10,000 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2024
    1. Figure 1.1.21.1.2\PageIndex{2}: Canyons like this, carved in the deposit left by the May 18th, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens, are sometimes used by purveyors of pseudoscience as evidence for the Earth being very young. In reality, the non-lithified volcanic deposit is carved much more easily than other canyons like the Grand Canyon.

      I learned from this canyons existence how powerful volcanos really are and how much volcanos can curve out large Canyan's.

    2. Another way scientists avoid bias is by using quantitative over qualitative measurements whenever possible.

      avoiding being bias seems impossible so tactics like this that help limit it is very interesting

    1. The Paleozoic era was dominated by marine organisms, but by the middle of the era, plants and animals had evolved to live and reproduce on land, including amphibians and reptiles.

      This is interesting.

    1. These first well-preserved fossils are photosynthetic microbial mats, called stromatolites, found in Australia [41].

      This is really interesting.

    1. Because the light wavelengths of receding objects are extended, visible light is shifted toward the red end of the spectrum, called a redshift.

      This is something interesting that I didn't know about.

    2. The universe appears to have an infinite number of galaxies and solar systems and our solar system occupies a small section of this vast entirety. The origins of the universe and solar system set the context for conceptualizing the Earth’s origin and early history.

      This shows how large the universe is.

    1. In casual conversation, the word theory implies guesswork or speculation. In the language of science, an explanation or conclusion made in a theory carries much more weight because it is supported by experimental verification and widely accepted by the scientific community. After a hypothesis has been repeatedly tested for falsifiability through documented and independent studies, it eventually becomes accepted as a scientific theory.

      It's interesting to note how the word "theory" takes on a different meaning in science compared to everyday conversation. In science, a theory is a solid idea backed by evidence, not just a guess.

    2. The theory of evolution by natural selection is another example. Originating from the work of Charles Darwin in the mid-19th century, the theory of evolution has withstood generations of scientific testing for falsifiability. While it has been updated and revised to accommodate knowledge gained by using modern technologies, the theory of evolution continues to be supported by the latest evidence.

      Evolution by natural selection is like a never-ending puzzle that scientists are constantly trying to solve. By piecing together evidence from fossils, genetics, and the natural world, we get a clearer picture of how life has evolved over time

    1. Trace fossils are indirect evidence left behind by an organism, such as burrows and footprints, as it lived its life.

      Although something might not be in the fossil itself, its traces gives insightful information.

    2. This theory of evolution by natural selection was elaborated by Darwin in his book On the Origin of Species (see Chapter 1) [36]. Since Darwin’s original ideas, technology has provided many tools and mechanisms to study how evolution and speciation take place and this arsenal of tools is growing. Evolution is well beyond the hypothesis stage and is a well-established theory of modern science.

      I remember Darwin’s theory was never end believed by the public until many experiments and research was done

    3. Actual preservation is a rare form of fossilization where the original materials or hard parts of the organism are preserved. Preservation of soft-tissue is very rare since these organic materials easily disappear because of bacterial decay [24]. Examples of actual preservation are unaltered biological materials like insects in amber or original minerals like mother-of-pearl on the interior of a shell.

      This is very interesting to see how this insect is displayed on this amber crystal

    4. vessels of dinosaurs, from which proteins have been isolated and evidence for DNA fragments have been discovered [27].

      This is cool but leaves me uneasy about what can be done in the future.

    5. Actual preservation is a rare form of fossilization where the original materials or hard parts of the organism are preserved.

      Butterflies are very common animals to preserve, would they fall under this type?

    6. Permineralization occurs when an organism is buried, and then elements in groundwater completely impregnate all spaces within the body, even cells. Soft body structures can be preserved in great detail, but stronger materials like bone and teeth are the most likely to be preserved. Petrified wood is an example of detailed cellulose structures in the wood being preserved.

      I don't get why they used the word "impregnate all spaces within the body, even cells." that just sounds really weird to say and read.

    7. Fossils are any evidence of past life preserved in rocks. They may be actual remains of body parts (rare), impressions of soft body parts, casts and molds of body parts (more common), body parts replaced by mineral (common) or evidence of animal behavior such as footprints and burrows.

      To me it has always been crazy how little the amount of fossils actually survived.

    1. However, some rock specimens have an enormous number of radioactive isotopes, perhaps trillions of atoms and this large group of radioactive isotopes do have a predictable pattern of radioactive decay. The radioactive decay of half of the radioactive isotopes in this group takes a specific amount of time. The time it takes for half of the atoms in a substance to decay is called the half-life.

