes are typically fastened to a flexible cap (similar to a swimming cap) that is placed on the participant’s head. Figure 2.3.12.3.1\PageIndex{1} shows a patient wearing such a cap. From the scalp, the electrodes measure the electrical activity that is naturally occurring within the brain. They do not introduce any new electrical activity.
I did not mean to highlight this whole thing but I was wondering if the patient does feel the volatage that would be happening and if it is a uncomfortable feeling.
EEG and MEG have been used to examine ASD.
Which one is more accurate to examine ASD since they both measure brain electrical activity.
From the scalp, the electrodes measure the electrical activity that is naturally occurring within the brain. They do not introduce any new electrical activity.
How long does this procedure typically take, does the patient feel anything?
In short, there are differences in the time for processing auditory sounds in children with ASD compared to those without ASD.
This is a very interesting fact to know. I did not know that using an EEG and MEG can see different processing times in children with ASD and children without ASD.
the act of writing is more than sitting down and writing something.
you really need to know what your writing or else it won't make sense
Think about how your own writing process fits with what Hale and Lamott have to say. Is yours similar? Different? Is there any new information you have learned that you did not know before exposure to these works?
Like Hale and Lamott, I try to start my work early in the week to avoid procrastinating. I also get stuck on what to write about and end up with short, vague sentences that lack details.
You may recall from past experiences that some resources refer to prewriting as planning and some texts refer to writing as drafting.
I can relate because in high school and middle school we would warm up by quick writing before writing essays
In truth, every writer must develop his or her own process for getting the writing done, but there are some basic strategies and techniques you can adapt to make your work a little easier, more fulfilling and effective.
This is true because each person has a unique learning style that helps them understand and retain information. For instance, I learn best by taking notes while the teacher is explaining something. If I don't, I tend to forget the material later on, especially if we revisit that topic in the days that follow.
But anyone who has procrastinated or struggled with writer’s block knows that the writing process is more arduous, if not somewhat mysterious and unpredictable
I believe this is the main idea
So today America does remember the hundreds of men used in research without their knowledge and consent. We remember them and their family members. Men who were poor and African American, without resources and with few alternatives, they believed they had found hope when they were offered free medical care by the United States Public Health Service. They were betrayed.
What was the effect on healthcare trust of the unethical treatment of African American men in medical research?
However, single cell recordings are usually extracellular (outside of the cell). That is, they don’t record from inside a single cell but, rather, they record from outside a few cells. Also, consider that the neuron that responds to a line in a particular location that is moving in a particular direction likely does not respond to much else. So, it is extremely difficult to determine what exactly each cell does through single cell recordings. Recording from one area ignores what is happening everywhere else in the brain
A fact that I thought was cool was that single cell recordings detect brain activity from external cells, but because each cell is so specialized, it can be hard to identify exactly what it does.
is used to put one half of the brain “to sleep”
I'm not sure if I'm correct but that's also called as the Un hemisphere sleep. It's mainly birds that experience this.
Split-brain research refers to the study of those who received this treatment and the knowledge resulting from this work (Rosen, 2018). Under what circumstances would such a seemingly radical procedure be used - and what are its effects?
I watched a Split brain documentary on youtube and it was so interesting to see how our brains can control specific parts of our bodies!
fMRI measures the change in the concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin, which is known as the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal
My annotation does go for this whole paragraph, but I did think that it is fascinating that Instead of directly measuring brain activity, fMRI monitors blood flow, which allows us to see changes in oxygen levels that indicate brain activity.
amygdala and the hippocampus
Dont these relate to speech, emotion and memory? I could be wrong but that is I recall!
This has proved to be a valuable tool in studying the function and timing of specific processes such as the recognition of visual stimuli.
This type of non invasive technique is used for people that have major depression.
Raymond Damadian
What role did Raymond Damadian's finding have in the advancement of MRI tumor detection technology?
X-rays can depict a two-dimensional image of a body region, and only from a single angle. In contrast, more modern medical imaging technologies produce data that are integrated and analyzed by computers to produce three-dimensional (3D) images or images that reveal aspects of the body functioning.
Modern imaging technologies, as opposed to X-rays, use advanced computer processing to provide 3D images and functional data, providing more in-depth understanding of the body.
Figure 2.2.22.2.2\PageIndex{2} shows a CT scanner with a platform for the subject to lie on. A computer combines these images into a two-dimensional view of the scanned area, or “slice.” Figure 2.2.32.2.3\PageIndex{3} shows a series of slices of the brain for one subject.
I find it very difficult to distinguish the difference between a ct scan and an MRI, not only do the scans look similar to me, yet the machines do too!
Thus, X-rays are best used to visualize hard body structures su
If we are able to see the same information shown on an x-ray through an mri, why do we still use x-rays if we have more detailed and reliable techniques?
The patient must be enclosed in a metal tube-like device for the duration of the scan, sometimes as long as thirty minutes, which can be uncomfortable and impractical for ill patients.
The MRI is such a powerful machine but there are some flaws to it. You are in a loud and confined tube for multiple minutes. This may be great for patients that are able to do this but must be difficult to have a child or someone in general that does not feel comfortable doing the scan.
