4，2 ^n

Key Takeaways Knowing a theory ≠ living it. True expertise comes from practice, not memorization Language is power. The words you use shape what you see, feel, and can do Unlearning matters as much as learning. Default habits and assumptions must be disrupted before new skills can develop Failure is discovery. A supportive learning environment should reframe mistakes as learning, not punishment The goal is transformation, not information. The discipline should shift from teaching students about communication to helping them become expert communicators

It asks people to consider how they wound up being a particular way of acting or behaving in the world; and asks them to identify the stories they are living and how those stories shape and constrain other possible ways of being and knowing available.

The language people use shapes what they see, how they feel, and what actions are available to them — and the goal of communication education should be helping students experience that power firsthand, not just learn about it in theory.

Organizational communication already has powerful theories about how language shapes reality — the field needs to stop just teaching them as concepts and start helping people practice them as lived skills.

Reminds me of working meetings with LPMA or at work

This source made me think about how harassment can be hidden behind a cause that sounds reasonable. Gamergate supporters often said they cared about “ethics in video game journalism,” but the campaign became known for targeting women in gaming with threats, doxing, and abuse. I think this connects well to the chapter’s point about people justifying harassment. When a group frames its attacks as protecting a community or defending values, it can make harmful behavior seem acceptable to the people taking part in it.

The paper by De Cristofaro about raids on 4chan really opened my eyes since it considers online coordinated harassment as an example of organized collective action rather than trolling. What got me thinking was the fact that such raids may lack any ideological background at all – people take part in them out of fun or a feeling of community, which somehow makes it even more difficult to deal with than harassment fueled by hate. It is scary how community building can be based on hating some stranger on the Internet.

This article was about the author's experience of being cyberstalked for 14 years by someone who repeatedly harassed her over various different ways. Even when she tried to report it, the police dismissed it because she wasn't "physically afraid" even though the harassment was stressful and mentally hard to deal with. This connects to the chapter because of the harassment she dealt with being a repeated action that doesn't fit neatly into legal definitions. Both the article and chapter show that online harassment can cause real damage to individuals even when the actions seem small in waves.

This article sits right at the intersection of crowdsourcing, harassment, and public shaming. It shows how a Twitter account mobilized a distributed crowd to identify Charlottesville marchers, with very real offline consequences like people losing jobs. I found it useful as an example of how “doing good” (calling out overt white supremacy) can still raise ethical questions about misidentification, due process, and what we want punishment to look like.

This example makes me think about how complicated doxing can be. Publishing the KKK members’ names and addresses was meant to expose people connected to a violent racist group. I understand why some people might see this as a way to protect others. But it also raises a difficult question: even when the target has caused serious harm, does sharing private information create another form of harassment?

$$f(x+\Delta x)-f(x) = \Delta y \approx dy$$

$$f(4.5)-f(4) = \Delta y \approx dy = f’(4)\cdot dx = 1/4 \cdot 1/2 = 1/8 = 0.125$$

$$f(c+\Delta x) \approx \ell(c+\Delta x)$$

$$\ell(x) = \frac12(x-\pi/3)+0.866$$

$$y = f’(c)(x-c)+f(c)$$

The cases mentioned above such as riots, mob violence, and governmental persecution have taught me that online bullying is not a new social problem that has emerged due to the Internet; it is an innate tendency that has simply taken a new form. The most interesting thing about online mobbing is that it eliminates the personal danger that used to prevent people from participating in a mob previously. You had to be present there and be aware of the consequences. Anyone can take part in the mobbing activity anonymously via the Internet.

add ( and )

( )

add ( and )

insert ( before and ) after

to be consistent, insert * before Witten

and after (2010)

suggest to add parens before Hastie and after 2008)

add year and details even tho this is referenced above

I wonder if this subsection should be a section ... mainly so the title shows up in the outline!