      How can this be unpredictable and then have enormous of radioactive isotopes

    2. During metamorphic events, zircon crystals may form multiple crystal layers, with each layer recording the isotopic age of an event, thus tracing the progress of the several metamorphic events

      I believe that it is very interesting that these crystals form many layers that track back to metamorphic events

    3. Beta Decay is when a neutron in its nucleus splits into an electron and a proton. The electron is emitted from the nucleus as a beta ray. The new proton increases the element’s atomic number by one, forming a new element with the same atomic mass as the parent isotope. For example, 234Th is unstable and undergoes beta decay to form protactinium-234 (234Pa), which also undergoes beta decay to form uranium-234 (234U). Notice these are all isotopes of different elements but they have the same atomic mass of 234.

      Beta decay occurs when a neutron splits into a photon plus a proton, producing an element that is new has the same mass as itself but a greater atomic number.

    4. Detrital sedimentary rocks contain clasts from separate parent rocks from unknown locations and derived ages are thus meaningless. However, sedimentary rocks with precipitated minerals, such as evaporites, may contain elements suitable for radioisotopic dating. Igneous pyroclastic layers and lava flows within a sedimentary sequence can be used to date the sequence. Cross-cutting igneous rocks and sills can be used to bracket the ages of affected, older sedimentary rocks.

      Date detrital sediments is difficult due to the variety of clasts; nevertheless, strata rocks containing precipitating nutrients, magma layers, and crossovers magma structures provide options for age assessment.

    5. he radioactive decay of any individual atom is a completely unpredictable and random event. However, some rock specimens have an enormous number of radioactive isotopes, perhaps trillions of atoms and this large group of radioactive isotopes do have a predictable pattern of radioactive decay. The radioactive decay of half of the radioactive isotopes in this group takes a specific amount of time.

      It emphasizes the inconsistency of each atomic disintegration while emphasizing the stability that develops on larger scales, allowing investigators to use this trait to figure out the age or historical samples.

    6. daughter isotope and the original element is called the parent isotope.

      I find it interesting that isotopes were named parent and daughter. It showcases a deeper meaning for sure.

    7. Zircon is resistant to weathering which makes it useful for dating geological events in ancient rocks. During metamorphic events, zircon crystals may form multiple crystal layers, with each layer recording the isotopic age of an event, thus tracing the progress of the several metamorphic events

      zircon is so useful in geology

    8. When this occurs, an unstable isotope becomes a more stable isotope of another element. For example, carbon-14 (14C) decays to nitrogen-14 (14N).

      In this example is the carbon turning into nitrogen?

    9. he discovery of radioactivity in the late 1800s provided scientists with a new scientific tool called radioisotopic dating.

      saw this in the video we watched before it was really cool

    10. the time elapsed since some silicate minerals, such as coarse-sediments of silicate minerals, were last exposed to light or heat at the surface of Earth.

      is this method not as accurate as radioisotopic dating?

    11. may reset the clock and derived ages may represent a smear of different metamorphic events rather than the age of original

      can lead to misunderstanding of the rocks age?

    12. In the 1950s, Clair Patterson (1922–1995) thought he could determine the age of the Earth using radioactive isotopes from meteorites, which he considered to be early solar system remnants that were present at the time Earth was forming. Patterson analyzed meteorite samples for uranium and lead using a mass spectrometer. He used the uranium/lead dating technique in determining the age of the Earth to be 4.55 billion years, give or take about 70 million (± 1.5%) [15]. The current estimate for the age of the Earth is 4.54 billion years, give or take 50 million (± 1.1%) [13]. It is remarkable that Patterson, who was still a graduate student at the University of Chicago, came up with a result that has been little altered in over 60 years, even as technology has improved dating methods.

      This paragraph let me know how people tryed to calculated the earths age.

    13. Because science advances as technology advances, the discovery of radioactivity in the late 1800s provided scientists with a new scientific tool called radioisotopic dating. Using this new technology, they could assign specific time units, in this case years, to mineral grains within a rock.

      This shows how scientists predict the time period. of each rocks.

    14. Many elements have both stable and unstable isotopes. For the hydrogen example, 1H and 2H are stable, but 3H is unstable. Unstable isotopes, called radioactive isotopes, spontaneously decay over time releasing subatomic particles or energy in a process called radioactive decay.

      If I remember correctly, the only reason why 3H was unstable was because of the extra isotope that it had, because it was able to function normally with 1 or 2 but when it got 3 it couldn't handle the pressure/energy or something.

    1. This is a type of unconformity called a disconformity, where either non-deposition or erosion took place. In other words, layers of rock that could have been present, are absent.

      I believe that it is very unlikely to see the absent layers without close attention

    2. Deformation events like folds, faults and igneous intrusions that cut across rocks are younger than the rocks they cut across.

      Based on some prior knowledge some of these deformation events that I can think of would come from thousends of years of water erosion is the only thing I can think of. I just want to know what other ways, that are not man made, that expose these sediment layers?

    3. Stratigraphy is the study of layered sedimentary rocks

      I remember learning about this in another geography class I took at Wright. It is very intersting to see the history of a loctation just based on their layers of sediment over the hundereds of thousands of years.

