Résumé de la vidéo [00:00:07][^1^][1] - [00:55:08][^2^][2]:

Cette vidéo présente une conférence de Gilles Deleuze et Félix Guattari à Vincennes en 1975, où ils discutent des concepts de "redondance" et de "trou noir" dans le contexte de la sémiotique et de l'informatique. Ils explorent la manière dont l'information et la communication sont structurées dans les sociétés modernes, en utilisant des métaphores issues de la physique et de l'astronomie pour illustrer leurs idées.

Points forts: + [00:00:07][^3^][3] Introduction aux concepts * Discussion sur l'ordre des mots et l'ordonnancement social * Exemple de la transmission d'informations et de la vie sociale + [00:17:01][^4^][4] La redondance et le bruit * Explication de la redondance comme moyen de lutte contre le bruit * La redondance peut aussi être un signe en soi + [00:27:09][^5^][5] La nature informatique du langage * Questionnement sur la nature informatique du langage * La distinction entre la poésie/littérature et le langage informatif + [00:40:00][^6^][6] Le pouvoir et la communication * Analyse des conditions de l'information et de la bonne réception des commandements * Le rôle des ordres et des commandements dans la communication + [00:53:04][^7^][7] Les embrayeurs linguistiques * Discussion sur les termes spéciaux comme "je" et "moi" * L'animation de la catégorie des résonances par ces termes + [00:55:08][^8^][8] Conclusion sur les systèmes de signes * Réflexion sur les différents systèmes de signes et leur interaction * L'importance de percer le "mur sémiotique" pour accéder à une sémiotique non formée

10 Things The 1975's Matty Healy Can't Live Without via GQ

The 1975's Matty Healy uses his phone to take notes. They're more important to him privacy-wise than all the text messages he's ever sent.

He also uses an A5 sized notebook as one of his 10 most important things. He's placed reward notices in his notebooks ranging from $500 to $5000.

G-L-O-R-EYE-EYE-EYE<br /> by Dale Keiger

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblique_Strategies

So much to unpack here.

Similar to experiments I've seen by Henry James Korn (esp. The Pontoon Manifesto), John Irwin, etc.

Similarities to means of forcing Llullan combinatorial creativity, but in alternate form.

I find it crazy that the school lost 100 students weekly.

"What is regarded as important and interesting is what is likely to be recognised by others as important and interesting, and thus to make the man who produces it appear more important and interesting in the eye of others."

There are many different reasons scientists research different subject matters. These intentions are not always known to the public, but the public has a sense of hope that these intentions are in the interest of the people and the research is done to better those who will be affected. The research to find a cure to cancer is a prime example where the people hope this research is done to better the people. The public hopes that scientists will find a cure to save their loved ones. However, this quote bursts this bubble of hope, in a sense. It takes away the innocence of these good intentions and creates doubt in the minds of the public. This quote makes the people wonder if research is being conducted to further the professional reputation of the scientists by being the first one to discover a knew piece of information and create history. People often default to thinking others have the best intentions in mind, but this quote brings a sense of darkness about that innocence. Is research really conducted to benefit the public, or is it done so a scientist can become a piece of history?