Functional imaging techniques allow researchers to learn about the brain activity during various tasks by creating images based on the electrical activity or the absorption of various substances that occurs while a subject is engaging in a task. Such techniques can be used, for example, to visualize the parts of the brain that respond when we're exposed to stimuli that upset us or make us happy.
How can brain activity during emotional or cognitive tasks be seen using functional imaging techniques?
ructural imaging techniques are useful in many situations such as locating tumors, sites of physical brain damage, or finding size differences between the structures of the brain between various groups
How may brain abnormalities or group differences be identified using structural imaging techniques?
narrow that down to a specific gyrus (ridge) or sulcus (groove) of the cerebral cortex?
If we could narrow it down to the specific gyrus, how does that help us exactly? I dont understand the significance, function, or meaning of the gyrus!
without having to go inside. A series of MRI images can be used to create a picture of the brain.
What are the cases that would require a more invasive approach into the brain?
They may ask “When does this activity occur?” Or “Where does this activity occur?” Some techniques are better for answering one of these questions, whereas other techniques are better for answering the other question.
There are two questions being asked in this sentence. Since there are two questions and different techniques, which are the best techniques to answer these questions?
More clarity in language is important, but as we already know, communication isn’t just about exchanging information—the words we use also influence our emotions and relationships.
Have you ever noticed how some people are great at giving apologies? I was taught that it is a very important life skill to be able to apologize correctly. The first rule was to tell someone that I wanted to apologize about (insert my offense here). This was to be followed by an explanation of how I knew I was wrong. Finally, an apology was coming to a finish with an explanation of what I would do differently in the future and if needed, ask for forgiveness. If an apology was presented sincerely without any kind of excuses, it was a solid effort (whether accepted or not). Things to avoid were "I'm sorry but if you hadn't", or excusing your behavior by explaining it, such as "i was only trying to". A good apology got right to the point, didn't make excuses, recognized the offense, had a plan for fixing the behavior (mine, not theirs) and actually asking for forgiveness or understanding. That's it. That's the whole thing. Nothing more, nothing less.
Sometimes it can be difficult to speak clearly—for example, when we are speaking about something with which we are unfamiliar. Emotions and distractions can also interfere with our clarity. Being aware of the varying levels of abstraction within language can help us create clearer and more “whole” messages.
Howard Stern once told his audience that it was very important for a good communicator to not use interjections like "um". He said that his father taught him to be very aware of 'filler words' like um, uh, like, well and so. His point was that if you wanted to come across as confident and deliberate that you would eliminate these interjections from your daily speech. When i first heard Howard explain this practice I spend the next two weeks listening to other people talk. I was surprised to see how often people use filler words absentmindedly. I put effort into becoming aware of, and eliminating my own usage of these interjections and i thought it was difficult at first. It gets easier with practice, and i thought that my speaking sounded more deliberate when I became conscious of how I used or eliminated these expressions.
People who speak the same language can intentionally use language to separate. The words us and them can be a powerful start to separation. Think of how language played a role in segregation in the United States as the notion of “separate but equal” was upheld by the Supreme Court and how apartheid affected South Africa as limits, based on finances and education, were placed on the black majority’s rights to vote.
I was noticing this in a big way over the last 10 years when it comes to the media and politics. "Woke" certainly means something, but if you ask someone to define it you probably wont get a very standard definition if you get an explanation at all. "Woke" certainly isn't used as a complement. Its used as a label of derision. "Sheeple, qanon, immigrant, patriot, liberal and maga" all have connotations that are meant to be exclusionary and divisive. I'm a bit startled at how many words have been hijacked or created to minimize and dismiss entire groups and populations in the recent years. I think its interesting to ask someone what the definition of some of these terms are. I don't often get a comprehensive or definitive explanation as much as i get a response of the emotion behind the buzzword.
People make assumptions about your credibility based on how you speak and what you say. Even though we’ve learned that meaning is in people rather than words and that the rules that govern verbal communication, like rules of grammar, are arbitrary, these norms still mean something. You don’t have to be a perfect grammarian to be perceived as credible.
Not only are the words you choose to use important in conveying a sense of professional acumen or expertise, the tone and speed that you use is equally important. Want to convey a sense of comforting control? Slow your speech down and drop your voice down an octave or two.<br /> Want to have people listen to you carefully? Speak a little softer to make a listener put effort into hearing you. Want to get people to spring into action and get orientated? Nobody does it better than a drill sergeant with the voice of command booming across a room. Using the right jargon for the environment will clearly convey your message and give you credibility. How you say those words will allow your listener to be in the right frame of mind to absorb your words as you mean for them to be heard.