I think the title of sec 2.5 should be more general, like "Predictive Modeling" and then make Recursive Partitioning the first subsection. Why? because with Recursive Partitioning the title of the entire section, it seems to hide the real meat of the section, witch I think is the New Directions ...

Is Se supposed to be "Since ... "?

Frank says this should be 0.05

Этот функционал вообще работает? Не вижу на стороне клиента каких-либо методов. Нужно проверифицировать.

Этот функционал еще работает? Не вижу в WebSDK метода для отправки SIP сообщений. Нужно проверифицировать

Не критично, предложение: часто встречается эта формулировка, может лейбл введём? чтобы различать какие хуки информационные, а какие контрольные

Тот же вопрос по стрелке под Incoming call, стоит ли её сделать пунктирной, если это продолжительное действие

Может стрелку под Call established пунктирной сделать? Вроде как, продолжительное действие.

Go through what the article is address and go through step by step yourself and make the notes as you go then covert those notes into an article. Do not try to shortcut this steps or you will sound robotic or miss steps.

Open- Introduction Body- List, screenshots, zight recordings to make life as easy and possible for the client to scan through Closing- Temperature check to see if any more questions and close on a good note with well wishes.

NB: Avoid long, stressful, tedious lists at all cost. Long lists that are wordy are a turn off and can frustration or escalate a calm situation. We're in an "im not reading all that generation". You either adapt and adjust or get left behind.

Tweak the saved replies to feel personable, warm and empathetic.

The customer only cares about resolving the issue or the solution. Do everything in your power and search all available resources until you can find and answer. You're required to be as helpful as possible.

That is you identify the emotion the client is feeling and you state it in your response. Keep it relevant and relatable.

• The expectation is 1 reply a minute or 1.5 hours for email while working in background
• Set the timeline expectation for the client and under promise and over deliver

• We are encouraged to probe and find out why?

• We're also encouraged to log into the account with permission and walk through the issue ourselves to replicate the steps on our end

ohh 🤨😒🤨😒

There is this controversial Russian philosopher who I know of. His daughter was killed by a terrorist attack (a carbombing), and the whole incident was somehow videotaped and spread online. Because of this, and because he really is quite controversial and has a lot of haters, whenever he posts on social media, especially Twitter (a site I use often), the replies are just clips of his daughter being blown up.

I know this is hard to believe, so this is the philosopher's wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin

This distinction between private and public harassment is important because the harm shifts when there’s an audience. Public attacks don’t just hurt the target; they also shape how other people see them, and they implicitly recruit bystanders as witnesses or even participants. It reminds me of times I’ve seen posts on social media where the real damage wasn’t just the words, but the fact that hundreds/thousands of others were liking and sharing them.

Key points to keep in mind when writing.

Important to get familiar with now for our future careers.

How to come up with questions in that topic of discussion

What to keep in mind when writing the discourse community.

The 6 key criterias to look for.

Another way to view discourse community.

Meaning of discourse community.

given example of discourse communities.

I think the overall chapter's explanation of harassment was helpful because it shows how harassment isn't always one big obvious action, but an often repeated pattern of smaller actions that cause harm to someone over time. This example helps to understand how one splash may seem accidental or small, but a barrage of splashing becomes intentional and ends up hurting an individual. Online harassment on social media works the same way, a rude comment isn't that serious on its own and people can let it roll off their back, but when its a bigger dogpile the harm becomes much bigger. This is definitely why moderation is difficult because platforms let "free expression" turn into harmful actions that get bypassed constantly.

Stick to writing about what the teacher is asking.

Another key point to avoid on what not to do.

Key point to not do for post.

Always double check before making a post.

More things to double check when writing discussions.

Requirements when doing a discussion.

Keep in mind when responding to a specific classmates post.

Go question to ask yourself when writing discussions.

Ways to handle a stressful writing process.

What this semester expects from us as students.

Key point to remember when writing.

Actually online only. pictures everywhere. scam?

