- Jun 2024
-
- Nov 2021
-
-
Nelson (2020) - Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework
- urn:x-pdf:9f22952783af4581a3525c1a1497328a
- https://is.gd/k2YLcm
-
- Sep 2021
-
roambrain.com roambrain.com
-
The point of my research is to reflect on the portfolio ideas that I have and then push myself to criticize them. Any idea that can’t stand up to scrutiny wasn’t a good idea in the first place. The power of investing is being able to get behind those ideas you have with conviction you’ve earned through doing the work. “Take one simple idea, and take it seriously.” (Charlie Munger)
The conviction that leads to investments needs to be checked if it is grounded in truth
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2020
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
WP:SNOW
Bureaucratic behaviours
-
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Bouman
El caso de Katie Bouman en la categoría de Articles for Deletion y mi análisis de los comentarios bajo la categoría inicial de not relevant
-
she does pass the notability criteria on her own
Notability criteria
-
This might be a good place for a speedy decision to be made,
Decision
-
wide variety of coverage in a variety of media
Coverage Media
-
article should be trimmed a bit, but deletion is unjustified
Deletion
-
Some undue weight, but that doesn't means she isn't notable
Notable
-
Jealous bros should not cry each time a woman is part of an achievement.
Achievement
-
the media did give her way too much unasked for credit for a discovery made by a large international team
Media
-
Recommend editing article to reflect disproportionate amount of press coverage received and reiterate that she is one of the many researchers behind the photograph of the black hole
Press coverage
-
Meets criteria under WP:NACADEMIC due to *extensive* press coverage (including multiple secondary sources) over the past 48 hours.
Criteria Notable Press coverage
-
it was held recently in the AfD discussion about Saikat Chakrabarti that coverage of other aspects of the person's like (which our article on her details a fair bit of) satisfied those concerns even if the coverage was in news stories otherwise about the "1E"
Article for Deletion discussion Coverage Notable
-
the subject meets WP:GNG
Notable Significant coverage Reliable source
-
There is an important nuance that you're missing (along with others)—WP:SUSTAINED press coverage is what establishes notability, not a sudden burst of coverage. WP:TOOSOON also applies.
Press coverage Notable
-
it isn't indicative of is significance, but that's a different thing
Significance
-
press coverage is exactly indicative of (and more or less synonymous with) notability, as defined by GNG
Press coverage Notable
-
not necessary indicative of notability if it is not WP:SUSTAINED
Notable
-
it will be more due to press/social media celebrity
press/social media
-
the sources like the NYT note that the press coverage she's received is of outsize significance to her actual role in the project.
Sources Press coverage
-
WP:1E is pretty clear;
Notable
-
I don't know that "her story needs to be told" is a justification for a WP article.
Story
-
the disproportionate level of coverage to her share of the project should be clarified.
Coverage
-
Bouman has received substantial focused coverage from many major news outlets
Coverage
-
it's an embarrassment to Wikipedia to have the AfD tag on top
Article for Deletion
-
WP:SNOW
Borocratic behaviour
-
is predicated on non-trivial coverage in reliable sources, and there is plenty of that here
Coverage Reliable sources
-
WP:BIO
Wikipedia: Notability (person) Notable
-
Her notability doesn't hinge on whether she was the principal person behind the the images
Notable
-
This article is much better than many others about non-notable academics!
Non-notable academics
-
this is good indication that the Bouman article is notable
Notable
-
Prominent coverage is primarily due to a facebook photo that went viral.
Coverage
-
per WP:1E
Notable
-
the press should not have covered her work is original research
Press Covered Original research
-
the subject meets criterion 7 under NACADEMIC due to the press coverage
Criterion (policy) Notable Press coverage
-
adjust her article to reflect the analysis—in reputable secondary sources—about how the media singled her out as the "hero".
Secondary sources Media
-
Her story *should* be on Wikipedia
Story
-
Bouman has probably been covered in the news in every country in the world
Covered News
-
She is obviously notable enough to have a profile on here
Notable
-
And the Washington Post story shifts gears from her role in the black hole image to online trolling focused around her,
(Press) story Trolling
-
There's now tons of in-depth coverage specifically about her
Coverage
-
WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC.
Wikipedia: Notability Wikipedia: Notability (academics) Notable
-
There is no evidence that she is a "key component"
Evidence
-
Easily notable
Notable
-
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
-
list of Women-related deletion discussions.
