- Last 7 days
-
blogs.baruch.cuny.edu blogs.baruch.cuny.edu
-
To generate text that I've edited to include in my own writing
I see this as collaborative writing with AI; no longer just the students work
-
- Aug 2024
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
Interesting thought. This guy relates the upcome of AI (non-fiction) writing to the lack of willingness people have to find out what is true and what is false.
Similar to Nas & Damian Marley's line in the Patience song -- "The average man can't prove of most of the things that he chooses to speak of. And still won't research and find the root of the truth that you seek of."
If you want to form an opinion about something, do this educated, not based on a single source--fact-check, do thorough research.
Charlie Munger's principle. "I never allow myself to have [express] an opinion about anything that I don't know the opponent side's argument better than they do."
It all boils down to a critical self-thinking society.
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
Really useful video about the generation of story beats.
-
- Nov 2023
-
www.meetup.com www.meetup.com
-
https://www.meetup.com/edtechsocal/events/296723328/
Generative AI: Super Learning Skills with Data Discovery and more!
-
- Oct 2023
-
-
LLMs are merely engines for generating stylistically plausible output that fits the patterns of their inputs, rather than for producing accurate information. Publishers worry that a rise in their use might lead to greater numbers of poor-quality or error-strewn manuscripts — and possibly a flood of AI-assisted fakes.
-
for: progress trap, progress trap - AI, progress trap - AI - writing research papers
-
comment
- potential fakes
- climate science fakes by big oil think tanks
- Covid and virus research
- race issues
- gender issues
- potential fakes
-
-
- Sep 2023
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
- Aug 2023
-
Local file Local file
-
Mills, Anna, Maha Bali, and Lance Eaton. “How Do We Respond to Generative AI in Education? Open Educational Practices Give Us a Framework for an Ongoing Process.” Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching 6, no. 1 (June 11, 2023): 16–30. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.34.
Annotation url: urn:x-pdf:bb16e6f65a326e4089ed46b15987c1e7
-
- Jul 2023
-
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Feb 2023
-
www.sudowrite.com www.sudowrite.com
-
another tool with a creative bent
-
- Dec 2022
-
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com
-
Which is why I wonder if this may be the end of using writing as a benchmark for aptitude and intelligence.
-
Perhaps there are reasons for optimism, if you push all this aside. Maybe every student is now immediately launched into that third category: The rudiments of writing will be considered a given, and every student will have direct access to the finer aspects of the enterprise. Whatever is inimitable within them can be made conspicuous, freed from the troublesome mechanics of comma splices, subject-verb disagreement, and dangling modifiers.
-
I’ve also long held, for those who are interested in writing, that you need to learn the basic rules of good writing before you can start breaking them—that, like Picasso, you have to learn how to reliably fulfill an audience’s expectations before you get to start putting eyeballs in people’s ears and things.
-
- Nov 2022
-
-
“In literacy education, particularly for developing writers, instructors are looking for the level of desirable difficulty, or the point at which you are working yourself just as hard so that you don’t break but you also improve,” Laffin told Motherboard. “Finding the right, appropriate level of desirable difficulty level of instruction makes their capacity to write grow. So if you are doing compensation techniques that go beyond finding that level of desirable difficulty and instructing at that place, then you’re not helping them grow as a writer.”
-