This is not surprising to me because I witness this exact pattern in children while working in a public school. Many times, children come to school making inappropriate remarks to others, talking about hating their lives, or having extreme outbursts that can last for long periods throughout the day. I have also noticed sudden changes in their engagement with instruction and assigned work. When contacting parents, they often begin venting and expressing the difficult situations they are experiencing at home, which can contribute to the student’s behavior and emotional struggles at school.

Highlighting both the advantages and disadvantages of the DSM is important for social workers so they can understand its usefulness while also recognizing its limitations. This allows social workers to apply it appropriately and effectively when helping clients. Because mental health assessment is such an essential part of diagnosis, understanding the DSM is crucial to how we will practice in the field.

important

Llosa argues how literature is important for protecting society and human freedom because people will become more ignorant and divided without. He warns the readers how society will become "spiritually barbaric" and can even "jeopardize its freedom". By using strong words, he creates a serious tone showing how strongly be believes in literature

Author of the text

This quote demonstrates Llosa's use of a first-person POV because he includes his own personal experiences. By using personal pronouns, he creates a more personal connection and strengthens his position as a writer and reader.

Llossa shows a disappointed tone towards people who choose not to read because he sounds concerned. He believes they are missing out on important experiences, and has a persuasive tone to convince readers to rethink the value of literature.

By criticizing people, Llosa compares the lack of reading to a limitation that weakens language and imagination. His straight forward tone also makes the argument feel persuasive because he wants to get the point through on how literature is not optional if people want to properly communicate

Literature does more than entertain, it also teaches people about themselves and human nature. Llosa writes how reading is a learning experience of what we are, showing that stories help readers reflect on their identity. By using "we", he creates a tone that makes literature feel important for everyone.

Llosa believes literature helps people becomdemore understanding through his harsh diction and frustrated tone. He emphasizes how dangerous ignorance can become when people refuse to understand each other, leading to examples such as racism and prejudice.

Lolosa explains how literature can connect people despite cultural differences. He supports this by saying how literature is "one of the most common denominators of human experience." showing how stories allow people to relate and share experiences. This creates a hopeful tone since he believes literature helps humanity with shared experiences and emotions.

dit wel lastig...

goeie validiteit en betrouwbaarheid

oppervlakte en bron- kenmerken

The political calculus—and actual math—of gerrymandering<br /> by [[Rachel Wallach]] in Johns Hopkins University Hub<br /> accessed on 2026-05-19T15:14:23

we had a conversation about whether or not to allow for multiple links, possibly with different cardinality

this might be semantics but somehow it feels odd having links for pyramid coarsening and those for say mesh faces living in the same namespace

... i would take this out. there are some times when we override notices that there are multiple parts to the piece of equipment being checked out

take out this section

A student comes to the RMC desk on a whim, and checks out a Tascam Portacapture audio recorder from the circulation materials. How long can they borrow the item? A) As long as they need it B) 3 hours C) 10 hours D) 24 hours (correct) E) 7 days

At the RMC, circulation equipment can be checked out for either 3 or 24 hours, based on the type of equipment. Most cables have a 3 hour checkout period. Other pieces of equipment have a 24 hour checkout period. You can see when the item is due under the date due column in Workflows after the item has been checked out (include picture).

Some patrons may need the equipment longer than the set due date. They MUST receive prior permission from a supervisor to get an extended checkout. Patrons can get an extended checkout by emailing Robert Holden and explaining why they require a longer checkout period.

You can only extend a users checkout if they have written permission from Robert Holden.

