68 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2024
    1. Select Academic Year: 1876-1877 1877-1878 1878-1879 1879-1880 1880-1881 1881-1882 1882-1883 1883-1884 1884-1885 1885-1886 1886-1887 1887-1888 1888-1889 1889-1890 1890-1891 1891-1892 1892-1893 1893-1894 1894-1895 1895-1896 1896-1897 1897-1898 1898-1899 1899-1900 1900-1901 1901-1902 1902-1903 1903-1904 1904-1905 1905-1906 1906-1907 1907-1908 1908-1909 1909-1910 1910-1911 1911-1912 1912-1913 1913-1914 1914-1915 1915-1916 1916-1917 1917-1918 1918-1919 1919-1920 1920-1921 1921-1922 1922-1923 1923-1924 1924-1925 1925-1926 1926-1927 1927-1928 1928-1929 1929-1930 1930-1931 1931-1932 1932-1933 1933-1934 1934-1935 1935-1936 1936-1937 1937-1938 1938-1939 1939-1940 1940-1941 1941-1942 1942-1943 1943-1944 1944-1945 1945-1946 1946-1947 1947-1948 1948-1949 1949-1950 1950-1951 1951-1952 1952-1953 1953-1954 1954-1955 1955-1956 1956-1957 1957-1958 1958-1959 1959-1960 1960-1961 1961-1962 1962-1963 1963-1964 1964-1965 1965-1966 1966-1967 1967-1968 1968-1969 1969-1970 1970-1971 1971-1972 1972-1973 1973-1974 1974-1975 1975-1976 1976-1977 1977-1978 1978-1979 1979-1980 1980-1981 1981-1982 1982-1983 1983-1984 1984-1985 1985-1986 1986-1987 1987-1988 1988-1989 1989-1990 1990-1991 1991-1992 1992-1993 1993-1994 1994-1995 1995-1996 1996-1997 1997-1998 1998-1999 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009

      Let's delete this element for now.

  2. Aug 2024
  3. Apr 2024
  4. Mar 2024
    1. There is no active user with that ID, so you cannot search by it. The whole point of deleting an account is to make it inaccessible, unreferenced, and unlinked. We're not going to implement "soft" account deletion.
    1. I am currently working with a system presently where every table has a Deleted flag for soft-delete. It is the bane of all existence. It totally breaks relational integrity when a user can "delete" a record from one table, yet children records which FK back to that table are not cascade soft-deleted. Really makes for trash data after time passes.
    2. Now you have something with all of the benefits of soft-deletes but none of the drawbacks:
    3. So, soft delete is better, right? No, not really: Setting up cascades becomes extremely difficult. You almost always end up with what appear to the client as orphaned rows. You only get to track one deletion. What if the row is deleted and undeleted multiple times? Read performance suffers, although this can be mitigated somewhat with partitioning, views, and/or filtered indexes. As hinted at earlier, it may actually be illegal in some scenarios/jurisdictions.
  5. May 2023
  6. Aug 2021
  7. Oct 2020
    1. As Casper’s January IPO filing revealed, scale is all: in 2018 the company lost $92.1 million on revenue of $358 million, spending $126 million on sales and marketing and, according to one calculation, losing $160 on every mattress it sold.

      The problem with believing your own advertising. What happened to real capitalism?

  8. Nov 2019
    1. "While we hope that Google will lift these unwarranted sanctions for AdNauseam, it highlights a much more serious problem for Chrome users," the AdNauseam team adds. "It is frightening to think that at any moment Google can quietly make your extensions and data disappear, without so much as a warning."
  9. Jun 2019
    1. asic Sciences IC110 Engineering Mathematics Download Course Details IC111 Linear Algebra Download Course Details IC121 Mechanics of Particles and Waves Download Course Details IC130 Applied Chemistry for Engineers Download Course Details IC130P Chemistry Practicum

      this page is not required it is already covered in http://iitmandi.ac.in/academics/disciplinewise.php