    4. When sea-level fell, the land was exposed to erosion creating an unconformity.

      It's interesting to know that we used to have much more water on the earth than we do now and makes me wonder how different life would be if sea-levels stayed the same.

    5. deposited, so there are no rocks that represent events of Earth history during that span of time at

      This makes me wonder how much information we've lost about the earth because of this and how/ if that would impact the information we know today.

    6. this erosion is shown as heavy wavy lines between the various numbered strata

      This surprised me because I never knew that those lines are created by nature, I always thought it was human or our ancestors that did it.

    7. The predominant white layer just below the canyon rim is the Coconino Sandstone.

      it would be very interesting the grand canyon filled in, and to be able to see this layer of sandstone as one unbroken piece.

    8. Principle of Fossil Succession: Evolution has produced a succession of unique fossils that correlate to the units of the geologic time scale. Assemblages of fossils contained in strata are unique to the time they lived and can be used to correlate rocks of the same age across a wide geographic distribution. Assemblages of fossils refer to groups of several unique fossils occurring together.

      its so cool to see different layers of sedient almost like time capsules. you can see time go by while looking at the strata.

    9. Principle of Superposition: In an otherwise undisturbed sequence of sedimentary strata, or rock layers, the layers on the bottom are the oldest and layers above them are younger.

      Its interesting that this information seems common knowledge to us now, but back then this was a scientific breakthrough.

    10. There are three types of unconformities, nonconformity, disconformity, and angular unconformity.

      I did not know there was so much layers to Earth's processes. These types of unconformities are not some that I have heard of before.

    11. s: When one rock formation contains pieces or inclusions of another rock, the included rock is older than the host rock.

      This shows how scientists differentiate rock layers.

    12. The Grand Canyon of Arizona illustrates the stratigraphic principles. The photo shows layers of rock on top of one another in order, from the oldest at the bottom to the youngest at the top, based on the principle of superposition.

      This shows how the grand canyon in Arizona shows how rock layers form

    13. This is a type of unconformity called a disconformity, where either non-deposition or erosion took place. In other words, layers of rock that could have been present, are absent. The time that could have been represented by such layers is instead represented by the disconformity. Disconformities are unconformities that occur between parallel layers of strata indicating either a period of no deposition or erosion.

      So disconformity is a specific type of geological layer, how do people tell them apart semi easily because I feel like its very difficult to do.

    14. The photo shows layers of rock on top of one another in order, from the oldest at the bottom to the youngest at the top, based on the principle of superposition. The predominant white layer just below the canyon rim is the Coconino Sandstone. This layer is laterally continuous, even though the intervening canyon separates its outcrops. The rock layers exhibit the principle of lateral continuity, as they are found on both sides of the Grand Canyon which has been carved by the Colorado River.

      I remember this from Highschool, the older the layers are the older the rock is typically, and the older marking of the rock were at the bottom, meanwhile the (Younger) markings of the rock were newer. Never really expected to remember that.

    15. The photo shows layers of rock on top of one another in order, from the oldest at the bottom to the youngest at the top, based on the principle of superposition.

      In High School I learned that rocks have different layers on top of each other, the bottom layers are the oldest, and the top layers are the youngest. But, one question that I have is how long does it take for a new layer to be formed?

    1. Fromm viewed societies as forces that lead to alienation from a more natural, primitive way of life. As a result, freedom and individuality actually create psychological problems, as we become disconnected from our immediate social groups (such as the family or local community). This often leads to unfortunate consequences, such as seeking fellowship within a society at the expense of one’s regard for self and others, providing a framework within which dictatorships can develop (as individuals completely surrender their freedom).

      Fromm posits that societal structures cause alienation from natural, simpler lifestyles, negatively impacting individual freedom and identity. This alienation stems from losing connection with close social groups, like families, leading to psychological distress as individuals strive for societal acceptance at personal and communal costs. An example of this is seen in individuals' excessive use of social media to gain approval, often sacrificing genuine relationships and personal well-being. This concept is illustrated in the film "The Social Dilemma," where social media's role in increasing alienation and facilitating manipulative control is explored.

    1. Think about the setting and environment of grocery stores in each culture. Would these differences change the way one interacts with others?

      Yes, because each culture grocery store has different items and maybe other cultures have different ways of greeting one another.

    1. What movies or tv shows impacted you as a child? How did they influence your social norms and values?

      I watched a show called 13 reasons why and it is a really strong show to watch and it made me realize how someones life can turn upside down. It was important because every person goes through things, that other might not know of and some people don't believe depression a thing but it can affect people.

    2. What are some examples of “hidden curriculum” that you experienced? How did it impact you then and now? Share any books that you read (either assigned or personal choice) that might have influenced any thoughts or ideas that you had as a child or teenager. How did they impact you now and then?

      I had played sports my whole life since I was 7. I have always been on a team and have had teammates for about 8 years. We all had to get along to have better chemistry through out the game so we wouldn't have miscommunication. It has impacted my life because I learned to get along with people that I didn't like or never thought I would talk too.