To extend a users checkout, 1) Ask to see Robert Holden's written permission for the extended checkout 2) input the user's ID number into the User ID field 3) click the calendar icon in the top left corner 4) select the special due date 5) make sure "for this checkout only" is marked, and click ok 6) scan the piece of equipment that will have the extended checkout. 7) Tell the patron what day and time they need to return the equipment by

*You will have to go though this process for each piece of equipment that is being borrowed with an extended checkout

True/False Patrons can only extend their equipment checkout over 24 hours if they have written permission from Robert Holden (true)

make this BOLD

Checking out an item means 'charging it' to a library user's account and occurs when patrons come to the front desk an request a piece of circulation equipment.

circulation

Circulation Equipment

LibCal software for processing reserve equipment

reserve equipment

LibCal

a piece of circulation equipment

a piece of reserve equipment

RMC circulation equipment

get rid of this question

Digital Media Consultants

Take out these questions

This is the same programs that the UVA library uses to process and circulate book, DVDs, and more!

Circulation equipment

How is circulation equipment processed differently than reserve equipment?

Circulation v. Reserve

1. A Tascam Recorder with a green tag (circulation)
2. A hig-end lighting kit with a blue tag (reserve)
3. 3D printing pass that requires prior training (reserve)
4. A PA system that you can book in advance (reserve)
5. A USB to USB-C adapter that a student checked out at the desk without booking in advance (circulation)
6. A SM58 microphone, circulated though Workflows (LibCal)
7. A Canon RP camera, circulated through LibCal (reserve)
8. A Canon Vixia camera, with a UVA barcode and green tag (circulation)

Reserve Equipment

Reserve equipment are all the pieces in the vault with a BLUE tag. These items rarely have a UVA barcode, and tend to be higher-end.

The library information system we use to circulate reserve equipment is LibCal

Change picture below

Circulation Equipment Circulation equipment are all the pieces in the vault with a GREEN tag. All of these items have a UVA barcode that is found in the equipment's case or on the largest piece of the equipment. That's it! That's the neat trick for identifying Circulation equipment.

Circulation equipment is labeled in GREEN and has a UVA BARCODE.

The library information system we use for circulation equipment is Workflows

circulation equipment from reserve equipment?

Reserve Equipment is the pieces of equipment that require prior trainings or permission in order to check out. Students, faculty, and staff with the proper permission book reserve equipment in advance of picking it up from the RMC desk. This equipment tends to be higher-end. Digital Media Consultants use LibCal to circulate reserve equipment.

Reserve Equipment

Circulation is the equipment that ANY students, faculty, and staff can checkout during hours when the RMC desk is open. This equipment is first come, first serve, and requires no prior trainings or permissions. Digital Media Consultants will use Workflows to circulate circulation materials.

Circulation Equipment

RMC equipment

RMC equipment

Workflows and LibCal

circulation vs. reserve equipment

Circulation vs. Reserve equipment

equipment

equipment

Circulation vs. Reserve Equipment

get rid out routing

the equipment

media center's

As a Digital Media Consultant, you staff the RMC and DML desks and circulate RMC equipment.

Digital Media Consultant

routing is not part of the job

1. Identify and process RMC equipment in Workflows
2. Identify and process RMC equipment in LibCal
3. Understand Workflows and LibCal, the two programs used for circulating equipment at the Robertson Media Center
4. Check out and discharge RMC circulation equipment in Workflows
5. Search for patron accounts in Workflows
6. Check out and discharge RMC reserve equipment in LibCal
7. Identify the special case equipment where a combination of Workflows, LibCal, and/or paper forms are needed

equipment

LibCal

equipment

Identify and process high-end UVA Library equipment in LibCal

equipment

the vault

Planning strategies.To help you manage your reading assignments before you begin reading. Active Reading strategies.To help you understand the material while you read. Application strategies. To solidify your understanding at a higher and deeper level after you finish reading.

i wonder about writing down in pseudo-code what a reader has to do here, e.g. coming from an object query, how it finds what spatial chunks/fragments, order of the different range requests etc.