Women-related deletion discussions
-
list of Science-related deletion discussions.
Science-related deletion discussions
-
We cover what reliable sources cover.
Cover Reliable source
-
Something like that would almost be worth an article itself.
Article
-
I don't see the policy basis for keeping this page
Policy
-
doesn't satisfy WP:NACADEMIC
Wikipedia: Notability (academics) Notable
-
Where do the sources say that she is tenured?
Sources
-
her tenured position at CalTech was announced before the media frenzy this week
Media
-
I don't support deletion of the article, but the importance of the mediatic coverage and her implication in the M*87 black hole should be explicit as “member of a collaboration of 200 researchers”
Coverage
-
Don't you think that this position is a consequence of this mediatic coverage?
Coverage
-
She's been featured in almost all coverage
Coverage
-
There were at least 200 people with comparable roles and dozens of people with much more notable roles in this event.
Notable
-
WP:1E,
Notable
-
These are guidelines, not policy, and based on the amount of publicity she's receiving, I see no reason why Wikipedia shouldn't have a well-sourced article on her.
Policy Publicity Well-sourced article
-
she isn't actually credited with any notable accomplishments herself.
Notable
-
only in the context of WP:1E
Notable
-
there are many reliable sources providing significant coverage of her personally.
Reliable sources
-
Bouman's not right for Wikipedia because she "is certainly not notable as a scientist",
Notable
-
Any relevant material can be mentioned there
Relevant
-
of WP:1E
Wikipedia: Notability (people). Notable
-
Someone who isn't even an assistant professor is certainly not notable as a scientist.
Notable as a scientist
-
Wikipedia:Notability is not inherited.
Notability
-
The Event Horizon Telescope project is notable in itself, and has its own article, but anyone who are in some way (remotely) associated with it are not inherently notable.
Notable
-
-
xtools.wmflabs.org xtools.wmflabs.org
-
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Bouman • en.wikipedia.org
Estadísticas sobre el Article for Deletion de Katie Bouman
-
- Jan 2019
-
static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
-
actor network theor
Actors (human or otherwise) function together in systems (networks), and those systems must be observed and described rather than "explained": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor%E2%80%93network_theory
The notion that a system should be examined prior to bringing in theories and frameworks is also one held by the qualitative research approach called grounded theory (a theory grounded in observed data).
-
- Nov 2018
-
eric.ed.gov eric.ed.gov
-
Instructional Design Strategies for Intensive Online Courses: An Objectivist-Constructivist Blended Approach
This was an excellent article Chen (2007) in defining and laying out how a blended learning approach of objectivist and constructivist instructional strategies work well in online instruction and the use of an actual online course as a study example.
RATING: 4/5 (rating based upon a score system 1 to 5, 1= lowest 5=highest in terms of content, veracity, easiness of use etc.)
Tags
- instructional design systems
- etcnau
- constructivism
- distance education
- instructional methods
- instructiveness effectiveness
- instructional technology
- etc556
- Performance Factors, Influences, Technology Integration, Teaching Methods, Instructional Innovation, Case Studies, Barriers, Grounded Theory, Interviews, Teacher Attitudes, Teacher Characteristics, Technological Literacy, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Usability, Institutional Characteristics, Higher Education, Foreign Countries, Qualitative Research
- Instructional systems design; Distance education; Online courses; Adult education; Learning ability; Social integration
- online education growth
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.tandfonline.com www.tandfonline.com
-
Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration
This article explores the interaction of student based learner-centered used of technology tools such as wikis, blogs and podcasts as new and emerging technology tools. With distance learning programs becoming more and more popular, software applications such as Writeboard, InstaCol and Imeem may become less of the software of choice. The article looks closely at the influence of technology and outcomes.
RATING: 4/5 (rating based upon a score system 1 to 5, 1= lowest 5=highest in terms of content, veracity, easiness of use etc.)
Tags
- education programs
- etcnau
- distance education
- imeem
- synchronous
- instacoll
- etc556
- asynchronous
- Performance Factors, Influences, Technology Integration, Teaching Methods, Instructional Innovation, Case Studies, Barriers, Grounded Theory, Interviews, Teacher Attitudes, Teacher Characteristics, Technological Literacy, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Usability, Institutional Characteristics, Higher Education, Foreign Countries, Qualitative Research
- writeboard
Annotators
URL
-