    3. What are your thoughts…. Should parents get the credit when their children turn out to be “good” kids and even go on to accomplish great things in life? Should they get the blame if their children turn out to be “bad”?

      I believe that every child/person is going to become who they are going to become. You can be raised with manners and with all the nice stuff but every kid is going to have their own personality. Now if the kid is being good, that is something that the kid is choosing to do even if ititss good or bad.

    1. Some of these microscopic organisms had hard parts, such as exoskeletons or outer shells, making them better candidates for preservation. Foraminifera, single-celled organisms with calcareous shells, are an example of an especially useful index fossil for the Cretaceous Period and Cenozoic Era [37].

      I sometimes find it hard to believe that these microscopic organisms are constantly used to determine strata ages due to how small they are of course

    2. Eon is the largest division of time, followed by era, period, epoch, and age.

      I still am not confident in the understanding of geologic time but this is a semi break down that clarifies.

    1. Affirmative action is defined as a set of procedures designed to; eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants, remedy the results of such prior discrimination, and prevent such discrimination in the future

      affirmitive action

    2. Studies across the nation show that Black women have higher mortality rates while giving birth, and Black children have higher infant mortality rates. Some of the mortality rates among women tie to the lack of quality healthcare, doctors that have a bias against them as Black women, and more.

      this pargargh is about trusting midwives more than health care providers

    3. New Jim Crow (2010) chronicles the great systemic issue of incarceration that disproportionately affects communities of color, especially Black people. Michelle Alexander names statistic after statistic that demonstrates how white youth, for example, are criminalized way less and less harshly compared to Black youth (pp. 95-99). Cocaine is criminalized less than crack, as there are harsher penalties for being caught with crack.

      new jim crow laws talks about crack and cocaine

    1. he city was a testament to Black communities’ capacity and a centralized hub of intellectual and financial capital. It became known as Black Wall Street due to its economic, political, and social significance

      black wall street

    2. “one drop” rule was applied to mixed-race people, meaning that if you had even one drop of Black blood, that made you legally and socially considered to be Black

      one drop rule

    3. d Black Codes, were laws that created restrictions on Black people’s abilities to own property, conduct business, lease land, and move freely through public spaces. These regulations worked to keep separate the established white society from the lives of Black people.

      black codes

    4. three-fifths compromise was a decision in the 1787 U.S. Constitutional Convention that determined that while enslaved people were not eligible to vote, they would be counted toward the population when determining the number of representatives from each state, but only at 3/5th the rate of the free, white population

      three fifths compromise

    5. double consciousness symbolized the psychological impact of living in a racist society for African Americans in the years following the end of slavery.

      double consness

    1. __________________________________________________________________

      Some professors will repeat the important information, some will project there voice, some will right related words on the board

    2. __________________________________________________________________

      In the front row cause the professor read your facial expressions and they know you are taking the class more serious

    1. Panafricanism became the foundation for the idea of Blackness and Black identity, which brings together the experience of people of African heritage

      panafrricism

    2. Panafricanism. His ideology emphasized pride, empowerment, and economic prosperity for Black communities, and is so widely studied and documented it came to be known as Garveyism

      garveyism

    1. even people who speak the same language experience cultural differences because of their various intersecting cultural identities and personal experiences. We have a tendency to view our language as a whole more favorably than other languages.

      This is interesting to consider in an international sense. How does a culture change based on what language they speak? What isn't affected by language? Additionally, something to consider is that, in certain languages, some words have additional meaning to a single action. For example, in Greek, there's eight different words for our word "love." So I can understand why some languages are looked at more favorably.

    1. Affective language can be intentionally used in relational contexts to create or enhance interpersonal bonds and can also be effectively employed in public speaking to engage an audience and motivate them in particular ways. We also use affective language spontaneously and less intentionally.

      I often get the empathy this piece is trying to explain. I went on a date last December and we had a good talk, followed by her almost crying (not in a negative way). I almost cried as well, due to that communication, whether intentional or not. Its very different from talking with friends or associates who I only have partial or non-romantic interest in, where I wouldn't have the same level of empathy.

    2. In some cases, swearing can be cathartic, allowing a person to release emotions that might otherwise lead to more aggressive or violent actions.

      This made me laugh. I really connect with this. If you've been anywhere with me for long enough for me to speak, you'll know that I have the mouth of a pirate. When I'm pissed or stressed, I go into my room, a car, on any space free of people. Then I belt out a Blink 182 song that contains George Carlin's "7 dirty words" plus 3 other "vulgar" for good measure. From a mental health perspective, I think that swearing is a pretty good way of dealing with emotions. The last thing you want is to go ballistic because you're pent up. Swearing is a way to pop open the pressure valve, for lack of a better metaphor.