• The Core Argument: The author challenges the narrative that AI allows unskilled users to prompt and immediately ship complex, professional-grade software. They point out that after years of widespread access to advanced models, the world is not drowning in "vibecoded" equivalents of Photoshop, Excel, or operating systems.
• The "Vibecoding" Accusation: Calling someone’s project "vibecoded slop" has become a destructive social weapon and gatekeeping mechanism. It is used to dismiss AI-assisted work, costing the target immense time and morale to defend while costing the accuser nothing.
• Hypocrisy of the Critics: The accusation itself acts like unverified "vibecoded" content. It is a fast-shipped emotional reaction put out as a factual finding, devoid of definitions, testing, or evidence.
• The Three Levels of Software Work:
  • Level 1 (Typing): Mechanical coding, syntax, loops, and memorizing syntax. AI has successfully lowered the barrier to and cost of this layer.
  • Level 2 (Verifying): Flow, testing, data structure choices, debugging, and quality control.
  • Level 3 (Deciding): Architecture, macro decisions, trade-offs, and long-term design that survives the real world.
• Source of Backlash: The gatekeeping stems from Level 1 programmers who tied their professional identity and self-worth to the physical act of typing code. Because AI made Level 1 cheap, they feel personally threatened and lash out at AI-assisted creators.
• Call to Action: Despite having a rigorous engineering and demoscene background that would allow them to "punch down," the author refuses to weaponize the term. They urge creators to transparently ship their AI-assisted work without apology, and encourage the community to judge projects by their testing and architectural choices.

Hacker News Discussion

• Shift Toward Long-Tail, Bespoke Tooling: Multiple users argue the premise is slightly off because AI isn't meant to build a mass-market "Photoshop replacement." Instead, it is empowering people to build bespoke, narrow-scoped, one-off tools (e.g., custom data scripts, household apps, or personalized pedometers) that solve exact personal needs without needing to learn full-stack development.
• The 3D Printer Analogy: A prominent debate compares vibe-coding to the 2010s hype of household 3D printers. Critics argue that just as 3D printing stalled because CAD design is harder than the actual printing, vibe-coding will stall because software architecture and data persistence are harder than generating basic code. Proponents counter that unlike 3D printing, AI software has zero upfront hardware costs, relies on devices people already own, and lowers the barrier further by translating plain English into functional instructions.
• Moving Goalposts vs. Generative Slop: Some developers express frustration that AI advocates are shifting goalposts from "AI will replace all software engineers" to "AI will build minor scripts." They emphasize that software design remains the difficult part of engineering, and raise concerns over the normalization of low-quality, AI-generated "slop" across tech and art.
• Accessibility vs. Professional Engineering: Commenters note that Level 1 coding was always the easy part, which is why experienced engineers command a premium for architectural foresight. However, making Level 1 universally accessible means a broader demographic of non-techies (the "Uncle Bobs" of the world) can finally build functional tools for themselves and their communities without relying on professional developers.

• Transition to Zed: The author has switched to Zed (v1) as their primary code editor, praising its sane defaults, fast and responsive performance, great integration with the VS Code ecosystem, and tasteful AI integration.
• The JetBrains Breakup: For years, the author paid ~$85/year for CLion and appreciated its UI, default settings, and powerful debugging tools. However, they decided to cancel their subscription because the IDE became frustratingly slow.
• Specific Technical Frustrations: - Creating a new file triggers a tedious popup and loading screen.
  • Startup and project-switching times are exceptionally sluggish.
  • Remote development features intermittently disconnect on older hardware.
  • Constant, unexpected re-indexing cycles exhaust CPU and RAM resources.
  • The massive on-disk installation footprint makes it unsuitable for older machines.
• Impact on Developer Flow: These combined performance regressions created friction, causing the author to hesitate before opening the editor and ultimately disrupting their ability to enter a productive flow state.

