the message is clear: The AI industry isn't immune from U.S. government interference
大多数人可能认为AI技术的前沿性质使其能够规避传统监管框架，但作者认为政府的禁令明确传递了一个信息：即使是尖端AI技术也不能摆脱政府干预。这与科技行业自认为能够自我监管的普遍认知相悖。
5 Matching Annotations
- Last 7 days
-
techcrunch.com techcrunch.com
-
- Mar 2023
-
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
-
Another way to widen the pool of stakeholders is for government regulators to get into the game, indirectly representing the will of a larger electorate through their interventions.
This is certainly "a way", but history has shown, particularly in the United States, that government regulation is unlikely to get involved at all until it's far too late, if at all. Typically they're only regulating not only after maturity, but only when massive failure may cause issues for the wealthy and then the "regulation" is to bail them out.
Suggesting this here is so pie-in-the sky that it only creates a false hope (hope washing?) for the powerless. Is this sort of hope washing a recurring part of
-
- Dec 2021
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
www.ft.com www.ft.com
-
Espinoza, J. (2021, November 28). Vestager urges European legislators to push through rules to regulate Big Tech. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/1880d0fb-0651-47ed-a8f4-6cde0f729859
-
- Aug 2020
-
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com
-
Romeo, N. (n.d.). What Can America Learn from Europe About Regulating Big Tech? The New Yorker. Retrieved August 19, 2020, from https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/what-can-america-learn-from-europe-about-regulating-big-tech
-