    1. When you are trying to make sense of an experience, expressing observations in a descriptive rather than evaluative way can lessen defensiveness, which facilitates competent communication.

      This is probably why I don't have a ton of comfort with communication. I often take the evaluative route to talking with others, and I know this can often cause some ruffled feathers, so to speak, which isn't intentional usually. I would love to learn more about how to speak descriptively.

    2. Expressing feelings can be uncomfortable for those listening. Some people are generally not good at or comfortable with receiving and processing other people’s feelings. Even those with good empathetic listening skills can be positively or negatively affected by others’ emotions. Expressions of anger can be especially difficult to manage because they represent a threat to the face and self-esteem of others. Despite the fact that expressing feelings is more complicated than other forms of expression, emotion sharing is an important part of how we create social bonds and empathize with others, and it can be improved.

      Very true. But we as humans can't expect people to stifle their feelings. There's a balance, or a two way street (whichever metaphor you like better). Don't take out all your anger on someone. Find a good way of expressing it, like for example, playing a distorted chord on an instrument, screaming expletives into a pillow, sing a loud song full of expletives, etc). But also, when someone says, "I'm pissed off because xyz," try to give them a chance to talk about it, whether that's in the moment or at a later, more appropriate time.

    3. Sometimes people intentionally or unintentionally express thoughts as if they were feelings. For example, when people say, “I feel like you’re too strict with your attendance policy,” they aren’t really expressing a feeling; they are expressing a judgment about the other person (a thought).

      This is very important. People often confuse thoughts and feelings with each other. I've seen this with people in my personal life. Some people genuinely struggle to make that differentiation. That's valid, but it's something that needs to be worked on rather than brushed off. I think that in order to communicate well, one needs to be able to differentiate between thoughts and feelings. Part of being a good communicator is making a habit of trying to better your communication skills.

    1. Jasper and Abby have been thinking about getting a new dog. So each of them is having a similar thought. They are each using the same symbol, the word dog, to communicate about their thought. Their referents, however, are different. Jasper is thinking about a small dog like a dachshund, and Abby is thinking about an Australian shepherd. Since the word dog doesn’t refer to one specific object in our reality, it is possible for them to have the same thought, and use the same symbol, but end up in an awkward moment when they get to the shelter and fall in love with their respective referents only to find out the other person didn’t have the same thing in mind.

      I think this demonstrates how experiences shape us and our decisions, and therefore our communication. Being a product of our environment has both truth and falsity to it. Like the saying "Aristocrats developed weak chins," a person raised in wealth might not have a ton of working experience, but can learn this experience based on a different, more productive environment.

    2. Each pebble represented one chicken, meaning that each symbol (the pebble) had a direct correlation to another thing out in the world (its chicken). This system allowed the farmer to keep track of his livestock. He could periodically verify that each pebble had a corresponding chicken. If there was a discrepancy, he would know that a chicken was lost, stolen, or killed. Later, symbols were developed that made accounting a little easier. Instead of keeping track of boxes of pebbles, the farmer could record a symbol like the word five or the numeral 15 that could stand in for five or fifteen pebbles. This demonstrates how our symbols have evolved and how some still carry that ancient history with them, even though we are unaware of it.

      I love learning about this stuff. Its interesting to see how history shapes the world, and to see the consequences of how certain decisions turn actions into reality. Its also intriguing to see the natural correlation people can make with abstract concepts, like a rock being equal to a chicken. Clearly, that's not literally the case, but the human mind makes the connection.

    3. Being aware of this indirect relationship between symbol and referent, we can try to compensate for it by getting clarification. Some of what we learned in the chapter titled “Communication and Perception”, about perception checking, can be useful here.

      This is an important part of communication. Another way to refer to this is "follow-up questions". Follow-up questions are important to help yourself understand someone, but they also help you connect with a person. Using follow-up questions can set the impression that you're invested and have a genuine interest in the person and conversation.

    1. his suggests that Hispanics have a unique view of race that doesn’t necessarily fit within the official U.S. definitions.”13

      Yeah, so why are Hispanics not part of a race to the official U.S. definition?

    2. When comparing Hispanic, Black, and white respondents, Hispanics were more likely to say the questions described them “not too well” or “not well at all,” suggesting they found the categories as not providing relevant options.12

      How can we make the census more applicable to any audience?

    3. I am assuming it is because if Latinos were to chose multiracial, they might get more benefits. I know that if I choose white as my race-- I will get more help for different situations in life, and it is because of how a lot of different societies have been taught to accept white color as superior to all other skin color. I know that belief is degrading as time goes on though.

    4. The results of the 2020 census indicated that 15.1% of the total population (about 49.9 million people) selected the Some Other Race box alone or in combination, making it the second-largest race group. Interestingly,

      I am assuming because their race is not listed there, a lot of the 15.1% of the total population picked Some Other Race, but for the people who did not choose it for that reason, why did they choose it?

