- Jan 2024
-
gsh.cib.natixis.com gsh.cib.natixis.com
- Nov 2023
-
ontobee.org ontobee.orgOntobee1
-
- Oct 2023
-
owl.man.ac.uk owl.man.ac.uk
- Aug 2023
-
hub.jhu.edu hub.jhu.edu
-
In an article she wrote recently for Scientific American, Riehl quoted John Horton Conway, an esteemed English mathematician: "What's the ontology of mathematical things? There's no doubt that they do exist, but you can't poke and prod them except by thinking about them. It's quite astonishing and I still don't understand it, despite having been a mathematician all my life. How can things be there without actually being there?"
-
- Jun 2023
-
mapping-commons.github.io mapping-commons.github.io
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
mapping-commons.github.io mapping-commons.github.io
-
campus.dariah.eu campus.dariah.eu
-
There are many different types of controlled vocabularies, the most common among them are: Thesaurus - a type of controlled vocabulary used in information systems that organizes concepts in hierarchical and/or associative relationships and provides their semantic definitions Classification schema - a system that based primarily on classifying things or concepts into groups or classes with a detailed explanation of those classification methods Subject heading list - a list of terms describing subjects in information system Taxonomy - a system that organizes things and concepts in groups based on their common characteristics and/or differences Terminology - a list of terms used to describe concepts in a certain domain Glossary - an alphabetical list of terms with their explanation used in a specific context
-
-
schema.org schema.org
-
ceur-ws.org ceur-ws.org
-
ontologydesignpatterns.org ontologydesignpatterns.org
- May 2023
-
accidental-taxonomist.blogspot.com accidental-taxonomist.blogspot.com
- Mar 2023
-
accidental-taxonomist.blogspot.com accidental-taxonomist.blogspot.com
- Jan 2023
-
www3.cs.stonybrook.edu www3.cs.stonybrook.edu
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Dec 2022
-
-
-
www.w3.org www.w3.org
-
-
www.w3.org www.w3.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Oct 2022
-
www.cs.upc.edu www.cs.upc.edu
-
Noy, Natalya F, and Deborah L McGuinness. “Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology,” 2001, 25.
suggested via:
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>New @tana_inc folks seem hungry for in-depth books on ontologies & schemas.<br>Initial reaction was... books are overkill? There's not much to know? Just google it? But then tried googling. And it is *noisy* and poorly curated out there.<br><br>A few recommendations:
— Maggie Appleton (@Mappletons) October 21, 2022
-
-
www.ebi.ac.uk www.ebi.ac.uk
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Apr 2022
-
raw.githubusercontent.com raw.githubusercontent.com
-
basic-formal-ontology.org basic-formal-ontology.org
-
- Feb 2021
-
basic-formal-ontology.org basic-formal-ontology.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Spadaro, G., Tiddi, I., Columbus, S., Jin, S., Teije, A. t., & Balliet, D. (2020, October 28). The Cooperation Databank. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rveh3
-
- Nov 2016
-
dh2016.adho.org dh2016.adho.org
-
Isaac, 2013; Stead, 2006
buscar estos
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Jul 2016
-
www.parrhesiajournal.org www.parrhesiajournal.org
-
. Sensual objects exist for real objects, namely, me, or some other perceiver. So I’ve got the caricature of the table and the caricature of the chair, those caricatures have no relation to each other. They have relation only for me, because my experience unifies both of them. So the real is always the bridge for the two sensuals; the sensual is always the bridge for the two reals. And that’s what we try to analyse in Object-Oriented Philosophy
Cole's problem is that this is Kant.
-
-
muse.jhu.edu.proxyau.wrlc.org muse.jhu.edu.proxyau.wrlc.org
-
This principle is, I will show, a convenient fiction in this new work, enabling the philosopher to hear the call of things and to speak to and for them, despite the new rule that we cannot think of objects as being-for-us and must reject older philosophies smacking of "presence" and traditional ontology or ontotheology
So this is the leap. But what about work like this?
"Answers to this question are beginning to emerge from an area of work I see as connected to rhetorical ecologies, the study of object-oriented ontologies (OOO), led by Graham Harman, Levi Bryant, and Ian Bogost. Bogost’s self-described “elevator pitch” for this area of inquiry reads as the following:
Ontology is the philosophical study of existence. Object-oriented ontology (“OOO” for short) puts things at the center of this study. Its proponents contend that nothing has special status, but that everything exists equally–plumbers, cotton, bonobos, DVD players, and sandstone, for example. In contemporary thought, things are usually taken either as the aggregation of ever smaller bits (scientific naturalism) or as constructions of human behavior and society (social relativism). OOO steers a path between the two, drawing attention to things at all scales (from atoms to alpacas, bits to blinis), and pondering their nature and relations with one another as much with ourselves. (bogost.com)
There’s much more to this area, of course, no surprise given its relationship to Heidegger’s work, but this statement makes the case for a focus on things, just as theories of rhetoric as ecological inform my research methods. While OOO rejects the disproportionate historical focus of study on all things human, often referred to as correlationism, focusing on objects does not mean dismissing human-based studies so much as looking with equal rigor at all the innumerable phenomena that populate the world. This is a question of balance, as becomes clear with Bogost’s call in the last phrase of his blurb to consider objects in their “relations with one another as much with ourselves” (emphasis mine). As those concerned with activism—i.e., action mostly on behalf of people—our anthropocentrism will never recede so very much, but work like that of rhetorical ecologies and OOO opens space for us to consider the existence, movement, and effects of objects in new ways. Hence, my claim that adapted flags might do a kind of activist work on their own. From this angle, any flag objects than trigger thoughts or actions on behalf of D.C.’s disadvantaged would be doing the work of activism."
-
-
tcjournal.org tcjournal.org
-
Ontology is the philosophical study of existence. Object-oriented ontology (“OOO” for short) puts things at the center of this study. Its proponents contend that nothing has special status, but that everything exists equally–plumbers, cotton, bonobos, DVD players, and sandstone, for example. In contemporary thought, things are usually taken either as the aggregation of ever smaller bits (scientific naturalism) or as constructions of human behavior and society (social relativism). OOO steers a path between the two, drawing attention to things at all scales (from atoms to alpacas, bits to blinis), and pondering their nature and relations with one another as much with ourselves. (bogost.com)
For a critique of ANT and OOO, see Andrew Cole's, "Those Obscure Objects of Desire" and "The Call of Things: A Critique of Object Oriented Ontologies."
-
- Jun 2016
-
Local file Local file
-
ome kind of ontolog-ical reassessment of authorship is called for to ensure thatauthority, credit, and accountability, currently apportionedin confused fashion across authors, acknowledgees and con-tributors, are henceforth distributed appropriately, parsimo-niously, and unambiguously. I
an "ontological reassessment is required" of authorship
-
- Dec 2015
-
mfeldstein.com mfeldstein.com
-
we don’t have a vocabulary to talk about these teaching strategies
-