In order to verbally express our emotions, it is important that we develop an emotional vocabulary. The more specific we can be when we are verbally communicating our emotions, the less ambiguous our emotions will be for the person decoding our message. As we expand our emotional vocabulary, we are able to convey the intensity of the emotion we’re feeling whether it is mild, moderate, or intense. For example, happy is mild, delighted is moderate, and ecstatic is intense; ignored is mild, rejected is moderate, and abandoned is intense
There was a great scene in a movie called 'dead poets society' where the professor (played by robin williams) is trying to convince his students that they should be diverse and passionate in how they explored and used language. The professor encourages his students to use synonyms to elicit better emotional responses to communication. He says that instead of saying you are sad, to instead say you are morose... I looked up the quote. “So avoid using the word ‘very’ because it’s lazy. A man is not very tired, he is exhausted. Don’t use very sad, use morose. Language was invented for one reason, boys - to woo women - and, in that endeavor, laziness will not do. It also won’t do in your essays.”
Some linguists have viewed the rules of language as fairly rigid and limiting in terms of the possible meanings that we can derive from words and sentences created from within that system (de Saussure, 1974). Others have viewed these rules as more open and flexible, allowing a person to make choices to determine meaning (Eco, 1976). Still others have claimed that there is no real meaning and that possibilities for meaning are limitless (Derrida, 1978). For our purposes in this chapter, we will take the middle perspective, which allows for the possibility of individual choice but still acknowledges that there is a system of rules and logic that guides our decision making.
Subject + Verb + Object + Adverb Of Place + Adverb Of Time. I don't think i was ever directly taught the order that words were supposed to go in for the english language. It is so obvious from a lifetime of practice that there simply is a natural way to format our sentences.<br /> I thought it was interesting to learn that in spanish certain words go out of order when compared to english, or in the korean language organizes by subject-predicate-object.
The symbolic nature of our communication is a quality unique to humans. Since the words we use do not have to correspond directly to a “thing” in our “reality,” we can communicate in abstractions. This property of language is called displacement and specifically refers to our ability to talk about events that are removed in space or time from a speaker and situation (Crystal, 2005). Animals do communicate, but in a much simpler way that is only a reaction to stimulus. Further, animal communication is very limited and lacks the productive quality of language that we discussed earlier.
I had a professor who made an interesting point. He said that if you took a person (of any age, but it works best if the person is very young with a mind that's attuned for language formation) and simply had them observe people speaking over time, that observer would start learning the basics of the spoken language. Syntax, different tenses, singular and plural... all of it. But if that same person spent years observing writing without being directly taught the basic rules of written language, then that person wouldn't learn to write without instruction. The point was that learning a spoken language was innate over time, but writing took specific instruction and practice.
center-directed
"Self-centered" acceleration :)
△𝑥→0
It should be delta t approaches zero, and not delta x.
Another problem is that respondents may lie because they want to present themselves in the most favorable light, known as social desirability
Lying may occur
Effect of the Amount of Solid Present on Equilibrium in a Heterogeneous Solid–Gas System. In the system, the equilibrium composition of the gas phase at a given temperature, 1000 K in this case, is the same whether a small amount of solid carbon (left) or a large amount (right) is present.
What is the reason no matter how much graphite you put on a scale they're showing the same temperature, does the quality of graphite matter more than the quantity?
At higher temperatures, the gas mixture has a deep brown color, indicative of a significant amount of brown NO2NO2\ce{NO_2} molecules. If, however, we put a stress on the system by cooling the mixture (withdrawing energy),
Why is the gas mixture color brown and not any other color, is brown the default color?
: Le Châtelier’s Principle- How a System at Equilibrium Responds to Disturbances
I need to take a closer look at Le Chatelier's Principle for a deeper understanding.
lowering the concentration of one of the reactants would cause QQQ to be larger than K)
How does Q determine the directional shift when the reactant is added? Does K affect it too if changed?
“During peace time a scientist belongs to the World, but during war time he belongs to his country.”
I wonder how many people still hold this principal in these troubling times. Maybe we can get a discussion going on this topic?
Because partial pressures are usually expressed in atmospheres or mmHg, the molar concentration of a gas and its partial pressure do not have the same numerical value. Consequently, the numerical values of KKK and KpKpK_p are usually different. They are, however, related by the ideal gas constant (RRR) and the absolute temperature (TTT):
What if one compound is a gas and the other is a solid?
with the equilibrium constant K″ is as follows:
What does the constant K with two apostrophe's mean?
(2.1.1)N2O4(g)colorless⇌krkf2NO2(g)red−brown\underset{colorless }{\ce{N2O4 (g)}} \ce{ <=>[k_f][k_r] } \underset{red-brown }{\ce{2NO2(g)}}\label{Eq1} The double arrow indicates that both the forward reaction N2O4(g)−→kf2NO2(g)(2.1.2)(2.1.2)N2O4(g)→kf2NO2(g)\ce{N2O4 (g) ->[k_f] 2NO2(g)} \label{eq1B} and reverse reaction 2NO2(g)−→krN2O4(g)(2.1.3)(2.1.3)2NO2(g)→krN2O4(g)\ce{2NO2(g) ->[k_r] N2O4 (g) } \label{eq1C}
How is the reaction between NO2 and N2O4 considered reversible? What does it demonstrate?
mp = −9.3°C; bp = 21.2°C
What does mp and bp represent? "Material product" and "By-product)?
interplay
The way two things can have effect on each other
ideas of stimulus and response, along with the application of rewards or reinforcements
Conditioning
The Reaction Quotient
How does the reaction quotient ( Q ) differ from the equilibrium constant ( K ), and how can it be used to determine the direction in which a reaction will proceed?
