Tao, Terence. “What Is Good Mathematics?,” February 13, 2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0702396.

Variations of this can also be applied to other fields, like history. What makes good history, good historians, good history teachers, etc.?

They had parties, we got the hangover<br /> by [[Ruth Sunderland]] for The Guardian<br /> accessed on 2025-09-06T12:17:48

Gignac, Gilles E. “The Number of Exceptional People: Fewer than 85 per 1 Million across Key Traits.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 234, Feb. 2025, p. 112955. ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112955.

Tett, Gillian. Anthro-Vision: A New Way to See in Business and Life. Simon and Schuster, 2021. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Anthro_Vision/p_kDEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0

What Isn't Abundance?<br /> by [[Dave Karpf]]<br /> accessed on 2025-09-06T08:42:21

https://davekarpf.substack.com/<br /> Dave Karpf

Wilson, Georgina. Paper and the Making of Early Modern Literature. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025, https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827446/paper-and-the-making-of-early-modern-literature/.

Related to the idea of paper helping, as a technology, create modernity.

See also Roland Allen's The Notebook (2023)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_the_Future_Doesn%27t_Need_Us

Brown, John Seely, and Paul Duguid. “A Response to Bill Joy and the Doom-and-Gloom Technofuturists.” 2000. Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance, by Gary E. Marchant and Wendell Wallach, edited by Gary E. Marchant and Wendell Wallach, 1st ed., Routledge, 2020, pp. 65–71.

via: https://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~koehl/Teaching/ECS188_W16/Reprints/Response_to_BillJoy.pdf

annotation URL: urn:x-pdf:1e8f84f1b5e3fb65dfe49ef6f173c79e

A reprint of: <br /> - “Re-Engineering the Future: A Response to Bill Joy and the doom-and-gloom technofuturists,” The Industry Standard, John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. 24 April 2000, p.196. - “A Response to Bill Joy and the Doom-and-Gloom Technofuturists,” AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2001, edited by Albert H. Teich, Stephen D. Nelson, Celia McEnaney and Stephen J. Lita, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2001.

Cross reference: Bill Joy's paper and notes at urn:x-pdf:753822a812c861180bef23232a806ec0

Joy, Bill. “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us.” Wired, April 1, 2000. https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/.

Annotation url: urn:x-pdf:753822a812c861180bef23232a806ec0

Annotations: https://jonudell.info/h/facet/?user=chrisaldrich&url=urn%3Ax-pdf%3A753822a812c861180bef23232a806ec0&max=100&exactTagSearch=true&expanded=true

Reprints available at: - Joy, Bill. “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us.” 2000. AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2001, edited by Albert H. Teich et al., Amer Assn for the Advancement of Science, 2002, pp. 47–75. Google Books, https://www.google.com/books/edition/Integrity_in_Scientific_Research/0X-1g8YElcsC.<br /> - Joy, Bill. “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us.” 2000. Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance, by Gary E. Marchant and Wendell Wallach, edited by Gary E. Marchant and Wendell Wallach, 1st ed., Routledge, 2020, pp. 65–71.