  10. Apr 2019
  11. Aug 2018
  12. Dec 2017
  13. Nov 2017
  14. May 2017
  15. Mar 2017
    1. No one city has gotten it right so far. Many, however, have gotten it wrong, falling for the promises of greater efficiency delivered by startups, of greater creativity delivered by hackathons, and of greater transparency delivered by open government initiatives that, instead of helping to eliminate the corrupt parts of the public sector, provided the rationale for shrinking those that worked rather well. Silicon Valley and the Big Four consulting firms that, between themselves, dominate the smart city market, do not exercise their hegemony effortlessly; it takes a lot of hard work –which manifests itself in endless conferences and expos, commissioned think-tank reports, and regular think pieces –to frame the smart city issue as an inevitable, self-evident, and progressive project. It’s a world where venture capitalists have their own podcasts, write books on political themes, and fund philosophers (and occasional lawsuits). In a world like this, defending the theme of technological sovereignty would require not just practical interventions in the inner workings of our cities but also constant ideological and intellectual work in order to oppose the constant reframing of issues along the lines favorable to big business. Given the high turnover of concepts and narratives supplied to us by Silicon Valley and its resident intellectuals –it’s not just smart city, but also the sharing economy, big data, the internet of things, algorithmic regulation, Web 2.0 –the very idea of technological sovereignty is likely to be soon twisted into something it should not be.

      Die beiden Absätze würde ich einfach wegstreichen.

    2. Despite the incessant celebration of citiesas the most important actors of the global system, with celebrity mayors rising to rulethe world and soon, perhaps, the universe, the reality lookssomewhat different.

      Mal wirklich eine Kürzungsoption.

  16. Nov 2016
    1. .

      delete period

    2. (More than once per week leakage.)

      suggest to remove

    3. (EBRT or Brachytherapy and moderate/big problem with urinary function)

      suggest to remove

    4. (2 or more pads per day or Moderate/Big problem dripping or leaking urine)

      suggest to remove

    5. These Urinary recommendations are tailored for the following:

      This type of callout/listing of tailoring variables is not common to me, but I do kind of like it. However, I'd remove all of the redundant (stuff in parentheses).

    6. These General recommendations are tailored for the following:For all patients

      I'd remove this block/text entirely. Mostly because we tell participants it's tailored to them and this says everyone. So even if it were applicable to all men dealing with prostate cancer, it in essence is still 'tailored'. so there is no risk of deception in tailoring. I'd delete to avoid confusion or disillusionment.

    7. (For all patients)

      Remove

  17. Aug 2016
    1. . This is seen in a different way
    2. in detail in drafted simplified images
    3. s
    4. a
    5. for example
    6. alpha
    7. For the analysis,the technical replicates were assumed to be biological replicates
    8. between methylated und unmethylated CpGs
    9. diverse conversion of cytosines
    10. Whereupon
    11. The ratio 260nm/280nm was used to assess the purity of the DNA.

      redundant

    12. Wavy bumps indicatethe activity (read depth, the number of reads).
    13. (activity is defined by the expression levels of the transcripts)
    14. s
    15. , which means that the
    16. higher CGI promoter activity and
    17. (red line)
    18. in theRNA-seq dataplot
    19. out of 632
    20. single
    21. and forall 30 mouse tissues
    22. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to compare the expression level of the intragenic promoter (CGI) or transcriptionalactivity initiating at the intragenic CGI and the ratio upstream/across, which means transcription upstream and splicing across the CGI. For the negative control sample dataset Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated as well with simulated intragenic promoters. The cut-off was set close to the maximum correlation of the negative control dataset and defined at 0.5.

      redundant

    23. and defined
    24. For the negative control sample dataset,Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated alongside simulated intragenic promoters.
    25. ‘Host gene upstream of the intragenic promoter’(Upstream) defined as fragment numbers measured from the TSS until the beginning of the CGI and ‘Gene through the intragenic promoter’(Across), defined as exonic fragmentsoverlapping with the host gene;

      redundant

    26. Work form
    27. has recently

      not so recent

    28. , notwithstanding of gene expression
    29. and occurs if an intron is retained,which normally would be removed

      redundant

    30. the
    31. -specific

    Tags

    Annotators