Any point representing a pair of concentrations that does not lie on the line corresponds to a nonequilibrium state. In such cases, the reaction in Equation 2.7.42.7.4\ref{15.6.4} will proceed in whichever direction causes the composition of the system to move toward the equilibrium line.
I don't this statement properly
To understand how different phases affect equilibria.
How does the inclusion of activities in equilibrium constant expressions impact the treatment of homogeneous versus heterogeneous equilibria, particularly in relation to the standard states of pure solids and liquids?
volatility
the tendency of a substance to evaporate at normal temperature.
interpersonal communication is strategic, meaning we intentionally create messages to achieve certain goals that help us function in society and our relationships.
This reminds me of coaching practice, where effective communication requires planning and setting goals.
We create relationship cultures based on the relationship schemata we develop through our interactions with our larger society and culture.
How can we tell when cultural differences in the way we see relationships might cause misunderstandings?
personal idioms are unique to certain relationships, and they create a sense of belonging due to the inside meaning shared by the relational partners.
This reminds me of inside jokes with close friends, how a simple phrase can bring back memories.
Google’s compliance with the Chinese government did not help it make inroads into the Chinese Internet search market—although Google held about a quarter of the market in China, most of the search traffic went to the tightly controlled Chinese search engine Baidu. However, Google’s departure from China would be a blow to anti-government forces in the country. Since Baidu has a closer relationship with the Chinese government, political dissidents tend to use Google’s Gmail, which uses encrypted servers based in the United States. Google’s threat to withdraw from China raises the possibility that globalization could indeed hit roadblocks due to the ways that foreign governments may choose to censor the Internet.
China and Baidu. Google left China
Jones uses a fixed game of Monopoly as an allegory for the U.S. pretending that there is a fair and objective economic system, when really 400 years of slavery and the violent systems that have persisted since (such as Jim Crow, lynchings, racial massacres, and mass incarceration) is the same as cheating every round, and has made the game impossible to win.
this is a great concept
Testimony is quoted information from people with direct knowledge about a subject or situation. Expert testimony is from people who are credentialed or recognized experts in a given subject. Lay testimony is often a recounting of a person’s experiences, which is more subjective. Both types of testimony are valuable as supporting material. We can see this in the testimonies of people in courtrooms and other types of hearings. Lawyers know that juries want to hear testimony from experts, eyewitnesses, and friends and family. Congressional hearings are similar.
Of all the supporting materials to give your topic boost, testimony has got to have the greatest potential. Theres and old saying 'If i say it, its a lie. If you say it, its the truth'. People are naturally skeptical with presentations. Audiences have a natural aversion to being sold to or manipulated. Using a well chosen person whose testimony supports the subject can take the focus off of you being the sole source of potential bias. It helps when a little granny talks about how she relies on medicaid, or how a farmer relies on livestock guardian dogs to protect a herd. Relatable testimonies will give your subject legs and naturally help your audience trust both your argument but also your intentions.
Statistics are numerical representations of information. They are very credible in our society, as evidenced by their frequent use by news agencies, government offices, politicians, and academics. As a speaker, you can capitalize on the power of statistics if you use them appropriately. Unfortunately, statistics are often misused by speakers who intentionally or unintentionally misconstrue the numbers to support their argument without examining the context from which the statistic emerged. All statistics are contextual, so plucking a number out of a news article or a research study and including it in your speech without taking the time to understand the statistic is unethical.
Statistics have taken a hit in presentations for a while now. I think audiences have been oversaturated with statistics that are questionable, not explained well, not sufficiently backed up by credible sources (sources that need time to be explained outside of simply saying that 'so and so source says this statistic'. I would use statistics sparingly, if at all; and if I did use them I'd actually take the time to work through how those statistics were created at least for the first part of the presentation to build my own credibility.
Visual aids help a speaker reinforce speech content visually, which helps amplify the speaker’s message. They can be used to present any of the types of supporting materials discussed previously. Speakers rely heavily on an audience’s ability to learn by listening, which may not always be successful if audience members are visual or experiential learners. Even if audience members are good listeners, information overload or external or internal noise can be barriers to a speaker achieving his or her speech goals.
I prefer using a whiteboard to present ideas if I'm talking about something that has a thought process. Using diagrams and explanations really helps both myself and my audience to stay focused and to follow the train of thought. Sometimes my presentations have math involved, and while it isn't important to have an audience that needs to work through the math with me, I do need to show how the information I'm presenting has a basis for the conclusions of the lecture.
Sometimes you can access primary sources through Wikipedia if you review the footnote citations included in an entry.
This is a great little trick to find sources, Ive used it many times to find more sources about a subject. You can find books you've never heard of and links to primary sources. While I would never use Wikipedia as a source for an academic paper or any presentation I would want taken seriously, I would use it to find books, peer reviewed articles and other credible sources
Editorials may also have bylines, which make them look like traditional newspaper articles even though they are opinion based. It is important to distinguish between news articles and editorials because editorials are usually not objective and do not go through the same review process that a news story does before it’s published
I didn't think about editorials not going through the same review process, its always good to have a reminder to vet and double check your sources so that you aren't presenting someones opinion as a fact. I feel like this is an easy mistake to make and how misinformation gets spread unchecked.
