Notably, the move marks the first time AISI has been left out of pre-release evaluations of Anthropic models. The institute was granted access to Claude Mythos 5 when it first launched in April

Yeah Svelte uses its compiler. They have a syntax which makes components easily identifiable vs just other functions so they can localize their transform. I think it sets the wrong precedence. It basically lies about the capabilities of the system. If that is the biggest sticking point people are valuing the wrong things. I can't stop them from doing so, but I'm ok with them learning for themselves the hard way. At certain point denying the truth is just building a house of cards. Look at the whole class handling in Svelte 5. It might be ergonomic but it is representative of the slippery slope I'm talking about. Once you start lying you have to maintain that lie.

In the same way, the Fourteenth Amendment’s repeated use of the term “any person” in the Citizenship, Due Process, and Equal Protection Clauses has notoriously created a legal precedent for corporate personhood.

Google: Sign Out, Sign In, "Create an account"

Alito’s draft opinion includes, in small type, a list of about two pages’ worth of decisions in which the justices overruled prior precedents – in many instances reaching results praised by liberals.

udgment of 9 March 2010, Commission v Germany, C‑518/07, EU:C:2010:125

judgments of 21 December 2016, Tele2, C‑203/15 and C‑698/15, EU:C:2016:970

judgments of 6 October 2020, Privacy International, C‑623/17, EU:C:2020:790

judgment of 2 October 2018, Ministerio Fiscal, C‑207/16, EU:C:2018:788

judgment of 6 October 2020, La Quadrature du Net and Others, C‑511/18, C‑512/18 and C‑520/18, EU:C:2020:791

judgment of 10 July 1991, Commission v France (C‑294/89, EU:C:1991:302)

judgment of 18 May 2017, Lahorgue, C‑99/16, EU:C:2017:391

judgment of 25 February 1988, Commission v Germany, 427/85, EU:C:1988:98

he judgment of 3 April 2014, 4finance (C‑515/12, EU:C:2014:211

judgment of 3 April 2014, 4finance, C‑515/12, EU:C:2014:211, paragraph 20

judgment of 11 December 2014, Ryneš, C‑212/13, EU:C:2014:2428, paragraph 25

judgment of 13 May 2014, Google Spain and Google, C‑131/12, EU:C:2014:317, paragraph 71 and the case-law cited

judgment of 24 November 2011, Asociación Nacional de Establecimientos Financieros de Crédito, C‑468/10 and C‑469/10, EU:C:2011:777, paragraph 40

judgment of 18 November 2020, Commission v Germany (Refund of VAT – Invoices), C‑371/19, not published, EU:C:2020:936, paragraph 76

judgment of 18 November 2020, Commission v Germany (Refund of VAT – Invoices), C‑371/19, not published, EU:C:2020:936, paragraph 78 and the case-law cited

udgment of 21 November 2018, Vădan, C‑664/16, EU:C:2018:933, paragraphs 41 and 42

ee judgment of 18 November 2020, Commission v Germany (Refund of VAT – Invoices), C‑371/19, not published, EU:C:2020:936, paragraph 82 and the case-law cited

(judgment of 2 May 2019, Sea Chefs Cruise Services, C‑133/18, EU:C:2019:354, paragraph 35 and the case-law cited

Set#intersection already exists and is an alias for Set#&, so there's precedent for such a method to exist.

an institution to receive public aid would seem to depend on which group it is classed in, rather than on its individual characteristics."[30]