In an era where trust in science and concerns about misinformation areparamount, publishers could leverage anxieties about the risks of sharing "non-peer-reviewed" material to cast doubt on the reliability and credibility of preprints.
A deep concern, especially in a wider context where the value of expertise itself is being undermined...
The report is 33 slides long; yet about 10 slide-equivalents are essentially content-free (compulsive repetitive branding, twiddly hierarchical organization, empty space, assorted title pages, and so on). This PP fluffed-up material here and quite a bit more could easily be placed in a technical report on 4 pages of an 11" by 17" piece of paper (folded in half)
https://infohist.fas.harvard.edu/news/information-cultures-series-john-hopkins-university-press
This looks like a fascinating series and who could go wrong with Ann Blair, Anthony Grafton, and Earle Havens?
Also interesting to see what sorts of things they will find interesting at the cutting edge of all these disciplines.
Sakakibara, R., & Ozono, H. (2020). Psychological Research on the COVID-19 Crisis in Japan: Focusing on Infection Preventive Behaviors, Future Prospects, and Information Dissemination Behaviors. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/97zye
Amazon.com : You're annotated out there. Gibson: Yeah it's sort of like there's this nebulous extended text.
Avant d’être des biens économiques, la culture et l’information fondent notre humanité
La culture et l'information participent à la construction de notre personne en ce sens qu'à travers elles, nous avons les ressources et les outils favorables à notre épanouissement.