Once you have determined (or been assigned) your general purpose, you can begin the process of choosing a topic. In this class, you may be given the option to choose any topic for your informative or persuasive speech, but in most academic, professional, and personal settings, there will be some parameters set that will help guide your topic selection. Speeches in future classes will likely be organized around the content being covered in the class. Speeches delivered at work will usually be directed toward a specific goal such as welcoming new employees, informing about changes in workplace policies, or presenting quarterly sales figures. We are also usually compelled to speak about specific things in our personal lives, like addressing a problem at our child’s school by speaking out at a school board meeting. In short, it’s not often that you’ll be starting from scratch when you begin to choose a topic.
I like to choose a topic that I can simply ramble on about naturally for at least 30 minutes. If I drive from boise to mountain home and can talk to myself about the subject the entire time, then I'm probably going to be off to a good start with being comfortable and familiar with the material.
Audience analysis is key for a speaker to achieve his or her speech goal. One of the first questions you should ask yourself is “Who is my audience?” While there are some generalizations you can make about an audience, a competent speaker always assumes there is a diversity of opinion and background among his or her listeners. You can’t assume from looking that everyone in your audience is the same age, race, sexual orientation, religion, or many other factors. Even if you did have a fairly homogenous audience, with only one or two people who don’t match up, you should still consider those one or two people.
This has got to be the most important starting point for creating a presentation. I, myself, have given presentations to audiences that didn't make a connection simply because I failed to think about what my audience would be interested in. Since people engage in things that relate to them, I would imagine that it would be paramount to ensure that a topic be broadly relatable to the people listening. If your audience is largely children, stay away from talking about taxes. If they are mostly elderly women churchgoers, probably don't talk about how awesome the big city nightlife scene is. If its mostly macho men, maybe stay away from talking about which carebear what the cutest and most awesome. This has got to be the most important thing to consider when starting. The rest of the presentation will fall into place nicely if you choose your topic wisely. This doesn't mean that you have to pick a topic that your audience will agree with however. It's ok to talk about something controversial or upsetting... your audience still needs to be interested and orientated.
t’s always a good idea to visit the place you will be speaking ahead of time so you will know what to expect.
I would never have thought if doing this, but its such a good idea. I have been thrown off by unexpected things at a location where I was performing, and checking out the space before hand will help make sure that doesn't happen in future performances.
One way to positively engage your audience is to make sure you establish your credibility. In terms of credibility, you want the audience to see you as competent, trustworthy, and engaging
This is very important! I feel like if i dont trust that the person speaking has credibility i tune out and am turned off by the speaker. If the person seems to be well informed and knows a good deal about their subject i am much more likely to listen to their perspectives.
competent speaker always assumes there is a diversity of opinion and background among his or her listeners.
This is an important factor in everyday speaking or writing. When at work, I can sometimes come off the wrong way to customers and I have trouble explaining myself afterwards. It is important to stay formal but also balance humor, connection, and humility.
One student compared the concept of biogasification to the natural gas production that comes from living creatures like humans and cows. This comparison got a laugh from the audience and also made the seemingly complex concept more understandable.
I LOVE it when people use a comparison that helps the listener or reader gain more understanding. The Pastor at my church does this a lot, and by the end of the sermon, I can understand what he is preaching about. I understand it so much that can go and tell my friend or use that example in a the future when someone asks me a question regarding that topic.
it would be unwise to focus solely on one group over another.
I like the point made in this Chapter because yes it is unwise to do this but sometimes people can try to be 'too diverse' and ramble about 1,000 things in their speech. I find myself in this trap while writing essays for even talking to a friend.
The following outline shows the standards for formatting and content and can serve as an example as you construct your own outline. Check with your instructor to see if he or she has specific requirements for speech outlines that may differ from what is shown here.
This is by far the most useful section of chapter 9 for me. Actually seeing how the preceding suggestions and explanations were tied together in a format is just the kind of template that I can compare my own presentation outline to. Using this example will be a good reference to make sure I don't miss or forget about any areas that need to be included.
distance between donor and acceptor chromophores
how can i calculate the distance between donor and acceptor chromophores ?
altruistic
showing a selfless concern for the well-being of others
What is the effect of [choose a literary device that features prominently in the chosen text] in this work of literature, and how does it relate to a theme? How does this work of literature conform or resist its genre, and to what effect? How does this work of literature portray the environment, and to what effect? How does this work of literature portray race, and to what effect? How does this work of literature portray gender, and to what effect? What historical context is this work of literature engaging with, and how might it function as a commentary on this context?
These are also good questions to think about while reading.
"While most people reading Hamlet think he is the tragic hero, Ophelia is the real hero of the play as demonstrated through her critique of Elsinore's court through the language of flowers."
This example is actually a very interesting argument!