    1. ________________________________________________________________________________
      1. Remembering things the best.
      2. You might actually delete them, but you won't lose them as easily as paper notes.
      3. 1.Asking Teacher 2.Asking for notes powerpoint
        1. Ask other students what you missed
    1. 1.2. Communication is how we send and receive messages. Interpersonal communication is communication between two people and interpersonal communication is between two people with different cultural identities. We can learn to be stronger communicators by being aware of other people's languages and cultures. We understand each other more.

    2. it is important that we understand how culture influences our communication

      We can learn to be stronger communicators by being aware of other people’s languages and cultures. We understand each other more.

    3. How do you think this form of communication impacts your everyday experiences?

      Ch. 1

      I use interpersonal and intercultural communication the most as a Mother and a manager. I communicate with people that speak different languages, and come from different places.

    1. Although this organizing pattern is more complicated than the others, it offers a proven structure that can help you organize your supporting materials and achieve your speech goals.

      I have never heard of the Monroe's motivated sequence. After reading about it I actually like it. I think that it is important to have a plan or a layout so you know exactly what you want to do. I like that in this sequence you don't get to the problem until after you have grabbed the audience and establish the importances of the speech. I like that you leave the audience with how can we fix this problem.

    2. When organizing your speech, you want to start with the body. Even though most students want to start with the introduction,

      I hate when teachers tell me to do this! I hate starting the body paragraph or the purpose of my speech. I always find it taking me forever to get started. I understand why people say it's better but I don't like it. The developing process comes differently to different people. So I don't think it is fair that this is the best way for everyone to work.

    3. One of the key elements of academic and professional public speaking is verbally citing your supporting materials so your audience can evaluate your credibility and the credibility of your sources.

      We’ve talked about this in class and how important it is to properly clarify your points and sources. While speaking in my presentation I am anticipating that I will forget many things I am supposed to say. The previous paragraph talks about how each peice of supporting material needs to directly link back to your thesis. I don’t know many ways to verbally cite things out loud. My fear is being repetitive during my speech.

    1. It may be acceptable for you to include magazine sources in your speech, but you should still consider the credibility of the source. Magazines like Scientific American and Time are generally more credible and reliable than sources like People or Entertainment Weekly.

      I have never thought of using a magazine as a source for a speech. For any paper honestly. I wonder if I know someone that's ever used a magazine as a source. It just seems unprofessional to use that as a source.

    1. you may have to inform your audience about your topic in one main point before you can persuade them, or you may include some entertaining elements in an informative or persuasive speech to help make the content more engaging for the audience.

      I thought that this interesting because it's true. You have a speech be one general purpose. You have to incorporate other factors to make your speeches cohesive and entertaining. Nobody wants to listen to a speech of someone just reading facts off a piece of paper. Although people also don't want to hear an entertainment speech with absolutely no facts.

    2. In summary, audiences enter a speaking situation with various psychological dispositions, and considering what those may be can help speakers adapt their messages and better meet their speech goals.

      I have never really thought about my audience when I am giving my speech. I have thought about who I'm speaking to but It never accrued me to look further. I think that if you took the time to establish your audience and what you want your speech to be, you are able to execute it better. If you look at it from a psychological analysis state you can take the audiences 's beliefs,attitues and values.

    3. Your thesis statement

      I suck at these. I remember in high school I was writing an English paper, and the only thing I got a tally or a mark off for was my thesis statement. I am horrible at writing these and I hate them. I usually can not for the life of me find and or generate a sentence that is attention grabbing.

    4. brainstorming a list of your personal interests that can then be narrowed down to a speech topic.

      I feel that generally brainstorming is not the way for me to find a topic. I usually use like a web of ideas that I kind of bounce off of and determine my topic from there. A method I also use is bouncing ideas off of other people and see their reaction and get their feedback.

    5. the general purpose of your speech will be to inform, to persuade, or to entertain.

      I really love giving speeches that entertain. I do really good with humor and making people laugh and entertaining speeches are my bread and butter. Entertaining speeches are also more eye grabbing and attention grabbing than others that I have found.

    6. If you’ve ever followed the approval rating of a politician, you know that people’s likes and dislikes change frequently and can change dramatically based on recent developments.

      Government officials approval rates change for many reasons. The most prominent reason I feel is because they say something controversial. For example, Donald Trump says stupid stuff but then he says something good and he goes up again. It changes based on what he says or what ny government official says and does.

    7. it would be unwise to focus solely on one group over another.

      I find that when I am giving speeches it is most of the time easier for me to focus on one group. I find that at the beginning of the speech you find certain people that are more invested than others and paying better attention and that is usually what I focus my attention to. I also find that I end up making more eye contact with those that are paying attention more than others.

    8. When considering your audience’s disposition toward your topic, you want to assess your audience’s knowledge of the subject. You wouldn’t include a lesson on calculus in an introductory math course.