Hacker News Discussion

• Hardware and Environment Variables: Several commenters argue that complaints about JetBrains being slow usually depend on older hardware or a bloated setup packed with third-party plugins. Users with modern machines (like Apple Silicon) report cold start times of just a few seconds, noting that JetBrains IDEs are meant to be kept open all day rather than spun up per file.
• The Pushback Against AI and Bloat: A major pain point among long-time subscribers is JetBrains' aggressive push toward AI features. Commenters express frustration over persistent AI companion sidebars, the "minimalist" new UI (which some claim mimics VS Code and has poor icon contrast), and overall SaaS feature creep meant to justify subscription fees rather than improve core performance.
• The Text Editor vs. Full-Scale IDE Debate: A core disagreement centers around whether it is fair to compare Zed to JetBrains. Proponents of JetBrains argue it is a full-featured IDE with deep indexing and tooling capabilities that a lightweight editor like Zed may never natively match. Conversely, others counter that those features are useless if the resource-heavy footprint disrupts a developer's flow state or causes crashes.
• Alternative Workflows: Many developers mention abandoning full IDEs altogether in favor of highly optimized, lightweight text editors backed by the Language Server Protocol (LSP). Solutions like Neovim, Emacs, and Helix are praised for offering powerful code intelligence and debugging with a fraction of the memory and CPU overhead.

• Silne bodźce fizjologiczne zamiast rytuałów: Sauna i morsowanie nie są zwykłymi rytuałami zdrowotnymi, lecz silnymi bodźcami fizjologicznymi opartymi na zasadzie hormezy (krótkotrwałego stresu), które mogą pomagać lub przeciążać organizm [00:00:14].
• Kto odniesie korzyść: Osoby względnie zdrowe metabolicznie, dobrze tolerujące stres, ze stabilnym snem [00:01:42]. U takich osób ciepło sauny aktywuje układ przywspółczulny, wycisza, poprawia krążenie i jakość snu [00:02:02], a także zmusza do odłożenia telefonu [00:02:38].
• Kto powinien uważać lub zrezygnować: Osoby przewlekle zmęczone, z niedoborem snu, zaburzeniami hormonalnymi (np. tarczyca, wahania kortyzolu) oraz chorobami serca i nadciśnieniem [00:03:38]. Dla nich drastyczne zmiany temperatur są sygnałem zagrożenia i nadmiernym obciążeniem [00:04:32].
• Różnica między sauną a morsowaniem: Sauna (ciepło) działa zazwyczaj wyciszająco i regenerująco [00:05:38]. Morsowanie (zimno) silnie pobudza układ nerwowy oraz wyrzut adrenaliny i noradrenaliny, co u osób przemęczonych może pogorszyć sen [00:05:53].
• Błąd mylenia pobudzenia z regeneracją: Przypływ energii odczuwany bezpośrednio po wyjściu z zimnej wody jest często wynikiem działania hormonów stresu (adrenaliny), a nie faktyczną odbudową organizmu [00:06:40].
• Złota zasada podejścia: Najpierw należy zadbać o podstawy, czyli odpowiedni sen, dietę i stały rytm dnia [00:06:58]. Sauna i morsowanie nie leczą same z siebie – one jedynie testują, czy organizm posiada rezerwy adaptacyjne do poradzenia sobie ze stresem [00:07:14].

tone seems bright, mood sdeems optimistic. WH`Y?

two quantities scale or change in a similar, consistent pattern, without an exact or perfect mathematical relationship.

a statistical value that divides a ranked dataset into five equal groups, with each group representing 20% of the total population.

Repyy to u/bluestemgrass at https://old.reddit.com/r/typewriters/comments/1thup7q/reink_ribbon/ RE: Ribbon for a toy Sears Holiday typewriter.

Before you go too deeply here, is the ribbon made of cloth material (nylon, silk, or cotton) or is it a plastic film/carbon type?

If it's the latter, is it a proprietary cartridge or typewriter spools? What width is the ribbon? Cartridges with carbon can be difficult if not impossible to find for these models.

It looks like it may be a Sears rebranded version of some of the Byron Jardine/PETITE toy typewriters. https://typewriterdatabase.com/no_info.525.typewriter-serial-number-database There may be an imprint of the manufacturer on the bottom which would help to identify the original manufacturer.