Gender roles are bad and should be abolished."
this Is showing you what you should not do because as you can see they didn't give much information. Im not saying that the statement that they made was okay.
The works of ecstatic love poets Rumi, Hafiz, and Kabir use symbols such as a lover’s longing and the Tavern of Ruin to illustrate the human soul’s desire to connect with God.
Your thesis is always going to sum up what you are talking about because the reader is going to need information about what is going on
Observation: usually regarding the form or structure of the literature. This can be a pattern, like recurring literary devices. For example, "I noticed the poems of Rumi, Hafiz, and Kabir all use symbols such as the lover's longing and Tavern of Ruin"
Their is always many different observations when reading a story or even just reading An article their are things that they want you to visualize
or a topic they already know a great deal about.
I feel like we need to be informed well about the topic we are talking about . Thats why i would choose a topic that i am good at to talk about with the audience.
Sociology takes a different approach, as it stresses that individual problems are often rooted in problems stemming from aspects of society itself.
Problems do tend to come from more than one thing, if you really think about it. We just have learned to blame problems on someone else.
Liberal feminists view gender inequality as arising out of gender differences in socialization, while Marxist feminists say that this inequality is a result of the rise of capitalism, which made women dependent on men for economic support. On the other hand, radical feminists view gender inequality as present in all societies, not just capitalist ones
Do you think gender inequality exists in all societies? Why do you think about a woman in todays times being economically supported by a man?
Thus functionalism emphasizes the importance of social institutions such as the family, religion, and education for producing a stable society.
Family, religion, and education place key roles in producing stable societies. Religion sets a lot of standards for people, but family does also. How far you go in your education makes a difference in you experience and expertise in a certain topic, which impacts your life.
If this cultural standard did not exist, far fewer American women would suffer from eating disorders than do now.
I think that that is an old standard for today’s times. Eating disorders are something that will be hard to solve and probably always be an issue.
When only a few people are out of work, it is fair to say that their unemployment is their personal troubl
If only a few people are having trouble dinging a job it is far to say it’s a personal problem. It’s not enough people to say it’s a social problem, unless other factors come into play.
The natural history of a social problem consists of four stages: emergence and claims making, legitimacy, renewed claims making, and alternative strategies.
What part of a social proof you think we are at in reference to companies changing or not having any diversity, equity, or inclusion policy or programs? Do you think this will spark more protests or boycotting?
This stage may involve a fair amount of tension between the social change groups and these targets of their claims.
Do you think with all the new executive orders that tensions will rise? What kind feelings do these orders bring to mind?
provocative implication: Just as a condition or behavior may not be considered a social problem even if there is strong basis for this perception, so may a condition or behavior be considered a social problem even if there is little or no basis for this perception
We are currently dealing with a lot of social constructionism with the executive orders. I feel a new social problem is developing and an old one will be reinvented.
Although men were sometimes arrested and prosecuted for rape and sexual assault, sexual violence was otherwise ignored by legal policymakers and received little attention in college textbooks and the news media, and many people thought that rape and sexual assault were just something that happened
At one point in time married women could not refuse sex with their husbands, and the husband could use force and not be charged with rape. Los it took a while for men or male children to be considered raped.
The reasons for these consequences are often hotly debated, and sometimes, as we shall see in certain chapters in this book, sometimes the very existence of these consequences is disputed.
I can see where diversity, equity, and inclusion is already a social problem. I can also see that the perception is the suggestion that we no longer need to have any standards, which will lead to more issues.
The Natural History of a Social Problem
One of the most interesting points concerning social problems is the evolution of concern. Referring to the natural history/steps of social concern, a concern may start for one reason or another and evolve into a completely different movement. Going back to my comparison but the Black Lives Matter movement, it started with acknowledgement of high rates of shootings of African Americans. Over time, the movement turned into more than just that, to include more progressive changes in equal rights and opportunities, extending to all facets such as law enforcement and Hollywood.
List the stages of the natural history of social problems.
The steps of social problems entail four stages. The first stage is “emergence” or proposal of the issue. This often occurs through media coverage. The second stage is “legitimacy” of the issue by bringing it to the attention of government in order to garner funds and policies for the issue. The third stage includes “renewed claim making” which involves pushing the issue further even if attempts to remedy the issue have begun. The fourth stage is the “development of alternative strategies” where the group that brings up the concern are not satisfied with the results/progress and typically take matters into their own happens by attempting to resolve the concern themselves. The Black Lives Matter is an example of a movement to address a social problem.
Define “social problem.”
Social problems are situations that have undesired consequences for the affected population. Social problems and their merits are often contested or debated. One example of a social problem is global warming. The social issue can be very emotional for some or most as the issue can be tied to a shared view of a political party.
neuron doctrine,
Couldn't really understand what neuron doctrine was and I looked it up. I got "The neuron doctrine is the idea that the nervous system is made up of individual nerve cells, called neurons, which are the basic units of brain function." Is this correct?
He used a silver chromate salt to reveal the intricate structures of single neurons (Elias and Saucier, 2006).
I'm guessing the silver stain made it easier to see neurons by highlighting their shape under a microscope?