      This is good advice but how would you accurately determine your audiences’ attitudes and beliefs? Usually the people who attend public speaking events are interested in the topic. Of course it is safer to speak liberally when you are unsure of your audience.

    1. It’s important to note that an outline is different from a script. While a script contains everything that will be said, an outline includes the main content.

      I myself have a hard time differentiating between the two sometimes as I use a script as an outline occasionally. I forget what I need to say often so I write a lot of things down. While delivering speeches in previous classes my classmates would do similar things. Would I be able to write down everything I need to say?

    1. Visit O*Net (http://online.onetcenter.org/find) and look up one of the careers you may be considering. What kinds of things does O*Net tell you about a career? ________________________________________________________________

      O*Net tells me how much money I can make from certain jobs, and how much schooling I will need.

  2. Jan 2024
    1. Noise

      Noise is anything interfering with clear communication; distractions that occur during communication that resolves in misinterpretation.

      Internal noise: psychological or physical problem someone is dealing with during communication

      External noise : Environmental components that cause distraction

      Semantic noise: a disturbance in the transmission of a message; interferes with interpretation of the message due to words having more than one meaning.

      A connotation: positive or negative emotional connection to a definition. connotative semantic noise is more of an emotional issue with the intended use of words.

      Denotation: the literal meaning of a word; denotative semantic noise: when we hear or see language we cannot define therefore we cannot interpret.

    1. There are five groups of early mammals in the fossil record, based primarily on fossil teeth, the hardest bone in vertebrate skeletons. For the purpose of this text, the most important group is the Eupantotheres, which diverges into the two main groups of mammals, the marsupials (Sinodelphys) and placentals or eutherians (Eomaia) in the Cretaceous and then diversified in the Cenozoic. The marsupials dominated on the isolated island continents of South America and Australia, and many went extinct in South America with the introduction of placental mammals. Some well-known mammal groups have been highly studied with interesting evolutionary stories in the Cenozoic

      This diagram was very useful and helped me understand better

    1. Pangea started breaking up (in a region that would become eastern Canada and United States) around 210 million years ago in the Late Triassic

      I wonder what life would’ve been like if the Pangea didn’t break up.

    2. Melted rock spheres [138], a special type of “shocked” quartz called stishovite, that only is found at impact sites, was found in many places around the world. The huge impact created a strong thermal pulse that could be responsible for global forest fires [141], strong acid rains [142], a corresponding abundance of ferns, the first colonizing plants after a forest fire [143], enough debris thrown into the air to significantly cool temperatures afterward [144; 145], and a 2-km high tsunami inferred from deposits found from Texas to Alabama.

      This sounds very historical

    1. The Paleozoic era had two smaller mass extinctions, but these were not as large as the Permian Mass Extinction, also known as the Permian-Triassic Extinction Event.

      This is very cool, I did not know that.

    1. these oppositely charged ions attract each other, forming ionic bonds.

      ionic bonds: opposite charged ions attract each other, resulting in ionic compounds -- cations & anions

    2. Those that lose electrons become positively charged, and those that gain electrons become negatively charged.

      cations: positively charged atoms that lose electrons anions: gain electrons, become negatively charged

    1. Eventually, as oxygen continued to be made, absorption of oxygen in mineral precipitation leveled off, and dissolved oxygen gas started filling the oceans and eventually bubbling out into the atmosphere.

      This is very interesting to think to about

    2. Early life in the Archean and earlier is poorly documented in the fossil record, but chemical evidence and evolutionary theory state that this life would have been single-celled photosynthetic organisms such as cyanobacteria in stromatolites. Fossil cyanobacteria in these stromatolites produced free oxygen in the atmosphere through photosynthesis. Cyanobacteria are prokaryotes, i.e. single-celled organisms (archaea and bacteria) with simple cells that lack a cell nucleus and other organelles.

      Fossil Cyanobacteria produce free oxygen in the atmosphere through photosynthesis is very amazing to me how that works

    1. One hypothesis is that life arose from the chemical environment of the Earth’s early atmosphere and oceans, which was very different than today.

      I would assume this would be my own hypothesis as well.

    2. A craton has two main parts: the shield, which is crystalline basement rock near the surface, and the platform made of sedimentary rocks covering the shield. Most cratons have remained relatively unchanged with most tectonic activity having occurred around cratons instead of within them. Whether they were created by plate tectonics or another process, Archean continents gave rise to the Proterozoic continents that now dominate our planet

      It is very interesting now the cratons have remained unchanged while the plate tectonics have changed.

    1. partially molten surface, volcanism, and asteroid impacts.

      This makes me think about how maybe it is possible for humans to live on other planets that are similar to Earth prior to what it is now.

    2. However, it is hard to know if Earth processes could have changed the water’s isotopic signature over the last 4-plus billion years. It is possible that all three sources contributed to the origin of Earth’s water.

      I wonder how hard it is to track Earth's process to see how it effects the water process.