Most Petite typewriters use T4430 or T4431 ribbon (1/4" wide or 6.50mm) which can sometimes be found on eBay and other sites. It generally requires original spools. These were generally carbon/plastic based ribbon.

If you have the original spools, you might find someone who still manufactures carbon-based ribbon and you can cannibalize it to spool onto your Sears Holiday. Look around for some of the 80s/90s film-based cartridges meant for word processors.

If it did originally have cloth ribbon you might be able to re-ink it, but the process typically tends to be very messy. Generally some glycerine and ink meant for metal stamps (not rubber) will get you where you'd like to go. Some have also soaked their old ribbon in WD-40 as a means of rejuvenation, but this is also time consuming and messy.

More detail/photos of the manufacturing details on the bottom and photos and measurements of the spools and the original type of "ribbon" will help immensely.

If you get the chance, add your example to the typewriter database and include photos of the spools as well as measurements of their width and diameter to help others with these questions/problems in the future.

this seems to suggest that there is no relationship between layers of the resolution pyramid, right?

what I am getting at is: how would I structure an oct-tree or a quad tree with this? I specifically want to (performantly) traverse only chunks that are within a query region.

so the chunks are row-major... and we are making a distinction between the "N" dimensions of space over which a vertex is indexed, and the remaining "columns" aka dimensions, known here as vertex "Attributes" which are stored elsewhere yes?

💻/thinkpad/🧊/me/📓/2026/5/1

indy.dweb.archive

This is only going to work if we have people involved with animal welfare funding and modeling it on board

Belief elicitation and updating probably cannot occur in real time. Too much thinking is needed. As in, the previous workshops will encourage people to submit their beliefs before the workshop, and then talk them through it during the workshop, and then ask them to submit their beliefs after the workshop. Finally, share what others thought and ask them to update their beliefs.

Link this instead: https://uj-pba-workshop.netlify.app/beliefs

We're probably going to need to structure this live discussion. It's not clear what an organic discussion of this would look like. Do we have specific computing models? Will people be citing certain papers? Will it just be vibes?

Also don't use the word "disagreements" here?

I don't think you need this bit at the end. I think that's kind of obvious. Instead, we could frame it in terms of ~'which approaches are (more) reliable for the practical questions?'

This should be longer if we get participation from researchers in this area.

Rephrase this: Why do animal welfare advocates and funders care about substitution?

This is stated too strongly. We don't have this as a finding yet. It was just an initial literature review.

"drop-in segments" -- Make it clear that people can join for only the parts they're interested in.

Also mention other questions, such as "will meat taxes improve or worsen animal welfare?" and "Will innovative products such as PBA and cultured meat substitute for farmed animal consumption, or will they mainly be taken up by (existing) vegans and vegetarians"

This is kind of captured above, but I would do something more here with belief elicitation, interactive updating, and aggregating knowledge.

This isn't something we're trying to achieve. This is just a path we're thinking of taking with the workshop.

and/or

Colon instead of dash.

Rather than "conclude" something like "do currently available methods and data even yield useful insight?"

Conclude is too strong here. I would say, what can we reasonably say about substitution effects and with what confidence?

Also industrial organization, quantitative demand estimation, economists, and quantitative marketing economists

Aims to - we don't have a confirmed guest list yet.

funders and industry and charity practitioners

Economists interested in animal welfare

Tool tip with some reference discussion of the limitations here.

Mention the use of instrumental variables and other strategies here, perhaps in a tooltip. Give specific references in that tooltip.

Add a tooltip here, discussing some of the strengths and limitations of each, using the context and explanations discussed elsewhere . Let me know if you need more context on this.

... (tooltip) Note this is in part due to the aforemationed point that elasticity is not likely to be constant across an individual or market demand curve, and there will also be heterogeneity thus, it matters what parts of the curve you are looking at, and which markets, times, etc.

rephrase this -- it's not quite right, and confusing

Also be clear: these are estimates of own price elasticity, although it seems unlikely that cross-price elasticities would be more consistent or robust. And these are price-shifting field experiments. But also note, in a tooltip, some of the critiques of these experiments themselves. Ask me if you need context.