Through his dissection of human cadavers, Vesalius found problems with the Galenic view of anatomy (which emphasized three major systems--the heart, brain, and blood--and the importance of a balance between four bodily fluids--blood, phlegm, and black and yellow bile).
The Galenic model was mostly based on animal dissections and old medical ideas, but Vesalius proved many of them wrong by studying real human bodies.
It is important to examine the historical path of our understanding of the brain and its role in our behavior and mental processes.
This says how important to look at how our understanding of the brain has changed over time and how it affects our behavior and mental processes.
materialism or physicalism
The difference between materialism and dualism is a big debate that affects how biopsychologists study the brain.
Key areas of focus within the field include sensation and perception; motivated behavior (such as hunger, thirst, and sex); control of movement; learning and memory; sleep and biological rhythms; and emotion.
This is important because it shows how much biopsychology helps us understand both human and animal behavior.
If everything in the universe is physical, then this means that the mental processes and subjective mental experiences of our mind must also be entirely physical processes taking place in an entirely material brain. Using this fundamental assumption of the modern scientific view of the universe, this means that the mind is entirely material, dependent upon the physical activities of an entirely material organ, the brain.
This is an obvious but interesting statement. Our brains are physical material and all thoughts, feelings and actions are a result of physical functioning. What makes us any different from a machine then?
Self-Determination Self-determination refers to the social movements, legislation, and beliefs by which Native American tribes in the United States exercise self-governance and decision making on issues that affect their own people. Self-determination is an integral piece of sovereignty and the right of a people to decide upon its own form of government, without outside influence and relates to the freedom and free will of the people of a given area to determine their own political status and independence. Self-determination includes tribal self-governance and intellectual self-determination (Teves et al., 2015). When tribes institute their own court systems, have their own tribal police, develop their own K-12 tribal schools and/or tribal colleges, these are acts of self-determination and sovereignty.
Honey is a natural food, essentially an invert sugar. Bees gather nectar and, through the enzyme invertase, change it into honey.
Brief mention of honey production*.
For many of us, Ethnic Studies is our lifeline. Ethnic Studies saved us.
Ethnic studies raises awareness on the oppression ethnic groups have been inflicted with.
The repetitive and focused movement of walking while absorbed in prayer enhanced the devotional experience for the worshiper—who was also the viewer of the labyrinth—on both a physical and a spiritual level.
usually when I think of a labyrinth I think of maze runner, but to see that labyrinths were mostly used for a person to practice faith is very interesting to know.
there are other times when it is helpful to have some information about the artist or artwork for us to better understand and appreciate what we are looking at.
personally, I like it more when I know the backstory or why the artist created such a piece work.
This text is not intended to determine what is or is not good art and why it matters.
This chapter ended on a good note while allowing myself to develop my own opinion of art and although everything is considered art it is up to the individual to decide whether or not they view the piece as important or not.
his definition gets us no closer to understanding what does or does not qualify as an art object.
I believe I know where Mr. Bell was headed ''as in just saying everything is art" with the aesthetic pleasure and colure. How I think is we are so stuck as humans trying to find a set rules system for "what art is" we can't stop and enjoy or admire the work, maybe art isn't just a yes or no answer but just a word we categorize trying to find a deeper meaning to.
Zeuxis conceding defeat
I think the story on parhassios and zeuxis are interesting because we can gather so much information about that time on the artwork or just the tale itself. I know for a fact I could never paint something like that. I suppose I am relieved that Jackson pollock didn't follow the stereo type during that age and went the complete and opposite route.
мова
Язик - найсильніший м'яз в організмі. Мова - language язик - tongue
Monroe’s Motivated Sequence is a five-step organization pattern that attempts to persuade an audience by making a topic relevant, using positive and/or negative motivation, and including a call to action. The five steps are (1) attention, (2) need, (3) satisfaction, (4) visualization, and (5) action (Monroe & Ehninger, 1964).
It is really interesting to me that there can be a formula for convincing people to get off their butts and do something. It feels like such an abstract idea to me, if you're trying to convince someone you're trying to reach them emotionally, internally. The idea that there's a "five-easy-steps" way of organizing your thoughts to help you convince people to do something is a strange concept to me, but I'm going to think about it a lot as i work on this speech
Explain why scholars who study social problems often rely on existing data.
The benefit to relying on existing data pertaining to social problems is that individuals have already done the groundwork for the information that a scholar is looking for. Starting study from the beginning is to be inefficient with the scholars’ time and the resources it would take to complete the study. Using existing data helps not only in saving time and resources, but it’s also helpful in correlating former data with the latest data. If there are any dramatic discrepancies, comparisons can be made to ensure accuracy and integrity of the study.
List the three sources of changes to social problems.
One source of change to social problems is social science theory and research. This source focuses on solving/addressing social problems. A second source of change is through the legislative process through the creation of new policies. Elected/appointed officials aid on governing social problems through these means. A third source of change is the actions and lessons collected by other groups or nations. Having a publicly visible response to social issues teachers all others that observe the response on how to respond or not respond to social issues.