    3. There is possibly even evidence of life existing over 4.0 billion years ago. However, the most reliable record for early life, the microfossil record, starts at 3.5 billion years ago.

      This is very interesting that there was possibly life over 4.0 billion years ago and we just don't have enough date to prove that claim.

    1. Fusion is a steady and predictable process,

      Is this measured throughout scientific discovery? The process of fusion is considered steady and predictable but how did this come to conclusion?

    2. Another process must be responsible for creating the other 90 heavier elements.

      I think this is very interesting how the big bang theory is the root cause for life on Earth according to science. I am curious how stellar evolution is responsible for the making of heavier elements.

    1. The planets continued to grow over the course of many thousands or millions of years, as material from the protoplanetary disc was added

      This is interesting to think about. Are our planets done growing yet?

    1. We quickly cut through and push to the background all kinds of sights, smells, sounds, and other stimuli, but how do we decide what to select and what to leave out?

      I think this is really interesting to think about, I have sensory issues so it’s hard for me to push past some background noise on a day to day basis. This makes me wonder why I don’t automatically filter out a lot of background noise and get overwhelmed by it instead. Why do I focus on things that a lot of other people can look past? I often use noise cancelling headphones for this reason. Being in public when there are many other people and chatter creates intense anxiety in me.

    1. The principle of unity means that each letter or number represents one idea. One concrete way to help reduce the amount of ideas you include per item is to limit each letter or number to one complete sentence.

      This is a good thing to think about while making my own speech. I will only have one flashcard to work with; how do I use the space on it appropriately? I think it will take a bit of practice and thought to know what the important points to talk about are, and how to respond to questions in a concise, thought-out manner.

    1. Think of each main point as a miniature speech within your larger speech. Each main point will have a central idea, meet some part of your specific purpose, and include supporting material from your research that relates to your thesis.

      This is good advice to follow, and reminds me of something in psychology; Everyone does what they do for themselves. This doesn't mean people are always, 100% of the time, selfish, and can quite honestly point to the opposite. They do things required of them because it helps them maintain relationships, etc. As this relates to a speech, it's important to keep this in mind as people will always try to serve themselves first; so make your speech revolve around them as much as you can. Painting your idea, even if its totally irrelevant to them, as something that benefits people somehow, is how to keep a crowd engaged.

    1. Second, most of the content on research databases has gone through editorial review, which means a professional editor or a peer editor has reviewed the material to make sure it is credible and worthy of publication. Most content on websites is not subjected to the same review process, as just about anyone with Internet access can self-publish information on a personal website, blog, wiki, or social media page.

      I do think it's important to develop the skill of determining credible sources yourself. I had no idea that peer reviewed research was even a thing. This can prove super helpful, especially on very in-depth topics. Balance these peer reviewed sources with credible cites you find, and you'll be very strong in backing up your claims.

    2. Unless the guidelines or occasion for your speech suggest otherwise, you should balance your interview data with the other sources in your speech. Don’t let your references to the interview take over your speech.

      This is very important. I can say that I've listened to a few speeches that felt more like, "according to this expert," rather than having substance that I could retain. A good speech is a balance of the speaker's point backed up by research/evidence. Make sure your point still comes through.

    3. Trust me, if you’ve thought of a topic to do your speech on, someone else has thought of it, too, and people have written and published about it. Reference librarians can help you find that information.

      I knew that librarians could be helpful to find information, but I never knew that there was specific training for it. That definitely feels like a weight off of my shoulder. I consider myself to be pretty good at research, but I can quickly become stressed out. This is a very helpful tip.

    1. Speaking about something you’re familiar with and interested in can also help you manage speaking anxiety. While it’s good to start with your personal interests, some speakers may get stuck here if they don’t feel like they can make their interests relevant to the audience.

      This is very true. That said, I wouldn't say that one should avoid giving speeches on personal interests. Just make sure you have a way to relate it to the audience, or make it relatable to them in some way.

    2. View having a captive classroom audience as a challenge, and use this space as a public speaking testing laboratory. You can try new things and push your boundaries more, because this audience is very forgiving and understanding since they have to go through the same things you do. In general, you may have to work harder to maintain the attention of a captive audience.

      This is an interesting perspective. A classroom audience would be more forgiving than a professional one. It's interesting to view a classroom audience as a way to be somewhat experimental. Of course, take the speech assignment serious, and give it your best effort. But rather than view it as, "yikes I have to do this," it might be better to reframe it as, "what can I learn from this?"

    3. You may not be able to assume much more, but that’s enough to add some tailored points to your speech that will make the content more relevant.

      This section is very reassuring to me. Sometimes I tense up when giving speeches. I think if I can think back to this, I might be more at ease. I think sometimes I get intimidated by audiences, so it might be helpful to think that my audience is just like me in a certain way. We're all here to learn how to communicate better and be better at giving speeches. To me that's less pressure.