I don't see what this part of the sentence adds. If the data is available in later years, we can focus on that later data. Maybe just leave this out, or mention something like "partly because of the limited availability of these products, and lags in releasing data for research use." -- But That's tooltip details. Also, I want you to ground some of these statements with references and links, mainly in tooltips.

More when they expect demand to be more price sensitive --- have pro or counter-cyclical pricing; Put the details in a tooltip

These explanations are taking up too much space and will take up even more when you consider a wider range of approaches.

Use folding boxes and tooltips more.

These are key issues with ~traditional econometric (IO and quant. marketing) methods.

Field experiments (supermarket-level or at school cafeterias etc.) have less of an endogeneity issue, but some of these issues are still present (e.g., short term vs long term), and these are hard to implement at scale and cleanly, and have issues of their own (see the notes/discussion, and sketch these).

Hypothetical and small-value choice experiments and hypothetical discrete choice surveys have other important limitations (mention these, from the sources and discussion).

That suggests

Why is this useful?

clear and strong thesis

Strong sentence to support your claim

weg

https://www.reddit.com/r/BaseballScorecards/comments/1tfc7t0/is_tom_hanks_the_unofficial_ambassador_of_the/

Video of Tom Hanks at the Yankees/Mets game televised on Fox in bottom of 6th with Yanks leading 2 to 5. He's showing the Met mascot something in his Thirty81 Press baseball scorecard and then posting for a photo.

weg

hoeveel cash gekregen hoeveel gefactureerd hoeveel opstaand creditnotas doorklikken grafieken en taart 1e 2e 3e

That Pigeon Looks Just Like Michael Keaton<br /> The Late Show with Stephen Colbert

Definitely a late model Olivetti. Either a Studio 45, which was more common in the United States, or a Studio 46, both of which came in that color.

I'm leaning toward 46 because of some of the shape of the hood as well as the white variable button on the platen which I've only ever seen on the 46 while the 45s were typically black or had the button colored to match the body color.

Annotation station

type weg rest in 1

weg

kleuren

weg

weg

verbergen

verbergen

teams weg

bugs data inconsistent kaarten weg

These aren't demos—they're previews of how AI will collapse the gap between passive content consumption and active task completion. Every image, video frame, or document becomes a potential action surface. This fundamentally changes what 'content' means.

Natural human communication is indexical (context-dependent, gesture-relying). The 'prompt engineering' era forced humans to communicate like machines—verbose and explicit. AI Pointer inverts this: it's AI adapting to human communication norms, not vice versa.

The shift from spatial pointer (where?) to semantic pointer (what?) is a fundamental interface paradigm shift—equivalent in magnitude to moving from command-line to GUI. When pixels become actionable entities, every surface becomes an AI interface.

The mouse pointer—unchanged since Douglas Engelbart's 1968 demo—is now being reimagined for the first time. The counterintuitive insight: the most ubiquitous computing interface is also the most neglected for AI integration.

This reframes the AI interaction problem: instead of AI being a destination users navigate TO, AI should come TO the user's context. This 'ambient AI' design philosophy is the opposite of the chatbox paradigm that's dominated for 3 years.

This title frames a UI component as a foundational breakthrough. It's a masterclass in branding, elevating a simple interaction tool to the level of a core technological paradigm shift, implying the mouse is obsolete and AI-native interaction is the new default.

这个声明指出了研究方法的局限性。虽然ECI分数可以用于模型间的相对比较，但不能用于追踪不同领域的绝对性能或进步趋势。这是一个重要的方法论限制，意味着我们不能直接从这些数据推断Claude在软件工程或数学方面的绝对能力提升，只能比较不同模型间的相对表现。研究者需要谨慎解读这些数据，避免过度推断。