Le Chatelier's principle states that if a dynamic equilibrium is disturbed by changing the conditions, the position of equilibrium shifts to counteract the change to reestablish an equilibrium. If a chemical reaction is at equilibrium and experiences a change in pressure, temperature, or concentration of products or reactants, the equilibrium shifts in the opposite direction to offset the change. This page covers changes to the position of equilibrium due to such changes and discusses briefly why catalysts have no effect on the equilibrium position.
a
Why Study Sociology? Last updated Jan 21, 2023 Save as PDF 1.4: Theoretical Perspectives 1.6: Key Terms
sociology helps us see the bigger picture, from why people act the way they do to how social systems create inequality. It's a tool for understanding and even changing the world around us.
Max Weber (1864–1920) Prominent sociologist Max Weber established a sociology department in Germany at the Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich in 1919. Weber wrote on many topics related to sociology including political change in Russia and social forces that affect factory workers. He is known best for his 1904 book, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. The theory that Weber sets forth in this book is still controversial. Some believe that Weber argued that the beliefs of many Protestants, especially Calvinists, led to the rise of capitalism. Others interpret it as simply claiming that the ideologies of capitalism and Protestantism are complementary. Weber believed that it was difficult, if not impossible, to use standard scientific methods to accurately predict the behavior of groups as some sociologists hoped to do. Weber argued that the influence of culture on human behavior had to be taken into account. This even applied to the researchers themselves, who should be aware of how their own cultural biases could influence their research. To deal with this problem, Weber and Wilhelm Dilthey introduced the concept of verstehen, a German word that means to understand in a deep way. In seeking verstehen, outside observers of a social world—an entire culture or a small setting—attempt to understand it from an insider’s point of view. In The Nature of Social Action, Weber described sociology as striving to “… interpret the meaning of social action and thereby give a causal explanation of the way in which action proceeds and the effects it produces.” He and other like-minded sociologists proposed a philosophy of anti-positivism whereby social researchers would strive for subjectivity as they worked to represent social processes, cultural norms, and societal values. This approach led to some research methods whose aim was not to generalize or predict (traditional in science), but to systematically gain an in-depth understanding of social worlds. The different approaches to research based on positivism or anti-positivism are often considered the foundation for the differences found today between quantitative sociology and qualitative sociology. Quantitative sociology uses statistical methods such as surveys with large numbers of participants. Researchers analyze data using statistical techniques to see if they can uncover patterns of human behavior. Qualitative sociology seeks to understand human behavior by learning about it through in-depth interviews, focus groups, and analysis of content sources (like books, magazines, journals, and popular media).
Max Weber's view on society argued that people's beliefs and values shape society just as much as money and power do. He also warned about bureaucracy making life too rigid and impersonal, something that still feels relevant today.
Émile Durkheim (1858–1917) Émile Durkheim helped establish sociology as a formal academic discipline by establishing the first European department of sociology at the University of Bordeaux in 1895 and by publishing his Rules of the Sociological Method in 1895. In Division of Labour in Society (1893), Durkheim further laid out his theory on how societies transformed from a primitive state into a capitalist, industrial society. According to Durkheim, people rise to their proper levels in society based on merit. Durkheim believed that sociologists could study objective social facts (Poggi, 2000). He also believed that through such studies it would be possible to determine if a society was “healthy” or “pathological.” Healthy societies were stable while pathological societies experienced a breakdown in social norms. In 1897, Durkheim attempted to demonstrate the effectiveness of his rules of social research when he published a work titled Suicide. Durkheim examined suicide statistics in different police districts to research differences between Catholic and Protestant communities. He attributed the differences to socio-religious forces rather than to individual or psychological causes.
Durkheim believed that society influences us more than we realize,shaping our behaviors and choices. His study on suicide showed that even personal decisions are deeply connected to social forces.
Karl Marx was a German philosopher and economist. In 1848, he and Friedrich Engels (1820–1895) coauthored the Communist Manifesto. This book is one of the most influential political manuscripts in history. It also presents Marx’s theory of society, which differed from what Comte proposed. Marx rejected Comte’s positivism. He believed that societies grew and changed as a result of the struggles of different social classes over the means of production. At the time he was developing his theories, the Industrial Revolution and the rise of capitalism led to great disparities in wealth between the owners of the factories and workers. Capitalism, an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of goods and the means to produce them, had developed in many nations. Marx predicted that inequalities of capitalism would become so extreme that workers would eventually revolt. This would lead to the collapse of capitalism, which would be replaced by communism. Communism is an economic system under which there is no private or corporate ownership: everything is owned communally and distributed as needed. Marx believed that communism was a more equitable system than capitalism. While his economic predictions did not materialize in the time frame he predicted, Marx’s idea that social conflict leads to change in society is still one of the major theories used in modern sociology.
Marx saw society as a constant battle between the rich and the working class, with capitalism fueling inequality. His ideas still shape how we think about power, money, and social change today
Theoretical Perspectives
This section breaks down the three big ways sociologists view the world: functionalism- how society stays stable, conflict theory-who has power and who doesn't, and symbolic interactions-how people communicate and create meaning. Each perspective offers a different way to make sense of social life.
Degrees180=𝑅𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑠π
formula to find the degrees and the radians